Showing posts with label distant future. Show all posts
Showing posts with label distant future. Show all posts

Saturday, November 30, 2019

The post-stellar civilization



The post-stellar civilization

Thoughts about the super civilizations

In someday every star would end its life, and in that case, the entire planetary systems will be destroyed. But after the explosion in the planetary nebula could start forming the new planets, what are similar to earth, but what has different sky than we have. When we found the exoplanets orbiting the pulsar, we have created ideas of the post-stellar civilization. In those models, the civilization would notice the change of the star and take enough distance to explode star, and then that alien race would start to benefit the energy of the dead star. They can create massive centrifugal force cannons, which drives the material to the remaining of the star, and then that civilization would collect that energy by using the solar panels.

So in this scenario, the civilization would just move to outer planets, when their star would start to expand. And then they would survive the explosion by evacuating to the space station or creating some kind of energy field, which will turn the impact wave of the exploding star away. And in that case, they would just dig huge tunnels for protecting themselves from the radiation, and of course, those creatures would suck the atmosphere of the planet to huge tank, where they can store that gas. And deny it escape to space when the temperature of the planet will rise.

How to benefit gravity energy?

Could it be possible, that somewhere in the universe would be civilization, what lives on the planet, what is orbiting the white dwarf or neutron star? The thing is that those civilizations could benefit gravitational energy, but how those civilizations would do that. Benefiting the gravitational energy is easier than we ever thought if we would have a star, what has very strong gravity like a thick white dwarf, neutron star or black hole, what we could benefit in that kind of action.

The thing is that gravity energy can benefit simply by shooting material to the surface of that star. When the material will impact the surface of that kind of star, that thing causes a powerful nuclear detonation. And the energy of those impacts can be collected by using the solar panels, or in the case of neutron star the radio mast can be put in the electron ray, which leaves from the neutrons star.

The material like small stones can be driven to the surface of the star by using the centrifugal cannon, which just slings the material to the star, and the thing is that the white dwarf is enough for causing the huge explosions or eruptions. Those eruptions are releasing energy, which can be collected by using solar panels. In the case of a neutron star, the energy can be collected straight from the gravity field by using a radio antenna. The disk of a black hole is sending radiation, which can be collected by using solar panels. But if we would put the power satellite to the jettison of the black hole, that would give very much energy for the civilization.

Could some civilizations survive from the end of the universe?

When we are thinking about the post-stellar civilizations, they might be very old, and they would not require star for their existence. In some theories, this kind of civilization would remain from the universe, what was before our universe. The idea of that thought has been taken from the paralleled universe theory, or sharper saying the theory where it is claimed that universes are following each other.

The idea is that when the final stars have spent their fuel the dark matter would start to form the black holes. In normal case, the dark matter would not react, but when the universe is very stable, the gravity would start to win and pull the dark matter to one point. The idea is that the dark matter effects by its gravity, and that means that at least gravity would start to make new kinds of black holes, which is forming by dark matter. But for making that thing possible, the universe must be an absolute stable condition. And that means that this would not happen until the final star has been flamed out.

The thing is that when the last molecule from the universe is pulled in the black hole, that thing causes effect, that the gravity would start to affect in a longer distance than ever, and the dark material would also start to accumulate, and then it starts to form giant black holes. Then those black holes are starting to collide with other black holes. In this version of the multiverse theories, every universe would end it's life in the big crash, where all material would form the giant black hole. And then that black hole would just explode as the new big bang. In this theory, some civilization can remain alive, if it can stay enough far away from that giant black hole.

https://www.stockvault.net/data/2019/08/29/269009/preview16.jpg

Thursday, October 31, 2019

A couple of words of time travel

A couple of words of time travel

Hypothesis about the briefcase men from the future.

Have you seen time-machine movies? Do you know what those fictional heroes make with those crystal sticks? Those crystals are oscillating with the same frequency with crystal, which is in the leaving point and helps to adjust the time machine. In theory, the time machine is possible, and we would want to go to the past. But if we would want to get back, there would be problems.

And sometimes the theorists or science fiction writers have created the model, where the person leaves the message to the descendants for sending the ideas and innovations from the future. This kind of time loop, where the astronaut from tomorrow would pump the data of the solutions of the future would help some hypothetical society to get ultimate power, even if those time travelers could travel only in one direction. That hypothetical future technology would give great benefit for people, who have it in their hands.

The theory behind the hypothesis of time travel

We know that we can stop time if we are moving fast enough, and there is introduced an idea that in someday, we would create the giant particle accelerator, where the small craft will accelerate to the speed of light, and that thing would cause that we will start to travel in time, and this makes possible to travel to future. But how we would travel to the past? This is a really interesting question?

When we would slow time in capsule, let's say about 50 %, which means that one year in the capsule would be two years outside. The thing, that we must do for creating that effect is to travel the speed, which is 50% of the speed of light. But how we would make the time travel faster in the craft? This is the problem in the theories of time travel. In theories, what is far from real life there could be organisms, what has so advanced nanotechnology, that they could be nanomachines in their body, what rotates the extreme small plates near the speed of light, and that thing would stop the time in their bodies.

But we don't have a chance to create that system in real life, because we cannot create structures, what would stand this kind of speed. And in real life, this kind of disk would be broken because of the centrifugal force, and that's why this kind of thing is pure theoretical level.

One version is that we would send the spacecraft in the black hole, and hope that there would be the space, where time would travel backward. And if we cannot go back to the point, where we have left, the time-traveling has no sense. The idea of time machine would be simple, and there is needed the plate, what rotates near the speed of light, and that's why the principle of the H.G Wells time machine is right, as we might so often say in theory. But how we could travel back in time? The idea of time slowing is that the energy level of the particle would increase.

And if we would create the opposite effect, and pump the energy out of the particle, we could make time moving backward, because, in the capsule, the time travels faster. In this case, we would need to create something, what we ever imagine is possible. We must create a particle where the movement is absolute zero. And we cannot create absolute stability, because the universe is moving, and this will put limits to create a time machine.

But let's think, that we could pull the entire energy off the craft, and we could create the space, where time moves faster, that thing would make the craft where is one cabin inside other. That means that when we are creating this hypothetical time machine we must make the structure, where are two hypothetical time machines one inside other. But as you see those systems are only theoretical research.

There is one little problem that we haven't even think about while we are thinking about this kind of technology. And that is, what if the "spin" of the nuclear particles of the time machine would turn, and the entire craft would turn to antimatter. This kind of technology would be dangerous because that allows some states to travel to the past, and start the battles by using modern military technology. And those things are, of course, very big moral and ethic questions. But who knows, what we would do in a distant future? Maybe there this kind of technology would be possible, but there would be many technical problems with materials and other kinds of things before this technology is coming to true.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ipMwrcvukpU&feature=youtu.be

Astronomers could have a model for why photons from GRB 221009A were at a high energy level.

"An illustration shows a photon from the biggest cosmic explosion since the Big Bang reaching Earth. (Image credit: Robert Lea (created...