You, me, and the language model.

Who has responsibility if people let their thoughts to some AI?

Why do we let AI think for us? The road to this point is long and rocky. When we order the AI to make essays and poems we follow the journey that began a long time ago. When we read essays and poems, made by AI we can say how those things destroy our creativity. At this point, we might say that we can buy a poem book and write that poem from it. 

So, in this case. We simply copy a poem from the book that some great poem master made. And then we can look at the mirror and ask from that image, who made the poem that we just wrote? We wrote a text that some other person invented. So, if we think about this case, and connect AI to that continuum, we see that AI is taking the role of the poem book. In the point of the receiver or reader, it's the same who made that poem. 

Is it some Chat GPT, or is it some Lord Byron? The poem was not made by the person who wrote it on the card. Then we can think about people like Sam Altmann who make more and more advances in AI. We blame them and AI and search for mistakes from them. But then we forget our own responsibility. The user makes the decision to use AI, so we decide whether will we make poems ourselves or will we let some other actors make those things. We have responsibility for things that we make and introduce to people. When we make and introduce some poems ourselves, we face very pithy criticism. 

When we say that people must go to libraries, read books, and do other things, we must be honest. Are we only jealous of people who have tools and skills that we didn't have 20-30 years ago? When we look at work effectiveness we gaze at things like time. 

That a person uses for work. And if the work is done faster, we give that person new work. Would that be an encouraging way to work? If some person does the work faster than others and the work is well done, should we give the rest of the time free for that person? 

Or should we give a new job to that worker? And then order the person back to the office. And take some artificial smile to our faces and then fire that worker because that person makes work better and faster than we do? Or should we cheat that person about poems that this individual worker published on social media? 

We can also remember that person who is part-time working in our company. That means we can use our supreme control and show everybody how jealous we can be. If a person goes to some poem courses at the labor college outside the working time, we can find a new shift for that person. We have some ideal vision of what a henchman should be, and if a henchman does not fit into that thing, we must change that person to fit into that mold. 

That can be crushing. So, it's easier to take the book from the bookshelf. And then make a copy of some of those well-known poems. That means we can say that the person who invented that poem was somebody else. That might be impressive. We didn’t use our own brains for that poem. We made hard work if we took a pen and then copied those words. But it is easier to make the copy using a computer. Or, maybe we find some of those poems from the net and then use copy-paste. Then we must not use our brains at all. AI is the tool that releases our resources from thinking to something else. When we think about cases where somebody makes their own poems, we must realize that every poem makes the first text. 

We decide the easy way. If we want to write some poems or essays, we must sit on our computer. And then we must take the trouble for that text. If we have some other things to do, we have no time to write texts and think about things that we make. Sam Altmann or anybody else than me and you decide if we use AI. That makes our life easier. It leaves our time to have a social life in discos and bowling alleys. But is that the advance that we want? The answer is that the decisions that we make show the road. 

People like Sam Altmann are basically businessmen. They follow the Maslow hierarchy of needs. When our basic needs are filled we want more. AI is the thing that allows us to transfer all our productivity to some computer. And that is the thing that makes AI advance faster than we expected. When the AI satisfies some need, there is another need it must respond to. This is the thing in AI development. AI can make things better than humans. 

Or, we can say that it can make some things better than humans. But then we must realize that AI must also learn new things. There was a story that some antique ATARI computer beat Chat GPT in chess. That thing happened because nobody ever taught the Chat GPT the chess. In the same way, we would lose all chess games against the monkey if we ever played that game. Every skill that AI has is a module. And if the AI has no module for something it's helpless. The AI requires lots of power. The AI, or LLM server requires its own power platform. And when we develop new and more scalable AI systems, we need new and more powerful computers. 

But still, we must realize that the AI that makes everything cannot make things from nothing. Those systems require massive databases and as much power as some cities. That waste heat can also be used for energy production. But the problem is always the temperature. New solutions like biological AI where the microchips communicate with microchips are coming. And in the wrong hands, those systems are dangerous. 

Fake news and how they are created

Fake news and how they are created

The fake news is made for supporting something. They are created for supporting ideology or some opinion. Most of the faked news is connected with things like medicine, foreigners and other kinds of things. The reason is that political leaders have affected to those questions. They are making laws about those things, and they are personal to some people.

Many times people are asking about the reason, why there is not much faked news about things like rockets and physics. The thing is that those people who are created fake news cannot affect that kind of things like black holes. So why waste time on making things, what does not affect?

The fake news has some purpose and that means that they are considering things, where people who are in political leadership in the nation can affect. When we are thinking about the normal form of fake news, we are facing things, where something has sone kind if costs, but in those things is not mentioned any positive things.

That means that the positive things or things that are supporting the opinion of the writer are used as sources. This thing is called the selective use of data.

And that thing makes fake news very dangerous because many of those things base real stories. But the story itself is strongly filtered. That means that there are only mentioned things that are supporting the opinions of the writer. Many times the fake news is made for supporting some politicians.

The thing is that there is no politician, who has caught that the fake news is made by the order of the politician itself. But the support can be given without asking permission of that politician. And that means that some nations can support the foreign politicians, who please them without telling that to supported politician self.

Space exploration is not science. It is the way to get scientific data, but the rocket itself in the form of engineering. And that means the members of normal nations parliaments have very little change to affect that kind of question.

When we are thinking about the miniature shuttles, there must have some purpose, why that equipment has been built. And the defense department would not tell the reason, why it orbits that kind of systems years in the orbiter because those things are quite expensive.

So nobody in the defense department is not told me the reason, why the X-37B has been built, but it might be some kind of multipurpose system, what can carry nuclear weapons, and act as the HCM (Hypersonic Cruise Missile). But there might have also other roles to that thing, what is one of the most mysterious space systems in the world. Those systems are the national secrets, and that means the data, that is shared is always limited.

Image:

https://www.seekpng.com/ipng/u2w7w7a9q8q8y3t4_donald-duck-read-book/

Cosmos, biology and strange tales about giants

Cosmos, biology and strange tales about giants

What somebody doesn't want us to know about giants (1)?

In the image, what is connected to this text is two rocks in Roque Nublo area Gran Canaria, and the tale tells that those rocks are remaining of two giants, who were stoned in that area. This is not the only tale about this kind of thing. Giants were quite popular characters in the Medieval tales. Also, Titans (2) were giants, and the origin of those stories is in Antique Greece. Sometimes there is claiming or theories that the Titans were the silicone-based lifeforms (3). 

And if we are thinking about those giants, they might have space suits, what were hot inside. But this is only a hypothesis or theory. The only thing, that can say is true is that somebody has told many stories of those mysterious creatures. But why those stories have been told is a mystery.

This tale is, of course, one of the most well-known stories about giants, and those stories are many times feeling hoaxes or just the tales, what are told because of fun. But sometimes we must realize, that there is something incredible and mysterious about this kind of story, what is fascinating and the imaginational. 

The stories of giants are the origin of the thing, what is called as cosmology and research of life in the universe.

When we are thinking about SETI-program, we must understand that searching the extraterrestrial lifeforms from the universe is a hopeless mission, if we have not the model, what kind of lifeforms can be existed. The thing is that those lifeforms must not be similar to what we are. 

The alien might not be a vegetable or animal. The alien could have the skin, what has the ability for photosynthesis

And the second thing is that they must not have the ability to live on earth. That means that even if we cannot do something, those aliens could do some other things, and the idea is that if those species would be formed on some planet they are fully adapted to the conditions of that planet. 

So the thing is that those aliens might have skin, which would have the ability for photosynthesis, and that means that the "green men" might be true. If those aliens would have skin, what makes them able to create chlorophyll for photosynthesis in their skins, that means that those aliens would not even have to get oxygen for life. In those cases, the skin of the alien creates the necessary oxygen for that hypothetical species.

What about protective suits, where could grow the cells for creating oxygen and nutrient in those suits?

But then we must realize that the purple-molecule can also act as the photosynthetic element. That means that if the alien would have that molecule in the skin cells, the alien would be red. But there is a possibility that the extraterrestrials have a biomechanical protective suit. In that very advanced suit would be transparent tubes, where could grow the cells, which can create the oxygen and nutrient for an astronaut. 

The thing is that those aliens might have protective suits, where are cells, what is giving life support. In those protective suits, the photosynthetic cells would be in the tubes, where they would get nutrients, and those biomechanical suits might have the ability to grow the same cells for nutrients for the astronauts. 

The silicon-based life forms (4)

In the end, we must say that there is a possibility that some lifeforms could be silicone base. That means that those creatures will turn to mountain crystal if silicone would touch with water, and that means those creatures would be stoned on Earth. 

That kind of hypothetical lifeform would need extremely high temperatures and a totally dry area. This means that this kind of creature would need the spacesuit, where its extremely high temperature. So those creatures would need near 200 degrees celsius for operating. And if the suit will be broken, that creature will turn to mountain crystal. 

(1)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vjq3qKH-nQg

(2)

https://www.greekmythology.com/Titans/titans.html

(3)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4GmGO__75NY

(4)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hypothetical_types_of_biochemistry

Image:

https://travel.usnews.com/Canary_Islands/Things_To_Do/Roque_Nublo_Gran_Canaria_63072/

The secrets of intelligence and evolution

The secrets of intelligence and evolution

Sometimes people have thought, that is the intelligence only the big memory block. That means that memory makes intelligence, and if that thing would be true, the thing is that every species can be intelligent if its brains would connect to the memory blocks or giant databases.

This kind of theories are fascinating and brings in front of our eyes also horrifying images of the animals, what are connected to the internet by using some sensors, which allows them to communicate with computers by using normal BlueTooth or WLAN systems. Those microchips are not very big, and there is a possibility to implant them to bugs like bees or wasps, and then this bug can communicate with central computers by using that kind of radio transmitters.

Anthropologists call that thing as the "gate inmates", which allows the computers and the users of computers to control animals like bugs by using the internet. This thing makes the possibility, that something goes wrong because the brains of that bug might act like the pineal gland, what might make horrible consequences. 

The idea of the researches of intelligence is that the pineal gland is the will and mind of the human being, and the thing is that this area of human brains is not very big. When we are thinking about the brains of bugs like bees, we must remember that this area would operate much effectively in the brains of bugs, because of the neurons of bugs are wired to themselves, what makes them billions of connections.

So what if those neurons or brains would be connected to the database of the internet? This kind of things are very interesting to think, and there is also one very big thing, what people have not thought before, or at least there are not very much talks about this evolutionary aspect.

The thing is that some of the bugs live only a couple of days, which guarantees that the genetic diseases are not transferred to the next generation,  but it also makes possible that the population would renew very fast. And that thing is really interesting, because also the bugs, what are living short time have been advanced. If the body of the animal would die, that doesn't mean that its nervous system would also be destroyed.

I don't know does this kind of things happen, but there is a theoretical possibility that some bug would transfer its neurons to the next generation, and after that, the body would die. Is some species does this, that thing guarantees that the memories and experiences will transfer to the next generation of those species. 

But there is one other threat, what is connected with Darwinism. That is that the evolution of the shortly living animals is extremely fast, and if there would be done some tests, like transferring genomes to the bugs in some laboratory, this thing can cause some mutations, what are not willing.

And when we are thinking about tests, where is tested things like neurotransmitters and nerve gasses with bugs, those chemicals would cause over upsetting of the brains. The chemicals like amphetamine are also causing the excitement of the neurons, and that can cause the growing number of connections.

If we think that bugs are acting like humans, and choose their partners by methods, that those volunteers are similar to each other. And if the more intelligent bugs are choosing only inmates, what has brains where is more connections than regular inmates, that would cause problems. In this scenario, the bugs would make the evolution lines, where the genomes, what is making connections are enriching.