Uranus’ new moon and suspicion of Planet Y.

Uranus’ new moon and suspicion of Planet Y. 

“James Webb has revealed Uranus’ smallest moon yet, a six-mile-wide world hidden near its inner rings. This discovery pushes the planet’s moon count to 29 and shows how Webb can uncover secrets Voyager 2 never saw. Credit: NASA, ESA, CSA, STScI, M. El Moutamid (SwRI), M. Hedman (University of Idaho)” (ScitechDaily, Uranus Has a Tiny New Moon and It’s Only Six Miles Wide)

JWST found a new moon called S/2025 U 1 near Uranus. Did the Uranus planet capture its tiny, newfound moon after the Voyager 2 flyby in 1986? The width of that moon is about 6 miles. And it is hidden in Uranus' inner rings. 

Researchers noticed the new moon that orbits Uranus. That tiny moon is interesting. Because Earth-based instruments found it. That new Uranus moon is not a very big object.  But it's remarkable, and the interesting thing. But I think that researchers should have found that moon before. So, could that small moon have made a transit movement to orbit the Uranus planet in the near past? That means something pulled that moon out from the Kuiper Belt.

In this hypothesis, that is the new moon for that gas giant. Something in the Kuiper Belt pushed that thing out from its trajectory. That new moon called S/2025 U 1 is the new moon for the Uranus moon family. And that tiny moon, which is only six miles wide, orbits near that planet. The Voyager spacecraft should have found that tiny moon during its flyby in 1986. So that supports the model that Uranus captured that moon after the Voyager flyby.

“A new SwRI-led JWST survey discovered S/2025 U 1 (approximate location indicated in yellow), a tiny moon orbiting Uranus between the satellites Bianca and Ophelia. If it has an albedo comparable to other nearby moons, this object is probably around six miles in diameter, by far the smallest moon in the Uranus system to date. The solid ellipses indicate rings, while the dotted lines show the orbits of many of the inner moons. Credit: Public Domain” (SwRI), M. Hedman (University of Idaho)” (ScitechDaily, Uranus Has a Tiny New Moon and It’s Only Six Miles Wide)

Forget planet X, there might be a planet Y in the Kuiper Belt. 

Above: Why is there no dust on the white snow area on Pluto? That tells us that the white snow area is born recently. Or something pulls particles out from that. 

Some people believe that there is a planet X, or the ninth planet, somewhere, outside Pluto’s orbit. Planet 9 is a very well-known theory. There is a suggestion that Planet 9 is about three to seven times as massive as Earth. And that orbits the sun at the edge of the solar system’s gravitational pool. There can be something smaller, an Earth-size icy world hiding in the Kuiper Belt. Or outside it. Planet Y is not such a well-known theory. Than the Planet 9. 

The white area on Pluto’s surface can be a cryovolcano or a result of the recent cryovolcanism-type seismic effect. That thing can form because of the Charon-moon gravity. But there is another possibility. Something far stronger than the gravity effect can cause tidal waves that activate the cryovolcanism. The thing. What makes that white area interesting is that. There seems to be no dust in that area. That means it formed quite recently. Pluto is far lighter than Earth. And that means Charon’s tidal forces are far stronger on that dwarf planet’s surface than they would be on Earth. 

"Three years after NASA's New Horizons spacecraft gave humankind our first close-up views of Pluto and its largest moon, Charon, scientists are still revealing the wonders of these incredible worlds in the outer solar system. Marking the anniversary of New Horizons' historic flight through the Pluto system on July 14, 2015, mission scientists released the highest-resolution color images of Pluto and Charon. These natural-color images result from refined calibration of data gathered by New Horizons' color Multispectral Visible Imaging Camera (MVIC). (Wikipedia, Charon)

The processing creates images that would approximate the colors that the human eye would perceive, bringing them closer to “true color” than the images released near the encounter. This image was taken on July 14, 2015, from a range of 46,091 miles (74,176 kilometers). This single color MVIC scan includes no data from other New Horizons imagers or instruments added. The striking features on Charon are clearly visible, including the reddish north-polar region known as Mordor Macula." (Wikipedia, Charon)

Pluto has five known moons, and that makes the new Uranus moon very interesting. But could those moons common gravity effect be strong enough? To hover those particles out from Pluto's surface? Charon itself is grey, and it can be covered by cosmic dust. But was that moon once in the middle of the cosmic dust flow? And why do those particles not reach Pluto?

The problem is: why is there no visible cryovolcanism or cyoseismic effect in the images? Which New Horizons tool during its flyby? If that cryovolcanic effect happened only once. That would cause interesting thoughts. 

Researchers are finding tips that the large, maybe, Earth-mass planet can hide in the Kuiper Belt. That planet can be more interesting than Planet 9. Planet Y can give some answers to the Early solar system formation. But researchers need more evidence. To confirm the existence of this icy Earth. Maybe the Vera Rubin Observatory can give an answer for that question.  The researchers can use the accumulation of the dust and gas around hiding objects that could hide at the edge of the solar system. 

The problem is that those objects are very cold. And if they used their internal thermal source, those big planets can turn invisible to the IR sensors. But their gravitational effect can disturb their moons. Big and heavy objects capture smaller objects around them. And maybe the tidal forces can form the cyovolcanism in those small objects. The Kuiper Belt is a very stable environment. If there are big planets, their trajectories can be so far away from the Sun and other planets that they can escape from our solar system. 

https://dailygalaxy.com/2025/08/planet-y-haunting-space-beyond-neptune/

https://www.earth.com/news/planet-y-signs-of-a-world-hiding-in-our-solar-system/

https://www.newscientist.com/article/2493480-there-might-be-a-planet-y-hiding-in-the-outer-solar-system/

https://scitechdaily.com/uranus-has-a-tiny-new-moon-and-its-only-six-miles-wide/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charon_(moon)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Planets_beyond_Neptune

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pluto

The new evidence of the existence of Planet X

"An artist’s conception of Planet 9, or Planet X, which scientists theorize orbits in the distant solar system. Image credit: Robin Dienel/ Carnegie Institution of Washington" (NASA)

Planet X is never seen. That is one of the things that we should realize. Planet X is the mysterious gravitational effect at the edge of our solar system. The existence of that object is almost confirmed in one day. And some other day that strange thing doesn’t exist anymore. The thing that makes it very interesting is that the gravitational effect that makes Neptune’s trajectory wobble and the mysterious X-ray flares in Uranus are things that can cause many speculations. 

And one of them is that. There is a planet that is colder than the plasma around the sun. If the planet’s temperature is lower than the heliopause’s temperature and the planet’s trajectory is outside that point, this kind of object can be very hard to detect. The prediction is this, if Planet X really exists it would be geologically dead. It could be the rogue planet that our sun or the outer planets Neptune and Uranus are trapped near the edge of the solar system. It’s possible that this mysterious gravitational object has gone out from the solar system’s gravitational pool. And turned into a rogue planet. 

Uranus’s X-ray flares. 

Dwarf planet Haumea with Rings and its two moons Hiʻiaka (Haumea 1) and Namaka (Haumea 2). 

Artist impression of Quaoar rings. Credit: Paris Observatory

Artist's impression of Quaoar with its ring and its moon Weywot

The primordial black hole hypothesis. 

But there is also the possibility that Planet X is something like a black hole. In some scenarios, a very small black hole can pull a shell around it. In some models, the small black hole can exist in asteroid-size objects. Or even on some planets. The small black hole must only pull dust or ice around it symmetrically. If those particles are locked around that black hole they can form a structure that looks like a regular planet. So could some of the dwarf planets in the Kuiper belt be that mysterious Planet X? 

There is one object that can be interesting about the researchers. That object is the dwarf planet Quaoar. The thing that makes that dwarf planet very interesting is its ring system. That dwarf planet should have a very weak gravity. Sometimes astronomers and I thought that some kind of plasma whirling around that small dwarf planet makes the Van Allen-belt type magnetic phenomenon that can trap the low-energy plasma that comes from the sun. Another remarkable thing is that Quaoar has a moon called Weywot. And if that artist’s impression is right, that means that this moon is quite a long distance from Quaoar. 

The third interesting thing is that the Quaoar’s temperature is 41 K which is -231.3C. There is suspicion that some kind of radioactive process warms the Quaoar. But the primordial black hole can explain that temperature. 

But there is one very wild idea. Could Quaoar be the primordial black hole that formed the ice shell around it? Maybe that thing seems very rare, or radical theory. But if the planet X is some kind of primordial black hole, can that thing be some dwarf planet that we already know? That primordial black hole can seem very innocent if it's in some dwarf planet. And then we can look at another dwarf planet: Haumea. An interesting thing is that Haumea has two moons. 

When we look at images of Haumea we see that the little world with two moons is stretched. Haumea itself looks like an egg. That thing can happen because of the fast spin. Or it can happen because some force from that thing stretches the Haumea. Those two moons should destroy Haumea’s ring system. The names of those moons are Hiʻiaka (Haumea 1) and Namaka (Haumea 2)

The primordial black hole that is in the stable trajectory and pulls particle shells around it can be very hard to separate from the real dwarf planets. If there are no objects near that thing, we cannot measure the object’s mass using those things. If that black hole pulls all dust from around it. That thing prevents astronomers from seeing dust clouds from around it. 

https://astrobites.org/2025/04/28/vulcan-pbh/

https://www.astronomy.com/science/is-planet-nine-a-black-hole-or-a-planet-harvard-scientists-suggest-a-way-to-find-out/

https://www.bbc.co.uk/newsround/49910160

https://www.buffalo.edu/news/releases/2024/12/primordial-black-holes-may-be-hiding-in-planets-or-even-everyday-objects-here-on-Earth.html

https://chandra.harvard.edu/blog/node/786

https://nasaspacenews.com/2025/04/black-holes-from-the-big-bang-could-be-trapped-inside-our-planet/

https://www.rudebaguette.com/en/2025/07/were-seeing-something-massive-out-there-astronomers-detect-possible-ninth-planet-beyond-neptune-in-chilling-new-discovery/

https://scitechdaily.com/dark-matters-secret-hideouts-are-primordial-black-holes-lurking-nearby/

https://www.space.com/primordial-black-holes-cat-big-bang

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Haumea

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hi%CA%BBiaka_(moon)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Namaka_(moon)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quaoar

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Weywot

Can dark matter stars, or "dark stars" exist?

"A team of astrophysicists has discovered three potential “dark stars” using the James Webb Space Telescope. These theoretical bodies, thought to be powered by dark matter particles, are much larger and brighter than our sun. If confirmed, they could significantly illuminate our understanding of dark matter, one of the most significant unresolved issues in physics. Furthermore, their existence could reconcile the discrepancy between the current standard cosmology model and the observation of large galaxies early in the universe." (ScitechDaily, Powered by Dark Matter: Webb Space Telescope Catches Glimpse of Possible First-Ever “Dark Stars")

It's possible that the JWST telescope found the first 3 dark matter-powered stars, or "dark star" candidates. If those dark stars, dark matter stars, or WIMP stars are the hypothetical weakly interacting massive particles, WIMP power proves the existence of the WIMPs, hypothetical dark matter particles. The existence of dark matter stars tells us that there can also be dark matter "planets". 

And maybe hypothetical Planet X or the Ninth planet is one of those dark matter stars or dark matter planets. If those stars get their energy from dark matter annihilation that proves that the WIMPs have their mirror-particles. But there is a possibility that “dark stars get their energy boost from the dark matter particle’s collisions or dark matter fusion. There is also the possibility that particles can wobble between visible and dark matter. 

Invisible stars, formed of dark matter, can seem very utopian things. But there are models and theories. If weakly interacting massive particles, WIMPs exist there is a possibility that the WIMP can create the superposition and entanglement with another WIMP. That makes the channel between those hypothetical dark matter particles that pulls them together. There is a possibility that the dark matter stars can turn the WIMPs into reality. But there is one problem. 

Those WIMP- or dark matter stars can send radiation that is invisible to our sensors. The WIMP stars could be detected from the very young universe. The thing is that there are so-called WIMP clumps or WIMP accumulations all around the universe. And that means those clumps can also explain the mysterious Planet X. In that model, there is a small dark matter accumulation. That explains the mysterious gravitational effect at the Kuiper Belt. 

"The James Webb Space Telescope spotted three objects that may be formed from dark matter particles annihilating one another. (Image credit: NASA/ESA)" (Space.com, Do fabled 'dark stars' actually exist? James Webb Space Telescope spots 3 candidates)

But then if those dark matter or WIMP stars existed in the young universe, where they go? The fact is that those dark matter accumulations didn't go anywhere. Visible matter covered those structures and the visible material's brightness covered those dark matter structures, or dark matter star's radiation below them. If those WIMP, or dark matter stars exist they can explain dark energy. If the dark matter stars exist they send energy through the universe in radiation, or wave movement that wavelength is the same as the diameter of the transmitting particle.

And the existence of the WIMPs can be the thing that can revolutionize physics. There is a possibility that WIMP particles can form similar structures as quarks make in mesons. Normally mesons are quite short-term particles; there most usually two quarks forming the bond. There is a possibility that if those quarks are turning in the right direction and their spin is high enough they wrap quantum fields around them so fast that they can keep each other in the same structure. 

If those particles are in quantum entanglement that double whirl keeps them in one form. The quantum entanglement is like a tube between those particles. The asymmetry in those energy whirls causes the energy that comes behind those particles to push them together. This thing can explain the WIMP stars or dark matter stars. The WIMP star is the gravity center that pulls other, visible particles at that place. That kind of quantum fusion where quarks impact each other can revolutionize our knowledge of energy. 

There is the possibility that the JWST telescope detected the first dark matter star or WIMP star in the universe. Or, the star that is the dark-mater powered. The dark matter interaction, if it exists, can boost the star's energy production. If there is dark matter fusion in that star, that energy can push energy to particles that this gravity center pulls around it. 

Or if those quantum channels make those, still hypothetical WIMP particle's impact turn smaller that makes small empty pockets in the quantum fields. And then those pockets can also pull visible particles together. That means those hypothetical dark matter reactions can boost the reactions and a gravity effect between visible particles. 

https://scitechdaily.com/powered-by-dark-matter-webb-space-telescope-catches-glimpse-of-possible-first-ever-dark-stars/

https://www.space.com/nasa-james-webb-space-telescope-stars-dark-matter

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dark_star_(dark_matter)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Planet_Nine

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Weakly_interacting_massive_particle

It's possible that primordial black holes can lurk even on Earth.

"An illustration of small primordial black holes. In reality, such tiny black holes would have a difficult time forming the accretion disks that make them visible here. Photo: NASA" (Buffalo.edu, Evidence of primordial black holes may be hiding in planets, or even everyday objects here on Earth)

In theories the primordial black holes formed before material. Some of them are very small masses, lighter than Earth.  And those black holes can hide almost everywhere. 

The new evidence about the theoretical primordial black holes. Is the path to fundamental science and technology. The primordial black holes were born in the young universe. In theoretical models. Small whirls in the young and hot universe formed those primordial black holes. 

That means those things are closest to a theoretical phenomenon called "Kugelblitz black hole" where radiation turns around photons and turns them into black holes. In the modern universe, Kugelblitz black holes are probably impossible. Because the energy flow out from those structures would be so fast. 

And the turbulence is so powerful, that it destroys those structures before their energy level turns so high. That the black hole can form. But in the young universe, the outside energy level was so high, that it could resist and pack the energy that comes out from the primordial black hole. 

"NASA's Curiosity rover will soon explore a patch of spiderweb-like "boxwork" features on Mars. This photo, taken in 2006, shows a similar area to the one that the rover will explore. (Image credit: NASA/JPL-Caltech/University of Arizona)" (LiveSciece, Gigantic 'spiderwebs' on Mars are the next big target for NASA's Curiosity rover, agency reveals)

The idea is that those small black holes are locked because of their acceleration disk and plasma layer that keeps energy inside that small black hole. In the same way in normal black holes the plasma shell presses against the event horizon. Without that counter pressure, the black hole will vaporize. 

In some theories, the primordial black holes can hide almost everywhere. That means that it's possible that somewhere is the hollow planet or some cave or tunnel where those cosmic seniors could hide. The impact of a so-called primordial black hole would be a very high energy effect. 

This could explain the so-called spiderweb stones on Mars. And that could also explain the mystery tunnels below the Moon surfaces. It's possible that if the huge spiderwebs formed in electromagnetic phenomenon like lightning. One explanation for those mega-lightnings is the impact of one or more primordial black holes. 

"Formation of the universe without (above) and with (below) primordial black holes." (Wikipedia, Primordial black hole)

The primordial black hole can make the "invisible" planet possible. One offered explanation for hypothetical Planet X is the planet there is a primordial black hole in the hollow planet. And that thing makes that planet invisible. Calculations tell that Planet X must have a mass of about 10 Earths. 

Planet X is the mysterious gravitational effect and if the source of the effect is small and dense we might not see that thing. If the primordial black hole forms some small planet-looking object around it that structure might deny to see the radiation that the black hole sends. The black hole pulls material through the ice and stone. Because it's smaller than grapefruit the stone shell blocks that radiation. And maybe that object is smaller than the Moon or Ceres, the largest known asteroid in the asteroid belt. 

The mass of those black holes is about the Earth or even lower. The idea is that there formed a hole in the young universe's plasma and energy fields. That hole pulled the energy string through it. And then the outside energy fell against that string. If that energy couldn't get out it could form a small black hole. 

The black hole can pull material against it, and if the dust and gas fall symmetrically into that black hole they may lock around it. If that happens at the right distance those particles form a ball there they orbit the black hole. And that forms a so-called hollow planet. 

"An international research team discovered a lava tube on the Moon, indicating a potential habitat safe from harsh lunar conditions. The study, which reanalyzed NASA LRO mission data, offers significant insights for future lunar exploration. (Artist’s concept.) Credit: SciTechDaily.com" (ScitechDaily, NASA’s Lunar Orbiter Reveals Hidden Tunnels on the Moon)

Can some Wolf-Rayet stars be so-called quasi-stars that form around the low-mass primordial black hole? 

In some models, the supernova explosion or other black hole relativistic jet can cause the situation that the planet's shell turns so hot that energy travels into the planet's core. There that energy can form a black hole. Sometimes similar effects can explain the blue supergiant stars. The star's shell turns very hot for some reason. Energy falls into its shell forming a black hole. 

Then the black hole pulls material from around it into it. But shells of those stars happen the fusion reaction that pushes part of the star away from the black hole. And then the shell of the star starts to orbit the black hole as a quasi-star. If the Earth-mass black hole forms a quasi-star that star could be like some blue supergiant or Wolf-Rayet stars. 

Theoretically is possible to transform any object in the universe into a black hole. The system would cover the structure with a hollow- ball-shaped antimatter chamber. Then the system explodes antimatter-material annihilation in the ball-shaped chamber's shell. That creates an energy impulse that presses an object in it into a black hole. 

Artist's concept of a hypothetical Planet 9 orbiting far from the Sun

The orbital trajectory of hypothetical Planet X. (BBC)

The thing is that the small black holes can make it possible to make many new things like stable superposition and entanglement. If the quantum superposition and entanglement are made between two black holes or black holes and neutron stars that thing is the breakthrough for quantum computers. But the problem is where we can find those neutron stars and black holes? 

The antimatter system can be the answer to those things. The ball-shaped antimatter system can create energy impulses that press plasma in the ball-shaped chamber into the same material that forms neutron stars. Or the antimatter explosion can press that plasma to form what we call a black hole. 

And if we would find primordial black holes from somewhere? 

Primordial black holes can be the answer to the Earth's energy problems. And things like quantum computing and interstellar travel. The primordial black hole can be used to make a stable quantum superposition. But the primordial black hole can be the energy source for the entire Earth. If that kind of small black hole is found, it's possible to build a ball-shaped chamber around that thing. 

Then that ball can collect energy from the gas and particles that fall to the black hole. The ball must have hatches that allow particles and gas can come into contact with that primordial black hole. The small black hole can also give energy to interstellar spacecraft. 

https://arstechnica.com/science/2020/08/planet-x-why-not-a-tiny-black-hole-instead/

https://www.bbc.co.uk/newsround/49910160

https://www.buffalo.edu/news/releases/2024/12/primordial-black-holes-may-be-hiding-in-planets-or-even-everyday-objects-here-on-Earth.html

https://interestingengineering.com/science/everything-you-need-to-know-about-planet-x-the-mysterious-9th-planet

https://www.livescience.com/space/mars/gigantic-spiderwebs-on-mars-are-the-next-big-target-for-nasas-curiosity-rover-agency-reveals

https://scitechdaily.com/nasas-lunar-orbiter-reveals-hidden-tunnels-on-the-moon/

https://science.nasa.gov/solar-system/planet-x

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kugelblitz_(astrophysics)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Primordial_black_hole

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quasi-star

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wolf–Rayet_star

Quasars, Planet X and gravity model.

 

Quasars, Planet X and gravity model. 

Could gravity be two forces? One with long and another with extremely short wavelength. 

In some models, the gravitation is two forces. Another gravitation is radiation with extremely long wavelengths. That gravitational wave is behind the radio waves. And the other gravitational waves have extremely short wavelengths. So they are behind gamma rays. That thing could explain why gravitation is so hard to model. 

Short-wave gravitation has a shorter wavelength than gamma rays

Long-wave gravitation has a longer wavelength than radio rays. 

If this model is right all particles inside atoms send gravitational waves. If gravitational waves have the same wavelength and same energy level they form standing waves in the atoms or between subatomic particles. That thing causes reflection in those gravitational waves because they interact the same way as all other wave movements. And in that case, the gravitational waves are turning opposite. 

If only long-wave gravitational waves can travel through subatomic particles that travel around them. This thing forms an electromagnetic or gravitational shadow behind that particle. And that shadow pulls particles backward. That means the long-wave gravitation is the thing that is called antigravity. 

The short-wave gravitation travels through particles. When it impacts the back wall of subatomic particles inside them it sends wave movement backward. And that backward traveling wave movement pushes particles forward to the gravitational center. That explains why gravitation is so special. So, at the quantum level, gravitation just breaks material. 

Another gravitational force is the extremely shortwave radiation that the source is between gluons and quarks. Another gravitation is the weakness in electromagnetic or quantum fields inside subatomic particles. That weakness in quantum fields is the electromagnetic low pressure that pulls objects into it. 

The gravitational interaction is simple. The gravitational waves form electromagnetic low pressure in the front of the particles. That thing means that gravitation interacts wrong direction. So if gravitation is two forces that could explain something about that mysterious phenomenon. In that model, gravitation is like wire or superstring that travels through particles. Particles are like pearls in necklaces. And that wave travels through those particles. During that process, the string pushes the particle in the opposite direction. 

If we think that the quantum particle is like warped or stretched paper the gravitational interaction pushes that structure. Then the particle sends radiation or wave movement backward. Another long-wave gravitation might travel sideways of the particle. And that thing makes the electromagnetic shadow behind the particle. So that means the gravitational waves with long wavelengths are the thing that pushes particles. The electromagnetic shadow pulls particles backward. 

So: 

Long-wave gravitation pushes particles

Short wave gravitation pulls particles. 

When I write that the elementary particle is like a yarn-ball I should write that elementary particle is like a yarn-ball that formed of stretched or warped superstrings. The warped superstring turns into a ball form in electromagnetic fields. 

"An artist’s impression of a Kuiper Belt object (KBO), located on the outer rim of our solar system at a staggering distance of 4 billion miles from the sun. Credit: NASA, ESA, and G. Bacon (STScI)" (ScitechDaily/Modified Newtonian Dynamics: Is the Ninth Planet Hunt Revealing a New Law of Gravity?)

Planet X, or Ninth Planet tests gravitational theories. 

The name or term Planet X means a gravitational effect that causes an anomaly in Netune's trajectory. 

The problem with Planet X is it's invisible. But the gravitational effect that causes anomalies in Neptune's trajectory is real. There is some kind of lumb of invisible material in the Kuiper belt. And the problem with this lumb is that it could cause some denser points in the Kuiper belt. But there is no that kind of point. And that makes Planet X so interesting. Planet X is not confirmed, but astronomers call the mysterious gravitational effect that causes anomalies in Neptune's trajectory Planet X. 

Another mysterious thing is the X-ray flares in Uranus' atmosphere. Those X-ray flares form when some field accelerates particles that impact the Uranus' atmosphere forming X-ray flares. Some researchers think that Planet X is full of dark matter. If that lump of dark matter exists. Its only interaction with material is gravitational. If a particle goes in the dark matter glump's gravitational field it should follow the same trajectory that material follows when it falls into a black hole. 

"Artist's rendering of the accretion disc in ULAS J1120+0641, a very distant quasar powered by a supermassive black hole with a mass two billion times that of the Sun." (Wikipedia/Quasar)

Acceleration disks and anomalies in spectral energy in quasars help to understand gravitation and its interaction with other fundamental forces. 

The acceleration disk around black holes is full of extremely high-density energy. Black holes pull all material inside it. And there is also dark matter that falls in the monstrous gravitational fields. The acceleration disk will not end in the event horizon. The event horizon is the point where escaping velocity turns higher than the speed of light.  

When material falls through the event horizon it continues a spiral trajectory to the center of a black hole. At some point in that journey is the point, that dark matter interacts with visible material. That point is at least singularity in the center of a black hole. The reason for that is extremely powerful gravitation that pulls material and energy into entirety called singularity. 

Some quasar's luminosity and spectral energy levels don't match with its brightness. Researchers suspect that the reason for that energy anomaly is some wind or some other anomalous material flow in acceleration or transition disk. That model explains that the anomaly in spectral energy comes from some whirls in the acceleration disk. That thing explains the high energy level in quasars as the parasite black holes that form in acceleration disks. The energy level in that material disk is extremely high. 

And the energy may turn some small objects like asteroids or planets that fall through them into black holes. If those parasite black holes exist they send radiation beams to material around the black hole. And they might increase the energy level in the entire quasar. When those small black holes fall into bigger black holes that causes gravitational waves around the universe. 

So if something makes a whirl in that material the whirl may turn to a black hole. Or it can make extra friction in the transition disk. And maybe that extra friction turns the material or acceleration disk's energy level higher than it should be. The thing is that black holes are things that help researchers to make gravitational models. 

In some models, the impacting gravitational waves increase the energy level in the acceleration disks. If a parasite black hole exists it sends gravitational waves with the same frequency as the bigger black hole's gravitational waves. That thing can cause a situation in the quantum fields or material to start to flow sideways in acceleration disks. We can say simplified that the antigravity makes the anomaly in the energy level of quasars. 

The existence of the parasite black holes is very short-term. They form in an acceleration disk. And then they fall into a center black hole. But during that time they aim material away from the acceleration disk. 

And one thing is sure, if parasite black holes exist they send counter gravitational waves. That thing causes a situation where gravitational waves undo each other. If we want to see a situation where impacting gravitational waves undo each other, we must find objects that send the gravitational waves in the same frequency and same power. 

https://www.livescience.com/uranus-x-ray-radiation-detected.html

https://www.livescience.com/37115-what-is-gravity.html

https://scitechdaily.com/from-quasars-to-black-holes-spectral-energy-puts-established-theories-in-question/

https://scitechdaily.com/modified-newtonian-dynamics-is-the-ninth-planet-hunt-revealing-a-new-law-of-gravity/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Planet_Nine

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Planets_beyond_Neptune

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quasar

The black holes can be closer than we expected. But how close they can be?

 The black holes can be closer than we expected. But how close they can be?

Researchers found the closest black hole-candidates in the Hyades star cluster. "The Hyades Star Cluster is the closest cluster of stars to the Sun. The Hyades open cluster is bright enough to have been remarked on even thousands of years ago, yet is not as bright or compact as the nearby Pleiades (M45) star cluster. Pictured here is a particularly deep image of the Hyades which brings out vivid star colors and faint coincidental nebulas. Credit & Copyright: Jose Mtanous" (ScitechDaily.com/Hyades Star Cluster Revelations: Earth’s Nearest Black Holes Uncovered) 

Distance to black holes is hard to measure. The massive gravity in the black holes stretches light, causing enormous redshift. That's why the black holes can easily seen being at longer distances than they are. There is a theory that black hole is lurking even inside our solar system. The idea is that the mysterious "Planet X" that causes anomalies in Neptune's trajectory is about a grapefruit-size black hole. But the question is, how that black hole can be stable? 

Why would it not vaporize? The thing that causes questions about that black hole is the mysterious X-ray flares in Uranus' atmosphere. The source of those X-ray flares is high-energy particles. And one of the possible sources for those high-energy particles is a black hole in our solar system. 

Above: Artist's impression of Triton's cryovolcano. 

Cryovolcanoes or nitrogen smokers on Triton. 

Another thing that causes questions is the mysterious black nitrogen smokers on Triton Moon. There is some kind of ray-shaped energy impact that forms those icy geysers on that icy moon. Could the thing that causes those black geysers be the Einstein-Rose bridge or wormhole that travels through Triton? Conditions on that icy moon should be extremely stable. And the temperature along with gas pressure are very low. So forming the icy geyser requires some kind of energy impact. 

And if that energy impact would be some kind of gravitational effect from Neptune that causes a much larger volcanic phenomenon. The third thing that causes questions is the fresh ice at Pluto's south pole (down in the image). That fresh ice seems like some kind of eruption from under the icy shell of that dwarf planet. What causes that quite large water eruption on that dwarf planet? 

Dwarf planet Pluto in New Horizon's image. You can see white fresh ice at its south pole. The interesting thing is this. The white material seems to travel in two directions. And it is, of course, possible that Charon's moon's gravity causes that thing. But is its gravity strong enough that it causes that effect? And what is another particle flow's, or another effect's source that causes the other route for that Y-shaped ice structure? 

Is there some kind of common mass center between the Sun and Proxima Centauri?

 

The thing that causes questions about the common mass center between Alpha Centauri and the Sun is Proxima Centauri. Or Alpha Centauri C: which is another name for Proxima. That orbital period is very long, and that could explain why Proxima is so long the closest star to the Sun.  The Proxima system travels around Alpha Centauri in 547000(+6600−4000) years. 

That red dwarf is the third participant in the Alpha Centauri binary star system.  Proxima Centauri orbits Alpha Centauri A and B. And that means it should sometimes turn in the opposite direction from the sun to another side of Alpha Centauri. 

So how long does that star remain as the closest star to our sun? If there is some kind of common mass center between Alpha Centauri and the Sun, that thing causes the situation that Proxima Centauri is always the closest star to our solar system. The only invisible mass center is a black hole. 

https://edition.cnn.com/2021/04/01/world/uranus-xrays-detected-scli-scn-intl/index.html

https://www.go-astronomy.com/planets/neptune-moon-triton.htm

https://www.nasa.gov/image-feature/detecting-x-rays-from-uranus

https://phys.org/news/2019-09-planet-primodial-black-hole.html

https://scitechdaily.com/hyades-star-cluster-revelations-earths-nearest-black-holes-uncovered/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cryovolcano

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proxima_Centauri

The water worlds are more common than we thought.

The water worlds are more common than we thought. So could the hypothetical planet X be the frozen zombie planet there are no internal nuclear reactions? There are plans to send a probe for searching that mysterious object which causes the errors in the trajectory of Neptune. Could that thing be the frozen water world there are no internal nuclear reactions? The thing that makes this hypothetical planet interesting is that it's invisible. 

Water worlds or planets that are covered by a water layer are more common than anybody expected. The water worlds can be planets there is liquid water. But there is also the possibility. That large-size objects are forming from ice. So in some theories, the mysterious "Planet X" is the frozen water world. In that case, hundreds of kilometers deep of ice can cover a large part of that planet. 

But in the case of "Planet X," we should talk rather about the "gravitational effect X" than some planets. One of the explanations why we cannot see hypothetical "planet X" is that the planet is so old that in its nucleus is no radioactive material left. And its nucleus is turning cold. In that case, the planet will not send its radiation at all. That means it's impossible to detect by using infrared. 

But when we are thinking about the water worlds there is one thing that can make them hard to detect. Water has one quantum state that we don't remember. That molecule is polar. So that means if the planet's magnetic field is very strong. It can turn water molecules in the same way. 

Two things can keep water liquid on hot planets. The first thing is gravitation. In an exoplanet, Gliese 436 gravitation causes the ice core covers the entire planet. Which surface temperature is over 400 degrees Celsius. And the second thing is the strong magnetic field. The strong magnetic field can also deny water vaporization. 

A strong magnetic- or gravitational field can turn the entire planet superconducting. That means the magnetic or gravitational field can remove oscillation from the minerals and other materials. And that thing turns planet superconducting. In that case, radiowaves can travel through this planet. 

The thing that can make the planet invisible is (almost) 100% reflection. There is a possibility that a certain level of radiation reflection creates a shockwave or standing wave above the layer. In that case, the standing wave motion will drive a large part of incoming radiation through that planet. And that thing makes it harder to detect. 

In that case, reflection impacts incoming radiation with the same power. Or the material will pull most of the radiation in it. And in that case, there is a possibility that the outcoming radiation pushes reflection back on that planet. We must remember that things like hypothetical "planet X" are extremely cold objects.  

And in that case, the oxygen or hydrogen atoms can turn outside. This thing forms a magnetic monopole. If the water is in the direction where all molecules are in the same direction it can turn the object hard to detect. In that case, there is no other emission than oxygen or hydrogen. 

If the temperature of the planet is extremely low. That planet turns into a superconductor. The superconducting planet could let radio waves travel through it. And in another case, the strong gravitational field can turn the planet superconducting. Superconduction means that the atoms or molecules are locked and their oscillation is removed. 

Normally researchers make that thing by decreasing the temperature. But also strong gravitation or a strong magnetic field can turn planet superconducting. 

https://scitechdaily.com/surprise-finding-water-worlds-may-be-more-common-than-we-thought/

https://solarsystem.nasa.gov/planets/hypothetical-planet-x/in-depth/

Image: NASA

The mystery of the 9th planet (Planet X)

The mystery of the 9th planet (Planet X)

When we are thinking about the mystery of the 9th planet, we must remember that gravity centers are not necessary to be planets or single objects. Those errors can cause also a material dense, which is collected by some dwarf planet. In this scenario, the cloud of bigger asteroids causes the error in the orbit of the planet Neptune.

The thing, what caused disturbing to the orbit of Neptune is sometimes raised back to the news, and that thing is really interesting. Calculations are shown that the bigger number of larger objects than usual in the Oort cloud can cause those errors in the trajectory of Neptune, and there is a possibility that those errors are causing the situation, where the Alpha Centauri is in the line with Proxima and the mass point of the Oort cloud, and this makes possible to explain that planet by this kind of effect.

And somebody explains the errors between the predicted trajectory of Neptune and the calculations as the error, what has caused that the astronomer has been tired. But when Pluto was found in 1936, astronomers became more optimistic about finding the planet behind the Pluto orbit. That thing has turned out to be a very nice question in the area of science.

The calculations about the errors of the trajectory of Neptune has pointed out that predicted planet to be 20 times farther than Neptune from the Sun, and that means it's very cold if it has existed. But there is a possibility, that even this planet has existed, that thing would leave our solar system a long time ago.

And there are many other explanations of the mystery planet. One is that there is quite a small object in the Oort cloud, what might be a dwarf planet, what has collected to an asteroid and dust cloud around it, and that thing causes those errors, as I have written at the beginning of this text. But why this strange planet is sometimes in headlights?

The thing that around Proxima Centauri were found exoplanets have caused the astronomers thought that there is a possibility to find another planet on our solar system. Or actually, astronomers have found new particles, what are bigger than Pluto at the Oort cloud, what is giving punch for thoughts that there could be a big icy planet outside the solar system. But is it possible that the particle, what is 20 times farther than Neptune could remain orbiting the Sun?

This means that the distance to the Sun could be extremely huge, and there is only a little possibility that the surface temperature of that planet would be higher than three kelvin. This makes extremely difficult to find it by using infrared. So what would we do with this planet?

A one really interesting theory is that this planet would be used to create magnificent computers. Even the normal computer would have extreme high-power computing capacity because the surface of the planet would be superconducting. One of the ideas is that the bugs would send on the surface of that planet, which means that the neurons of those bugs would turn superconducting. And then humans could communicate with those neurons by using radiotelescopes. But those things are only visions, and the search of that particle that is called "Planet X" would continue hundreds of years.