The mind-altering weapons are not science fiction.

Image: Total News

The mind-altering weapons or “mind-control” weapons are one of the biggest risks in modern life. Those weapons include hallucinogens, subliminal acoustic systems, and other types of systems that control consciousness and brain functions. Those weapons. Those that affect the central nervous system (CNS) are of concern to researchers. And people try to include them in the Hague-Convention, which denies the use of chemical weapons. There are four major types of those weapons. 

1) Chemical agents like heroin, cocaine, fentanyl, LSD, BZ (Substance 78), and other neuro-active components. Most of those chemicals are used in the POW and political prison camps for interrogations. Sometimes sodium amythal, “truth serum,” is also associated with those weapons. 

2) Acoustic systems that send infrasound to the opponents. The subliminal commands will travel straight through the nervous system. And that makes them hard to resist. The infrasound just passes the nervous system's resistance. 

3) Visual systems. Those systems send fast blinking images to the observer. Those images don’t reach consciousness. But in the same way as in subliminal infrasound systems, those signals travel straight through the nervous system’s defence. There is suspicion that those methods are used on some internet pages. 

4) Electromagnetic systems. Those systems are probably under development. They send electromagnetic signals. That affects neurons’ electric carriers. That means those electromagnetic signals send information to neurons. There is a possibility that the electric system. Sends electric impulses to the nervous system. Those systems are modified electric shock systems. That sends EEG-curves. 

To the targeted person’s brain. Those systems can use the recorded EEG. Today. The AI can create those brainwaves synthetically. Those systems can look like jewels. The ring can send those electric impulses to the targeted person's neural systems. So, the brainwasher just gives a ring or a wristwatch. To the victim. And then that system sends those impulses to targets. Or those systems can be in the hat. 

Things like narcotics are used to force people to cooperate with interrogation officials. The person will be turned into a narcotics addict. If they cooperate, they will get drugs. And if they don’t cooperate, they will not get drugs. That method is the classical brainwashing. Called the Pavlov method.  When a controller gets the desired response, the person gets a price. If the response does not please the controller. The person gets punishment. 

The hallucinogen chemicals like LSD and BZ are used to decrease the consciousness level. Sometimes those chemicals are planned to be installed in chemical bombs. Those chemicals give a stun effect. To those bombs. which makes opponents unable to operate.  

“The only time a CNS-acting weapon was used at scale was by the Russian Federation in 2002 to end the Moscow theatre siege. Security forces used fentanyl derivatives to end the siege, in which armed Chechen militants had taken 900 theatregoers hostage.”The Guardian, Mind-altering ‘brain weapons’ no longer only science fiction, say researchers)

Most of the hostages were freed, but more than 120 died from the effects of the chemical agents, and an undetermined number suffered long-term damage or died prematurely.” (The Guardian, Mind-altering ‘brain weapons’ no longer only science fiction, say researchers)

Things like hallucinogens can be used to create fake memories in people’s minds. Those systems can turn people against their former friends. 

Those kinds of methods can be used with virtual reality (VR) systems. But those systems are used in limited areas or for individual people. The acoustic and electromagnetic systems give the ability. To send signals to large groups of people. Those acoustic systems are quite easy to install in loudspeakers. When we think about things like the legendary “Psychotron.” 

"An NYPD LRAD on top of a police humvee outside the 2004 Republican National Convention! (Wikipedia, Long-range acoustic device). The non-lethal systems to control riots' role is to deny radicals from becoming martyrs. Deaths can fuel riots. 

Mind-altering weapons can be used to motivate future soldiers. Those soldiers can use the BCI interface to communicate with other systems. And that brings an idea. To use those systems to give motivation. The BCI systems can also be used for teaching people. And that means. That it is possible. To misuse those systems. The BCI opens the track to the people’s brains. And that offers the possibility. To use those tracks in the “security operations”. The problem with nervous-interacting microchips is in cases. That somebody gets those microchips illegally. There is a possibility that those systems have been hacked. And then they can open the attacker path to the person’s brain. 

Those systems require only the infrasound loudspeaker and radio telephone. Infrasound systems are sometimes. Planned for us in hostage situations. The infrasound that is connected with ultrasound causes nausea to the targeted person. This type of system can be used in the combat area to disturb enemy snipers. Those acoustic systems are also used for interrogations in some countries. 

Those systems are also suitable for Pavlov’s method, created by Ivan Pavlov. That method is called “classical conditioning”. But those systems can disarm dangerous persons. Long-range acoustic devices (LRADs) are meant to save lives. Their purpose is to offer an alternative to batons and rifles. But those systems can be dangerous in the wrong hands. 

And they probably tested by Nazis and in Soviet GULAG camps. The use of those weapons causes headaches. And problems with sleep. This causes suspicion that things like “Havana syndrome” are caused by the use of that kind of weapon. 

When we think of modern technology. The new threat. It is in Brain-Computer Interface ( BCI) systems. Brain-implanted microchips. Make it possible to move paralyzed limbs. But the same system can be used to turn a person into a robot. Modern technology allows the creation of systems. These are far more advanced than some loudspeakers. 

But when we think about modern technology. That opens the road to the more dangerous systems. Nano- and biotechnology allow the creation of new types of CNC weapons. Those weapons can be bacteria or “trained neurons” that transmit information straight into the brain. There is a possibility of creating the nanomachines that seek out the brain shell. 

And then those systems. Start to transmit data to the brain. Those technologies are under development for fixing injuries. Those accidents cause. For people. But the same technology can be extremely dangerous in the wrong hands. The problem is that the same technology can save lives in the cases of violent sieges. 

The imagination is the limit in those cases. In some futuristic models, the entire person will be cloned. And then the politically correct clone replaces the original person. 

https://nypost.com/2025/11/24/science/scientists-issue-wake-up-call-over-mind-altering-brain-weapons/

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2025/nov/22/mind-altering-brain-weapons-no-longer-only-science-fiction-say-researchers

https://totalnews.com/researchers-raise-alarm-about-mind-altering-brain-weapons/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brain%E2%80%93computer_interface

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Havana_syndrome

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ivan_Pavlov

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Long-range_acoustic_device

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/3-Quinuclidinyl_benzilate

Black holes in our solar system

 

Black holes in our solar system

Under this text is a link to an article that is published in the Business Insider magazine. There is writing about the possibility that we have a black hole in our solar system(1).  

There is one very interesting thing Could we have a black hole in our solar system? (2) Could this be possible? When we want to observe black holes, we must realize that we cannot get observations straight from the black hole. We see the disk of material around it, and here I must say, that we see only the radiation, what comes around the black hole. But inside the point, where escaping velocity would across the speed of light we cannot get the observation. 

And that means that we see black holes only when something drops inside them. So if the black hole is orbiting the star in the area, where is not material, that thing would cause that the radiation, what comes from the black hole would be very hard to notice. Or in other scenarios, the material that is dropped in the black hole is pure helium or hydrogen, because the black hole would act similar way with planets, and they will sweep other particles from their trajectory. 

That means that the light particles, that are dropped in the black hole would not send very strong radiation, which is hard to detect from the Earth, because it is sending in the form of X-ray frequency. That weak radiation would be lost in the background radiation. There have been speculations that near our solar system can be the very small black hole, what size would be about basketball. 

But what could form that kind of black hole? The answer would be that the antimatter explosion could form those really small black holes, which can exist about thousands or millions of years. Those periods are extremely short if we are thinking them at the point of view of the ages of stars like the sun. But even if those black holes would vaporize in a short period, that thing will take a very long time, if we compare that thing to the lifetime of a human. 

The vaporization time depends on the things, how much material the black hole can pull inside. And the stars would give the energy to those black holes, which means that the existing time of the small black holes is extremely hard to predict. The vaporization means that sometimes the black holes are losing photons, and what smaller the mass of this supermassive particle goes the loss of photons would increase. 

And sooner or later the black hole has finished its existence. When a black hole is in the space, the black holes cannot get anything to eat, and that means that they cannot get more energy. But if the black hole is near the star, that will feed it with energy, and that kind of thing can increase the lifetime of the black holes, which is extremely small. 

(1)

https://www.businessinsider.com/astrophysicists-found-black-hole-in-solar-system-planet-2019-11?utm_content=buffer194e2&utm_medium=social&utm_source=facebook.com&utm_campaign=buffer&r=US&IR=T

(2)

https://www.livescience.com/tiny-ancient-black-hole-planet-nine.html

Image:

https://www.spaceanswers.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/10/Black-hole-in-Solar-System.jpg

Radial particle accelerator

Radial particle accelerator

Do you know, what is the radial particle accelerator? It is the machine, what is created for material research, and the mission of that system, what looks a little bit like a radial piston engine, what would shoot the ionized material in the central point of that system. So in this multiple accelerator system, the accelerators would be in the form, what is looking like a radial engine. The mission of that system is to use small energy particle accelerators for impacting many ionized atoms together by creating new superheavy elements, what is existed only a couple of nanoseconds.

The idea is that the radial accelerator can shoot more ions at the same point than the normal particle accelerator. This kind of system is sometimes used in fusion experiments. In Sandia laboratories, this kind of system is used for creating so-called impulse fusion. The idea is that the system would shoot those ions together, and at the same time, it would need less energy than Tokamak or torus systems because the ions are pulling each other together.

But the radial accelerators might have history, what people would not usually know. Those systems were planned to use in the hypothetical spacecraft known as "Kosmokrator". The idea of this system is that the normal nuclear reactor would give power to the radial accelerators, which would create superheavy radioactive elements for the motor of that system. This kind of spacecraft would open the road to the entire solar system.

The idea is that by using ionized Uranium, Iron or some other element, the accelerators would shoot those atoms together, and then then the formed element, what would be existed in a couple of nanoseconds would be used as the fuel of the high power reactors. The fusion of iron might seem very impractical because it needs outer energy to sustain, but that would help to create the super heavy and very radioactive elements for high power reactors because the storage of those elements is very difficult, and there is easier to create them by using fusion. But this system is only one theoretical spaceship, which has been created during history.

There is one other remarkable system, where the radial particle accelerator would be useful. During the Cold War, the SDI (Strategic Defense Initiative) defense program some scientists suggested the system, where magnetized plutonium or uranium powder would shoot in the chamber, where would be created the fission reaction. That system would create the most massive particle flow in the space, what people have ever seen. And the thing is that that kind of system could destroy incoming missiles and cause the very strong EMP-pulses to the atmosphere. That ion layer would deny the communication between satellites and clients and EMP pulse can destroy the electronics all over the Earth.

Image
https://www.sandia.gov/news/publications/research_magazine/articles/2017/03/images/z_machine_600.jpg

Could photon captured by quark? And the difference between theory and practical science

Could photon captured by quark? And the difference between theory and practical science

The grand idea of physicists is to create a theory, that contains every particle of the area of physics. And the problem of this thing is that other theories would not find harmony with new theories. The thing is that Einstein's and Newton's theories have conflict, and because of the theory of Special Relativity cannot fit the quantum theory, which means that the world of those people is collapsed. If they cannot create the formula, which contains everything in the Universe, that thing would mean that everything cannot be introducing with mathematics. So this is the problem with theoretical and practical science.

At this point, we must say that Einstein created his famous formula for about ten years. People think that creating some formulas is a very easy job, and they might be really interesting things, but then the mathematical formulas must fit the observations and don't worry, that thing is the most fascinating and at the same time difficult part of science. So what the scientists wait, when they are using some instrument.

Could photon captured inside the quark?

They might wait years the situation, that the photon would impact with another photon or quark in some laser ray, that thing could ever happen, but some people believe that kind of possibility, where photon goes inside the quark like in pocket. The thing would be extremely short projection, where photons would capture inside the quark.  There is a strange theory that photons can merge with other photons or quark. That theory is one of the most fascinating and at the same time unbelievable claim in history. There is not single prove that photons can capture by quark, but if that thing is possible that could revolutionize many things.

The thing what scientist could wait is a theoretical thing, what is called as the photon fusion, there is a little possibility, that the photons can merge, but that reaction cannot even prove. The reason for that theory is that because almost everything in the universe can be impact together, so why photons can merge or quarks, as well as quarks and atoms,  do together, do in the high-energy reactions.

But there is no way that we could prove that thing because for that thing would need the photon or quark, what has extremely high energy, or what comes in the right direction. That thing would prove that photon has mass or there could be some reactions between photons, what we will not know. And the people, who are making those investigations would just in that time cut the electricity off from laser when the suitable photon or quark comes to atmosphere.

That thing would cause this kind of reaction, which is impossible at this moment ever detected. This thing is the most incredible scenario. Just at the moment, when some theories can be proven that the system would turn off in a couple of seconds. But the extremely long laser rays have confirmed the thing, what is called as the gravity wave true.

Gravity waves

LIGO-system has detected those waves at the moment when two black holes have collided and in this kind of case the gravity wave would cause that the laser ray would be flattened like some kind of tube, and that thing would not seem like some kind of seismic action. But for hunting those gravity waves the laser ray must be extremely long, and the length of that laser ray in LIGO is over 3000 kilometers. That distance makes possible to see, how the laser ray would be flattened.

But if we would want to create a more sensitive sensor, we would need longer laser rays. In some scenarios to the edge of the solar system would send two or three probes, where is laser systems. Those lasers would form the sensor, what size is the same as the solar system, and those laser rays could measure weaker gravity waves than any system before it.

About Apollo-program, scientists, and science

About Apollo-program, scientists, and science

We have spent the 50th. anniversary of the moonwalk and that thig would bring in the front of our eyes visions what are full of the most impressive images of the rockets, what are 110 meters long, and the landing crafts what are flying over the strange landscape. TV and today the internet are full of images of the impressive moonwalk, and impressive technology behind that thing and the Moon mission was a very good image for NASA and other kinds of organizations.

But when we are thinking about science, scientists, researchers, and developers, what are making science and machines every day, we are facing the thing that their work is not very impressive, if we would look at those people, while they are working. When we are thinking impressive science, we might think would Darwin's theory of evolution be so popular, if that man would make his invention about the advancing of the species in Great Britain in his backyard? The "Beagle" ship made Darwin's journey around the world very interesting, and the findings, what that man did in the Galapagos islands very interesting.

We have forgotten that probably Darwin would get the same results by researching the flowers and bugs like earwigs in his home yard. When we are looking at the impression, what things like Apollo-program made, when Neil Armstrong put his steps on the Moon, we might forget that the thing, what Armstrong made was to bringing some stones and dust to the Earth. 

That thing was very good for laboratories, but we have forgotten that the unmanned probes would do the same thing, and bring similar samples to Earth. And the thing is that those probes would not risk human lives. The risk is the thing, what makes explorations impressive. If we would send the robot to another planet, there is no drama, if the mission fails.

 But when we are thinking about explorations to the jungles, we ever hear those people, who are at least so brave as Neil Armstrong was, except if those explorers would be missing in the jungle. In the jungle, those explorers might be eaten by some snake, but the thing is that they are traveling to their operational area by using DC-3 or some jeep, and that is not very impressive. That's why nobody even sees the lifting off those jungle researchers. But everybody saw the lift-off of the giant Saturn-V rocket in Cape Canaveral.

When we are thinking about people, who are selecting the career as the scientists, we are facing the thing, that those people have very little attention in their private life. If we would observe people like Cosmologists in their work, we would see people, who are writing something on the paper, or who would use some laptop computer and write something. And that thing is not very impressive.

That's why we would not respect those people because they are not using CAD-programs or make some computer software. When people are talking about the influential professions they are always mentioned people like computer programmers, because they are writing some nice codes, what are collecting data from some large areas. 

But has anyone mention persons like conference translators or other language scientists as influential professionals. In almost every publication is mentioned how poor salaries the humanists would get in comparison to engineers. This is the problem with the people like translators, and then we forget to ask, what is the salary of archeologists and egyptologists? Do those persons ever get salaries?

And if they are not getting salaries, how they would live? Then we are facing the fact, that somehow we don't respect people, who are translating other languages, and things like words, what are written by some rock artist. Have we ever ask a single thing about the work of those people? Or have we ever asked things, what people like the translator of the sign language must handle?

I think that we ever spend a single thought about those kinds of people when we are looking at some document of science, or actually, those documents are almost every time made to handle the scientific instruments. The thing is that things like web-cameras and message solutions are vital systems for deaf people when they are wanted to communicate with other people. This kind of things is really interesting to think when we are going out and talk about Neil Armstrong and other interesting people.