The new theory about the 7-dimensional black hole structure tries to solve the black hole’s information paradox.

“Researchers propose that extra-dimensional spacetime torsion prevents black holes from fully evaporating, leaving remnants that preserve quantum information. Credit: SciTechDaily.com” (ScitechDaily, New 7-Dimensional Theory May Finally Solve the Black Hole Information Paradox)

What if back holes ever completely evaporate? The new 7-dimensional model, or theory, suggests that the black hole will not completely disappear. That could solve the black hole information paradox. But. That model causes an idea. That's what the black hole’s core, the singularity, is not solid. What if. It's the cluster of multiple densely packed black holes. If there is an empty space between those black holes. That explains the gravitational waves.  It can have an origin in the structures between those black holes. This model tries to explain the structure of black holes as the strings that form between densely packed black holes. Those black holes turn those strings into torsion. And we might call that structure a torsion structure. 

In that model. The form of the black hole is 7-dimensional torsion. The model is like the yarn ball model. But the structure of that thing is more complicated than a simple yarn ball; there, the information swirls around the black hole's center. In this new model, the torsion forms the confused form of those torsions. Those torsions could be the confused superstrings. And this means that the torsion structure remains in the universe, even if the black hole disappears. 

“Example of torsion mechanics” (Wikipedia, Torsion). The black hole pair turns the superstring like this. 

Energy or information that travels in those torsions. Can act. Like a thermal pump. That structure binds quantum fields into it. And that forms the gravitational pull. But could that torsion form between black holes in the massive event horizon and the gravity field? And the new question is: could that form in large-scale systems? That means that. Those torsions. They could explain the cosmic web. In that model. The comic web, or cosmic filament, forms in torsions. That connects the supermassive black holes together. 

“Unifying black hole stability and elementary particle mass via 7D geometry. Schematic illustration of the framework presented in the 7-dimensional Einstein-Cartan theory on a G2​-manifold with torsion. The left panel shows the 7D G2​-manifold torsion knot. Geometric torsion generates a repulsive force at Planck densities (central inset), stabilizing a black hole remnant.” (ScitechDaily,New 7-Dimensional Theory May Finally Solve the Black Hole Information Paradox)

Through dimensional reduction, the torsion vacuum expectation value is identified with the electroweak scale (≈246 GeV), naturally providing the Higgs field vacuum expectation value (VEV) and enabling elementary particles to acquire mass in 4D spacetime. Credit: Institute of Experimental Physics SAS” (ScitechDaily,New 7-Dimensional Theory May Finally Solve the Black Hole Information Paradox)

This causes another idea. If a black hole does not vanish. That could mean. That. The black hole remnants can form another universe after the universe disappears in the Big Freeze. The black hole will not destroy information anyway. It changes the form of information. That means it pulls the information. Or superstrings. That carries information in a straight form. Or the form of those strings is not completely straight. That means there are “holes” in the black hole structure. The superstrings are like tornadoes in the quantum fields. Have quantum vacuums inside them. In the black hole’s extreme conditions, those superstrings can connect them to other superstrings. And that forms the confused structure. Energy travels in the complex network of energy tunnels. When. We are looking. At the model of the 7D torsion. 

We might think. The structure looks like an electron shell. Of the atoms. This causes an idea. That may be electron positions in its orbital because there is some kind of tunnel at that point. This tunnel. Or some kind of lower energy point. Anchors the electron in its trajectory. So could the theory of the quantum-sized black holes be true? There is also a possibility that the black hole’s singularity is not in a solid form. What if it's the structure of the many black holes? In that model. The black hole cluster looks like an atom. There could be multiple smaller gravitational centers in the ultimate dense form of the singularity. Even if the singularity, the core of the black hole, seems solid from outside. That model means that there could be some kind of space between those structures. That means that there is a possibility that a black hole’s core can have some kind of quakes. 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Torsion_(mechanics)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ultimate_fate_of_the_universe

Does dark energy exist?

"The universe’s accelerating expansion is usually attributed to an unseen force called dark energy. New research proposes that a deeper understanding of gravity and spacetime geometry might explain this behavior without invoking such a mystery. Credit: SciTechDaily.com" (ScitechDaily, What if Dark Energy Doesn’t Exist? New Theory Could Rewrite Cosmic Expansion)

There are two types of energy, or quantum fields, in the universe. The local fields that surround galaxies and other gravity centers. And the global fields. These are sometimes called Higgs fields. Those fields are the base energy fields in the universe. Global fields exist in space between galaxy clusters. And they determine the minimum energy level in the universe. The expansion of the universe affects the global field more strongly than the local fields. The local field is like a bubble. That form is when energy and matter are. Pack around gravity centers. 

Like. Galaxies and black holes. Because those gravitational centers pull energy around them, the particle evaporation, or quantum evaporation, is slower around those gravity centers. When particles outside those local fields turn energy. Or wave movement faster than particles in the local fields. It can cause an effect that we cannot see. That evaporation form. When quantum fields turn weaker. Energy. 

That comes from the global field pushing local fields and turning their geometry. That quantum wind forms energy shadows that move objects inside those fields. So. When that energy hits the quantum field around the galaxy clusters. It. Forms a similar halo. The sun forms near Earth. The energy of those objects with the minimum energy level. It is not very strong, but there are lots of those objects. Far more. Than in the galaxy clusters. This means that the local fields around galaxies don’t let that energy come through them. 

The local fields are complex internal bubbles that surround stars, star clusters, galaxies, local galaxy clusters, and galaxy superclusters. Those fields make it hard to detect radiation that comes from the space between galaxy superclusters. So that energy can push the galaxy's halo. The halo around galaxies is far heavier. Than. A galaxy. When that halo moves, the galaxy in it moves. The problem is that. The galaxy is the dominant object. But the galaxy is not alone. Along. With the surrounding halos, dwarf galaxies, and star clusters, it forms the local system. The local system. It is very complex. Each dwarf galaxy has its own halo inside the main halo. Those halos are formed of dark matter and visible matter. 

That means other objects around the galaxy move in the same way relatively to the galaxy. So the virtual position of the dwarf galaxies around the massive or full-size galaxies remains the same. Or it's the same relatively to the central galaxy. Because. The local system. Remains in the same form. That means the local system moves as an entirety. The movement is hard to detect. If. The observer is that system. 

This halo is one of the things that makes it hard to detect low-energy objects. Outside. That halo. In the same way as local quantum fields, those halos are multi-layer bubbles that surround single galaxies. Local clusters. And super clusters. 

So if dark energy is the movement in the Higgs field. The next. Question is: What pushes that field into motion? The Higgs field. The base energy field is all around the universe. That field determines the base energy level in the universe. And the expansion of the universe. Causes the effect. The Higgs field turns weaker. This effect pulls energy out of particles. 

"AI-generated picture of the expansion of the universe. Credit: ZARM, Universität Bremen (AI generated)" (ScitechDaily, What if Dark Energy Doesn’t Exist? New Theory Could Rewrite Cosmic Expansion)

Again, does dark energy exist? That depends on how we determine dark energy. Is it energy? That just cannot. Travel through the galaxy's halo? Or, is it so weak energy or energy that the source is in such a small particle that we cannot separate it? The halo around the galaxy is so bright. That. We simply. Cannot see the radiation that is between galaxies. The problem is that the halo around the galaxy is so high-energy that it covers the energy. That is the particle at almost the minimum energy level. Transmits. In the case of dark energy, we should ask: What pushes energy in motion? Things like stars in the galaxy. And high energy. Shining nebulae cover that weak background radiation. Under. Radiation that comes from stars and other objects. 

The fact is that nobody knows. Dark energy can be a virtual situation that forms when the universe expands. Universe’s expansion. Causes a situation where quantum fields. Around particles turn weaker. That means material, or rather, particles, evaporate faster. This means particles turn into a wave movement. A particle is actually a pack of dense wave movement. The quantum field outside it. Keeps it in form. So when the energy level in the quantum field decreases. 

The energy level. Around the particle decreases. Particle releases wave movement. This increases energy in the universe. At the same time. When. The universe expands. The distance between objects rises. This causes the gravity effect between objects turn weaker. 

Quantum Evaporation. Along. With. A weaker gravitational effect. It can explain dark energy. Then the key problem is this: why is that thing so hard to detect? We should rather say why we cannot see that effect in small-scale systems. Things like galaxies and black holes are gravity centers. They pack energy fields around them. This means that. 

The large-scale quantum evaporation or particle evaporation. It cannot happen near galaxies. This means that the universe’s expansion doesn’t have a direct effect on the field around galaxies. Massive gravitation, along with energy that comes from stars, keeps that local quantum field, at least, more stable than the global field. The global field is the quantum field. Or the Higgs field, which is between galaxy clusters. The universe's expansion affects the global field more strongly than it affects the local field. 

https://scitechdaily.com/what-if-dark-energy-doesnt-exist-new-theory-could-rewrite-cosmic-expansion/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dark_energy

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dark_matter

https://simple.wikipedia.org/wiki/Higgs_field

Radical new theory about dark matter.

 Radical new theory about dark matter.

"An artistic illustration of the mechanism proposed by Professor Stefano Profumo where quantum effects near the rapidly expanding cosmic horizon after the Big Bang gravitationally generate dark matter particles. Credit: Stefano Profumo" (ScitechDaily, Two Wild New Theories Could Finally Explain Dark Matter)

************************************************'

Next quotes are from ScitechDaily

"One idea envisions a hidden “mirror” universe with its own particles and forces, where the early cosmos forged tiny, incredibly dense black hole–like objects that could make up all the dark matter in existence."

"Another proposes that dark matter emerged from the universe’s rapid expansion, born through quantum radiation at the very edge of the observable cosmos during a short but dramatic period after the Big Bang."

"Both possibilities are grounded in established physics, offering testable explanations that carry forward UC Santa Cruz’s tradition of connecting the smallest particles with the largest cosmic mysteries."

(ScitechDaily, Two Wild New Theories Could Finally Explain Dark Matter)

************************************************'

The new radical theory explains dark matter as it formed in the quantum fields in the young universe. Or in some other, even more exciting versions, dark matter formed in the mirror universe.  This new theory tries to explain dark matter as particles that formed just after the Big Bang. Then some of those particles stayed in a higher energy level than other material. 

We must notice that the matter that we can detect is a minority in the universe. The term "dark matter" means a gravitational effect that has no visible source. There is a model of a hypothetical tachyon particle. That which travels faster than light leaves a track or hole behind it. That channel is like a hole or a tunnel in the 3rd. Dimension. And that tunnel makes those fields move like real particles. But in that model, tachyons must exist. 

"Diagram of the Meissner effect. Magnetic field lines, represented as arrows, are excluded from a superconductor when it is below its critical temperature." (Wikipedia, Meissner effect)

In the gravitational model, Tc (temperature critical) is replaced by Mc (Mass critical). There could also be a critical density at which this thing works. So maybe singularity in black holes or energy in the event horizon makes the gravity behave like EM-fields interact with superconducting objects. Maybe that effect in gravitational form requires that the object is surrounded by an absolutely slight quantum gravity bubble that aims gravity waves around the object. In that model, the object has a slight quantum field that cannot catch and hang onto the outside quantum field around it. That makes outside fields slide around the object. 

G-(gravity)field and dark matter. There is a model that G-field or gravity waves can exist without material or other quantum fields. That means there are four fundamental interactions. Those interactions are gravity, electromagnetism, weak nuclear interaction, and strong nuclear interaction. Each of those four interactions has its individual transmitter particle. And those interactions have wave and particle forms. Three of those transmitter particles, bosons, are known. The graviton is missing a transmitter particle.

Each of them can form individual fields. Every single field has individual wavelengths. Wavelength in electromagnetic fields is different from the wavelength in the weak nuclear interaction, for example. All of those fields can exist independently. And that means: gravity- or G-field can exist without other fields. 

There is a model of dark matter that suggests it is the graviton, or an extremely small black hole. The idea is that the particle's spin is very fast. And that can form the effect that looks like a Meissner effect. That spin drives makes electromagnetic fields behave like they behave around the superconducting particle. That thing makes those particles invisible. That means that dark matter is free gravitons. 

Those things are still hypothetical particles. And proving that thing requires that dark matter have a particle form. That means things like axions or weakly interacting massive particles, WIMPs, are the same thing as gravitons. The graviton is a mythical transmitter particle that transmits gravitational waves. That particle is hard to detect. And harder to confirm. The energy flow around that particle allows it to interact. But the interaction point is too small. Or maybe the graviton is like a neutrino, and maybe it can tunnel through matter. 

Another interesting part of the new model is that. The dark matter comes from some kind of anti-universe. There is a possibility that there is a so-called anti-universe. When our universe, or the universe where we live, expands, that anti-universe falls, or reduces. That causes the idea that maybe time travels backward in that anti-universe. But that is one of the models that requires more discussion. 

The thing is that the anti-universe is the place where material turns younger because its energy level rises. Or maybe, we should say that the energy density in the anti-universe causes matter to turn younger. But can the dark matter be material where time moves backward? 

Is it possible that the dark matter is in the bubble, or the so-called WARP bubble, where it gets more energy than it releases? If WIMP or whatever the dark matter particle can be gets more energy than it releases, that means the particle travels opposite in time than all other particles. 

https://scitechdaily.com/two-wild-new-theories-could-finally-explain-dark-matter/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dark_matter

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Meissner_effect

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tachyon

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Weakly_interacting_massive_particle

The universe, its particles, and quantum fields.

"New research suggests that collapsing stars may serve as natural laboratories to uncover hidden neutrino behavior, with potential implications for the birth of black holes and neutron stars. Credit: Shutterstock" (ScitechDaily, The Universe’s Most Elusive Particles Might Be Talking to Themselves)

Wave-particle duality (WPD) means that particles can turn into energy and vice versa: energy or energy fields can turn into particles. WPD means that particles are only the denser points in the quantum fields. The fact is that the particles require quantum fields for their existence. Without those quantum fields, there is no resistance that can push particles into their form. And that means if we take quantum fields out, energy flows away from particles, ripping them into pieces. And that turns particles into wave movement or quantum fields. Dark energy can form in some sub-particle structures that are too small to detect. 

But anyway, if a particle goes out from the universe, it turns into a wave immediately. And that makes it hard to detect anything outside the universe. The temperature outside the universe is unknown, but it's lower than 3K radiation or Planck radiation. It might be lower than the thermal minimum in the universe. And if that energy level is lower than the thermal minimum, 0K or -273.15C. That means energy can travel only out of the universe. That makes it impossible to observe things outside the universe. 

The most elusive particles in the universe can play an important role in neutron star and black hole formation. 

Neutrinos are almost massless particles. Their interaction with other particles is very weak. And that makes them travel through planets without touching anything. But today, researchers noticed a new interaction between neutrinos. That means a neutrino can interact with other neutrinos. And that makes those elusive particles more interesting than they were before. When a neutrino travels through objects, it takes some part of the quantum fields with it. That means those quantum fields transfer energy to the neutrino when it travels through them. 

Can the gravitational version of the Meissner effect be possible? In that gravitational Meissner effect, gravitational waves act like electromagnetic fields in the Meissner effect. And can this kind of effect also explain why neutrino interaction is so weak? The case where EM-fields travel past the particle that turns them denser than that thing allows the particle tunnel itself through walls? So is the spin of the neutrino so fast that a similar effect to the Meissner effect can make it almost weightless. If a neutrino hovers in an EM-pocket, it's hard to detect. 

"Diagram of the Meissner effect. Magnetic field lines, represented as arrows, are excluded from a superconductor when it is below its critical temperature." (Wikipedia, Meissner-effect) Tc=Temperature Critical. Could there be a similar critical level to gravity?

In the theoretical model, the gravitational waves in extremely dense, fast-spinning particles can act in the same way as electromagnetic fields act in the so-called Meissner effect.  That theoretical phenomenon can be called the gravitational Meissner effect. Or the antigravity. 

If the gravitational Meissner effect exists, that thing can make gravitational levitation possible. The idea is that the fast-spinning particle can turn into a quantum-sized black hole. And that thing makes it possible that gravitational waves travel past the particle. The gravitational Meisner effect can explain some details about black holes. Radiation that travels past those objects closes them inside the radiation bag. So the thing that makes black holes special is that regular and quantum gravity are connected in them. The fast-spinning, extremely dense objects can create a situation where they don't let gravitational waves travel through them. That thing can make the gravitational Meissner effect possible. 

When a neutrino beam travels through the star, that thing can act like airflow that travels through rooms. The neutrino beam takes energy with it. And that decreases the temperature in the star's core. That thing can cause a very dangerous situation when the energy level decreases in the star’s core and the route of the neutrinos. When the energy level decreases, that means the energy that can resist gravity turns lower. And that neutrino beam can cause situations that start to explode sooner than it should. When the energy level decreases, that means the star's outer layers start to fall to its core, and that can cause extreme peaks in the energy production. 

Can a neutrino be the thing that glues quantum and regular gravity together? The idea in quantum gravity is that some kind of radiation or small particles that travel through the particles turns them cold. When something takes energy away from an object, outgoing energy tries to replace that energy. That movement continues until energy levels inside and outside the object are at the same level. In some models, the spin of particles binds quantum fields to them. 

That means particles turned those fields into kinetic energy. The energy that the particle binds pulls other particles to that thing. So, theoretically, a quantum-sized black hole requires that the spin of the particle turns so high. 

When large and dense groups of particles spin, they bind lots of energy into them. Without that spin, that particle’s existence ends. The question is, where do particles put the energy that they store? The outside quantum field pushes structure into its form. If that quantum field turns too weak relative to the structure, the energy that comes out from the structure destroys it. The question is, could the extremely fast-spinning quantum black hole emit gravitational radiation past it? That causes an interesting question about the gravitational Meissner effect's existence. If that Meissner effect's gravitational version exists, that means the gravitational levitation can turn into reality.   

https://bigthink.com/starts-with-a-bang/quantum-fields-quantum-particles/

https://scitechdaily.com/the-universes-most-elusive-particles-might-be-talking-to-themselves/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Meissner_effect

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wave%E2%80%93particle_duality

 

Could the universe expand faster-than-light during cosmic inflation?

In the cosmic inflation model is the statement that the gravity turned opposite in the Big Bang. That means the energy level in the very early universe was raised higher than its environment. The energy minimum was far higher than in the modern universe. And entropy was lower. It’s possible to eliminate the gravity wave that is the energy ditch by decreasing the energy level lower than the bottom of the gravity wave. Or lower than the energy minimum in the universe. Only time in history that this thing happened was the birth of the universe. 

When the universe turned cooler and the material formed there formed multiple gravity centers that formed the gravity turbulence. Before the first particles formed gravity waves traveled in straight lines. The growing entropy made space between those gravity waves. And turned them into curves. If straight horizontal gravity waves are possible that makes energy valley there particles can travel. That kind of gravity wave can pump energy to a particle that travels in it. 

The key element in cosmic inflation is somewhere in the history of the early universe: it expanded faster than light. And how that is possible. When material erupted from the Big Bang there was nothing that could slow that event. There is a possibility that the entire universe’s energy level including gravity waves were above the energy level around that event. So if the entire universe was at a higher energy level that means there was only a pushing effect that pushed material away. Because there was no scattering or other things and energy traveled in straight lines there were situations where nothing pulled energy out from that radiation. 

And then that thing made it possible for particles to cross the speed of light. Otr they crossed the speed of light in the modern universe. As we know, the speed of light is relative. It depends on the medium, where it travels. Without scattering there was no effect that pulled energy out from the first photons. So can the universe still expand faster than the speed of light. The fact is that if there is nothing outside the universe that means there is nothing that can limit the photon’s speed. Except only known photons come from our universe. 

And that means the gravity effect behind those photons slows them. But there is a theoretical situation where gravity can turn opposite. That situation is that the environment’s energy level turns lower than the energy level at the bottom of the gravity wave. This effect eliminates gravity. So, that means that in the very young universe gravity turned opposite. The reason for that is that the universe’s entire energy level was higher than its environment. And that is the only known theoretical situation. 

If we think possibility that the universe expansion causes gravity wave ahead the universe, that requires quantum field outside the universe. That means the energy ditch surrounds the material bubble that we call the universe. If the energy ditch is deeper at the front of the structure it pulls that structure forward. If there is an energy ditch only at the front of the structure, the force of the energy ditch at the back of the particle will not disturb its acceleration. When a particle or any other structure moves it binds energy into itself. That thing causes an energy ditch at the front of the particle. The energy ditch will fill sooner or later. And that causes that particle to slow. Differences between energy levels behind and forward of the particle determines its speed or acceleration. 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cosmic_inflation

Living fossils challenge Darwin's evolution theory.

Above: Cretaceous Loricera beetles with specialized morphology for collembolan predation (Cell.com)

The beetle that challenges Darwin's evolution theory has been unchanged for 100 million years. This beetle is one of the things. That we can call "living fossils". When Charles Darwin created his evolution theory, he involved the term "living fossils" in that model. The idea in evolution theory is that species must adapt to their environment. But sometimes evolution creates the "perfect shape" or "perfect construction". That construction can survive in fast changes in the environment. We know a couple of living fossils like Ginkgos, coelacanths, and some other creatures like a beetle named: Loriceda. 

That thing means that sometimes evolution forms creatures with versatile abilities to survive in fast, and large-scale changes in their environment. The Loriceda beetles might form in certain conditions. Where that creature had no competitors. That thing creates the idea that maybe those beetles formed in the conditions after some mass extinction. After those extinctions larger animals whipped out and that left space for the things like bugs. The thing is that living fossils are fascinating things. 

Above: Coelacanth

Above: Ginkgo

They offer a window to the past time. When we think about the need to change, we think that the environment is the thing that sets this need. In the case of other living fossil coelacanths, the reason why that strange-looking creature survived is that those, little bit pike fish-looking creatures lived and still live in very deep sea. In that deep sea, the meteorite that destroyed dinosaurs had no big effect. 

And that left those strange fishes alive. The living vegetable fossils like Ginkgo might survived because some of them were in a position where the asteroid impact didn't affect them straight. The nuclear winter after that impact freezes those seeds very fast. Before meteorites that destroyed dinosaurs, there were no competitors for those species in the group gymnosperm. 

Those species made their seeds much faster than angiosperms. The angiosperms formed the protective layer around the seeds and that made them more resistant to climate change and heat waves. The meteorite made space for those more advanced vegetables that created the protective layer to protect their seeds. The meteorite formed a situation where evolution started to favor complicated structures in seeds. That means evolution must have a reason or fast change to start favoring quality and deny large numbers of descendants. 

https://www.cell.com/the-innovation/fulltext/S2666-6758(24)00039-0

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coelacanth

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ginkgo_biloba

Quasars, Planet X and gravity model.

 

Quasars, Planet X and gravity model. 

Could gravity be two forces? One with long and another with extremely short wavelength. 

In some models, the gravitation is two forces. Another gravitation is radiation with extremely long wavelengths. That gravitational wave is behind the radio waves. And the other gravitational waves have extremely short wavelengths. So they are behind gamma rays. That thing could explain why gravitation is so hard to model. 

Short-wave gravitation has a shorter wavelength than gamma rays

Long-wave gravitation has a longer wavelength than radio rays. 

If this model is right all particles inside atoms send gravitational waves. If gravitational waves have the same wavelength and same energy level they form standing waves in the atoms or between subatomic particles. That thing causes reflection in those gravitational waves because they interact the same way as all other wave movements. And in that case, the gravitational waves are turning opposite. 

If only long-wave gravitational waves can travel through subatomic particles that travel around them. This thing forms an electromagnetic or gravitational shadow behind that particle. And that shadow pulls particles backward. That means the long-wave gravitation is the thing that is called antigravity. 

The short-wave gravitation travels through particles. When it impacts the back wall of subatomic particles inside them it sends wave movement backward. And that backward traveling wave movement pushes particles forward to the gravitational center. That explains why gravitation is so special. So, at the quantum level, gravitation just breaks material. 

Another gravitational force is the extremely shortwave radiation that the source is between gluons and quarks. Another gravitation is the weakness in electromagnetic or quantum fields inside subatomic particles. That weakness in quantum fields is the electromagnetic low pressure that pulls objects into it. 

The gravitational interaction is simple. The gravitational waves form electromagnetic low pressure in the front of the particles. That thing means that gravitation interacts wrong direction. So if gravitation is two forces that could explain something about that mysterious phenomenon. In that model, gravitation is like wire or superstring that travels through particles. Particles are like pearls in necklaces. And that wave travels through those particles. During that process, the string pushes the particle in the opposite direction. 

If we think that the quantum particle is like warped or stretched paper the gravitational interaction pushes that structure. Then the particle sends radiation or wave movement backward. Another long-wave gravitation might travel sideways of the particle. And that thing makes the electromagnetic shadow behind the particle. So that means the gravitational waves with long wavelengths are the thing that pushes particles. The electromagnetic shadow pulls particles backward. 

So: 

Long-wave gravitation pushes particles

Short wave gravitation pulls particles. 

When I write that the elementary particle is like a yarn-ball I should write that elementary particle is like a yarn-ball that formed of stretched or warped superstrings. The warped superstring turns into a ball form in electromagnetic fields. 

"An artist’s impression of a Kuiper Belt object (KBO), located on the outer rim of our solar system at a staggering distance of 4 billion miles from the sun. Credit: NASA, ESA, and G. Bacon (STScI)" (ScitechDaily/Modified Newtonian Dynamics: Is the Ninth Planet Hunt Revealing a New Law of Gravity?)

Planet X, or Ninth Planet tests gravitational theories. 

The name or term Planet X means a gravitational effect that causes an anomaly in Netune's trajectory. 

The problem with Planet X is it's invisible. But the gravitational effect that causes anomalies in Neptune's trajectory is real. There is some kind of lumb of invisible material in the Kuiper belt. And the problem with this lumb is that it could cause some denser points in the Kuiper belt. But there is no that kind of point. And that makes Planet X so interesting. Planet X is not confirmed, but astronomers call the mysterious gravitational effect that causes anomalies in Neptune's trajectory Planet X. 

Another mysterious thing is the X-ray flares in Uranus' atmosphere. Those X-ray flares form when some field accelerates particles that impact the Uranus' atmosphere forming X-ray flares. Some researchers think that Planet X is full of dark matter. If that lump of dark matter exists. Its only interaction with material is gravitational. If a particle goes in the dark matter glump's gravitational field it should follow the same trajectory that material follows when it falls into a black hole. 

"Artist's rendering of the accretion disc in ULAS J1120+0641, a very distant quasar powered by a supermassive black hole with a mass two billion times that of the Sun." (Wikipedia/Quasar)

Acceleration disks and anomalies in spectral energy in quasars help to understand gravitation and its interaction with other fundamental forces. 

The acceleration disk around black holes is full of extremely high-density energy. Black holes pull all material inside it. And there is also dark matter that falls in the monstrous gravitational fields. The acceleration disk will not end in the event horizon. The event horizon is the point where escaping velocity turns higher than the speed of light.  

When material falls through the event horizon it continues a spiral trajectory to the center of a black hole. At some point in that journey is the point, that dark matter interacts with visible material. That point is at least singularity in the center of a black hole. The reason for that is extremely powerful gravitation that pulls material and energy into entirety called singularity. 

Some quasar's luminosity and spectral energy levels don't match with its brightness. Researchers suspect that the reason for that energy anomaly is some wind or some other anomalous material flow in acceleration or transition disk. That model explains that the anomaly in spectral energy comes from some whirls in the acceleration disk. That thing explains the high energy level in quasars as the parasite black holes that form in acceleration disks. The energy level in that material disk is extremely high. 

And the energy may turn some small objects like asteroids or planets that fall through them into black holes. If those parasite black holes exist they send radiation beams to material around the black hole. And they might increase the energy level in the entire quasar. When those small black holes fall into bigger black holes that causes gravitational waves around the universe. 

So if something makes a whirl in that material the whirl may turn to a black hole. Or it can make extra friction in the transition disk. And maybe that extra friction turns the material or acceleration disk's energy level higher than it should be. The thing is that black holes are things that help researchers to make gravitational models. 

In some models, the impacting gravitational waves increase the energy level in the acceleration disks. If a parasite black hole exists it sends gravitational waves with the same frequency as the bigger black hole's gravitational waves. That thing can cause a situation in the quantum fields or material to start to flow sideways in acceleration disks. We can say simplified that the antigravity makes the anomaly in the energy level of quasars. 

The existence of the parasite black holes is very short-term. They form in an acceleration disk. And then they fall into a center black hole. But during that time they aim material away from the acceleration disk. 

And one thing is sure, if parasite black holes exist they send counter gravitational waves. That thing causes a situation where gravitational waves undo each other. If we want to see a situation where impacting gravitational waves undo each other, we must find objects that send the gravitational waves in the same frequency and same power. 

https://www.livescience.com/uranus-x-ray-radiation-detected.html

https://www.livescience.com/37115-what-is-gravity.html

https://scitechdaily.com/from-quasars-to-black-holes-spectral-energy-puts-established-theories-in-question/

https://scitechdaily.com/modified-newtonian-dynamics-is-the-ninth-planet-hunt-revealing-a-new-law-of-gravity/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Planet_Nine

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Planets_beyond_Neptune

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quasar

Wobbling jets of supermassive black hole. And intelligent universe theory.

 Wobbling jets of supermassive black hole. And intelligent universe theory. 

A wobbling beam of M-87 galaxy is evidence of incredible.  

The wobbling beam around the M-87 spiral galaxy tells that the supermassive black hole in its center wobbles. The reason for that could be asymmetry in the material that falls into the black hole. And if M-87 is full of cosmic voids or there is another black hole near the beam. That can cause the wobbling movement of the jet or beam of the supermassive black hole. 

That thing is incredible. Because normally, there is only another black hole that can wobble the black hole. Of course, things like cosmic voids can also cause an effect where energy bursts from the black holes and turns asymmetric. And there is the possibility that small cosmic voids cause an effect where some kind of wave movement travels away from that black hole asymmetrically. In wild visions, the small cosmic voids can cause a situation where black hole vaporization turns into an asymmetrical. 

"Schematic representation of the tilted accretion disk model. The black hole spin axis is assumed to be straight up and down in this illustration. The jet direction points almost perpendicular to the disk plane. The misalignment between the black hole spin axis and disk rotation axis triggers the precession of the disk and jet. Credit: Yuzhu Cui et al. (2023), Intouchable Lab@Openverse and Zhejiang Lab". (ScitechDaily.com/M87’s Wobbling Jet: A Spin on Black Hole Mysteries)

Intelligent universe theory. And the hypothesis that the superpositioned and entangled black holes would escalate through the young universe. 

When we think about theories of the intelligent universe, we might think that those theories are only hoaxes. But we must realize that there is a so-called Kuiper belt or gas and dust along with extremely cold asteroids and dwarf planets surrounding almost every star. There is a small possibility that those atoms and subatomic particles can spontaneously form quantum computers around that star. 

But the most incredible idea about that theory is that the entire universe turns intelligent. The idea is that the superpositioned and entangled black holes started to send their resonance in the universe. Then those oscillations just escalate through the entire universe. That thing means that the universe would be intelligent. The intelligent universe is the thing that interests philosophers very much. If we think that the universe would be intelligent that creature will be so large that it cannot see a single individual. But it sees intelligent civilizations as better than humans. 

https://scitechdaily.com/m87s-wobbling-jet-a-spin-on-black-hole-mysteries/

Why cannot we find errors in Einstein's theories?

 Why cannot we find errors in Einstein's theories?

Einstein must be wrong, and we know it. But nobody found errors in his theories. The theory of Relativity is two theories: Theory of Special Relativity. And the Theory of General Relativity. Those theories match certain types of gravitational fields. The theory of Special Relativity matches in the "straight universe" where gravitation is not strong. The theory of General Relativity matches in a strong gravitational field like near the sun. And that theory made it possible to calculate the planet Mercury's trajectory. 

But then we see one very interesting thing. The Theory of Relativity is tested only in weak gravitational fields. But what type of gravitational field is strong enough? That it can make those theories fall? Do they fall inside the event horizon of black holes?  

"As new and powerful telescopes gather new data about the universe, they reveal the limits of older theories. Credit: Shutterstock" (Phys.org/Why Einstein must be wrong: In search of the theory of gravity)

(https://www.sliderbase.com/spitem-104-1.html)

The uncertainty  principle of Werner Heisenberg says that it's impossible to measure precisely certain quantities. The place and momentum are both impossible to know at the same time. When measurement accuracy in some quantity increases, that means measurement error with some other quantity decreases. 

When the object's mass increases. That means gravitation turns more and more dominating. So in a black hole, the gravitation supplants or covers all other fundamental interactions.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Uncertainty_principle

When we are looking at gravitation. We are losing accuracy from the other three fundamental interactions. We cannot strip three fundamental interactions off from their entirety when we are measuring the gravitational effect between middle-class massive objects like planets and their stars. 

So that means if we put focus into some values or some quantity other quantities are less attented. The uncertainty principle in fundamental interactions is that they all interact with particles or particle groups in their entirety. All fundamental interactions affect particles and particle groups. We cannot divorce gravity from the other three fundamental interactions. We cannot remove all other forces from the sun for example. Those weaker forces exist. And in short distances, they are stronger than gravitation. 

Same way force cannot affect a system without affecting all its particles. So fundamental forces also affect objects as entireties. But in long distances, gravitation is dominating. So if we keep focus on gravitation, we lose focus on other recessive interactions. 

And when we are looking at gravity, we forget that there are also three other fundamental interactions. The effect of those interactions is limited. But it exists. If as an example electromagnetic interaction continues for billions of years at the same point on the planet that interaction affects to planet. Even if long-distance interaction between other fundamental forces than gravity is not very strong that interaction exists. 

https://phys.org/news/2023-09-einstein-wrong-theory-gravity.html

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/General_relativity

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Theory_of_relativity

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Uncertainty_principle

Can we rule out the Big Bang?

The Big Bang was the case, where matter got its form. So it was the beginning of spacetime or was it? Was there dark matter before the universe? 

Unknown things like dark matter and dark energy are causing questions about the universe's begin. In some models, the Big Bang was the case when the dark matter took the shape of visible material. And that thing makes the Big Bang a very interesting thing. Because if that is true the Big Bang was the case where one form of the material turned into another. 

The thing, that makes the Big Bang mysterious is that matter cannot form from emptiness. The Schwinger effect where matter forms from the wave motion, require that the wave motion exists. And there must be some kind of source for the wave motion. 

The Schwinger effect requires that two quantum- or electromagnetic fields are impacting together or some force turns the superstrings turn into a ball-shaped thing. A superstring is a thin quantum field that is traveling in space. The Schwinger model means that the material cannot be without wave motion. And wave motion cannot be without ball-shaped particles. 

The Schwinger effect means wave motion and particles are two sides of each other. So wave motion and particles are the same things. And the thing that makes the Schwinger model very creepy is that the Schwinger effect always forms particles and is anti-particle. So if the Schwinger effect forms the universe, that forms two universes. 

If we think that the black hole turns into an X- or gamma-ray pulsar. It means that its rotational axle turns similar to neutron stars or pulsars. That thing forms an X- or gamma-ray pulsar. If the black hole's rotation axle turns to its equator and the polar spin continues that black hole starts to act like a pulsar. 

But the energy level of that kind of pulsar is much higher than regular pulsars. That thing can form the case where the Schwinger effect can form a material that we cannot see. The idea is that there is a small area in the black hole where is no gravitation. And if the quantum bridge crosses that area the black hole can start to cross its nucleus. 

And then that bridge makes wave motion travel through the black hole. The idea is that the fast rotation motion along with extremely high centripetal force. Make that string antenna that conducts energy out from the black hole. The fact is that the universe is the combination of at least two main quantum systems. The invisible system and the visible system. Or actually, there are at least three different quantum systems. 

*Dark energy: an invisible wave motion. That rips the universe into pieces.

*Dark matter: an invisible gravitational effect. The thing that forms dark matter is unknown. There is suspicion that those things could be some kind of virtual particles. 

*Visible material and wave motion. Those things are forming the visible universe. 

So if dark matter is the virtual particles or so-called wormholes that thing causes an interesting idea. Is the cosmic web the dark matter? If those strings are forming because of the cosmic vacuum channel that explains the dark interaction. In that model, fast-moving particles like electrons can form the electromagnetic- or quantum vacuum tunnel. 

The idea is when an electron moves very fast it pushes quantum fields from its route. In the case, where the second electron follows the first one very close the quantum channel cannot be closed. And if the quantum whirl starts to rotate around that channel, that thing causes the situation where that quantum channel cannot fill. So that thing is called a wormhole if it's true. 

The role of dark matter is one of the things that is interesting. Dark matter is the gravitational effect. That is the only thing that we know about its shape. 

There is a possibility. That dark matter is the virtual particle. That hypothetical virtual particle forms when extremely fast spinning particles are starting to expand. 

When non-elementary particles like hadron spin. The outer quarks move outside from the center quark. That thing expands the length of the quantum tunnels between quarks. And then those quantum bridges are acting like antennas that are harvesting more energy levels to those particles. And that means the energy level and weight of the particles of that fast-spinning hadrons are turning higher. And that material is only too heavy. 

Or there is forming some kind of quantum bubble. Where the energy level or temperature is lower than the temperature of that particle is lower than the environment where they are. If dark matter is a matter that temperature is lower than the cosmic background or even lower than zero kelvin we cannot see that material. 

Or if we think that dark matter is an extremely fast-spinning electron there is a possibility that there are forming holes in that quantum field. In that case, the lower energy bubble pulls energy inside it. And that means if that kind of bubble is stable. It will pull radiation inside it. So that outcoming radiation will keep dwarf galaxies in their form. 

The idea of cosmic inflation is forming the theory that the universe is in a cosmic vacuum. That means energy travels from the higher energy universe to space around it. This thing means that cosmic inflation is the energy flow out from a bubble where all visible material exists. 

https://scitechdaily.com/can-cosmic-inflation-and-the-big-bang-be-ruled-out/

https://miraclesofthequantumworld.blogspot.com/

The multiverse and the idea behind that

"There is no empirical, scientific evidence for the multiverse"

BigThink.com

Image 1:)"Concept of a twin universe, with the beginning (of time) in the middle". (Wikipedia/Multiverse). If the Schwinger effect forms the universe, it would make two universes. This requires the Big Bang was one great Schwinger effect. If that is true there are two universes. 

The Schwinger-effect forms two particles. Those particles are particles and its antiparticle. On a macro-scale, that means the Big Bang formed the universe where we are living and antiuniverse. That hypothetical antiuniverse formed of antimatter. 

There is no physical proof of a multiverse. Theory and philosophy about that multiverse, are based on logical thinking. When we first saw that the Milky Way is only one galaxy in a large group of galaxies. When researchers are finding larger, and larger cosmic megastructure structures like the cosmic web. 

The next logical step is the existence of another universe. And maybe universes are forming similar giant structures like galaxies and galaxy groups. The idea of a multiverse is that the universe is the result of the Big Bang. And there is a possibility that there are other Big Bangs. 

There is the possibility that even if those other universes exist. We ever can see them. The Big Bang was the case when the elementary particles got their form and wave motion got its wavelength. So the universe got its form. And if things like the size of quarks are different or the margin between the lowest and highest temperatures in that hypothetical universe is different than in our universe, we cannot see that in another universe. 

If the absolute zero temperature in another universe is different than our universe's zero Kelvin, that other universe remains dark. The idea of this is that the material that forms another universe sends radiation with a wavelength that is impossible to see. And the shorter way to say that thing is that another universe forms dark matter. 

There are theories that dark matter can form similar structures with visible material. So, if another universe forms of dark matter that means it's impossible to see. Detection of dark matter structures happens by using gravitational lensing. In that model, researchers are looking for a point that affects the trajectory of photons. 

But that method requires that there is the light that comes behind that object. The fact is that even if the hypothetical universe forms of visible material. The brightness of our universe's stars covers light.  That comes from other universes below their shine. And, that makes it very difficult to detect other universes. 

Image 2:) "The local geometry of the universe is determined by whether the density parameter Ω is greater than, less than, or equal to 1.

From top to bottom: a spherical universe with Ω > 1, a hyperbolic universe with Ω < 1, and a flat universe with Ω = 1. These depictions of two-dimensional surfaces are merely easily visualizable analogs to the 3-dimensional structure of (local) space". (Wikipedia/Shape of the universe)

Was the Big Bang some kind of Schwinger effect? 

The Schwinger effect is one of the most interesting things in the universe and cosmology. The term "Schwinger effect" means that the magnetic field is turning into particles. When magnetic fields turn to particles in the Schwinger effect. That effect forms two particles, a particle, and its antiparticle. 

If the Big Bang was some kind of Schwinger effect. That thing could form two universes. The universe where we are living, and another Universe called the antiuniverse. The antiuniverse means a universe that is formed of antimatter. In that universe, time moves in the same direction as it travels in our universe. And the only different thing is that the material forms that hypothetical universe is antimatter. 

When we look at image 2. And the universe's possible geometrical forms. There is one thing that we must realize if the universe is flat, there is the possibility that the Schwinger effect formed it. The ball-shaped or spherical universe doesn't require the Schwinger effect. The thing is that there is a 2/3 possibility that the universe is flat. That thing means that the universe is "open". 

And it expands forever. But if the universe is a ball or spherical it will collapse. The theory of the phoenix universe where the universe forms again require a ball-shaped universe. But if the universe is flat or hyperbolic that means there is the possibility that the Schwinger effect formed that universe. 

https://bigthink.com/13-8/multiverse-no-evidence/

https://www.nationalgeographic.com/science/article/what-is-the-multiverse

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shape_of_the_universe

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Schwinger_effect

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ultimate_fate_of_the_universe

Image 1:) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Multiverse

Image 2:) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shape_of_the_universe

https://artificialintelligenceandindividuals.blogspot.com/

Strange gravitation.

The shape of gravitation is a wave motion. And because it's wave motion. That thing means that gravitation acts like all other wave motions. So when wave motion impacts particles their effect is similar to when two cars are impacting. When two objects are impacting the kinetic energy transforms to wave motion. The energy or wave motion that begins from the impact point will travel through the object which can be a car, particle, etc. 

And then that wave motion continues its movement behind the object. If impacting objects are cars people will hear that wave motion as the sound. When that impact happens at the quantum level the impacting wave motion faces the quantum field that forms the particle. And that quantum field moves backward like jelly. Then the wave motion continues to travel behind the object. 

When gravitation hits the nose of the particle the wave motion continues to travel backward of the particle. The reason for that is that energy travels always from the higher energy level to the lower energy level. And that difference between the two energy layers is called the potential difference. When wave motion travels through the quantum system it will deliver or get energy from the quantum system. And that thing causes the material would fall to the gravitational center. 

If the distance between begin and end of the object is long. That means that the system reaches a stable condition longer time. Stable condition or energy stability is the situation where begin and end of the track of the wave motion are the same. And that thing means that the energy flow in the system ends. 

Can the superstring theory explain why gravitation is so weak? 

Superstring theory describes particles as the whisk or yarn ball-looking quantum fields. The superstrings are the wave motion or quantum lightning that form the quantum field. 

The whisk-shaped form where superstrings are traveling over the poles makes the particle can have multiple quantum states at the same time. That thing means that every single superstring can have a different energy level or quantum state, 

The idea is that the gravitational radiation must travel through the superstring that is like serpentine. The catching area of the radiation is very large, but the problem is that gravitational radiation must travel through that superstring. 

When we are thinking about superstring as the paper serpentine the thickness of that paper is not very big. And there is no time to transfer information to the superstring. 

So why gravitation is the weakest of all forces? 

So why gravitation is the weakest of all forces? The answer might be easier than people ever imagine. The idea is that the wavelength of the gravitation waves is so short that the gravitation will impact the superstring. Because a superstring is extremely thin far thinner than some quarks or even gluons the energy difference between two layers is so small that the wave motion travels through that superstring causing an extremely small potential difference. 

The reason why gravitation affects long distances can be that the superstrings are very long. So the area that receives the gravitational wave is so large that it can receive enough gravitational radiation. But the depth of that superstring is so small that the potential difference between the side that is closer to the gravitation source and the side that is away from that source is very small. 

The superstring is like some kind of serpentine. The length of that thing can be very long. But the thickness of those papers is so small. The gravitational effect will affect straight through that superstring, not across it. And that means there is so little time to collect energy. 

The length of the superstring is very long. And also the width of the superstring can be large. but the thickness of that thing is so small that it makes gravitation weak. So catching area for gravitation would be large, but that radiation has a very short time to tunnel through the superstring. And that time will not give time to transfer information or energy to the superstring, 

Wave-particle duality and gravitation. 

The gravitation is the wave motion that behaves like all other wave motions. The limit of the speed of gravitational radiation is the speed of light. So gravitation can make whirls, it can reflect. 

Wave-particle duality means that the gravitation can also take the shape of the particle and otherwise.  And when two very powerful gravitational fields are impacting there is the possibility that those fields are jumping out from each other. In some wild theories, the gravitation can turn even solid if the gravitation field is powerful enough. 

https://miraclesofthequantumworld.blogspot.com/

Image: Pinterest

See also:

Black holes¨

Gravitational waves

Graviton

Standard model

Superstrings

Theory of Relativity

Wave motion

Can any particle travel between universes?

Can any particle travel between universes?

If the multiverse theory would be true, and there are other universes, we might ask a one really interesting question, and that is: could object travel between universes. So when we are thinking about the edge of the universe, we might use the term "solid", if any object than a photon can cross that line. 

The thing is that if some object wants to travel across the border of the universe, that thing would need so much energy, that we cannot ever imagine that thing. The object must win the gravity of the entire universe, which means that it would pull the particles back with the power of all galaxies and dark matter particles, and that means that the gravity level, what it must win is so huge, that we ever cannot imagine that thing. 

The form of the universe is a very interesting thing to think, and when we are thinking about multiverse theory, that theory has brought many things in the mind of the theorists. One of the most interesting questions is can the light or some object across the line, what is called "the edge of the universe"? 

In this case, we might ask, is the layer of the universe solid or is it something else? And then we might start to define, what the world "solid" means at this time. If we are thinking that the edge of the universe is the point, where our universes domination ends, and after that point, the gravity of our universe would not pull objects back, we might think the possibility, that could some object travel to another universe, if the supernova blows in that border? 

In this case, the word "solid" means that nothing can go across that line, which is the shockwave of the Big Bang. And why we are interested in the edge of the universe? The thing is that the first formed stars would find at that layer. And this thing makes the location of the Big Bang very interesting. If we find the location of that object, we might define the distance of our solar system to that location. 

So if we would find the galaxies or black holes that are farther from that location, that means that that object is forming before our solar system. And how simple this kind of thing seems in the paper. But we know that there is a big difference between practical solutions and theories. In this example, I started to write that the speed of galaxies is stable, and all galaxies are traveling at the same speed. 

But we have forgotten that there is a possibility that there are galaxies, which are formed of dark mater or gas and dust. Those giant disks would have gravity but there would be no stars at all. And that means those objects would pull the other galaxies faster than others, which means that the galaxies would not travel with the same speed, and this means that in the practical world only the very big distances means that some galaxy is older than some other galaxy. 

So can the object travel between universes?

If wormholes or "Einstein-Rosen bridges" (1) are real, the meteorite or asteroid could travel between universes. Can the energy of the supermassive black holes, what are oscillating with the same frequency be so powerful that the Einstein-Rosen bridge or wormhole would be forming between those objects, what are in different universes? And that means that there is a possibility that the object, what is formed of antimatter can travel to our universe or even in our solar system. There is a hypothesis that some supernova explosions are caused by antimaterial, what impacts with stars or planets. 

But can object make that journey without wormholes? This thing is a really interesting question. The journey between universes would take so long time, that the neutrons of the atoms would start to break, which means that the material stops its existence. And that means that if some particle would slip to another universe, that would be meanless to the things in another universe.  

(1)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wormhole

Image:

https://miro.medium.com/max/2700/1*QS59aHuIEgJoIogixOJ32w.jpeg

Schrödinger's cat and the material version about that example

 

Schrödinger's cat and the material version about that example

Could photon form the material?

Could there be material, what is not particle or energy? Or what could change the form between particle and radiation freely? And can photons form material? If we are thinking about the last question, we might say that we have ever faced the case, that there is a single structure, what is formed by the photons. Or should we rather say "the kinetic structure, what is formed by photons"? 

Light is forming by photons, so we might say, that there is an astral structure, which is forming by the light because photons are particles of light. Is the photon the key to one of the most fascinating material theories in the world, what is known as the "photon material" or "Schrodinger's material"?

The theory of "Shcrödinger's material" bases the example of what is known as "Schrödinger's cat"(1). When Erwin Schrödinger wrote his great example of the cat, what is not dead or alive, the philosophers started to create the idea of the material that is not material or energy. That material would be something, that we cannot even understand. The difference between Schrödinger material and "dark matter" is that the theoretical "Schrodinger material" can transform itself into material and energy. 

But here we must ask "does the material take the form of energy and backward anyway"?, So what this theoretical material would be, and what makes it so different than normal material. The idea about "Schrödinger's material" is that is created by pure light or photons, and the base of that thing is the theory that photon has mass. And if the photon has mass it is material. 

So if the photon has mass, that thing can create the atoms and then the atoms can form the structures. But as you might notice, there is one thing, that makes these kinds of theories hard to prove. There is not a single observation about the atom, what is forming only photons, and this means that the theory of the material, what is "pure light" is only theory, but as you might understand, theories are base for experiments and proving things. 

Is photon one version of dark matter?

The idea of this thing has been taken from the idea, that the dark matter is the "quantum fog", what interacts with other particles only by gravity because those particles have no "spin". So there is hot and cold dark matter, the hot dark matter, what interacts but very slowly. And the cold dark matter, what interacts only by the gravity. So if the material would react very fast, it would need the electromagnetic field for reacting. 

The subatomic particles would not have really big mass, which means that the gravity or gravitational interaction between those particles is extremely weak. That means that the interaction is also extremely slow, and it cannot happen until the universe is an extremely stable condition. 

And the 3-kelvin radiation would deny that interaction. So the question is, is the photon one version of dark matter. When photon leaves from a star or other light source, is it possible that it would someday stop. Or can the photon make the lattices metals can form? 

If it could make that thing someday, what does this material look like? This is a nice thing about theories, we can think things freely and make models, and when something has been proven, that thing would be to end of speculation, what is like the end of the road. The theory stops to be theory, which ties the researchers to the proven formula. 

(1)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Schr%C3%B6dinger%27s_cat