Black Holes, Dark Matter, and Information.

 Black Holes, Dark Matter, and Information. 

"Artist’s conception of a supermassive black hole, billions of times more massive than the sun, like those found at the centers of galaxies. The black hole’s rapid spin and powerful magnetic fields can launch enormous jets of plasma into space, a process that could potentially generate the same results as human-made supercolliders. Credit: Roberto Molar Candanosa/Johns Hopkins University" (ScitechDaily, Scientists Eye Black Holes as Cosmic Supercolliders in the Hunt for Dark Matter)

At the beginning of time, before our universe, only a G-field, or gravitational field, existed. Then, there formed some kind of whirls in that G-field. Those hypothetical whirls were gravitons. The idea is that the hypothetical graviton particle is a stick-shaped structure, a particle that forms from the quantum field. 

The form of the hypothetical graviton particle could be like tornado. So are the graviton and another hypothetical particle, axion the same thing? The idea is that we cannot see axions because their spin is so fast that it creates fields around them in the shape that looks a little bit like a black hole. 

The idea is that the graviton is so smooth that it cannot take outside fields inside it. And then it starts to transport those fields into its spin axle. So could that thing also explain dark energy? Graviton pulls energy from around it. That particle binds that energy inside in the form of kinetic energy and then aims it to the spin axle. That particle looks like a black hole. The particle collects energy until its energy level turns so high that energy can start to travel outside the particle or quantum field that surrounds it. 

When the mass or kinetic energy of a particle grows, it pulls material and quantum fields from larger areas into it. That thing locks black holes into their form. If that whirl vanishes black hole erupts immediately. That whirl denies the energy escaping from the particle’s or objects' equator. And that is the thing that creates the black hole’s relativistic jet. 

Black holes pull information inside them. Or if we think carefully, black hole rolls information from its environment around its spin axle. That means there is possibility to release that information. There is a question of whether information exists without a physical form. So if we think that information is wave movement, we must ask can information travel without superstrings or does it need superstring for existence. Information will be stored in quantum fields and particles as in curves. That should not be erased even in black holes. Those curves, or “mountains” and “valleys” can turn so low that they are hard to detect. 

But theoretically is possible to restore, or recalculate information that black hole stored. When black hole pulls quantum field, and information that quantum field carries inside it, we can think that the process is similar when something rolls paper around axle. The paper forms the roll, and it's possible to roll that paper from the axle. This is the thing. That makes the black hole collisions interesting. There is a possibility that during those events, the black hole can pull information out from another black hole. And possible somday we could decode that information. 

Researchers uncovered a hidden symphony in a black hole hidden vibrations. And that might help them to read information. That the black hole stored. 

"Black holes don’t just warp space, they sing. And now, for the first time, we’ve figured out what their cosmic echoes really sound like. Credit: Shutterstock" (ScitechDaily, Scientists Uncover the Spiraling Symphony Hidden in Black Hole Vibrations)

Another interesting thing in the universe are very old, large black holes. The biggest black holes formed in the early universe. Those monsters lost their mass after that. The reason for this is the expansion of the universe. Or, otherwise, weakening quantum fields and decreasing the number of particles. This thing tells. The universe expands. Or does it? There is another explanation for that thing. This very radical theory goes like this: the black hole is a more common phenomenon in the universe than we expected. And the black holes that are “sleeping” simply pull particles and quantum fields inside them. If those black holes exist between galaxies, they are very hard to detect. 

If all electromagnetic fields and particles are formed after the Big Bang, or the beginning of the universe, that means that when black holes pull those fields and particles inside them, there are fewer particles and fields left in the universe. So, can we see that effect as an expansion of the universe? There is a possibility that only the G-field existed before the Big Bang. And that field formed all other quantum fields. But we know that black holes are massive objects. There are black holes between galaxies. And black holes can collact particles to around them. 

That means that the dark matter should interact with black holes. And maybe that thing helps to find things like axions. Axions are hypothetical dark matter particles. Sometimes is introduced that axions are particles that spin very fast. That thing means that the axion can be like a stick or some kind of rugby ball. So, that means that. Maybe near black holes, regular particles could turn into axions. When a particle's spin accelerates, it binds energy into it in the form of kinetic energy. During that process, the outside quantum fields travel to that particle. 

And press it into a smaller size. If we think that particle is a whisk-shaped superstring stucture when outcoming quantum field pushes particle into a smaller size, those superstrings turn closer to each other. If those superstrings turn close enough to each oher. That turns the particle very smooth. And that means the quantum fields travel around the particle. The quantum fields that travel to the particle’s poles will start to travel out from the particle along its spin axis. That thing means that the particle starts stretching. 

And then it starts to transport the quantum field out from its spin axle. If some stick-shaped, fast-spinning particles form black holes, that means that the black hole will not pull things inside it. It just accelerates and aims fields form around it. That thing explains the black hole relativistic jet. That causes the idea. That maybe hypothetical gravitons are axions. Maybe. The graviton is like a tornado in the G-field.  As I wrote at the beginning of this text. 

https://scitechdaily.com/mysterious-radio-signals-reveal-whats-hiding-between-galaxies/

https://scitechdaily.com/scientists-eye-black-holes-as-cosmic-supercolliders-in-the-hunt-for-dark-matter/

https://scitechdaily.com/scientists-uncover-the-spiraling-symphony-hidden-in-black-hole-vibrations/

https://scitechdaily.com/webb-telescope-spots-oldest-black-hole-shattering-cosmic-records/

The String theory and the 5-plet problem.

"Concept image of strange particles in an atom." (InterestingEngineering)

The 5-plet is a strange 5-particle group detected in the Large Hadron Collider that can challenge String theory and give answers for Dark Matter problems. The problem is that the 5-plet must not exist in the String model. But it still exists. When we think about String theory itself, that theory seems to give answers to every problem in the universe. String theory has the same problem with the Big Bang theory. That theory is commonly accepted, even if it's incomplete. String theory is made for filling the Big Bang theory giving answers to where the material that formed the Big Bang came from. The purpose of String Theory is to answer the question: What “exploded" in the Big Bang? 

String theory is not the same as the Grand Unified Theory, GUT. Some people think that the String theory gives answers to all problems in the universe. 

That is not even close to the truth. The String theory handles small parts of the entirety. And the thing that supports some kind of superstring’s existence is the cosmic web. The main idea of the String theory is that the internal superstrings or energy channels form a dimension. And the universe is like a bubble in one extremely large superstring. Those strings also form material and everything. And every single particle is a bubble in a superstring. We often forget that the Superstring theory is a repair tool for the Big Bang theory, which should explain where the material and energy came from. 

(InterestingEngineering)

The problem with the Big Bang theory is this: it doesn’t answer one of the most critical questions in physics. Where did that energy that formed the Big Bang come from? The Big Bang theory's basement is in the wave-particle duality, WPD. That means wave movement can turn into particles and particles can turn into wave movement. But without wave movement, there are no particles. So there are many updates in the Big Bang theory. The most modern model is that time itself formed the Big Bang. And the Big Bang was rather the Big Burst than the single Bang. That means in modern models the Big Bang was a series of events that formed the material in the form as we know it. 

That means the Big Bang was some kind of annihilation, but it doesn’t answer where those particles that formed the annihilation came from. One of the suggestions for that question is that there formed a giant black hole that exploded.  That black hole could have formed from wave movement that existed before the Big Bang. Or, another suggestion is that the hypothetical black hole was a remnant of the universe that existed before our universe. The multiverse model explains the space as a dimension where Big Bangs happen all the time. And universes form in the crossing points of other universes' radiation. That radiation pushes particles or wave movement into the points where their gravitational effect starts to form new universes. 

But proving that the model is not a very easy thing. If there is material outside the universe, that material is so cold that we cannot see it. But the multiverse is a logical conclusion that begins from the galaxies, galaxy clusters, and superclusters. The idea is that the universe itself is part of a larger entirety. But then we face another way to answer the problem of where everything came from. That answer is written in a very incomplete Brane theory. The idea is that the dimension or third dimension simply collapsed. That opened the channel from the fourth dimension straight to the second dimension. That energy channel formed the event called the Big Bang. If that model can be true the 3D material cannot close that channel because its energy level is too high. 

https://interestingengineering.com/science/ghost-particles-that-could-snap-string-theory

https://penntoday.upenn.edu/news/things-know-can-data-large-hadron-collider-snap-string-theory

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Big_Bang

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brane

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grand_Unified_Theory

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pion

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/String_theory

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wave%E2%80%93particle_duality

Why is turbulence so important?

"The sky depicted in Vincent van Gogh's 1889 painting, The Starry Night has been studied for its turbulent flow"(Wikipedia, Turbulence)

“In fluid dynamics, turbulence or turbulent flow is fluid motion characterized by chaotic changes in pressure and flow velocity. It is in contrast to laminar flow, which occurs when a fluid flows in parallel layers with no disruption between those layers”. (Wikipedia, Turbulence)

When aircraft or laser beams travel through the gas it pushes particles away from it. Turbulence forms in the border between energy or two materials that have different densities. Turbulence forms on the aircraft wings when some air molecules touch the wing. That forms the whirl and when the aircraft moves ahead it pumps kinetic energy to those whirls. There are vertical and horizontal whirls and when they cross that causes oscillation. When crossing whirls pump energy into each other they start to oscillate the aircraft’s material. 

The whirl can form only in cases where there is a higher energy wall between low-energy or low-pressure fields. The idea is that the outcoming gas cannot break the whirl. The whirl can start to grow until the outcoming gas or energy breaks it. If things like laser beams travel through the gas that forms two whirls around that beam. The whirl also delivers energy inside it. And it can remain until incoming energy breaks it. Or outcoming energy destroys that structure. We call that thing turbulence. If some algorithms that can calculate turbulence are possible that thing can make a big advance for hypersonic aviation and plasma research. 

Turbulence is one of the most important things that we must control and predict. Turbulence, or chaotic whirling is the thing that makes it hard to create hypersonic jet engines. Turbulence is the thing that breaks plasma entirely in fusion systems. When We think about things like ramjet and scramjet engines the whirl that comes behind the dam makes the pressure wave that makes the pressure and heat barrier that ignites fuel breaks the fuel-air mixture shape. The dam is the cone-shaped structure in the ramjet engine. 

And that limits the use of the ramjet engine between Mach 1 and Mach 6. It is not possible to create the structure that connects the ramjet and scramjet engines using conventional methods. (Maybe) There is a test of thin wires at the front of the scramjet. The problem is that those things make the low-pressure area behind them. They look a little bit like fish. And when those pressure waves impact that causes whirls in the engine. 

Ramjet

Scramjet

The thing that limits ramjet speed is the turbulence behind the ramjet’s compression cone. The scramjet engine uses a different shape in the cone. Researchers tried to connect those shapes. But that is very hard to make. So in some ideas, the aircraft uses different turbojets, ramjets, and scramjets. The aircraft will accelerate to Mach 1 using regular turbojets. Then the ramjet system ignites. When the aircraft’s speed is high enough the scramjet engine starts. That allows the plane to operate from regular runways. And it gives it an extremely high speed. 

There is a possibility to create a cone that pulls itself away from the front of the engine. The system can share that cone structure into four bites that the system pulls away from the ramjet, and then the scramjet acts as the afterburner for that system. If the system can remove ramjet's cone it makes it possible to connect the scramjet behind the ramjet. That system can make it possible to create aircraft that can travel with speed Mach 12 and higher. The rocket ramjet means the rocket engine that uses atmospheric air while the aircraft travels in the air, and when it jumps out from the atmosphere that system can close the iris at the front of the ramjet. Then the oxygen-fuel mixture will burn in the engine. That turns to using the internal oxygen source. 

However, we can also consider turbulence and nuclear fusion. The problem in the plasma is that there is forming empty space or a difference between energy levels. The problem is that the lasers cannot push plasma using the same force at all points. If somebody creates a laser that inputs energy to the plasma by using a beam that covers the entire plasma ring that would be a big advance. It is also possible to create anion plasma in the fusion system. And then the ions will inject that plasma ring homogeneously from the entire length of the plasma. 

If the ignition happens homogeneously in the entire plasma that could make the system more stable. The problem with that system is with magnets. The same system that presses anions to the ring pulls ions away. If the system uses laser points, it creates energy hills within the system, which form a situation where the laser beams make whirls inside the plasma. The problem is in the one or mono-polar plasma. 

Particles in ion plasma repel each other. And there are small points where the magnetic system cannot press that plasma with the same power. That point is the connection point of magnets. Those points cause waves in the plasma where those particles will jump away from each other because of electromagnetic repel. That makes space in the plasma ring. And that space allows the form of the whirls. 

https://www.quantamagazine.org/new-superdiffusion-proof-probes-the-mysterious-math-of-turbulence-20250516/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ramjet

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scramjet

Do we live in a black hole?

Maybe, the Big Bang was not the beginning of everything. The black hole cosmology claims. The universe came from a black hole that detonated or separated from some larger entirety. 

This is one of the most interesting questions in the history of cosmology. The idea about the black hole universe that separated from the bigger universe. And exploding is not new. German scientist Karl Schwarzschild made that original model in the early 20th. Century. The thing that makes that theorem where the universe is in the black hole a big thing is that it can give answers to questions about where material and radiation that formed the Universe where we live came from. That theorem is the base of the Phoenix universe, and metaverse-type theories there the universe where we live is only one of the universes. 

This gives the answer to the question of where material and wave movement came from, as I just wrote. But it doesn’t give an answer to the question of where the ultimate beginning is. The thing that will make the black hole cosmology a little bit hard to understand is the time. When we think about the time dilation in the black hole, the logical thing is that time travels in the opposite direction in the black hole. The logical conclusion begins with the time dilation model. When escape velocity reaches the speed of light time will stop. And when escape velocity turns higher than the speed of light time starts to travel backward. 

So that is the evidence against black hole cosmology? Should time travel backward in the universe? The question seems to have a simple answer, but then the black hole is more complicated than we even imagine. There are models that when we go into the black hole the escape velocity would rise. That means the time would turn around multiple times before it reaches the center of the black hole. But then we can think about the observations that are made about gas giants like Uranus. When an object closes that gas giant first the entire mass pulls that object to it. When an object falls through the atmosphere there is less mass before it. 

And that means there is lower gravity on the Uranus rocky shell. The gravity at the edge of Uranus’s clouds is about 21 g. But on its “surface,” it's lower than Earth. The surface means the point where the Uranus’s rocky core is. And there the gravity is about 8 g. The same effect should happen in black holes. Those objects are the most extreme in the universe. But there are the same principles as in the gas giants. When an object travels in a black hole, there is less gravity left in front of it. When an object falls in the black hole it rides with the field that falls in it. So there is a small point where there is no gravity at all. 

That means time turns around in the middle of a black hole. In a black hole’s absolute center time travels in the same direction as it travels outside the event horizon. In a black hole, everything travels in the same direction. This means that the cosmic flow there, all galactic superclusters seeming to travel in the same direction, can prove that the entire universe orbits around the same mass center. 

Outside of the black hole it seems to spin extremely fast. But inside its event horizon, the movement seems to be slower. The fact is that the structure must not be just below, or behind the event horizon. That thing can be far deeper in the black hole. Black holes press particles into smaller forms. 

So it is theoretically possible that just in the middle of that strange object, inside its complicated and mysterious structures are the complicated systems. If black hole cosmology is the reality that explains dark energy as the black hole vaporization. The thing is that black hole cosmology is one of the most interesting visions that have ever been made in the rocky path of cosmology. And that means the Big Bang was not the beginning of the entirety. 

https://www.independent.co.uk/space/universe-start-big-bang-black-hole-b2763415.html

https://www.sciencealert.com/the-entire-universe-could-exist-inside-a-black-hole-heres-why

https://theconversation.com/what-if-the-big-bang-wasnt-the-beginning-our-research-suggests-it-may-have-taken-place-inside-a-black-hole-258010 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_hole_cosmology

The Wikipedia describes the black hole cosmology like this: 

*************************************************************’

“A black hole cosmology (also called Schwarzschild cosmology or black hole cosmological model) is a cosmological model in which the observable universe is the interior of a black hole. Such models were originally proposed by theoretical physicist Raj Kumar Pathria, and concurrently by mathematician I. J. Good. In the version as originally proposed by Pathria and Good, and studied more recently by, among others, Nikodem Popławski, the observable universe is the interior of a black hole existing as one of possibly many inside a larger parent universe, or multiverse.”

“Any such model requires that the Hubble radius of the observable universe be equal to its Schwarzschild radius, that is, the product of its mass and the Schwarzschild proportionality constant. This is indeed known to be nearly the case; at least one cosmologist, however, considers this close match to be a coincidence.”

A paper, published in March 2025 claims that, of a sample of over 200 early galaxies, around two thirds spin clockwise, whereas only half would be expected to do so. One possible explanation for this anomaly is that we might be inside a black hole; as all known black holes spin and this spin would influence any galaxies inside one. Alternatively it might be that the cosmos spins slowly for some other reason, or there may be some issue with the data.”

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_hole_cosmology

*************************************************************’

The Big Bang was not probably as we believed.

"A new cosmological model proposes that the universe grows not from a single Big Bang, but from multiple, rapid bursts of energy called temporal singularities. These unseen events may explain galaxy formation and cosmic acceleration—without relying on dark matter or dark energy. Credit: SciTechDaily.com" (ScitechDaily, No Big Bang? A Theory of Repeating Bursts Could Explain Everything)

In the new model, the Big Bang did not exist. Or its form was different. From we believed. It's possible that the Big Bang was a series of events that made the wave-particle duality from particles straight from the radiation. 

The new model of the universe's beginning is not as radical as it can be. The model is that the Big Bang was a series of events, not a single "bang". The idea of the Big Bang is that. There was an event where energy turned into material and those particles reached certain energy levels. 

There is the possibility that before modern material formed there formed some particle-antiparticle pairs that are very exotic in the modern universe. Those particles and their antiparticle pairs could be very common in the young, high-energy universe. 

There is a possibility that the very first gravitational centers, "Kugelblitz black holes". Those things formed when there formed whirls in the Higgs field. Those very first primordial black holes could explain the crossing waves that form the 

The energy or wave movement transformed into particles in the very high energy event that we call the "Big Bang". The only problem with the Big Bang model is that this thing. Wave-particle duality requires that wave movement impacts with opposite or crossing wave movement. 

When wave movement turns into particles. That requires crossing wave movement. There must be some source that sends those crossing waves. 

The wave-particle duality means that energy or wave movement can transform into a particle, or the particle can transform into energy. Those whirls can create crossing-wave movement. 

One of the possible models is that the Big Bang was a series of bursts that formed particles. There is a model. The Big Bang had multiple cores. The points where energy was released into the spacetime. When those energy waves crossed they formed particles that don't exist anymore. The young universe had a higher energy level than the modern universe. The energy flow from particles was slower than in the modern universe. 

That means there can be particles and atoms that cannot exist in the modern universe. The particle's ability to create compounds depends on the energy flow. That comes out from the particle. If that energy flow is too fast it pushes those particles away from each other. 

 https://scitechdaily.com/no-big-bang-a-theory-of-repeating-bursts-could-explain-everything/

The mysterious genius Srinivasa Ramanujan.

Srinivasa Ramanujan (1887-1920). (Quanta Magazine, Math Is Still Catching Up to the Mysterious Genius of Srinivasa Ramanujan)

The number theory is thankful to Srinivasa Ramanujan (1887-1920). The thing that makes this person, who was born into a poor Indian family in colonial India was a self-educated person, who made a lot of things in mathematics. Those theories are still handy tools for many types of advanced calculations. There are many interesting details in the life of that young person, who passed away in 1920. Many people say that Srinivasa Ramanujan died too early. If that person could live a longer life, he might stand in the place of Albert Einstein. 

There were many interesting things in Ramanujan's early life. The thing is that Ramanujan failed twice in college. Because of his passion for mathematics. And that's why he flees from home. Maybe he was afraid that his parents were angry. Finally, he went to Trinity College Cambridge where he started to work with Hardy and Littlewood in 1914. 

Pages from Ramanujan’s lost notebook. (Quanta Magazine, Math Is Still Catching Up to the Mysterious Genius of Srinivasa Ramanujan)

"Ramanujan’s first letter to G.H. Hardy included formulas (5), (6) and (7), strange nested fractions that Hardy said “defeated me completely; I had never seen anything in the least like them before.” (Quanta Magazine, Math Is Still Catching Up to the Mysterious Genius of Srinivasa Ramanujan)

(Quanta Magazine, Math Is Still Catching Up to the Mysterious Genius of Srinivasa Ramanujan)

There are lots of theories that this man created. At a young age, this man was very poor and also he had very big health problems. In 1912 he sent letters to famous mathematicians and one of them, G.H Hardy the expert in number theory and analysis at the University of Cambridge. When Hardy got the letter from Srinivasa Ramanujan. That man said, that his greatest work for mathematics was that he found Ramanujan. Then Hardy called Ramanujan to England. There Ramanujan made some works for Cambridge. He lived in England from 1914 to 1919. Then he returned to India where he died in 1920. 

"Hardy and Ramanujan collaborated closely for years. They exchanged letters about mathematics until Ramanujan’s death." (Quanta Magazine, Math Is Still Catching Up to the Mysterious Genius of Srinivasa Ramanujan)

And then he went sick. After returning to India Ramanujan died. An interesting thing is that Ramanujan died almost similar way as his colleague Nils Henrik Abel (1802-1829), a Norwegian mathematician. He came to his university, did impressive work, and then got some illness and then that ultimate genius died at a young age, 32. 

Images: (Quanta Magazine, Math Is Still Catching Up to the Mysterious Genius of Srinivasa Ramanujan)

Ramanujan work. 

Still today Ramanujan's work is very highly respected. 

The main thing that Ramanujan did is this: he introduce a way to calculate fractional numbers. There are five ways to introduce number 4.  The number four can be shared in pieces like this (2+2), or, (2+1+1), or, (1+1+1+1), or, (1+1+2). And then it is easier to make things like division calculations. 4/8 can be introduced like this: (1+1+2)/(2+2+2+2). And we all know that 4/8=1/2. 

The interesting thing is that. Those numbers can also be decimal numbers, which means that we can introduce as an example number 1 in this mode. (0,25+0,25+0,25+0,25). Or we can introduce number four in this mode. (0,5+0,5+0,5+0,5+0,5+0,5+0,5+0,5). Or we can share 0,5 to two 0,25. That is one of the most interesting things in mathematics. There are many ways to benefit from that model. 

The Ramanujan theorems play a key role in singularity calculations. There the curves and lines connect a series of points. The introduction for that is in the Quanta magazine article. 

The thing is that Ramanujan's work could help Grigory Prelman in his work with the Poincaré theorem. 

https://www.quantamagazine.org/srinivasa-ramanujan-was-a-genius-math-is-still-catching-up-20241021/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/G._H._Hardy

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Edensor_Littlewood

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Niels_Henrik_Abel

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Srinivasa_Ramanujan

List of Ramanujan work. 

• Ramanujan's sum
• Landau–Ramanujan constant
• Mock theta functions
• Ramanujan conjecture
• Ramanujan prime
• Ramanujan–Soldner constant
• Ramanujan theta function
• Rogers–Ramanujan identities
• Ramanujan's master theorem
• Hardy–Ramanujan asymptotic formula
• Ramanujan–Sato series

Wikipedia, Srinivasa Ramanujan

All images: (Quanta Magazine, Math Is Still Catching Up to the Mysterious Genius of Srinivasa Ramanujan)