Are the “red little dots” in the young universe so-called quasi-stars?

"By all rights, they shouldn’t exist. When NASA’s James Webb Space Telescope (JWST) first opened its eyes to the distant past, it spotted hundreds of tiny, brilliant objects glowing red in the infant universe — just 600 million years after the Big Bang. These “little red dots,” as astronomers came to call them, gleamed with such surprising brightness and density that they seemed to defy the basic rules of cosmology."Mysterious red dots may be a peculiar cosmic hybrid between a star and a black hole."(ZmeScience, The Universe’s First “Little Red Dots” May Be a New Kind of Star With a Black Hole Inside")

Little red dots are the first star-shaped objects in the universe. There is a new theory that those little red dots can be so-called quasi-stars. Quasi-stars are hypothetical star-shaped objects that get their energy from the black hole inside them. But can those objects exist in the universe where we live? Or could they exist only in the young universe? 

The hypothetical quasi-stars are star-like objects that get their power from black holes inside them. The idea in quasi-stars is that those black holes can lock particles around the event horizon, forming objects that look like stars. For a long time, researchers thought that the quasi-stars could be very large stars. But there is one thing that makes those quasi-stars more interesting than ever before. That thing is the primordial black hole. In models, primordial black holes can be very small and lightweight. Those low-mass black holes can be very small. Also, things like black hole relativistic jets can press even planets into black holes. 

In Einstein’s models, every particle or object can turn into a black hole. That means there can be very small black holes. The smallest possible black holes, called quantum-size black holes, are quarks or gluons that energy presses into an extremely dense form. In some models, those quantum-size black holes can be in your room. They are so small that they cannot pull particles inside them. But there is a possibility that things like ultra-heavy neutron stars can involve black holes. 

(ZmeScience, The Universe’s First “Little Red Dots” May Be a New Kind of Star With a Black Hole Inside")

The hollow neutron shell can orbit the small black hole. The neutron structure will be locked around the event horizon. That neutron shell can rotate the black hole in a “safe distance”. That kind of object looks like a massive neutron star. But it would involve a black hole. The existence of that kind of thing can be proven in the cases where the neutron star seems too massive. 

Those black holes can be grapefruit-sized, extremely high-energy objects. In some models, quasi-stars are not possible in our universe. Except for those things formed in the early universe. Or there is also the possibility that the low mass black hole can form a quasi-star around it if that thing is in the dense supernova remnant. But there is also a possibility that an extremely low mass black hole can form a planet-shaped shell around it. In that case, the water molecules or things like metal or silicone crystals can form ball-shaped structures around them. 

There is a possibility that some very hot red dwarfs or stars like Spica could be the quasistars. The thing is that the small, low-mass black hole can still lurk in our solar system. And there is a possibility that this exciting object can hide under the icy shell of some dwarf planet. That is the thing that can make the “ninth planet” exist and explain why it cannot be seen from Earth. So there can be something very massive lurking in our solar system. 

https://www.bbc.co.uk/newsround/49910160

https://blog.sciandnature.com/2024/09/little-black-holes-in-our-solar-system.html

https://www.livescience.com/space/black-holes/miniature-black-holes-could-be-hollowing-out-planets-and-zipping-through-our-bodies-new-study-claims

https://science.nasa.gov/solar-system/planet-x/

https://www.sciencealert.com/something-massive-could-still-be-hiding-in-the-shadows-of-our-solar-system

https://www.zmescience.com/science/news-science/the-universes-first-little-red-dots-may-be-a-new-kind-of-star-with-a-black-hole-inside/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Primordial_black_hole

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spica

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quasi-star

Can a black hole be a star? Or, can the black sun be possible?

In theory, the ultimate big stars can be quasi-stars. The quasi star is the star there is a black hole inside it. And in some models, those quasi-stars can be invisible. The high energy radiation from black holes can turn a star so hot that it starts to send ultraviolet or some higher energy radiation. 

But can the energy production continue in the black hole? That thing means that the black hole would be so high-energy object. That it sends. Only gravitational, gamma, and X-ray radiations. So could some black holes be so high energy stars that they send only X- and gamma radiation, or is it possible that some stars can send only gravitational radiation? 

We should ask: are some black holes stars? The black hole as the star is based on the theorem that there can be so high energy stars that they send only X- or gamma-rays. The thing can be possible. If there are some kind of very high-energy reactions in the black hole or the "black star". But what those reactions can be? 

The wavelength of the radiation depends on the particle or particle's diameter that sends radiation. So if there is so a high energy star that things like quarks unite in it. That makes it possible for the star can send X- and/or gamma rays. The thing is that it's possible that in the hypothetical extreme quark fusion, the transmitter particles of gamma rays are gluons and X-rays are from the quarks. 

Normally when we talk about nuclear reactions we talk about fission and fusion. In fission, heavy elements like uranium divide and send energy. In fusion lightweight elements like deuterium and tritium impact and that reaction sends energy. 

1) In normal fission heavy atom cores divide. 

2) In normal fusion light atoms collide. 

But...

In quark or quantum versions, subatomic particles divide or collide. 

1) In quantum fission things like neutrons divide. That means their quark structure is released by impacting it with other quarks (or bosons) and then that thing releases the energy of strong nuclear force. 

2) In quantum fusion the electrons impact with atom's core. That thing turns all particles into neutrons. The neutron star is a structure where there are only neutrons. The power field and heavy gravitation make neutron decay impossible. 

2b) The energy impact that comes outside the atom can press neutrons, protons, and electrons into a hypothetical entirety called a quark star. That hypothetical star is the quark star. The entire structure is similar to neutron stars but their quarks are under one common power field. 

The last version produces a black hole. 

2c) It's possible that all structures in the atom and subatomic entirety fall into one entirety called singularity. In that structure, all quarks melt into one single structure. So in that model, the black hole is like one big quark there are multiple power fields around it. It's possible. That so-called quark fusion continues after the supernova explosion. The energy level of a black hole rises differently than in a normal star because its powerful gravity field can pull all energy inside it. 

When that ultimate extreme reaction happens all parts of the subatomic particles send radiation into their own wavelength that is the same as their diameter. So quarks and gluons and some other parts like gravitons send X- gamma- and gravitational radiation. In some models, the source of gravity waves is in the strings in or between quarks. 

But if the star sends only X- or gamma-rays those rays can push energy fields away. And then the outcoming Higgs field tries to fill that structure. And that makes the interaction look like a gravitational reaction. 

The big question is this: does the black hole's energy production continue after that explosion? 

All of those reactions deliver very much energy. But the question is can those reactions like reactions where quarks turn into one entirety continue after the Big Bang explosion? Those things are exciting and interesting models and if some kind of quark fusion continues that means some of those black holes can be stars. When things like quarks impact the singularity that thing releases energy. 

But there are so-called quantum versions of those reactions. In so-called "quantum" or quark fission the quark impacts things like neutrons. Neutrons have three quarks and if that one quark hits between those quarks, that thing can deliver energy. Same way in which subatomic particles fusion things like protons and electrons can impact together forming neutrons. 

In that process, the reaction forms things like neutron stars. The thing is that there is the possibility that there is one more high-energy reaction. In that reaction, the quarks in the neutrons impact forming material called singularity. In quark fusion where quarks collide and act similar way as atoms in fusion, the energy level rises to a very high level. 

But could that thing make possible things like gravity waves? By forming a sustainable or stable version of the reaction where quarks melt together the system requires very much energy. In models, that thing happened only once in the black hole's life. But the incoming energy along with the high-power gravity can make this reaction sustainable. If that quark fusion happens in the black holes that thing can explain many things like gravitational waves. 

When those high-power reactions happen. The gamma- and X-ray radiation form the electromagnetic shadow if they face things like some kind of particles or superstrings. If a radiation string travels through particles like neutrons without touching quarks that thing acts like the thermal pump. That makes the material look cold. And that makes the quantum fields travel to that point.