The short tale about "Mandela Effect"

The short tale about "Mandela Effect"

The "Mandela Effect" means the cases when something is chancing when the person keeps it in hand or something is remembered wrong, and those things are caused rumors, that something changes things in history. But that thing is the only speculation and many times the "Mandela Effect" is explained as the misremembering, and that would be the good reason for letting that thing be. But in the film (1), what I linked below this text is claimed that many people have made mistake by the names "Bernstein" and "Berenstein" when they have remembered the name of the writer of some children's book. 

The explanation for that thing is claimed that the books, what are sold to South-Africa what had apartheid-government in that time had marked that the book was brought from that country, because of the South-Africa was enlisted as the sanction list of the United Nations, and that would be the reason, why this kind of books had miswritten writers because people would see, that the book was bought from that country. And that thing might be the natural reason, why that kind of books have sometimes miswritten names. 

Sometimes there is a question "Could Nelson Mandela be a body double? " That could explain, why some people remember the execution of that man (2).

But there is another story of the "Mandela Effect" and that thing was that some cosmonauts are claimed to say, that Nelson Mandela (3)(1918-2013) has died in the prison. And then the thing was uncovered as the fake, and the question is, did those cosmonauts told that thing? Or did somebody just imagined that story? And because I want to write a little bit longer text I would ask, what if those cosmonauts told truth? Was there some kind of fake information, where the radio-transmission with faked news would send to that spacecraft? Or was somebody just hiding the false memory?

That would be a nice looking explanation, but what if there is another more creepy thing, what somebody wants to hide. The thing is that, what if those people saw real execution? The question was, that was the same man, who went into the prison the same man, who steps out from the prison? Or was the Nelson Mandela, what people saw, actually changed in the South-African prison? The thing is that Nelson Mandela was one of the top men when the Apartheid was dispanded. And that means that he was a big man for his nation. But was he the same Nelson Mandela, who went into prison in 1962. He was released in 1990 after spending in prison for 27 years. 

The strange story of Winnie Mandela (1936-2018)(4) and four murders, what her bodyguards made under her command. Why she participated in those cases in 1989? That case could danger the release process of Nelson Mandela

His wife Winnie sent to prison for six years, because she participated in the murders of six young men. Then she got little more years in prison, for some kind of corruption. That means that Winnie was not spending lots of time with her husband, and there is a possibility, that she couldn't recognize Nelson well, but this thing is just guessing. But why she participated in the murders of the four young men in the year 1989. The youngest of those victims was 14 (5), and the question is, why those actions made and the youngest of the victims was killed by the personal order of Winnie Mandela. So is "Mandela Effect" some kind of misunderstanding, the prove that somebody is playing with history, or just imagination. 

(1)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bxZ0IbmdEUk

(2)

https://thewpwire.org/3664/ae/mandela-effect-conspiracy-explained/

(3)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nelson_Mandela

(4)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Winnie_Madikizela-Mandela

(5)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stompie_Seipei

Image

https://thewpwire.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/IMG_5400-900x325.jpg

Thoughts about old SciFi art and large-scale Dyson's spheres

Thoughts about old SciFi art and large-scale Dyson's spheres

Sometimes we have thought, that terraformation of the planets would be the answer to the overpopulation of the Earth. But many times we have forgotten that terraformation could also happen that way, that the planet would turn to giant Dyson's sphere, and then the structures and cities would build inside this ball. In this case, we would take the planet, or big asteroid and make it hollow. If we are thinking that the structures like our imaginational colony, the gravity of that place can adjust just by controlling the rotation movement of the hollow planet, but that thing can be true in the distant future.

In the image, what I used shortly before is a slight-looking layer, and at the horizon is the pyramid-looking structure. And sometimes I have wondered would the artist mean that the image portraits the planet, what would be covered by using the silicone panels. The purpose of that system would be to collect as much energy as possible.

That thing offers the power supply for the civilization, what lives in the underground tunnels, or inside the hollow planet. In this kind of scenario, the pyramid-looking structure would be the antenna, what the civilization would use to keep contact with its colonies or docking area of the spacecraft, which are offering supplies for that hypothetical space civilization.

So where that civilization would get or find the hollow planet. There is one very interesting idea, what might make this kind of project possible, and the thing is that building the very long pipe, the hypothetical civilization would suck the entire planet empty. That tube would make the magma of that planet to fly to space, and then the atmosphere of the planet would be pumped inside its core, and then the entire planet would be covered by using silicone panels.

The pumped gas would deny the collision of the core. If our hypothetical planet is near the center of the Galaxy, that structure would give a very powerful energy supply for the civilization, what will live inside their hollow planet. And if that civilization wants, it can create the artificial sun inside this planet, which is transformed into the giant Dyson's sphere. Or maybe that planet would not be so massive as we think, and the necessary thing is the liquid lithosphere. The pyramid-shaped structure would make easier to find the docking station, which might be also the communication antenna. Maybe someday, in the distant future mankind would make this kind of space station.

Image:

https://www.stockvault.net/data/2019/08/29/269009/preview16.jpg

The strange notification of the name "Abraham"

The strange notification of the name "Abraham"

Are the parents of the persons who had the name "Abraham" got a more respective attitude for education than the average persons, or why there were so many remarkable persons in the list, where are persons, who had name Abraham as the given name? There are many respected monks, kings, and theologians on that list, which is taken from Wikipedia. 

I have thought that could the name "Abraham" mean that the person was somehow prepared for that work. The reason, why I see that thing like that is three famous "Abrahams" in history, and more remarkable persons, who had that name, but who were not so well known. And is that name mean that those people were trained or prepared for the work in an effective role for society. This kind of thing is really interesting when we are looking at those names on Wikipedia. 

The most famous "Abraham" was the grandfather of Hebrews, and that means that this name has been for the kings for giving them the honor. That thing is, of course, causing that there are many kings in history, who were using that name. And that would explain, why many "Abrahams" were great men. 

The second Abraham is, of course, Abraham Lincoln. The man, who ruled the USA during the Civil War. The thing is that this man was murdered, and the persons who made that thing were recognized and shot. But the thing is that nobody knows, is there some organization like ex-confederate officers, who wanted to punish Lincoln about the war. 

Third of those men, who carried the name Abraham is, in my opinion, Albert Abraham Michelson, the man who metered the speed of light. That man is not mentioned in the list of persons, who had Abraham as the given name. These kinds of things are really interesting. The thing that makes Michelson a very interesting person, that he succeeded in the metering the speed of light in the 19th. century, where was not even electric systems, and this thing made him the remarkable man. 

But as we know, in the list of persons, who had Abraham as the given name were lots of kings. Also, men of the church and other kinds of people are well represented. So is this coincidence? Or were the parents of those people just more able to get the training or education for those people? Were they more educated than average people. This thing makes that name interesting. So is the name "Abraham" only motivating, or is there something behind it? These kinds of questions are really interesting when we are researching that kind of thing. 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abraham_(given_name)

Einstein and quantum theory

Einstein and quantum theory

Many people are making mistakes in the names of Einstein's theories, and that kind of thing is common in the scientific texts, and many times the things like speed of light are marked accidentally as the km/s. And even the best of best are making mistakes when they are tired.

But when we are facing the thing that the speed of light is 299 792 458 m/s that thing is causing the thought that photon is moving too slowly. And that should mean it has the mass because the speed of light is calculated to 300 000 m/s, and the thing that causes this thing would be the radiation or so-called chamfer photon, background radiation or dark material, would slow the photon. 

And the question is what number we use, calculated or measured? If the calculated speed of the light a measured speed has a difference, that means that the photon would not travel in the space, where is always some kind of energy, which makes the empty universe impossible. 

Did Einstein make a mistake when he calculated the trajectory of the planet Mercury? The thing is that this mistake might be caused a thing called accuracy in measurements that have caused one of the most interesting dilemmas in history. Was Einstein think that the speed of light was 300 000 m/s, and the real speed of light is 299 792 458 m/s? That thing was measured, by Albert A Michelson and Edward W. Morley during the so-called Michelson-Morley experiment in 1887. But did Einstein knew that thing?

E=Mc² is the most well known mathematical formula in the world, and that thing is sometimes mentioned as the Theory of Common Relativity. But in some sources, the same formula is called the theory of Special Relativity. So witch one is right? The letters mean E= energy, M= Mass, and c=the speed of light. So what is the name of that theory? The thing is that the formula itself doesn't belong to any of Einstein's theories, and that is the consequence of the Theory of Special Relativity. 

In the theoretical world is one thing that remains stable, and that is the thing, that when somebody is in the mode, everything must combinate with that. When we are looking exactly and with very big accuracy the Theory of Common Relativity was created in 1916, after the first relativity theory of Albert Einstein. 

The theory of Special relativity has taken ten years of the life of Einstein, and he published it in 1905.  that he fixed a couple of errors, what has been found in that theory, and those errors belonged to very limited areas in the Universe. That meant that the theoretical calculations between the speed and time of the trajectory of planet Mercury didn't match the measurements that scientists have made. 

Theory of Special Relativity E=Mc² is the energy formula, what is used as the formula, what is used to calculate the power of nuclear explosives. So that formula is not very suitable for calculating speeds and other things. And would that mean that Einstein created another formula, what is also called the name of Theory of General relativity? There is no answer to that question. 

That means that this thing was really small, and that thing proved the pliability of the universe and time have been proven, and by finding the errors of the extremely sharp clocks, what is used for the time measurements in GPS-locations have been running faster than clocks on the ground. And that thing caused the effect of slowing the time has been proven. The last thing is that the cases when the atom clocks have been in the aircraft, what have been fly around the world, there have been differences between those clocks, what were in those planes, and the clocks that were left in stable locations. 

So thins thing caused the slowing the time was true. But when we are thinking about the things of classical physics and Einstein theories and quantum theories, we must realize, that there is a very interesting thing in those theories, and that is that everything should be in harmony with the newest theory. 

If we are thinking that some of those theories are knocked out, that thing should argument by using the greater accuracy, than just saying that the "theory is out of use". Here I must say that things like G-force and escaping velocity are still the same things as in Newton's time, and those things are not things what would turn the normal physics lesson to the lesson of quantum mechanics, what would be an interesting way to begin lessons in the elementary school. 

But when we are saying that Einstein attacked against quantum theory, we should also ask when and how this attack happened? The Einsteins famous formula E=Mc² (Energy is mass counted speed of light power two) made him famous. That is known as the Theory of Special Relativity, but it's the consequence of that theory, and this formula is one of the key elements, while people are calculating the energy levels of nuclear explosions. 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Albert_Einstein

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Albert_A._Michelson

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Edward_W._Morley

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michelson%E2%80%93Morley_experiment

https://www.space.com/17661-theory-general-relativity.html

https://www.space.com/36273-theory-special-relativity.html

The planet hunter's problem

The planet hunter's problem

Planet hunting is the thing, what might help humans to find another civilization, and that is the thing, what makes this science so interesting. And the planet hunters have many problems in their work, and one is that the stars, what is capable to have the planet, what have similar lifeforms with Earth are quite bright. The reason, why we are looking for similar lifeforms is that those aliens could communicate with us easily if they have a similar form as we have, but the thing is that even if those hypothetical humanoids are looking like us, they might not be like us.

The problem is that we cannot even think where to find those humanoids. We don't have a single observation of the other planets, what are in the habitable zone near the star, what is like our sun. If humanoids would be different than we are, we might not understand them, if they would even want to make contact. Or if they would be similar to us, there is a possibility, that they could be hostile.

In some theories, the humanoids could even act here as European colonialists act in South-America and Polynesia. But we don't have a single officially confirmed attempts to be contacted by aliens, and if we would someday get a message from the other civilization, we must think very carefully, what we will do? Do we answer or play def? And who we would inform at that moment?

Would it be the President Of The United States or would it be the general secretary of the United Nations? And should we tell that thing to a great audience, and how we would guarantee, that some people would not send some "practical joke" to those hypothetical humanoids. And the thing is that every astronomer would want to find another civilization, but at the same time, the thing causes horrible visions about this kind of scenarios.

What if humanoids would take Earth under their control and start to use humans as cattle. Or what if the humanoids would use our planet as the zoo, where other species could observe primitive life forms. That scenario introduced on the Internet, and that brings interesting things in the mind.

The bright star blinds the telescopes when they are searching planets, and if the Earth-sized planet travels at the front of the bright star, the changes of the brightness of that star are so minimum, that it is difficult to notice. The artificial intelligence might search for the planet by observing the changes of brightness, and then if the changes of brightness have sequences, that thing tells, that there is the orbiting planet in that solar system.

That is a thing, what would be a problem if the star is like our sun. If we think about the planet, what has a similar atmosphere with Earth, the orbiting time would be quite long and finding those changes of brightness would need very intensive search and observations of that star, and when the star is very big, there would not be any changes in its trajectory, when it travels through galaxy. This is the reason, why we have found many solar systems what are orbiting the red dwarfs, but we have problems to find planets in the near of the yellow stars.

The solar systems would not cause errors in the specific movement of the star, and that's why we have problems to choose targets for intensive observations. When we are thinking, what we should find near those stars, we must find so-called "favorable Jupiter". That means that if we are looking for small planets near some star, we must find a bigger planet, calculate its mass, and then start to search other planets in the distance of Kepler's radius.

The thing is that we should not look for the copy of Jupiter and if the mass of the planet is two times Jupiter's mass, the distance of the planet must be two times of the distance of Jupiter if we would think, that it might have the same effect, what the Jupiter has in our solar system. And in fact, the red dwarf or some other star would act as the "favorable Jupiter" in that solar system. The planets would form in the Kepler's radius or Lagrange points between the star and "favorable Jupiter".

And at the first is forming a planet, which makes two other Kepler's radius to the star and the "favorable Jupiter. The forming of the solar system is not so easy to explain. And the stars can also pull or rob the planets from other solar systems, while they pass each other. But the "favorable Jupiter", what might be the brown dwarf is telling that there could be planets in that solar system because the object would not send light all the time.

But if that massive object is too heavy, it can turn the entire solar system to orbit it. And this thing has caused the idea of "Pandora", the Earth-size moon, what might orbit some brown dwarf in the habitable zone. But this thing is the topic of some other writing. Here I just wanted to tell, that also the moons of the planets might have living habitats.

If we would find that kind of moon, we might be closer to find another intelligent civilization. But the thing is that if we would find it someday, the Earth would not be the same place anymore. And that thing could be the threat and opportunity at the same time. But the thing is that we should search that species very careful because the situation would turn dangerous.