Challenging Einstein.

"Research into gravitational lensing, where light bends around massive objects, aligns with Einstein’s predictions from billions of years ago. However, newer findings suggest some deviations, indicating potential variations in gravitational behavior over large distances, sparking further investigation into the validity of Einstein’s theories. Credit: SciTechDaily.com" (ScitechDaily, Is the Universe Defying Einstein? New Discoveries Challenge Relativity)

The Theory of Relativity means that everything is relative to something else. Einstein's paradox, called the "Train paradox" is that an object can move very fast even if it's not moving at all. When we stand in a train that moves 200 km/h we can say that we don't move at all. But if somebody stands outside the train, that person can say, that we travel 200 km/h. In that case the space moves. 

So the movement is energy. When we stand or sit in a moving train that means we don't use energy. The moving train, if it's an electric train, takes electricity from wires. And then it transforms it into kinetic energy. When the train slows its speed it transforms its kinetic energy into thermal energy. 

During that process, the energy transformation pulls kinetic energy out of the passengers. But if we jump out from the moving train the kinetic energy that train stored in us would remain in our body until we touch the ground. The paradox is that what if we stand in spacecraft that travel speed of light? And then start to run forward? We can say that the quantum fields and wave movement that we face are like air molecules. We would not interact with those waves and fields if we were in a closed space. 

The thing is that. It's possible. That nothing happens. Because we are in a closed space. But if the nose of the spacecraft opens or we would sit on an open spacecraft and step forward that causes a situation in the impacting energy field that impacts us faster than the speed of light. In that case, the open structure or open platform makes it possible for the field to interact with objects. 

If we think of the effect where impacting wave movement or energy field can cause a situation where the particle virtually crosses the speed of light that effect could make it possible to escape from the black hole. The idea is that the impact speed between quantum fields that travel against a particle's trajectory can cross the speed of light. That effect can form a wave or particle that can escape from the black hole. But that requires that the particle can change its movement direction in the event horizon. 

" Artist impression of ESA's Gaia satellite observing the Milky Way. The background image of the sky is compiled from data from more than 1.8 billion stars. It shows the total brightness and colour of stars observed by Gaia released as part of Gaia’s Early Data Release 3 (Gaia EDR3) in December 2020." (ScitechDaily, Gaia (spacecraft))

The most modern instruments like the Gaia satellite, bring data that has been impossible before this time. Those observations tell us that things like gravity have not been stable in the history of the Universe. The strength of gravity- or gravitational effect- has changed in the universe's history. And that means that Einstein might make mistakes. 

Or maybe there is a distance where we can use Einstein's Theories of Relativity for modeling spacetime. The fact is that things like Newtonian gravity models are still useful tools for calculating gravity and object interactions. 

Same way. Things like Theories of Special Relativity and General Relativity are suitable models for calculating an object's behavior in the different types of gravity fields. The distance between objects from gravity centers determines which theory or equation is most suitable. But those theories are never tested in extremely long distances and in borders like when a particle crosses the line between the "regular universe" and cosmic voids.

The Big Bang was an event that released all known energy and material to the spacetime.  That model means that the Big Bang also released gravity into the spacetime. So when black holes "eat" material and wave movement they should eat gravity as well they eat other wave movements like visible light and radio waves. 

Gravity or gravitation is wave movement as well as electromagnetic radiation. That means there must be some kind of scattering effect between gravitational waves. In the young universe, the energy level was higher than in the modern universe. The Higgs field or base energy field in the universe was also stronger. 

Gravity waves were stronger in dense fields. But gravity waves impact each other. That caused the thing that gravity waves to scatter stronger than in the modern universe. The impacting gravity waves simply shared each other in the smaller pieces. And maybe that happens also today. But in the young universe, those gravity waves were wider than they are today. 

In black holes, massive gravity stretches all objects. That means. Also, gravity waves can travel straight. The massive gravity that pulls objects in the pothole minimizes entropy. And if the wave movement and particles turn into spaghetti-shaped things that are straight there is no entropy at all. In some models, the gravity waves can touch each other inside the black hole. That forms a gravitational electric arc that could create so high energy gravity waves that they can push the event horizon back to space. 

If we think this way the massive gravity fields should also focus gravity waves as they focus other wave movements. That means gravity lenses should also affect gravity waves and focus them into one point. And if that thing is true black holes should also pull gravity waves inside them. Or if a gravity wave is wave in the Higgs field that means black holes pull the Higgs field inside them. 

Same way. When the universe expands there should be less gravity left in the space that turns larger in comparison to energy and material. That thing doesn't mean that there gravitational interaction between particles and objects turns weaker. But is the thing that causes the effect the distance or does black holes pull that gravity inside them? That means cosmic inflation affects also gravity. 

https://scitechdaily.com/is-the-universe-defying-einstein-new-discoveries-challenge-relativity/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gaia_(spacecraft)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Theory_of_relativity

Ether and Michelson-Morley experiment

Ether and Michelson-Morley experiment

The speed of light is stable, and that means that there is something, that will put the limit to the speed of the photon. That thing could be the combination of the dark matter and dark energy, and because the dark matter and dark energy would be everywhere, that thing would make the speed of light stable. 

So in the next writing term ether is also means the combination of the dark energy and dark material, what should handle at the same time. And the thing is that the density of dark material and dark energy would be stable at the universe, which means that those elements also exist in the atmosphere of the planets, and even between atoms. 

Ether theory was crushed by Albert Einstein, who confirmed that the speed of light was stable. And the first thing, what gave the idea that ether-theory was wrong, was Michelson-Morley experiment in 1887, which proved that nothing could influence the light when it travels in the interferometer. That experiment brought Albert Abraham Michelson the noble prize in 1907. But the experiment was unsuccessful. 

But then some physicians realized that gravity can turn the direction of the photons like Einstein predicted. And this thing was proven that Einstein was right. The thing is that gravity can turn the direction of the light, and that thing was proven when gravity lens has been discovered. But when we are thinking about the theory of ether or aether, what this hypothetical thing, what is called a thing, what would transmit the wave moves forward, we must say that the real answer for that thing will ever be confirmed.

And sometimes dark material and dark energy are suggested as ether, but that means that this thing has something, what we have ever thought. This thing is called the error of Michelson, and that is in the accuracy of this theory. 

Is "ether the force or material, what would effect only in one direction"? That means that this force, what can also be called as the combination of dark energy and dark material would affect the straight direction of the moving of the particle. This means that this force would not have an effect, which influences the particle to the side of the moving direction. In that case, the mythic ether or dark energy and dark material would affect the particle, when it would move straight against it. 

So it cannot change the direction of the particles. And this means that the ether would cause some kind of quantum friction, which will slow or limit the speed of light. If we are thinking about the speed of light as the absolute thing, that means that the ether would limit the speed of the photon in everywhere with the same force. And that force would not be very big. 

Or is it some kind of a weird thing, what will resist the movement harder when the speed of it would close the speed of the light. And that means that the resisting force would get stronger when the speed of the particle would close the cosmic speed limit. This thing would explain, why the particle, what has mass cannot ever reach the speed of the photon. 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michelson%E2%80%93Morley_experiment