Gravastars and the matrioshka universe.

“An expanding mini-universe could counterbalance the collapsing matter of a star, thereby creating a stable gravastar. Credit: Daniel Jampolski and Luciano Rezzolla, Goethe University Frankfurt” (ScitechDaily, Scientists Say a New Universe Could Form Inside a Dying Star)

“A new study suggests that the collapse of a massive star could spark the creation of a tiny expanding universe rather than a black hole. The resulting object, called a gravastar, would avoid the singularity and event horizon that make black holes so puzzling.” (ScitechDaily, Scientists Say a New Universe Could Form Inside a Dying Star)

The hole in the Higgs field. It denies the gravitational interaction between the center. And  its environment. The gravastar forms when an exploding star. It will form the shell. All the mass of the star is in that shell. And that makes. The symmetrical gravitational pull inside that star. This thing can even rip a hole in the Higgs field. 

And that means. It's possible that there is no Higgs field at some point. Even a small mass around that bubble can keep that structure stable. The idea is that the entire mass of the structure is around that bubble. 

This means that the black holes can be multiple independent phenomena. The idea of gravastars is this: When a star. It is far more massive than. The Betelgeuse or red supergiant. It falls as a supergiant. When its energy production ends. But that causes a situation in the falling star’s fusion restarts again. The star packs material into its core. And that causes such a strong energy burst that the matter will be erased. The powerful radiation rips the star into pieces. And if that matter spreads too far. That denies the possibility. That gravity. It cannot pull that nebula back together. 

A black hole forms after the supernova explosion when gravity pulls matter back together. But if the radiation that the explosion forms is too powerful. That thing can rip a hole into the Higgs field. The Higgs field is the base energy field in the universe. That field carries gravitational waves. Or, gravity waves are a wave movement in that field. And without that field, there is no gravity. If there is no Higgs field. There. The gravitational center cannot touch. That thing denies gravitational interaction between the center and the environment. 

“A diagram comparing the structure of a classical black hole with a gravastar.” (Wikipedia, A diagram comparing the structure of a classical black hole with a gravastar.)

Can there be other universes inside our universe? 

A gravitational wave is like a ditch that travels through the universe. The energy hill between those ditches always turns lower. The reason for that is the expansion of the universe. When. The energy ditch. Or a lower energy point in the Higgs field impact object. The energy hill behind that energy ditch pushes objects into that energy ditch. The most reasonable reason. For why does gravity act only in one direction? 

It is in the universe’s expansion. When the universe expands. That turns the Higgs field weaker. This means that the energy hills between gravity waves are always lower. And because of the energy hill behind the object. What we look at from the gravity center is always higher. Than. The next one. That means that energy hills behind objects push particles into the gravitational center. This means that later energy hills. Between those energy ditches. always turn out to be lower. And that raises a question. Could there be two kinds of gravitational effects? The long-distance wave effect. 

And the short-distance effect. There. A fast-spinning object. Roll quantum fields around them. And then there is a question: can there be gravitational vacuums in the universe? The idea is that the Higgs field is that. The Higgs field delivers gravitational waves. Or, gravitation is a phenomenon that uses the Higgs field  as a transporter. So if there is a hole in the Higgs field. Or base-energy field in the universe. There is no gravity at that point. Because of that. The gravitational wave motion. It  cannot reach objects inside those bubbles. 

When an ultra-heavy star dies, it can form a structure that is weirder than a black hole. The object is called a gravastar. Or, a gravitational vacuum star. The idea is that. When the supernova explosion is strong enough. That thing can form a situation. There. In the gravitational field. Or, in the Higgs field, forms a bubble. If there is no Higgs field. There is no gravity. And that means there forms a gravitational vacuum. There is no gravitation at all. 

The gravastar is hard to detect. Or it doesn’t differ much in black holes. So, the gravastar might look like a black hole. When we think about the supernova explosions. Those violent events destroy entropy. And that means that. At that point. The speed of light is higher than the speed of light around it. So when the supernova explosion sends particles that travel behind the shockwave. ‘

Those particles travel faster than they could travel outside that shockwave. When particles reach that plasma wave. They release energy into that thing.  The plasma shockwave travels behind the radiation. And the scattering effect is strongest. Radiation. The explosion pushes material out from the star. And if the explosion is strong enough. And it forms at the point. That is small enough. That can destroy a star in its way. That the black hole will not form. 

The matrioshka universe means a universe. That is full of internal structures. This means that the universe is like a matryoshka doll. Full of internal universes. And maybe we. Or the universe that we know. It is part of some larger universe. 

But the idea of the universe. That form in the giant star explosion base. It is in the wave-particle duality. When a shockwave travels out from the supernova. It travels through the base energy field. This event forms energy whirls behind that shockwave. 

And this causes a situation. There, those energy whirls start to crystallize into particles. This is one version of the models and hypotheses that suggest that we are living in a black hole. This theory suggests that we are in a black hole. That could be inside other black holes. But the problem is: why can't we see those other universes? The answer. It is suggested that the black hole’s event horizon mixes the information in the form. That we cannot detect. 

https://scitechdaily.com/scientists-say-a-new-universe-could-form-inside-a-dying-star/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gravastar

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Higgs_field_(classical)

Black holes, fractals, and G-field interaction.

    Black holes, fractals, and G-field interaction. 

"Illustration of two novel theories exploring dark matter origins through a mirror world and early universe horizon." (Rude Baguette, “Dark Matter May Come From A Mirror World”: Bold Theories Suggest Hidden Twin Universe And Particle Factory At The Edge Of The Young Cosmos)

There is a possibility that some conditions in black holes are similar to those in a hypothetical anti-universe. That means black holes can be the source of dark matter. But if that is true. That model requires. There is a small anti-universe, or an anti-universe-like space, in every black hole. And if the only thing that differs between the anti-universe and our universe is the direction of time, that means there can be a small anti-universe in the black holes. Time travels in the opposite direction in black holes. So, maybe there are anti-universe-type conditions, and maybe. Some part of dark matter, or mysterious gravitational effects, forms in black holes. 

The new interesting theory about the origin of dark matter in the anti-universe requires more thinking. The thing is that the dark matter formed in the anti-universe is somehow utopian. However, theoretically, there could be anti-universes or structures that behave like an anti-universe within our universe. Those places are black holes. Behind the event horizon, time should move backward. And that thing can form a small-sized mini-universe in the black hole. 

The problem is how those weakly interacting massive particles, WIMPs, hypothetical dark matter particles, can escape from the black holes? The black hole vaporization can cause those particles to escape from the black hole. All black holes are losing mass. During that thing, the black hole sends gravitational waves. So, there is a possibility. The gravitational waves form when hypothetical gravitons are left outside the event horizon. When a black hole loses its mass. The event horizon withdraws, and that causes particles like gravitons to be left outside it. 

Another way to think about the black hole vaporization is to think of the black hole as a whirl. That while it always interacts with its environment, as all other whirls do. That whirl causes friction in the medium between the whirl's internal and outside structure. That means the contact between those whirls and the outside environment causes small whirls that steal energy from the higher energy space or field. 

Above: A Fractal can introduce a model of how a black hole, or the whirl in the Gravity, or G-field, creates other whirls around it. When it interacts with the outside G-field. 

The idea is that. The G-field makes a whirl when it impacts with another G-field that moves in another direction. In the same way, water forms whirls into the points where water flows in opposite directions. 

So, if we think that time is also like wave movement, the time that moves backward behind the event horizon can form a whirl in time or 4th. Dimension in the point where time moves forward and backward. And that point is the black hole event horizon. 

When escape velocity turns higher than the speed of light. That means time turns to travel backwards. 

At the point where escape velocity reaches the speed of light, time stops. And then the time starts to travel in the opposite direction when escape velocity turns higher than the speed of light. So, there should be some kind of whirl in time. 

And if we think that a black hole is like a time arrow that moves back in time, that means it should push particles around it forward in time faster than otherwise. That means if we use the time arrow model for that case, the particle near the black hole's event horizon should turn "very light" so that it can fall to the future. That means the time arrow, or the arrow of time, should push particles in the opposite direction when it travels through the spacetime. But that is only a philosophical expansion of that model. 

In the black hole case, the whirl is like in a G-field. That whirl interacts with the G-field that is outside that black hole or dense gravity, or the G-field whirl. When those environments touch each other, that forms a whirl. And that means the event horizon is full of whirls that are lying. The whirl's center is horizontal to the event horizon. And they can drive energy out from a black hole.

In some other models, the event horizon is a layer that seems to be full of photons. Those photons might make it seem like a ball, made of car tyres. That means the gravitons can escape from the middle of those photons. Or they can send gravitational waves to gravitons outside the event horizon. The event horizon can also send whirls inside the event horizon, and that forms entropy in the black hole. 

The idea is that the G-field is an independent energy field. That G-field forms from gravity waves. In black holes, the G-field has a higher energy level than the G-field outside the black hole. That means the G-field travels outside the black hole. The G-field is one of the fields of four fundamental forces. Those forces are gravity, weak, and strong nuclear interactions. And electromagnetism. 

Those fields are independently interacting substances. And that means G-field can rise to a very high energy level, and that doesn't mean that other fields must rise their energy level. But if the G-field is at a very high energy level. Or its density is so high that it can push other fields from around it. In the same way, if the G-field spins fast enough, that thing doesn't let other fields in it. 

The whirl interacts like a wheel that lets material and wave movement travel through the black hole. There could be a superstring or energy string that travels through the center of the whirl. But then. Those whirls are pumping energy out from the black hole. The black hole can also form whirls that can separate from the event horizon. Those whirls are like small kugelblitz-black holes. There is a possibility. Those whirls just explode immediately after they separate from the event horizon. 

https://www.rudebaguette.com/en/2025/08/dark-matter-may-come-from-a-mirror-world-bold-theories-suggest-hidden-twin-universe-and-particle-factory-at-the-edge-of-the-young-cosmos/

https://scitechdaily.com/two-wild-new-theories-could-finally-explain-dark-matter/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arrow_of_time

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dark_matter

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gravitational_wave

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Graviton

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Weakly_interacting_massive_particle

The holographic principle and parallel universe.

"The holographic principle is a property of string theories and a supposed property of quantum gravity that states that the description of a volume of space can be thought of as encoded on a lower-dimensional boundary to the region – such as a light-like boundary like a gravitational horizon." (Wikipedia, Holographic principle)

The holographic principle means that the Universe can be a hologram. The idea is that the crossing energy, or superstrings can cause a scattering effect. That effect breaks those strings into pieces. And then material forms in those points where those strings impact with each other. The thing that causes impacts of those superstrings is the expansion of superstrings. The interesting detail in the holographic principle is that this thing means that photons can turn into quarks. 

Then the holographic principle causes an idea that making those photon clouds denser and shooting light waves crossing each other is a possibility to form material. This model means wave-particle duality, WMD. Wave movement can form material and material can turn into wave movement. And the material is only the reflection, an ultra-dense hologram. The model is that the light beams that crossed each other formed the first particles. When we think that time is the only real thing in the universe and the superstring expands all the time, that thing explains why entropy grows all the time. 

The thing that makes parallel universe theory along with the WMD  one of the most interesting models that we can even imagine. The idea is that new universes can form in the points between those universes where radiation that comes from them touches each other. If radiation that comes from another universe is very weak radiation that comes from our universe pushes that radiation away from our universe. If that radiation slides at the edge of our universe’s plasma and photon halo that means we cannot see that radiation. Same way as the heliosphere turns off much of the radiation and plasma that comes from other stars, our galaxy’s halo and the edge of the universe will push weak signals away. If there are other universes there should be similar plasma impact waves that surround our solar system and our galaxy. 

The thing is this: There is evidence against and supporting parallel- or multiverse. The main thing is that there is not enough evidence of that model. The parallel- and multiverse are not the same thing. A parallel universe means that other universes will be in extra dimensions. And the multiverse means that those universes are in 3D spacetime with our universe. 

The model of holographic principle where crossing superstrings forms “electric arcs” that form universes and material. 

**********************************************************************

The evidence that supports and against the multiverse. 

-Cosmic microwave background radiation anomalies: Scientists studying the afterglow of the Big Bang have found strange patterns in space that some believe could be caused by another universe bumping into ours.

-Quantum mechanics experiments: The famous double-slit experiment showed that tiny particles can exist in multiple states at once, which could support the idea of a multiverse.

-Déjà vu and strange phenomena: Some people think that feelings of déjà vu or ghostly encounters could be glimpses of other realities. While this isn’t scientific proof, it’s still a fun idea!

Arguments Against Parallel Universes

-Here are some assumptions that suggest that parallel universes do not exist:

-Lack of direct evidence: So far, we haven’t been able to see or measure parallel universes, making them impossible to confirm.

-Testability issues: For something to be considered scientific, we need to be able to test it. Right now, the idea of a multiverse is more of a theory than a proven fact.

https://scienceandspacenews.com/2025/02/07/are-other-dimensions-real/

**********************************************************************

The parallel universe theory where the Big Bang was only one of many similar cases explains things like exotic particles as their source is in some other universe. If we want to make theories about the beginning of space and time we face one thing. The parallel universe theory is only an extension of the Big Bang Theory. If the universe where we live is only one of many universes that doesn’t answer the question of eternal entirety where universes exist and were formed. 

The eternal entirety is the place where the universes form the bubbles or quantum systems where there can be planets but in some universes, there might not be planets or stars. The problem is to prove that theory is in the stars in our universe. Same way as city lights cause light pollution, galaxies, and other objects cause light pollution, if we want to see things outside our universe we must remove all light that covers that very weak radiation that could uncover other universes' existence.

Logically other universes exist like galaxies, and galaxies form local galaxy clusters. Local galaxy clusters form galactic superclusters. So we can say that the universe is the global galaxy cluster that is part of a larger entirety. But then we can ask can we still see everything? The parallel universe is the next logical step to the model that expands all the time. We know many new details about the universe. The multiverse is a simple thing that is hard to prove. But then we can remember. How our worldview increases. 

Before Nicolaus Copernikus people believed that the Earth was the center of the universe. Then Galileo Galilei proved that four moons orbiting Jupiter. After that Hubble proved that the Milky Way is only one of billions of galaxies. Then astronomers found local and superclusters of galaxies. The next thing that astronomers found was the “cosmic web” the largest known megastructure in the universe. And then the new step would be the parallel universe. 

Another universe can exist in our universe, places like black holes. Or it can exist outside our universe. It can form visible or dark matter. And in theory, their time can travel backward. Those universes are things that can be proven in the future. The problem is that the universe covers radiation that comes from other universes if they exist.  The other problem is that we live in a galaxy. Galaxies are ultimately massive objects. They pull dark and visible material around them as halos. 

Those halos form light pollution that the dimmest light cannot pass. The other problem with that thing is that the material between galaxies can be thinner than nobody expected. And if we continue that induction thinking we can think that quantum fields and material between hypothetical multiverse universes is much more thin than nobody even imagined. That means radiation from other universes can be much weaker than we even imagine. 

. 

https://bigthink.com/starts-with-a-bang/evidence-parallel-universe/

https://phys.org/news/2025-05-bridging-worlds-physicists-holographic-principle.html

https://phys.org/news/2025-06-theory-dimensions-space-secondary-effect.html

https://scitechdaily.com/is-the-universe-a-hologram-schrodingers-100-year-old-equation-still-holds-the-key/

https://scienceandspacenews.com/2025/02/07/are-other-dimensions-real/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Multiverse

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/String_theory

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wave%E2%80%93particle_duality

The new theory suggests that time is the only thing in the universe.

When the universe expands. The quantum fields inside it turn weaker. That causes energy to flow from the material. There is the possibility to deny that energy flow if something pulls the same energy dose to a particle that is left from its environment. That compensates for energy flow out from the particle. When energy travels into the particle it turns younger. When energy travels out of a particle. It makes it older. If we compensate for energy flow out from particles that raise the energy level difference between the particle and its environment. That causes situations where energy travels faster out from particles when energy pumping stops. And that thing destroys the material. 

We can stop time in particles if we can keep their energy level the same. As you can read from above, that happens by compensating the environment's energy level decrease by pumping as much energy in the particle as lost from its environment. Because energy travels to a lower energy level the energy pump denies particles from sending wave movement. That means when the expansion of the universe decreases the energy level of the quantum field the particle must get the same energy dose from somewhere. There is the possibility that the ball-shaped chamber. Where the system can pump as much energy as lost from its environment and can store the data in quantum mode forever. 

Sometimes we compare time to path. But the problem is that time moves. The expansion of the universe causes a situation where material vaporizes, or turns into wave movement. However, we must also realize that the expansion of the universe is not as easy to model as researchers initially thought. There are theories about cosmic fluid. That means all galaxy superclusters are going in the same direction. And if that is true galaxies and galactic superclusters orbit the same point, the hypothetical center of the universe. 

The other thing is that researchers found the missing material. Most visible and dark materials are in halos around galaxies. But sometimes that material escapes from galaxies. The relativistic jet of the supermassive black holes pushes material out from the galaxy. Same way other galaxies or their black holes steal material from larger galaxies. Black holes do not only pull material in it. Their radiation from the transition disk and relativistic jet push material away. In the same way, radiation from galaxies can also push material clouds from around it. 

Material is not spread homogeneously in the universe. Things like particles are only compressed forms of energy. The material is spread into the cosmic web. 

There is a new theory about 3D time. The idea is taken from some versions of string theory. The idea is that time can basically move only in one direction. When time moves forward that causes expansion in the superstrings and that causes the “electric arcs” that we think of as “Big Bangs”. The key element in those models is that there can be multiple universes and spaces or states of wave movement internally. 

This is one of the things that makes the time an interesting thing. There can be universes where time travels backward. The idea is that those other, still hypothetical universes can pull material or energy into them. And then if that really happens and those other universes don’t expand that means energy density, or energy level in those universes rise. And then that means material turns younger in those other, still hypothetical universes. 

The new theory says that time has three axles. (X, Y, Z) like in space. Time is like a tube where the roof is the top of the “Y”-axle. The bottom of the Y axle is the bottom of the tube. The tube expands all the time. And that causes material vaporization or turning into wave movement. That causes quantum fog or photon clouds. That prevents us from seeing the future and limits our possibility to see the past. 

But time is the force. Where all other events and phenomena happen. The past and future, or X-axle time are quite easy to understand. But Y and Z axle times are harder to understand. That means there can be “up” and “down” time. Those “up” and “down” times are energy maximum and energy minimum. 

If that thing is possible that makes time travel or information teleportation back in time “easier than we thought”. Making that thing can happen by going in “up” or “down” time. How can we describe that thing? Maybe we can say that time is like a river. The surface of the river is the “up” time. And the bottom of the river is “down” time.  When material travels in time it releases wave movement. And that thing causes a scattering effect. When material releases energy or wave movement that thing denies energy flow against the time. There are also whirls in time. In those whirls that we see as black holes, time can move backward. 

And flow near shores are the “edges of the time”. So how can we put information travel back in time? How to swim against the flow? We must go to places where time moves slower. If we want to travel back to flow we must not try from the middle of the flow. We must try to be near the bottom or near the shores. In those points, river flow is as slow as possible. When we travel to the energy minimum the energy flow from the material is as slow as possible. 

https://www.esa.int/Science_Exploration/Space_Science/XMM-Newton/The_models_were_right_astronomers_find_missing_matter

https://phys.org/news/2025-06-theory-dimensions-space-secondary-effect.html

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brane

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Multiverse

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/String_theory

The mind-blowing multiverse theory. Is our universe one of the many?

 The mind-blowing multiverse theory. Is our universe one of the many?

Normally, the term universe means the formation where all the material and energy that we know exists. The question is could there be another universe? The fact is "yes". But the existence of those other universes is harder to prove. 

The main reason why the existence of those other universes is hard to prove is light pollution. Galaxies and stars in our universe cover those other universes. But there is another thing, that can make those other universes hard to detect. 

When radiation leaves the universe it travels into cosmic void. That void or cosmic vacuum is deeper than Boötes void. And in that emptiness, the wave movement changes its form. In a normal universe, wave movement jumps between ions. When wave movement hits ions or atoms it adjusts them to a higher energy level. 

When energy stress ends, and the particle's energy level turns higher than its environment it sends wave movement. In the cosmic void between our universe and hypothetical other universes are no ions or atoms or there could be so-called dark matter. But the thing is that there is no visible material that can resonate. 

"Is our universe on of many? Do universes pop up as bubbles from a multiverse?" (ScitechDaily.com/The Mind-Bending Multiverse: Our Universe Is Suspiciously Unlikely To Exist – Unless It Is One of Many)

So there is only wave movement or superstrings that can travel through that cosmic void. And the cosmic void may pull that wave movement to the tape-looking straight structure. 

The multiverse is a theory, that introduces our universe as one of the many universes. The idea in multiverse theory is that there are always events like the Big Bang in space, where our universe or all material and energy that we know exists. The multiverse is almost the same as the parallel universe. 

But the difference between multiverse and parallel universe theories is that in multiverse theory, other universes are in the same spacetime as our universe. The parallel universe means that other universes are at higher energy levels than our universe, or the universe where we live.  

Even if those other universes' particles are precisely the same as in our universe exchange of information is difficult if the other universe is "born" at a different time. 

The origin of multiverse theory is dark energy. The multiverse theory explains that dark energy and at least part of dark matter's origin is in other universes. In that model energy level of those universes is different than in our universe, and that thing means that even if elementary particles in those universes are the same as in our universe it's very hard to see those other universes if the size or energy level of elementary particles is different than in our universe. 

The thing that makes this thing interesting is this. If we think that the other universe is precisely the same as our universe but it's formed before our universe its energy level would be lower than in our universe. That means the radiation that comes from that elder universe cannot reach our universe.  

But if another universe is younger its energy level is higher than our universe. But also particle's size in that hypothetical younger universe is different. That means the other universe will send radiation that has too short a wavelength that we can see that radiation. In the case of identical universes. They could form standing waves between universes. And those standing waves make those other universes hard to detect. 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bo%C3%B6tes_Void

The multiverse and the idea behind that

"There is no empirical, scientific evidence for the multiverse"

BigThink.com

Image 1:)"Concept of a twin universe, with the beginning (of time) in the middle". (Wikipedia/Multiverse). If the Schwinger effect forms the universe, it would make two universes. This requires the Big Bang was one great Schwinger effect. If that is true there are two universes. 

The Schwinger-effect forms two particles. Those particles are particles and its antiparticle. On a macro-scale, that means the Big Bang formed the universe where we are living and antiuniverse. That hypothetical antiuniverse formed of antimatter. 

There is no physical proof of a multiverse. Theory and philosophy about that multiverse, are based on logical thinking. When we first saw that the Milky Way is only one galaxy in a large group of galaxies. When researchers are finding larger, and larger cosmic megastructure structures like the cosmic web. 

The next logical step is the existence of another universe. And maybe universes are forming similar giant structures like galaxies and galaxy groups. The idea of a multiverse is that the universe is the result of the Big Bang. And there is a possibility that there are other Big Bangs. 

There is the possibility that even if those other universes exist. We ever can see them. The Big Bang was the case when the elementary particles got their form and wave motion got its wavelength. So the universe got its form. And if things like the size of quarks are different or the margin between the lowest and highest temperatures in that hypothetical universe is different than in our universe, we cannot see that in another universe. 

If the absolute zero temperature in another universe is different than our universe's zero Kelvin, that other universe remains dark. The idea of this is that the material that forms another universe sends radiation with a wavelength that is impossible to see. And the shorter way to say that thing is that another universe forms dark matter. 

There are theories that dark matter can form similar structures with visible material. So, if another universe forms of dark matter that means it's impossible to see. Detection of dark matter structures happens by using gravitational lensing. In that model, researchers are looking for a point that affects the trajectory of photons. 

But that method requires that there is the light that comes behind that object. The fact is that even if the hypothetical universe forms of visible material. The brightness of our universe's stars covers light.  That comes from other universes below their shine. And, that makes it very difficult to detect other universes. 

Image 2:) "The local geometry of the universe is determined by whether the density parameter Ω is greater than, less than, or equal to 1.

From top to bottom: a spherical universe with Ω > 1, a hyperbolic universe with Ω < 1, and a flat universe with Ω = 1. These depictions of two-dimensional surfaces are merely easily visualizable analogs to the 3-dimensional structure of (local) space". (Wikipedia/Shape of the universe)

Was the Big Bang some kind of Schwinger effect? 

The Schwinger effect is one of the most interesting things in the universe and cosmology. The term "Schwinger effect" means that the magnetic field is turning into particles. When magnetic fields turn to particles in the Schwinger effect. That effect forms two particles, a particle, and its antiparticle. 

If the Big Bang was some kind of Schwinger effect. That thing could form two universes. The universe where we are living, and another Universe called the antiuniverse. The antiuniverse means a universe that is formed of antimatter. In that universe, time moves in the same direction as it travels in our universe. And the only different thing is that the material forms that hypothetical universe is antimatter. 

When we look at image 2. And the universe's possible geometrical forms. There is one thing that we must realize if the universe is flat, there is the possibility that the Schwinger effect formed it. The ball-shaped or spherical universe doesn't require the Schwinger effect. The thing is that there is a 2/3 possibility that the universe is flat. That thing means that the universe is "open". 

And it expands forever. But if the universe is a ball or spherical it will collapse. The theory of the phoenix universe where the universe forms again require a ball-shaped universe. But if the universe is flat or hyperbolic that means there is the possibility that the Schwinger effect formed that universe. 

https://bigthink.com/13-8/multiverse-no-evidence/

https://www.nationalgeographic.com/science/article/what-is-the-multiverse

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shape_of_the_universe

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Schwinger_effect

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ultimate_fate_of_the_universe

Image 1:) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Multiverse

Image 2:) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shape_of_the_universe

https://artificialintelligenceandindividuals.blogspot.com/

Can any particle travel between universes?

Can any particle travel between universes?

If the multiverse theory would be true, and there are other universes, we might ask a one really interesting question, and that is: could object travel between universes. So when we are thinking about the edge of the universe, we might use the term "solid", if any object than a photon can cross that line. 

The thing is that if some object wants to travel across the border of the universe, that thing would need so much energy, that we cannot ever imagine that thing. The object must win the gravity of the entire universe, which means that it would pull the particles back with the power of all galaxies and dark matter particles, and that means that the gravity level, what it must win is so huge, that we ever cannot imagine that thing. 

The form of the universe is a very interesting thing to think, and when we are thinking about multiverse theory, that theory has brought many things in the mind of the theorists. One of the most interesting questions is can the light or some object across the line, what is called "the edge of the universe"? 

In this case, we might ask, is the layer of the universe solid or is it something else? And then we might start to define, what the world "solid" means at this time. If we are thinking that the edge of the universe is the point, where our universes domination ends, and after that point, the gravity of our universe would not pull objects back, we might think the possibility, that could some object travel to another universe, if the supernova blows in that border? 

In this case, the word "solid" means that nothing can go across that line, which is the shockwave of the Big Bang. And why we are interested in the edge of the universe? The thing is that the first formed stars would find at that layer. And this thing makes the location of the Big Bang very interesting. If we find the location of that object, we might define the distance of our solar system to that location. 

So if we would find the galaxies or black holes that are farther from that location, that means that that object is forming before our solar system. And how simple this kind of thing seems in the paper. But we know that there is a big difference between practical solutions and theories. In this example, I started to write that the speed of galaxies is stable, and all galaxies are traveling at the same speed. 

But we have forgotten that there is a possibility that there are galaxies, which are formed of dark mater or gas and dust. Those giant disks would have gravity but there would be no stars at all. And that means those objects would pull the other galaxies faster than others, which means that the galaxies would not travel with the same speed, and this means that in the practical world only the very big distances means that some galaxy is older than some other galaxy. 

So can the object travel between universes?

If wormholes or "Einstein-Rosen bridges" (1) are real, the meteorite or asteroid could travel between universes. Can the energy of the supermassive black holes, what are oscillating with the same frequency be so powerful that the Einstein-Rosen bridge or wormhole would be forming between those objects, what are in different universes? And that means that there is a possibility that the object, what is formed of antimatter can travel to our universe or even in our solar system. There is a hypothesis that some supernova explosions are caused by antimaterial, what impacts with stars or planets. 

But can object make that journey without wormholes? This thing is a really interesting question. The journey between universes would take so long time, that the neutrons of the atoms would start to break, which means that the material stops its existence. And that means that if some particle would slip to another universe, that would be meanless to the things in another universe.  

(1)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wormhole

Image:

https://miro.medium.com/max/2700/1*QS59aHuIEgJoIogixOJ32w.jpeg