Why intelligent persons are following dictators?

Why intelligent persons are following dictators?

Masses are easy to manipulate. This thing raises the Nazis and Communists in the leadership in their countries. The idea was that the public image was every person was a member of the leading party, and if the mark of the membership was not found, that kind of person can be violated. And those people were, of course, show their strength to other persons. The membership of the group guaranteed the feel of strength, and the group, which were supporting and defending their own.

If people are in groups, what is surrounded by the militaristic group, they would always afraid. And then they are easy to take control of. Human is the group animal, and if in that case would rise the leader, that person can make other people able to follow the orders without criticisms. The force of the mass is just made some group feel that they are powerful, and also create an image in the mind, that everybody is following that leader.

The idea of mental manipulation is to make people think, that the ideas, what other people are giving are their own. When we are looking at things like Nazis, we must wonder, why brilliant geniuses were followed those bloody dictators? Why they created the aircraft like GO-229, what was the most revolutionary design in history.

If we are thinking V-2 (A-4) rocket as the conventional weapon, that thing doesn't have a very big effect on the war. it was too complicated and difficult to make, but if that rocket were equipped with Anthrax cultures, that weapon could turn to the most brutal weapon of mass destruction, whatever created, and this makes those people dangerous. They are not thinking like normal persons. But how people are serving the dictators by giving them all their time and energy for making new kinds of tools to handle things.

The answer is the mind control

The mind control is one version of the thing, which is called marketing. in this method, the person would start to obey or serve the leader of the group without excuses. That means that the person would grow in the environment, where the state or ideology is the thing, what is filtering and polarizing all information.

 And all accepted opinions are the things, that are accepted by the rulers of the state. In this method, the main elements are similar to Pavlov's method, which bases gifting and punishments. The key thing is that if the person would please the supervisor, that would give a gift and if a person would cause disappointment, the supervisor would give punishment. This is the normal brainwashing method, which is used in the Korean and Vietnam wars.

In those wars, the prisoners would be kept without sleep, and they must learn some part of Mao's Little Red Book and repeat it from memory. And if there are mistakes, the person would get punishment, because the lessons or homework were not made properly. This thing makes the brainwashing very dangerous. If a person is tired, the mind is willing to get the information and the human mind is created for pleasing authorities. In this method, the dugs are not used, because of the abstinence syndrome would make the "therapy".

The idea is to make the thinking robot

The brainwashing is one version of psychotherapy. The idea of the punishment is that the supervisor cannot be connected to the punishment. One version is that the prisoner would just take out, and washed with water. The wet clothes are uncomfortable. If the person would please the clean clothes would be given, and the guards will smile, as you might see. But modern technology makes this method more effective. The use of infrasound the victim would be targeted to simultaneous non-stop mantra, which continues 24/7. This kind of suggestion would be a very effective thing.

And if the victim would be bad, that thing causes a horrible headache. When the result is wanted, the headache would be more comfortable. The volume of the loudspeakers would decrease when the person would please the supervisor, and if there would be some kind of problems, the infrasound would get the ultrasound as the spicy, which makes horrifying pain. And the brain scanners can also use to make sure, that person doesn't acting., and the turning is real.

How complicated things experts can make their "clients" do?

What if we would have changed to locate people like Albert Einstein in childhood? Could we send that person to the special children's home, where the subliminal loudspeakers will turn the mind of that person to the tool for dictators? In those hypothetical places, all information is polarized, and the fake news is making the enemies of the state demons, what are used as a controlling tool?

If we are thinking about the intensive brainwashing, what continues from childhood, how deep it can go? Can those people make voluntary things like houses and other kinds of things to the controllers? When I'm looking at things, what people like creators of the nuclear weapons have created, I think is it possible to make the well-trained architect or engineer make things, what are against the peace?

The idea of mental manipulation would be fascinating and at the same time horrifying. People would think that their opinions are their own, but the fact is that those ideas might be created by using mental manipulation. Making people serve voluntary the government is the idea in this kind of case.

Criticism and science

Criticism and science

In the beginning, I must say, that the scientist, who makes science by using research. Or rather saying methods, what is accepted for the empiric research. That means that the results of experiments must be got from the tests, which is repeated in a similar environment. And that is confirmed by the other scientists and other laboratories. After multiple tests, the result can be accepted as the scientific truth.

We all have the freedom to use our brains. This is the thing, what we always forget. We must understand that in the past the scientists made mistakes, and the thing, what makes science very trusted is that scientists can accept that they don't know everything. Or why we have researchers?

Thank god we don't know everything because if that thing happens sometimes, many researchers would be lost their jobs. So when we are making calculations and other formulas, we must realize that the persons, who lived before us might make mistakes, so the scientific community must confess those mistakes.

We can get mercy by saying that the errors made the people, who lived before us. So the error was not made by us. And this thing is freeing us from blaming. That means that the scientists who lived 200 years ago had more limited changes and equipment that modern scientists have. This means that the more accurate methods and equipment are finding errors from many things, what we are thought of as a truism.

The criticism is not a synonym for negative or bad. When we are thinking about scientists, we must realize that the scientist is a human being, who has opinions and ideology as well as other people. And that means those people might make mistakes by accident or they can polarize the results of the measurements or experiment.

That thing is natural, and even the best scientists and philosophers in the world are making mistakes if they are writing some text at three o'clock in the morning, or they are looking for some spectroscope in sniffle and fewer. Or those people have faced personal problems like divorcement what disturbs the concentration, and sometimes the researcher is more or less forced to give wrong information about the experiments because of some other part like rulers want that science must support their ideology.

Those cases many people have hurt and blamed without reason. And that is the thing, why scientists should have a high level of morality. Giving wrong information can destroy the lives of many people.

And in those cases, there is made the most brutal crimes, what mankind has ever made. So the science must be public, and the publicity would remove the suspicious. But there is always a possibility, that the person would let other people bribe them to make something, what is wrong.

Cambridge analytics and political "hamburger university".

Sometimes I have thought things like Cambridge Analytics, the use of the names, what are easy to connect with universities, but what are the political movements and parties. Those things are like a political version of some kind of the "hamburger universities" or "salesmen universities" what is using that kind of name, but what is owned by the fast-food restaurants or some sales companies.

In the mind of the people, Cambridge Analytics is connected with the University of Cambridge, and that thing helps it to make people answer to its question forms. So that makes this kind of companies feel very academical, and it gives a very big benefit for the company, what is or was some kind of advertising agency. Those forms made collecting the data easier because people trusted that the company was part of the University of Cambridge, and that made it possible to adjust the speeches, what the candidates kept for people, that they could get a maximum number of votes.

The purpose of the political version of those "universities" is to produce actors like speech writers or political marketing merchandise for some political movement. And some people claim that the purpose of those institutes is only acting like a troll factory. The people are trained for supporting the ideology, or the data that is collected serving only one actor in the political field, but the names of those institutes are bringing the mind some very respected university.

Image:

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/6/63/Quartz_crystal.jpg/220px-Quartz_crystal.jpg

About Apollo-program, scientists, and science

About Apollo-program, scientists, and science

We have spent the 50th. anniversary of the moonwalk and that thig would bring in the front of our eyes visions what are full of the most impressive images of the rockets, what are 110 meters long, and the landing crafts what are flying over the strange landscape. TV and today the internet are full of images of the impressive moonwalk, and impressive technology behind that thing and the Moon mission was a very good image for NASA and other kinds of organizations.

But when we are thinking about science, scientists, researchers, and developers, what are making science and machines every day, we are facing the thing that their work is not very impressive, if we would look at those people, while they are working. When we are thinking impressive science, we might think would Darwin's theory of evolution be so popular, if that man would make his invention about the advancing of the species in Great Britain in his backyard? The "Beagle" ship made Darwin's journey around the world very interesting, and the findings, what that man did in the Galapagos islands very interesting.

We have forgotten that probably Darwin would get the same results by researching the flowers and bugs like earwigs in his home yard. When we are looking at the impression, what things like Apollo-program made, when Neil Armstrong put his steps on the Moon, we might forget that the thing, what Armstrong made was to bringing some stones and dust to the Earth. 

That thing was very good for laboratories, but we have forgotten that the unmanned probes would do the same thing, and bring similar samples to Earth. And the thing is that those probes would not risk human lives. The risk is the thing, what makes explorations impressive. If we would send the robot to another planet, there is no drama, if the mission fails.

 But when we are thinking about explorations to the jungles, we ever hear those people, who are at least so brave as Neil Armstrong was, except if those explorers would be missing in the jungle. In the jungle, those explorers might be eaten by some snake, but the thing is that they are traveling to their operational area by using DC-3 or some jeep, and that is not very impressive. That's why nobody even sees the lifting off those jungle researchers. But everybody saw the lift-off of the giant Saturn-V rocket in Cape Canaveral.

When we are thinking about people, who are selecting the career as the scientists, we are facing the thing, that those people have very little attention in their private life. If we would observe people like Cosmologists in their work, we would see people, who are writing something on the paper, or who would use some laptop computer and write something. And that thing is not very impressive.

That's why we would not respect those people because they are not using CAD-programs or make some computer software. When people are talking about the influential professions they are always mentioned people like computer programmers, because they are writing some nice codes, what are collecting data from some large areas. 

But has anyone mention persons like conference translators or other language scientists as influential professionals. In almost every publication is mentioned how poor salaries the humanists would get in comparison to engineers. This is the problem with the people like translators, and then we forget to ask, what is the salary of archeologists and egyptologists? Do those persons ever get salaries?

And if they are not getting salaries, how they would live? Then we are facing the fact, that somehow we don't respect people, who are translating other languages, and things like words, what are written by some rock artist. Have we ever ask a single thing about the work of those people? Or have we ever asked things, what people like the translator of the sign language must handle?

I think that we ever spend a single thought about those kinds of people when we are looking at some document of science, or actually, those documents are almost every time made to handle the scientific instruments. The thing is that things like web-cameras and message solutions are vital systems for deaf people when they are wanted to communicate with other people. This kind of things is really interesting to think when we are going out and talk about Neil Armstrong and other interesting people.