Showing posts with label Shape of the universe. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Shape of the universe. Show all posts

Monday, June 29, 2026

Can we live in a giant gravastar?


" A quantum physics experiment showed photons can exhibit negative dwell time while traveling through atoms. Scientists confirmed the phenomenon using weak measurements that minimally disturbed the system. Quantum physicists have uncovered a bizarre phenomenon in which photons appear to spend a “negative” amount of time interacting with atoms before emerging from a cloud of matter." (ScitechDaily, Physicists Have Measured “Negative Time” in Bizarre Quantum Experiment)

There is a suggestion. That there are other universes in the supernova remnants. The giant gravastar explains why our universe behaves as it does. The giant gravastar could pull the universe from every direction.  So. If we think of the possibility that there are other universes. In black holes. Or gravastars. Those things might seem very small. But also if we lived in the universe. That is in the gravastar. That thing means that. From outside. The universe is where we live. It could seem very small. So size is relative. Particles in those Matryoshka universes have different sizes. The term matryoshka universe means that. Universe. It could be multiple internal universes. 

Time is an interesting thing. We know that time runs at different speeds at different points in the universe. Gravitational fields pack quantum fields around the gravity centers. That makes it possible. That matter evolves differently in different places in the universe. Time dilation between Earth and some heavier star might seem meaningless. But in millions of years, even a small difference. Turns into a remarkable. There are models, things like cosmic vacuums. They can turn matter old very fast. The expansion of the universe is the thing. That causes the time. If we think. That time is matter evaporation. 

The dark energy is the thing. That causes the universe’s expansion. There is a model. It’s possible that we live in a black hole. Or rather, saying we could live in a gravastar. The gravastar is the hollow singularity. And the inner event horizon pulls matter against that structure that could surround the entire universe. The gravastar has outer and inner event horizons. That could explain why we cannot see other universes. But it's possible that the large cloud of particles. That moves very fast surrounds the entire universe. There is a possibility. That. Those particles pull energy from the universe. And energy that comes outside the universe. Into them. This means that if those particles bind all the energy into them. That thing makes other universes invisible. And denies us the ability to see things outside our universe. 





Scientists have developed quantum control techniques that can suppress or even reverse a quantum system’s perceived arrow of time, making its behavior appear more consistent with time flowing backward than forward. Researchers investigate how quantum time flow can be stretched, blurred, or even reversed.” (ScitechDaily, Can Time Flow in Reverse? A Quantum Breakthrough Challenges Our Assumptions)



“An expanding mini-universe could counterbalance the collapsing matter of a star, thereby creating a stable gravastar. A new study suggests that the collapse of a massive star could spark the creation of a tiny expanding universe rather than a black hole. The resulting object, called a gravastar, would avoid the singularity and event horizon that make black holes so puzzling. (ScitechDaily,Scientists Say a New Universe Could Form Inside a Dying Star)

Can time flow reverse? 

If time flows in reverse, it would mean that dimensional time exists. The term "dimensional time" means that time is one of the dimensions. Retrocausality is the phenomenon. This particle seems to reach the goal before it should. The reason for that is time dilation. The experiment used photons—quantum particles of light and the against-the-odds journey they must undertake to pass straight through a cloud of rubidium atoms.

"These atoms have a “resonance” with the photons, meaning the energy of the photon can be transferred temporarily to the atoms as an atomic excitation. This allows the photon to “dwell” in the atomic cloud for a time before being released." (ScitechDaily, Physicists Have Measured “Negative Time” in Bizarre Quantum Experiment)

When a photon-particle travels through an extremely cold rubidium atom cloud. Radiation emission from those cold radioactive atoms rises. The energy level in those photons. 

The question is this. Can time dilation turn so strong that the particle reaches its goal before it leaves? This thing requires. A very high-energy-level gamma ray. The particle that travels across those gamma rays can get a high enough energy level. That time dilation makes particles seem to be in the goal before they leave the transmitter. But the big problem is this. The system measured in those tests is the energy level of those particles. So, if those particles have an energy level. Higher than it should be. 

That means the particle is “younger” than it should be. But theoretically, it's possible to create time dilation. So powerful. The particle reaches the goal before it leaves the transmitter. This kind of effect. It can be possible near black holes. Their gravitational field causes the escaping velocity. That is higher than the speed of light. Along with high-power gamma rays, that thing can cause a situation. Those things. Like a photon seems. To be crossing the event horizon before they fall into it. This can make it possible. 




A diagram comparing the structure of a classical black hole with a gravastar. (Wikipedia, Gravastar)



Test: "Teapot Turk". “Nuclear explosion milliseconds after detonation. From the Operation Teapot test series in Nevada, 1955, showing fireball and rope trick effects.” (Wikipedia, Rope trick effect) The cables from the shot tower. It transports. Energy faster out of the fireball than the air. There is a possibility that the quantum-sized black hole that travels through the event horizon can pump energy out from the event horizon. 

Maybe that is the reason for the Hypothetical Hawking radiation. Later in this text is the model. There is Hawking radiation. Because of the effect of the superpositioned and entangled photon- quantum-sized black hole pair. In that model. The quantum entanglement. It steals energy from a black hole. Or it actually steals energy from photons. That whirls around the black hole at the point. Of its event horizon. 




The nuclear fireball millisecond after detonation. 

The model that can explain Hawking Radiation. “Rope trick effects visible from one of Operation Tumbler–Snapper's tower-mounted test shots in 1952, taken with a Rapatronic camera.” (Wikipedia, Rope trick effect)

The superpositioned and entangled photon pair. If another turned into a quantum-sized black hole. It could make. A similar spike into the event horizon of the black hole. As cables from the shot tower make in the nuclear explosion fireballs. The cables from the shot tower transport energy out. From the fireball, faster than the air. And in the cases of the superpositioned photon and a quantum-sized black hole. The cable is the energy string. Or, an energy bridge between those particles. 

In that case, the high-energy radiation from the black hole turns the farther photon from the superpositioned and entangled photon pair into the Kugelblitz black hole. First, energy travels into a black hole. Because of gravity. This means that the gravity steals energy from the photon. That is closer to the event horizon. But the upper photon. It cannot release energy. As fast as a lower photon releases it. Then that very strong radiation turns the upper photon. Into the quantum-sized black hole. That turns the energy flow direction in this quantum entanglement. 

Or maybe the quantum-sized black holes that travel through the black hole’s event horizon steal energy from them. 

The photon makes a superposition with itself. The retrocausality. It can transport information away from the event horizon. The idea is that the other part of this photon pair can turn into a black hole. That quantum-size black hole can steal matter or energy from the black hole’s event horizon. The outer photon is the thing that turns into a black hole. The inner photon is in a superposition and entanglement with that quantum black hole. 

And when that photon falls into a black hole. The string that connects the photon-black hole pair. It can transport energy from the event horizon. The idea is similar to the cases. The nuclear bomb makes the spikes in the fireball during the nuclear tests. in nuclear tests. The cables from the launch tower conducted energy out from the fireball faster than air does. In this quantum case. The wire that transports energy out from the black hole is the string. That connects the photon-black hole pair. Those spikes will conduct energy out from the event horizon. As I wrote before. 


https://scitechdaily.com/can-time-flow-in-reverse-a-quantum-breakthrough-challenges-our-assumptions/


https://scitechdaily.com/physicists-have-measured-negative-time-in-bizarre-quantum-experiment/


https://scitechdaily.com/scientists-say-a-new-universe-could-form-inside-a-dying-star/


https://scitechdaily.com/time-twisted-in-quantum-physics-how-the-future-might-influence-the-past/


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gravastar


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hawking_radiation


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Multiverse


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rope_trick_effect

Friday, May 9, 2025

The universe is not symmetric.


"The Standard Model particles and their (hypothetical) supersymmetric counterparts. This spectrum of particles is an inevitable consequence of unifying the four fundamental forces in the context of string theory, but if string theory and supersymmetry are not relevant for our Universe, this picture will serve as a mathematical curiosity only." (BigThink, The Universe is not symmetric)

The universe is not symmetric. Things like galaxies, black holes, and other gravity centers pull the plasma that forms the universe into a form that looks a little bit like an amoeba. 

The galaxy clusters can make potholes in the Universe's outer shell. That makes it look a little bit like the golf ball or some circular saw blades if the universe's geometry is not the ball. 

There are two geometric shapes in the universe. The local and global geometry. The local geometry might seem to be the ball. But the global geometry might be like the galaxy. 

The ball that we see as the universe could be only part of the structure. Outside that ball can be the structure that looks like the DVD plate. One of the reasons, why we cannot see that material disk is that the shine of the galaxies covers that lower energy material disk under it. 

This is one of the reasons why the multiverse is very hard to prove. If we think. That is in the ball-shaped part of the universe. The Higgs Field is the base energy level. 


"The local geometry of the universe is determined by whether the density parameter Ω is greater than, less than, or equal to 1. From top to bottom: a spherical universe with Ω > 1, a hyperbolic universe with Ω < 1, and a flat universe with Ω = 1. These depictions of two-dimensional surfaces are merely easily visualizable analogs to the 3-dimensional structure of (local) space." (Wikipedia, Shape of the universe)

If Ω = 1, the universe is flat.

If Ω > 1, there is positive curvature.

If Ω < 1, there is negative curvature

(Wikipedia, Shape of the universe)

Only if Ω > 1 or the universe is spherical the reborn of the universe can happen. In that case, the material drops into the middle of the universe. And that should make the reborn of the universe possible. When that ultimate black hole goes into absolute vacuum, it should detonate. 

The hypothetical material disk around the ball-shaped center has a lower energy level than the Higgs Field. And then the energy level of the fields outside the universe is even lower than this material disk's energy level. In that case, the energy that comes from other hypothetical universes should travel over at least two main energy barriers.

Then that energy or radiation must travel across the energy barrier that surrounds the galactic cluster, the Milky Way, and finally the Sun. That energy barrier series means that proving the other universe's existence requires that those other hypothetical universes will be at a very high energy level. 


There is a possibility, that four fundamental interactions (Gravity, electromagetism, weak interaction, strong interaction) separated after the Big Bang a little bit different distances from that point. "The idea of unification holds that all three of the Standard Model forces, and perhaps even gravity at higher energies, are unified together in a single framework. This idea, although it remains popular and mathematically compelling, does not have any direct evidence in support of its relevance to reality." (BigThink, The Universe is not symmetric)


The idea of the Grand Unified Theory, GUT is this. All four fundamental forces have different wavelengths. The black hole or extremely powerful gravitation or energy wave can press those four fundamental interactions together. In that model, all four fundamental interactions are pressed into one common wavelength. That wavelength unites the four fundamental interactions. 

The disturbance in the shape of the universe's local geometries causes problems with calculations. If we think that we are in the middle of the quantum field, or Higgs field, which is the base energy field in the universe, we can say that things like black holes and other kinds of things can cause asymmetry in that field. The black hole should pull Higgs Field inside it. 

And that thing causes movements in that field. When black holes and other things pull and move that field. That causes stronger and weaker waves in that field. When a black hole pulls the field inside it. That means. There is less field left. If the energy field is gas or water, we could say. That there are points in that field with lower density. That means there are so-called false vacuums in that field. 

Those false vacuums or lower energy points in the energy field make it possible that the waves and fields are moving. When the Big Bang event happened, we can say that this event were multiple cases where energy fields started to travel out from a certain point. If there was a point that created the lower energy point. That caused the situation there energy started to make whirls around that point. 

The small lower energy points make the waves. And then those crossing waves make the asymmetry. When we think about the shape of the Big Bang there could be some kind of hole in the absolutely straight and stable energy field. When that energy pothole turns deep enough it causes collapse. That collapse formed the energy tower that also collapsed. 

The situation is similar to cases. In which somebody throws a stone in the water. 

That stone transfers energy to water and pushes the hole into the water. And when that hole fills. That causes the form of the water statue. That water statue falls. Causing the wave movement. Maybe the Big Bang event. Or, its beginning is the fallen energy pothole in the energy field. The question is where did that pothole come from? 

If we follow the form of the black hole models there is the possibility that the pothole formed the bubble or vacuumed the static energy field. When that bubble collapses that can cause the wave movement that travels around that place. The vacuum that collapses collects energy at one point. That thing can cause the reflection effect there that packed energy escapes from that point. 


https://bigthink.com/starts-with-a-bang/universe-symmetric/


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fundamental_interaction


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grand_Unified_Theory


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shape_of_the_universe


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Theory_of_everything



Wednesday, November 27, 2019

How fast is the growing speed of the Universe?




How fast is the growing speed of the Universe?

The shape of the universe.

What is the shape of the universe? (1) This is a very good question because that speed can explain, why we cannot see the location of the big bang. In somewhere past the cosmologists got a fascinating idea that galaxies would be in the layer of the ball, what is called as the universe, and then by searching the directions of the galaxies, the researchers could define the point, where the big bang happened, and then the telescopes would be turned to the "south pole" of the galaxy.

One of the things is that I'm talking here the direction of the galaxy, what is to the direction of the point, where the big bang happened as the "south pole", and in fact, the black holes might have polar like planets and stars. The idea was simply the position of the galaxy is telling, where the big bang was, and then the telescopes would easily find that point.

And then the astronomers were looking at the stars more and more effective telescopes, and they noticed that there were many galaxies in location, what supposed to be in the direction of the big bang. But as you see the scientists must sometimes adjust their theories, because observations are chancing our knowledge.

The idea of a two-dimensional ball-layer changed to the combination of the multiple models, and the thing, what kind of model of the universe is used depends on the scale. as you might know, the Universe is very big, and if we would look at things by using the very large scale model, we would think that the universe is the straight layer, and that model could be suitable in the local galaxy group.

But then the thing, what is called "U-shaped" or saddle from would turn to dominate, if the scale is smaller, and the observed area, of the universe, is getting bigger. Then the universe is turning to the ball, if the area, what observer sees is big enough. And here I must say, that the observer is always hypothetical. I have thought the universe as the 3D ball-layer, where the galaxies are in the different locations and positions, and the width of this layer is extremely large.

Why the expansion speed of the Universe is slower than it should (2)

By using the most modern telescopes, we can see the distances of billions of light-years. That means that we can see objects from that distance. The distance of a farthest known galaxy is 13 billion light-years and the size of the universe is 46 billion light-years. So we see things, what is happening in the 13 billion years ago.

But when we are thinking that we cannot see the big bang, there is one very interesting theory, and that thing is that the beginning of the existence of the expanding speed of the universe was near the speed of light. And then it started to slow. There should be something, that slows that speed, and that would mean that there is a massive black hole in the place, where the big bang has happened.

The real number of expanding the speed of expanding the universe is about 67 meters per second, and that means that there is something, that would break the expansion speed. That thing could be the mutual gravity of the galaxies, the dark material, and the last hypothesis is that in the center of the universe is the giant black hole, what is larger than any galaxy, and that thing would pull the galaxies to it. This thing makes science very nice before we can create and confirm the models of everything, we must realize, that everything is possible in the world, where black holes are dominating their environment, and massive eruptions are disturbing the harmony.
(1)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shape_of_the_universe
(2)
https://www.avaruus.fi/uutiset/kosmologia-ja-teoreettinen-fysiikka/maailmankaikkeuden-laajenemisnopeus-ei-tasmaa-olemme-jattaneet-jotain-huomioimatta-kosmologisessa-mallissa.html

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Expansion_of_the_universe

Image:

https://scx2.b-cdn.net/gfx/news/hires/2014/compactgalax.jpg

Astronomers could have a model for why photons from GRB 221009A were at a high energy level.

"An illustration shows a photon from the biggest cosmic explosion since the Big Bang reaching Earth. (Image credit: Robert Lea (created...