Einstein-Rosen bridge or "wormhole"

Einstein-Rosen bridge or "wormhole"

In the beginning, I must say that even a couple of years ago black holes were just theory. In the 1970s the things like supercomputers were worse than modern pocket calculators, and things like quantum physics and quantum mechanics were pure theory. So there has been time before quantum and the Internet, and in the modern world, people can read many things straight from the internet.

Einstein-Rosen bridge is the theoretical phenomenon, which bases that two black holes are starting to resonate with each other. That thing causes the effect that between those black holes is forming the "bridge", but what would cause that resonation? One of the theories is that another black hole is sending the X-ray or some other radiation impulse to the direction of another black hole. 

And that radiation burst would cause the oscillation of another black hole would turn to the same frequency with each other. That thing is one of the most fascinating phenomena, which can form in the Universe. The reason why this theory is forming has been that the size of the black holes is not growing, and that means that the material is going to somewhere. Then telescopes noted that giant gas jettisons were leaving from the nucleus of galaxies. 

If those jettisons would travel inside the X-ray radiation of the black hole, that would make them at least the virtual wormhole possible, and that thing is actually the situation, where the particle is turning to quantum teleportation because the radiation from the black hole along with huge speed would make time moving slower in the jettison, and then another black hole would catch that jettison, and turn it direction stable, or open the virtual wormhole between those objects. But I will return to that version later. 

Einstein-Rosen bridge or the "wormhole" is one of the most fascinating theories in the world. And the thing what makes this theory so interesting is that thing allows human or some other species travel to another star or even in time. But the form of Einstein-Rosen bridge is conflicted. 

That means that two types of phenomena are far from each other, even they are looking at the same thing. In this case, I mean physical traveling between two points in the extremely long distance. The first version is that this bridge or wormhole would send the spacecraft through the tunnel across the fourth dimension, and that would mean that the form of travel is "interactive". 

The effect that allows the long journey is slowing the time and in the first version the people who are standing outside the vehicle would see that vehicle is coming from the "bridge" a couple of minutes after the craft is left to journey. And this effect allows the two-side traffic between long distances, and that thing is normally introduced in the SciFi movies.

But another version of this effect is the "virtual wormhole", which means that the mass of the craft would turn extremely high, and the time inside it would turn slow. The travel that feels probably a couple of hours in the mind of the travelers would take hundreds or even thousands of years. 

And that means that this kind of wormhole would be a "one-way" version of the wormhole. That thing is possible, because that craft, what travels through the wormhole would turn to the quantum teleportation system, where the time is slowing inside that thing, what is hoped also solve problems of quantum computers. 

But when we are thinking about the advantage of science, this kind of theory is the newest way to think. That kind of thought is connected to black holes. When the idea of the objects, what would have so strong gravity field that even the light cannot escape introduced about 200 years ago, those objects were only thoughts in the head of some philosophers. 

And then the evidence about the existence of that kind of object has been got after long-time research. But now the existence of black holes is confirmed, and those extreme objects are captured to film. The case of black holes can be thought of as the school example of the advantages of science and equipment, which can handle data. 

https://physics.aps.org/story/v15/st11

https://www.space.com/20881-wormholes.html

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wormhole

About Apollo-program, scientists, and science

About Apollo-program, scientists, and science

We have spent the 50th. anniversary of the moonwalk and that thig would bring in the front of our eyes visions what are full of the most impressive images of the rockets, what are 110 meters long, and the landing crafts what are flying over the strange landscape. TV and today the internet are full of images of the impressive moonwalk, and impressive technology behind that thing and the Moon mission was a very good image for NASA and other kinds of organizations.

But when we are thinking about science, scientists, researchers, and developers, what are making science and machines every day, we are facing the thing that their work is not very impressive, if we would look at those people, while they are working. When we are thinking impressive science, we might think would Darwin's theory of evolution be so popular, if that man would make his invention about the advancing of the species in Great Britain in his backyard? The "Beagle" ship made Darwin's journey around the world very interesting, and the findings, what that man did in the Galapagos islands very interesting.

We have forgotten that probably Darwin would get the same results by researching the flowers and bugs like earwigs in his home yard. When we are looking at the impression, what things like Apollo-program made, when Neil Armstrong put his steps on the Moon, we might forget that the thing, what Armstrong made was to bringing some stones and dust to the Earth. 

That thing was very good for laboratories, but we have forgotten that the unmanned probes would do the same thing, and bring similar samples to Earth. And the thing is that those probes would not risk human lives. The risk is the thing, what makes explorations impressive. If we would send the robot to another planet, there is no drama, if the mission fails.

 But when we are thinking about explorations to the jungles, we ever hear those people, who are at least so brave as Neil Armstrong was, except if those explorers would be missing in the jungle. In the jungle, those explorers might be eaten by some snake, but the thing is that they are traveling to their operational area by using DC-3 or some jeep, and that is not very impressive. That's why nobody even sees the lifting off those jungle researchers. But everybody saw the lift-off of the giant Saturn-V rocket in Cape Canaveral.

When we are thinking about people, who are selecting the career as the scientists, we are facing the thing, that those people have very little attention in their private life. If we would observe people like Cosmologists in their work, we would see people, who are writing something on the paper, or who would use some laptop computer and write something. And that thing is not very impressive.

That's why we would not respect those people because they are not using CAD-programs or make some computer software. When people are talking about the influential professions they are always mentioned people like computer programmers, because they are writing some nice codes, what are collecting data from some large areas. 

But has anyone mention persons like conference translators or other language scientists as influential professionals. In almost every publication is mentioned how poor salaries the humanists would get in comparison to engineers. This is the problem with the people like translators, and then we forget to ask, what is the salary of archeologists and egyptologists? Do those persons ever get salaries?

And if they are not getting salaries, how they would live? Then we are facing the fact, that somehow we don't respect people, who are translating other languages, and things like words, what are written by some rock artist. Have we ever ask a single thing about the work of those people? Or have we ever asked things, what people like the translator of the sign language must handle?

I think that we ever spend a single thought about those kinds of people when we are looking at some document of science, or actually, those documents are almost every time made to handle the scientific instruments. The thing is that things like web-cameras and message solutions are vital systems for deaf people when they are wanted to communicate with other people. This kind of things is really interesting to think when we are going out and talk about Neil Armstrong and other interesting people.