IMBH (Intermediate black hole)

"Researchers are exploring the elusive intermediate-mass black holes, theorized to bridge stellar and supermassive black holes. Simulations suggest formation pathways in dense star clusters, but their exact role in the universe remains uncertain. Credit: SciTechDaily.com" (ScitechDaily, Galactic Shadows: The Elusive Trail of Intermediate Black Holes)

IMBH (Intermediate black hole). IMBH black hole is smaller than a supermassive black hole. But larger than a stellar black hole.

Intermediate black holes are black holes with a mass smaller than supermassive black holes, but higher than stellar black holes. The IMBHs (Intermediate Black Holes) are the "gates" between the supermassive- and stellar black holes. I recently wrote that there are three types of black holes.

1) Supermassive black holes.

2) Stellar black holes.

3) Quantum black holes.

I should mention the IMBHs. The classification where there are three types of back holes means that the term "supermassive black holes" means all black holes that are more massive than stellar black holes. So IMBH is the smaller supermassive black hole. And if we use the classification of four types of black holes. That classification looks like this.

1) Supermassive black holes.

2) IMBH (Intermediate Black holes). Those are "lightweight supermassive black holes". That means they are lighter than Sagittarius A but more massive than stellar black holes.

3) Stellar black holes like Cygnus X-1.

4) Quantum black holes.

There is a possibility that supermassive black holes form when the interstellar nebula collapses. And maybe the collapse of the interplanetary- or smaller nebula forms the IMBH. It's possible that IMBH forms when some star cluster or group of stars collide. But there is possibility. That also interplanetary nebula's collapse forms IMBH. As you see from below.

"This diagram illustrates a mechanism turning massive cluster stars (1-5) into an intermediate-mass black hole (IMBH) within about 6 million years. The sequence begins with three normal stars, two forming a binary orbiting each other (1a, 1b, 2). After a while, this stellar triple undergoes a merging event, leaving only two stars (1a, 3), which again capture a massive cluster star (4). Finally, two stars merge (1a, 3) to produce a so-called very massive star (VMS) exhibiting more than 300 solar masses. At that stage, the VMS can grow further by drawing material from its companion (4). The VMS is now massive enough to evolve into an IMBH. It continues to grow by capturing additional stars (5), eventually leading to an IMBH of 350 solar masses. Credit: © M. Arca Sedda et al. / MPIA" (ScitechDaily, Galactic Shadows: The Elusive Trail of Intermediate Black Holes)

Substellar or planetary black holes.

Theoretically is possible that if the energy level in the molecular nebula around some red dwarf or planet rises to a high enough level. That molecular cloud can press a planet or red dwarf into a black hole.

Maybe. Some substellar black holes form when some red dwarf travels through GRB or FRB. In that case. Is possible, that the temperature of the molecular cloud is around the red dwarf or planet. If that object is in the right position in the molecular cloud, that energy can press that object into the black hole.

Of course, the rise of energy level in the molecular nebula increases the energy level in the red dwarf. And increase its energy production. It's possible, that the nebula's energy state turns higher than the red dwarf's energy. In that model, the ultra-hot molecular nebula could press that red or brown dwarf or planet into the black hole.

That fascinating model means that also "substellar" or "planet mass" black holes are possible. Those object's size is not big. And there is hypothetically possible, that there is a grapefruit- or ping-pong-ball-size black hole even in our system.

https://scitechdaily.com/galactic-shadows-the-elusive-trail-of-intermediate-black-holes/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intermediate-mass_black_hole

What is the difference between TR-3A and TR-3B? And are those planes real?

What is the difference between TR-3A and TR-3B? And are those planes real? Is TR-3B (0) "Black Triangle UFO" or is it only the piece of paper? The study project, what is used to create advanced ideas for use of the nuclear-powered aircraft. Or is it the study project or black budget aircraft, where lost 2,3 trillion dollars (1)of the stealth bomber were gone. In this text is things, that might seem very difficult to accept, and when we are thinking about things like doubling the object or making it smaller by using huge layers of energy, nothing denies to test those things. But were those tests successful, there is no data about that in public Internet, so we must say that things like doubling the human or aircraft can be tested, but the results can be unknown. But in the source two is the tale, what seems like impossible, those men, who got Noble Prize put at first time one atom to the box, and hit it with photon one photon in the box and hit it with th

Mythic Planet X is an interesting thing because that allows the way to the perfect stealth technology.

Mythic Planet X is an interesting thing because that allows the way to the perfect stealth technology. Could a hypothetical Planet X tunnel all radiation? The myth of Planet X still lives. Nobody ever saw that planet, and the thing that supports the theory of previously unknown large-size planets in Kuiper's belt are mysterious anomalies in Neptune's trajectory. The thing is that nothing else supports the theory of the existence of the "invisible planet". The size of the planet must be very big. And its gravitational field strong that it can affect Neptune's trajectory. And the search for that mysterious planet is very long work. In some visions, the mysterious gravitational source is mentioned as the small black hole, but nobody understands why that black hole doesn't seem to interact. In some other theories, Planet X is a glimpse of dark matter. And that thing makes it invisible. But there is one weakness. The dark matter object must have some kind of

Nanoparticles are excellent tools for medicine transporters.

"Researchers have developed a new therapy for pancreatic cancer involving nanoparticles that stimulate immune responses and improve drug delivery. This innovative method has led to significant tumor reduction in mice and holds potential for treating other cancers. Credit: SciTechDaily.com" (ScitechDaily, New Nanoparticle Cancer Treatment Successfully Shrinks and Eliminates Pancreatic Tumors) Nanoparticles can carry medicines into wanted cells. The idea is that the same system that feeds those cells transports those nanoparticles into cells that need medicine. When a nanoparticle goes, into a cell, it releases the chemicals into the targeted cells. Because nanoparticles don't let medical molecules interact with a body that makes it possible to create new and more powerful cytostatics. Nanoparticles can transport things like ricin molecules into wanted cells. Ricin is one of the most poisonous chemicals. That chemical is useful for next-generation cytostatics, if researche

Writings about astronomy and technology.

Search This Blog