There is no quantum computer. Without quantum memory.

 

“An international team of physicists has uncovered a subtle but important twist in how 'memory' works in quantum systems. Credit: Shutterstock” (ScitechDaily, An international team of physicists has uncovered a subtle but important twist in how “memory” works in quantum systems. Credit: Shutterstock)

Theoretically, a quantum memory is very easy to understand. Information is stored on the qubit as hills and valleys on those particles. That means.  That kind of system. It is theoretically easy to make. But a practical solution is harder. Because the system should transform binary data into hills and valleys on the qubit. The system can use a photon that transfers information to another photon. 

The body of information. 

The quantum computer is like a body that needs nutrients. For binary computers and quantum computers, information is the nutrient. The data processing system. Mimics human digestion. Their information is stored in mass memory. Until. It’s shared for the data units that require that information. 

Quantum memory is not what we thought, the new study suggests. The key to the quantum internet and ultra-secure data transmission is impossible if those systems cannot store information. The system transmits information into a quantum computer. That stores data in the transmitting side of the quantum entanglement, and then the system transmits that data forward. The problem is this. Without the ability to store data. The quantum system cannot send it forward. 

And without that thing, there are no quantum systems. We can think of this system. Like metabolism or digestion. Before information is transported into the quantum system, the AI-based system must preprocess it into a form that the quantum system can handle. That information.  The system must predict. Every type of anomaly. If there is some kind. Of anomaly. The system must store. that data into mass memory. 

“Scientists have unveiled a real-time method for tracking rapid qubit fluctuations inside quantum computers. The breakthrough reveals that even stable qubits can deteriorate in milliseconds, offering new insight into how to improve quantum processor performance. Credit: Shutterstock” (ScitechDaily, Scientists Finally See Quantum Computer Failures as They Happen)

 Data is the nutrient for the computer. The binary system preprocesses data. And then send it to the quantum data storage. In the human body. The fat cell stores nutrients until the body needs them. In the same way. In the body of information, a quantum computer stores information in the quantum data storage. And then that system starts to make. Quantum entanglement with the receiving particles. 

We can think that quantum data storage stores data in the form of standing waves. Another way is to create some kind of “hairy” qubit. In the last case, data is stored in the qubit in the form where the qubit’s surface is filled with “hair”. The length of those “hairs” is one state of a qubit. And that kind of qubit can be a revolutionary way to create models of how the quantum computer and quantum circuit should work. The system sends data to the receiver by using quantum entanglement. But. Before that thing is done, the computer must store information in the qubit. 

This is why the quantum computer must follow the behavior of quantum entanglement. All the time. When data is transferred to the receiving particle. The quantum computer can resend that data by transforming the side of quantum entanglement that received the data to the transmitting side. The point of quantum entanglement is that. The transmitting and receiving particles must have different energy levels. If the receiving particle’s energy level rises to the same level as the transmitting particle, the entanglement will be broken. But. If the system can transmit information .Into the next particle, which can make the quantum internet possible. Before the system can turn the receiving particle into a transferring particle. The system must cut the entanglement with the first particle. 

https://scitechdaily.com/quantum-memory-isnt-what-we-thought-physicists-reveal-a-hidden-duality/

https://scitechdaily.com/scientists-finally-see-quantum-computer-failures-as-they-happen/

https://scitechdaily.com/scientists-may-have-found-the-holy-grail-of-quantum-computing/

Researchers found interesting things in brains.

Researchers found new interesting details in human brains. First, our brains transmit light. And that light gives an interesting idea: could brains also have optical and photon-based ways to transmit data between neurons? And if neurons have that ability, how effective and versatile it is. We know that there are no unnecessary things in our brains. So that means the light in our brains must have something to do with neurons. But do neurons use that way to transmit complicated information or is it meant only for cleaning neuro-channels? 

That interesting light causes the question: does that effect have some connection to light that people see when they visit near death? When we think about death the neuro channels will empty from neurotransmitters and electric phenomena. That means our nerves are more receptive to those signals than usual. So could that light have some kind of interaction between neurons or axons? Is there some point in neurons that reacts to that ultra-weak photon emission, UPE? 

Does our own neural activity cover that light below it? There is an observation that dead organisms shine dimmer light than alive. And maybe that light turns dimmer when the creature closes to death. There is an article in the Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters, “Imaging Ultraweak Photon Emission from Living and Dead Mice and from Plants under Stress” that introduces ultra-weak photon emission from dead mice and plants turn dimmer. 

And the question is this: can humans see that ultra-weak photon emission and its changes subliminally? The article says that all living organisms shine weak light that disappears when a creature dies. Also, things like mammals shine IR-radiation but the main question is can the ultraweak photon emission, UPE happen on purpose, or is it some kind of leak? And can humans see that phenomenon but that observation cannot reach our consequence? 

There are two things that self-learning systems must do to become effective. Effectiveness means that the AI or human brains should ignore irrelevant information. If that thing doesn’t happen, it grows databases and data mass in the system. When the system makes a decision, it must select the right data from the data that it has. And then the system must make decisions using relevant data. This makes the situation problematic. The system must decide what kind of data it needs in the future. 

And that is quite hard to predict. When we learn something we cannot be sure do we need those skills anymore. Maybe we don’t need skills that we learn in the military ever after that. But as we see, the future is hard to predict. The other thing that the AI must do is to adjust its processor's actions like human brains do. In human brains, brain cells have multiple frequencies in oscillation. Scientists say that those differences in oscillation frequency are to avoid rush hours in axons. 

That thing means that brain cells give time to clarify axons. Because brain cells have different frequencies that make it possible to control axons and deny the situation that multiple neurons send data into the same axon at the same time. Those multiple rhythms allow the brain to avoid rushes in axons. The same thing can make a fundamental advance in technology. If we think about the situation that the system that runs AI doesn't have a controller that includes system architecture that makes processors operate a little bit at different times that causes a situation that all processors send data at the same time to the same data gate. That causes a rush and makes the system jam immediately. In the electric systems the system that uses electric impulses for data transmission. 

Processors. That operates in the same moment. Can form standing waves in the data channel. And that burns the system. There are many interesting details in the human brain. That thing opens visions that maybe brains might also have an optical way to transport information. Researchers try to find out the purpose of that light. And if they find a point in, or on neurons that react to that light, they find a new level in their brains. Another interesting detail is that different parts of the same neurons learn in different ways. That means that the neuron itself can be more intelligent and versatile than we thought. 

https://neurosciencenews.com/hippocampus-neuron-rhythm-29277/

https://www.psypost.org/different-parts-of-the-same-neuron-learn-in-different-ways-study-finds/

https://www.psypost.org/neuroscientists-discover-biological-mechanism-that-helps-the-brain-ignore-irrelevant-information/

https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.jpclett.4c03546

Researchers made the record-breaking breakthrough in Schrödinger's cat state.

Above is the image of the Schrödinger's cat state. A cat that is alive and carries information is closed in the cube that protects it. The cube itself doesn't carry information. And that makes Schrödinger's cat state seem dead. The outside observer cannot see the information that the cat carries in the hidden USB stick. 

Schrödinger's cat state is a thought experiment about a creature that is alive and dead, at the same time. That state can turn into a model where the particle or creature carries information and doesn't. That makes Schrödinger's cat state interesting. In quantum networks, data is stored in physical things called qubits. 

We can replace the words dead and alive. Using the words interesting and boring states. Interesting states carry interesting information. And boring states don't carry information. 

How do we protect physical information like letters? We simply put them inside the envelope. So that nobody sees it from the outside. So we can put the qubit into another particle so that outsiders cannot see the message transporter from the outside. The qubit can have both states 0 and 1 at the same time. That means. We can cover the qubit with zero and that makes it dead. Dead particles are not interesting. 

Because it doesn't carry information. Particles are alive when they are interesting. And interesting particles carry information. In the quantum system, the ability to steal information is physically denied. If somebody wants to read information from the qubit that destroys it. And the information will not reach the receiver. 

The model can be the qubit that is stored in another particle. The particle that carries qubit can seem "dead". So it doesn't carry information and the catcher will not see that particle as interesting. But the interesting or "alive" particle is inside that outside particle. The problem is to separate the right particles from the flow. The system must remove the particle or shell that covers the information carrier. 

The qubit is safe because it's single-use. If somebody tries to transfer data out from qubit that erases data immediately. Data that qubit carries is also encrypted for the receiving system's that it can route data to the right points. And if the wrong qubit transfers data in the wrong gate that destroys the information. 

The answer can be that the system knows what the right particle or information carrier looks like. When we think about cats that carry USB sticks we can use many cats in that work. But all of those cats don't carry important information. We can have workers who capture those cats and take the USB sticks. But then only. The most trusted workers can get the USB stick with ultra-high secure data. 

So the cat must have details like black and white fur. That the worker recognizes the cat that carries important data. The idea is that if the wrong worker takes the unauthorized USB stick it destroys the data immediately. Same way when a quantum system tries to download data from the qubit that destroys the data. The receivers must not try to download the wrong data types because that erases data from the qubit.

 https://scitechdaily.com/quantum-breakthrough-scientists-create-schrodinger-cat-state-with-record-long-lifetime/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Schr%C3%B6dinger%27s_cat

The Harvard astronomers uncovered the real shape of the Milky Way's halo of the stars.

Researchers from Harvard University have now uncovered the shape of the Milky Way's stellar halo.  The image above this text shows that the Milky Way galaxy's real shape looks a little bit like American football. That thing is one of the most interesting things in the history of science. 

Because the halo around the Milky Way stretched. That means there is some kind of force that is turning its shape to look like the rugby ball. The jets from Sagittarius A are traveling straight out from the poles of that supermassive black hole. The reason why the halo around the material stretches only from certain points is interesting. 

If that stretching would happen because of plasma, that is coming out from the material disk's equator the stretching must be symmetrical. That means the shape of the stellar halo should be like a beach ball, not an American football. So that thing is very interesting. Is there some yet unknown plasma or energy jet that stretches the stellar halo? 

There is a possibility. That the Fermi bubbles at both sides of the Sagittarius A are the answer. For the strange shape of that material halo. The impact radiation, that comes from Sagittarius A or its material jets can explain the shape of the stellar halo. But that thing is pure speculation. 

Only the part of the material that forms the Milky Way and other galaxies is in their material disks. There are lots of stars and material, including star clusters around the spiral galaxies. This halo is interesting because at the impact area where the material disk impacts with galactic halo are forming whirls. And those whirls can be the beginning of new stars. 

The reason why researchers are researching the halos around galaxies is that they can tell about the shape of the universe. There are theories that the universe is looking a little bit like the galaxy. 

There is a ball-shaped point of visible matter that is surrounding the far larger structure of dark matter. But nobody surely knows about that thing. The symmetry of the shape of those gases tells about the energy sources in distant galaxies. When something hits those halos that affect its symmetry. 

https://scitechdaily.com/harvard-astronomers-have-revealed-the-true-shape-of-the-milky-ways-halo-of-stars/

https://shorttextsofoldscholars.blogspot.com/

Astronomers found a one-kind-of of the triple star system.

"Artist’s interpretation of HD 98800, a quadruple-star system located 150 light-years away in the constellation TW Hydrae. Bin Liu and Alejandro Vigna-Gomez suggest that the more massive tertiary-star system"

"TIC 470710327 could have started in a similar configuration – two binary systems with one of them eventually merging into one, bigger star. TIC 470710327 is located very close to “Cassiopeia”. Credit: NASA/JPL-Caltech/UCLA" (ScitechDaily.com/“One of a Kind” Massive Triple Star System Detected)

The massive triple-star system TIC 470710327 is very special. The reason for that is those stars are extremely massive. The binary stars have a combined mass of 12 times the Sun. But the third component has the mass of 16 suns. 

The binary stars are orbiting each other very close. And because the third component is heavier than binary stars, that means the system is not yet stable. The binary stars might turn to orbit the third component. 

Because the third component is larger. That means the TIC 470710327 is not been a triple-star system very long time. Maybe the origin of this system is in the quadruple star. In that case, another pair of those star pairs have melted together.  

Or maybe, the binary star pair has impacted to heavier star's gravitational field. That explains why the heavier component is still orbiting the binary star. 

The star system is made up of a binary set of stars, two stars that orbit each other, and one more massive star that orbits the binary. There are many similar star systems in the universe. 

But the TIC 470710327 contains very heavy stars. And that makes it unique. Another thing that makes TIC 470710327 unique is that its third component is heavier than binary components. 

This kind of stellar system is interesting even if they have probably no exoplanets. But there is always the possibility that there are some cold exoplanets outside that system. Or those exoplanets can also orbit between those stars. In that case, those planets might be burning hell. There would be no lifeforms on those planets. But they might be very interesting. 

Even if planets cannot form in those solar systems there is always the possibility that the massive stars capture some rogue planets. There are calculations that many of the planets in the Milky Way are rogue planets. Those planets are formed of nova or supernova remnants after their star exploded as nova or supernova. 

Or the eruption of their star pushed those planets away from their orbiter. Maybe Pluto and most of the Kuiper Belt asteroids are turning to interstellar travelers after the Sun erupted nova when it used its fuel. 

https://www.sci.news/astronomy/massive-compact-hierarchical-triple-star-system-11014.html

https://scitechdaily.com/one-of-a-kind-massive-triple-star-system-detected/

https://www.thetechoutlook.com/news/science/scientists-discovered-a-unique-trio-of-stars-tic-470710327-in-a-major-development/

Strange gravitation.

The shape of gravitation is a wave motion. And because it's wave motion. That thing means that gravitation acts like all other wave motions. So when wave motion impacts particles their effect is similar to when two cars are impacting. When two objects are impacting the kinetic energy transforms to wave motion. The energy or wave motion that begins from the impact point will travel through the object which can be a car, particle, etc. 

And then that wave motion continues its movement behind the object. If impacting objects are cars people will hear that wave motion as the sound. When that impact happens at the quantum level the impacting wave motion faces the quantum field that forms the particle. And that quantum field moves backward like jelly. Then the wave motion continues to travel behind the object. 

When gravitation hits the nose of the particle the wave motion continues to travel backward of the particle. The reason for that is that energy travels always from the higher energy level to the lower energy level. And that difference between the two energy layers is called the potential difference. When wave motion travels through the quantum system it will deliver or get energy from the quantum system. And that thing causes the material would fall to the gravitational center. 

If the distance between begin and end of the object is long. That means that the system reaches a stable condition longer time. Stable condition or energy stability is the situation where begin and end of the track of the wave motion are the same. And that thing means that the energy flow in the system ends. 

Can the superstring theory explain why gravitation is so weak? 

Superstring theory describes particles as the whisk or yarn ball-looking quantum fields. The superstrings are the wave motion or quantum lightning that form the quantum field. 

The whisk-shaped form where superstrings are traveling over the poles makes the particle can have multiple quantum states at the same time. That thing means that every single superstring can have a different energy level or quantum state, 

The idea is that the gravitational radiation must travel through the superstring that is like serpentine. The catching area of the radiation is very large, but the problem is that gravitational radiation must travel through that superstring. 

When we are thinking about superstring as the paper serpentine the thickness of that paper is not very big. And there is no time to transfer information to the superstring. 

So why gravitation is the weakest of all forces? 

So why gravitation is the weakest of all forces? The answer might be easier than people ever imagine. The idea is that the wavelength of the gravitation waves is so short that the gravitation will impact the superstring. Because a superstring is extremely thin far thinner than some quarks or even gluons the energy difference between two layers is so small that the wave motion travels through that superstring causing an extremely small potential difference. 

The reason why gravitation affects long distances can be that the superstrings are very long. So the area that receives the gravitational wave is so large that it can receive enough gravitational radiation. But the depth of that superstring is so small that the potential difference between the side that is closer to the gravitation source and the side that is away from that source is very small. 

The superstring is like some kind of serpentine. The length of that thing can be very long. But the thickness of those papers is so small. The gravitational effect will affect straight through that superstring, not across it. And that means there is so little time to collect energy. 

The length of the superstring is very long. And also the width of the superstring can be large. but the thickness of that thing is so small that it makes gravitation weak. So catching area for gravitation would be large, but that radiation has a very short time to tunnel through the superstring. And that time will not give time to transfer information or energy to the superstring, 

Wave-particle duality and gravitation. 

The gravitation is the wave motion that behaves like all other wave motions. The limit of the speed of gravitational radiation is the speed of light. So gravitation can make whirls, it can reflect. 

Wave-particle duality means that the gravitation can also take the shape of the particle and otherwise.  And when two very powerful gravitational fields are impacting there is the possibility that those fields are jumping out from each other. In some wild theories, the gravitation can turn even solid if the gravitation field is powerful enough. 

https://miraclesofthequantumworld.blogspot.com/

Image: Pinterest

See also:

Black holes¨

Gravitational waves

Graviton

Standard model

Superstrings

Theory of Relativity

Wave motion

The dark matter and the forming of galaxies

The dark matter and the forming of galaxies

The dark matter can form also other nebulas than galaxies. 

The forming of the first protogalaxies started quite soon after the Big Bang. And the scientists have found the galaxy, what is forming purely the dark matter. That galaxy has proven that the dark matter interacts with other material by gravity and the dark galaxy has caused thoughts that can we see that galaxy if we would be very near that thing?

So is the dark matter glass, what will let the light go through it, or is it like some kind of carbon bite, what we see as a shadow against the normal galaxies. The thing is fascinating because of the form of dark matter is important, when we are thinking about the possibility to see that thing, and if there is a large number of dark material in some galaxy, we might think that could we see that material even in the short distances.

But we know that dark matter acts like normal material and forms the clouds like other material. The thing in gravity is that every single object in the universe has gravity field. When we are thinking about the gravity field and atoms, we must realize that every single star and planet is the combination of atoms as well as interplanetary nebulas are.

The idea of the next part of the text is taken from reality, that dark matter interacts only by gravity. So that means that the interaction between dark matter and other particles would be very slow except near black holes or neutron stars, which would behave dark matter like normal matter, and their gravity field is really strong. That means they would pull the dark matter to them and sling into space.

One of the impressive thoughts is how black hole or neutron star acts if they are getting in the nebula, what is formed by dark matter?

So if the dark matter is forming the similar nebulas what normal material forms in the visible versions of the interplanetary nebulas, the thing is that the dark nebulas might have a bigger effect on other particles in galaxies. And if we are thinking the case that the dark matter would interact with the gravity, that thing can cause the forming of the supermassive black holes in the points, where we cannot expect their forming.

When we are turning back to the dark galaxy, we might think the questions, is there be a possibility that there are galaxies, where is not a single planet? Or where is not a single solid planet? And what would look like a galaxy, where are only stars and the supermassive black hole, where the material would drop. The thing is that black holes are also pulling the dark matter inside them.

And because the dark matter would act like normal material, but the interaction happens only by gravity, that means there could be galaxies, what has formed by the dark matter, but what has the supermassive black hole inside them. But what the dark matter looks like, if it would drop in the black hole? Would that very powerful object turn the dark matter to the normal matter, or does the dark matter what is dropping in the black hole send some kind of radiation.

What would be the EIS and what makes this kind of things interesting?

What would be the EIS and what makes this kind of things interesting?

EIS(1) (Everywhere International SME:s) means one of the most interesting things in research and development or R&D. SME:s (Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises) (2) is one of the most effective methods to make the R&D effective. The small size enterprises are offering a good forum and environment for research projects. 

That kind of environment is helping to keep the project team motivated and the secrets inside the house, by using this model where the company is multiple cell companies nobody can slip in the group without somebody noticing that thing. Also, the team would not have unnecessary bureaucracy, but when we are thinking this kind of research in large-sized companies, we must remember that the company can create an auxiliary business name for new projects. Or it can establish the sub-company, which is fully owned by it. 

This type of cell model company is very safe if we are thinking about information security. And the cell-model helps cover the information, what is not wanted to give for the great audience. That means that the workers, who are working with confidential projects must not carry ID-cards or use computers, which can connect them with certain companies. 

So, in this case, the worker or even the big chief cannot connect themselves to companies like Lockheed-Martin, and that thing helps them keep things secure. And that thing also keeps them safe, if they must land to the hostile land, and in this case, the hostile actors cannot connect them anything secret. 

But what we need in that case, if the company works in a multinational environment? We need the thing, what teaches things to those people very fast. And that kind of technology, which allows a person to learn things like foreign languages in a very short period. The same method can be used to teach other things like engineering skills or military tactics. 

The most intensive way to learn things 

The most effective way to learn things is to involve as many neurons as possible in that process. And this thing is under research because in business life and intelligence world needs to create things like linguistic skills as fast as possible. So if the person has 24 hours to learn the new language, how people should work in that case? 

Would you think this kind of thing is impossible, and even that thing is possible, those kinds of methods are really dangerous. They affect straight to the nervous system and multiple areas at the same time. So if something goes wrong that thing could cause horrifying psychosis. And it can be used to create faked memories. 

The idea is to combinate all learning methods, what people have ever created and use them at the same time as a person. That thing would contain the subliminal voice, very fast flap images and electromagnetic stimulation to brain core. Also, the nerve tracks of hands can be used to give stimulation to the person. This thing would be the ultimate version of virtual reality. So this kind of thing would contain things, what some people would want to keep in secret.

(1)

https://www.interregeurope.eu/eis/

(2)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Small_and_medium-sized_enterprises

The hoax information and the dangers of it

The hoax information and the dangers of it

The false-flag information attacks

The false-flag information operations are one of the most sophisticated tools in the hands of trollers. The false-flag attack in social media would be done by using faked social media accounts, or by stealing the well-known user's account, and then start to deliver the deep fake images and films. That means that the faked commercials can deliver on social media, and the customers would come to some shop, and ask for sales, which have not existed.

The most dangerous effect in cyber warfare is that using deep faked information, which is connected with false-flag operations in social media. During those operations, the hackers can use that thing as the platform's phishing operations. And even the nuclear weapons officials would try to get in the trap and give the access codes to the nuclear storages. This is one of the scariest visions that have been introduced in the media.

False-flag attacks can be made by using captured social media accounts, which belonged to some media houses. That thing would make those attacks more effective than they would otherwise be, and in the hands of the wrong people, those things are creepy. If we are believing that some actor is trusted, the captured account can make very big damages, because the trusted actor would not deliver faked information. And that would cause the thing that somebody would even start the nuclear war by using that kind of method.

So the worst of the fears is that the faked information can cause nuclear warfare. This theoretical scenario begins with the idea that some support systems of nuclear weapons would be hacked. In this case, somebody would get the codes for access to the nuclear weapon message and communication systems. 

When we are thinking that the military place like Cheyenne Mountain or Gora Yamantau would be hacked and in those screens, what is used to commanding the nuclear weapons would be caught by hackers, who would deliver the hoax information of the incoming nuclear strike, that thing can cause war in theory. The problem is that if the nuclear weapon operators would notice the attack, they have only a couple of minute time to react.

And there is no time for making double-checks by using What's App and asking about the situation on the ground. So what if somebody hacks the communication line of the nuclear command?

In this kind of visions the persons, who are serving the third country, what is in war, and then those people would hack some missile control computer. After that, they would deliver the hoax information that some missiles have been shot from their enemy territory, which could cause that the personnel of that base would estimate the situation that they should open fire with nuclear weapons.

Image:

https://listverse.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/11/wikipedia-is-fake-news.jpeg

Writing about graviton and theoretical quantum particles

Writing about graviton and theoretical quantum particles

Could there be the thing, what is called as "antigravity"?

Researchers know that every single particle in the universe has a mirror particle. Or maybe we should rather say, researchers, believe that every particle in the universe has its antiparticle because nobody has claimed to find antiphoton. So there is one very interesting thing, what scientists have thought, and that question is: has every four fundamental base forces (1) (gravity, electromagnetism, and weak and strong nuclear force (Color force) of nature also their anti force. 

So is there the antigravitons in the universe? (2) That means that there would be one of the most interesting effects, what could be possible, the antigravity. In that case, the graviton, what is theoretical particle would have the mirror particle, which would act the opposite way with gravity. The thing is that we don't know much about gravity. We don't know about the direction, where the gravity effects. 

Theories are very difficult to make if we cannot see, what we must model. And in the case, when we are making theories of gravity, in the key role is the hypothetical particle known graviton. Every single time, when we are making theories about gravity, we have begun from the theorem, that because of every other base forces in the universe has the transporter particle, also gravity must have that particle. 

Antigravitons are making antigravity possible?

So how gravity effects? Does it pull or push objects? But every theory begins that at the first the object shoots the graviton to another object, and then the superstrings would pull them together. That means that the objects interact with other objects, but then we have one little thing, what we ever thought? Does the gravity field of the object expand like some radiation? 

That means that gravity is like radiation, but making sure about that, we should find graviton. And graviton would be the super photon. Or is that field stable? In the last case, that thing would give a chance to create the hypothetical graviton rocket motor, which is so extremely powerful, that even the photon rocket would look like a moped. But the problem is that we don't have a single observation about gravitons. 

When scientists found that neutrons are scattering, that was the beginning of the endless lists of theories and calculations, what purpose was to find the reason, why quarks are scattering neutron, and that thing has created an idea what is called "dark energy". The thing is that the outcome energy would keep the quarks in the structure, and the internal energy would push those particles away from each other. 

The thing, that is destroying neutrons is fascinating because it would give the key to an endless energy source or even the ability to break the gravity and create a fully operating antigravity device. The idea of dark energy is basing one theory that in the Big Bang the gravity was turned to its mirror force, and started to push particles away from the center of the Big Bang. 

And that thing has caused the conduction to theories that the graviton, theoretical particle, what transmits gravity would also have mirror particle, so-called antigraviton. That thing would revolutionize technology and science if we would someday find those particles. The existence of antigravity is an interesting theorem because that thing would make some science fiction stuff possible. 

(1)

https://www.space.com/four-fundamental-forces.html

(2)

http://curious.astro.cornell.edu/about-us/137-physics/general-physics/particles-and-quantum-physics/813-what-is-a-graviton-intermediate

Image:

https://www.techexplorist.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/11/gravity18.jpg

Could one single individual organism be civilization?

Could one single individual organism be civilization?

What kind of civilization would be the creature, what is hybridized with computers? The idea of this thing is taken from Xibalba(1) or Mayan underworld, and there was the god, who just sits in the place. The servants of that God made all the works, what that creature wanted. (Image II)

And this god was given an idea of the hybridization of the living creature and computers. in this case, the creatures, what are hybridizing with the computers, can make also this thing with the big-size data networks. So the idea is that when the creature would be born, the robots would put it in the tank, where the computer will connect the brain core stimulation and the EEG-control system to that thing.

So by using this kind of technology the single individual would control the very large combinations and entities, and maybe that would be the future of some kind of alien. If we are thinking about this kind of hybridization, the creature would put in the tank and the computerized networks would be acting as the sensors for that creature. And the thing is that the system would control robots by using WLAN-connections.

Image II

One of the most extreme things in futurology is the hybridization of the individual and the machine, we might think the model, where civilization is very different than our own. In one extreme version, there is only one individual on each planet and that individual would be connected to the very large network of computers. Then those individuals would keep in contact with each other by using radio telescopes.

And when they want to fix their bodies, they would change genomes, and connect them with the clones. In some very unique and extreme models, the entire civilization would be only one individual, what is connected with computers. When the body of that individual would die, it would renew itself by using the clone, which means it would act as some kind of Phoenix-bird.

Can one individual form civilization? This thing is one of the most interesting parts of the philosophies discussions about other civilizations. When we are thinking about the "phoenix-model", where only one creature of some species could exist, and when the creature would die, and the next, cloned individual would follow that thing, we might think that thing is possible, at least in theory.

Modeling the hybridization of computers and living creatures, we might face the thing where one single individual would connect its brains to the internet or some other kind of data network, we might think possible, that some creature would make that thing. In this kind of case, the alien would create very large automatized complexes to the planet, and then it would transform the living individual to that planet, which can be connected to the computers.

The thing is that the system would offer to the brains extreme large memory blocks, and the brains can offer creativity for the system, which cannot otherwise create new things or think abstraction. In this model, the individual would give cells to create a new body by using the cloning method. And that new body would take the place of the dead one.

(1)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Xibalba

Second image:

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/0/0d/Jarron_Maya_2_-_Ixquic_y_los_Se%C3%B1ores_de_Xibalb%C3%A1.jpg/375px-Jarron_Maya_2_-_Ixquic_y_los_Se%C3%B1ores_de_Xibalb%C3%A1.jpg

The life on Pluto

The life on Pluto

Pluto is an icy and small dwarf planet, which might have primitive lifeforms. Those lifeforms would live conditions, where is no sunshine, and the temperature is near zero kelvin degrees, which means that the lifeform must be far away from the lifeforms of Earth. But are those suspected lifeforms so different than we think or want to think? Those lifeforms, what we might meet in the absolute cold and dark worlds might use volcanic temperature for creating energy for their metabolism.

And an idea for those lifeforms has been given the bacteria and worms, what are living near the black smokers on the bottom of the Ocean. In those conditions, the lifeforms don't have sunlight for the photosynthesis, and the thing, what gives energy for their chemical reactions comes from the volcanic Geysir at the deep underwater, where is either free oxygen on the water.

The organisms that are found from those "black smokers" are an example for cases, where lifeform doesn't need free oxygen for living. Bacteria, what lives deep undersea are different than other organisms because the oxygen is poison for those organisms, what synthesizing the oxygen from the chemical combinations of sulfur or other molecules, what involve oxygen. There is also higher lifeforms like worms near those black smokers, and that thing has brought a new type of theories of the life in Universe in the mid of cosmologists.

That means that the primitive lifeforms can exist even the asteroids like Ceres, and those archeon bacteria can live in the ice of those asteroids, and the metabolism of those organisms is very slow, what means that they might be hard to detect. That kind of things might not seem important, but if there are some lifeforms on the Universe, the bacteria could be more dangerous than intelligent lifeforms. If we would face intelligent lifeform, we could at least try to discuss with that organism, but the bacteria what would come from the space inside some ice bite would be an organism, what only eats.

And we cannot communicate with those bacteria, what can infect people or vegetables, and there are theories that some of those bacteria would be like the silicon alga, and they could make the core, what protects them against cosmic radiation. So that means that those bacteria could have sleep form, what could live almost forever. The risk is that those hypothetical bacteria might seem a little bit like anthrax bacteria, which can create the germ, which can be dangerous after a very long time.

That ability to cut their metabolism makes the natural bacteria like anthrax very dangerous because those bacteria can wake up after a long time, and start the epidemic. It doesn't make impossible that some bacteria could come from somewhere at Universe during history because we don't at least officially have DNA molecules from another planet.

The thing is that the spectrometers can see amino acid, or actually, they see the elements, what can form the amino acids. And if we want to make sure, that there is DNA on some planet, we must send a probe to that world, and then search the cells, what can be under kilometers bold ice below the surface.

Is the story of Atlantis only the ancient SciFi tale? And could it be possible that Plato's home language other than Greek?

Is the story of Atlantis only the ancient SciFi tale? And could it be possible that Plato's home language other than Greek?

Is so-called "real philosopher" person, who has lived in ancient Greece, and write nice texts about the people, who have sitting in the cave all their lives. When we are thinking the difference of the book writer philosopher, we must realize, that the knowledge and way to get information is a little bit different in the modern life than in the time of Plato.

And that makes philosopher of the modern time a little bit different than some ancient Greek master, whose writings and stories would repeat again and again through the millenniums. Maybe some modern philosophers would be found the millenniums later when their texts would be found from some database of the Internet. Maybe that thing happens, when the data of the Internet would transfer to quantum computers.

When we are thinking about persons like Plato and Aristotle, we must realize that would it be possible that those persons were so-called "ordinary storytellers" in their lifetime. If we would think writings, what are consist of things like Atlantean story, we might think that Plato wrote the SciFi novel of the city, which was very powerful and advancing. But what sunk in the waves.

We don't know did Plato knew some words, what are in common use in modern language. And one of those words is "memory". Is it possible that Plato just didn't know that word, because he didn't have school-type education? Maybe he replaced the word "memory" by using the word "water". And "city, what lost below the waves" would just mean "forgotten city". This thing would tell one thing, what we have ever thought before, and that thing is that was the home language of that philosopher some other than Greek? But this is only the hypothesis about the strange words.

Maybe the idea of that story was given to Plato the destruction of the lost culture of Crete. The ruins of that civilization are in the coastline of the Crete, what might mean that the Minoan culture would just come to that island when the eruption of Santorini or some other volcano just whip that culture away.

The thing is that the eruption of Santorini Island would destroy even the large city, and then Plato used that happening as the source when he created a story of Atlantis. And in some stories, some other storyteller has created topics that the spirits of ancient Atlanteans would still live in the caves of the sunken city.

But Plato didn't mention, where the Atlantis was sunken and was that thing where the city was lost water, volcanic ash or lava? I don't know what kind of education was in the time of Plato, but sometimes I have wondered, was he knew the things like volcanic ash or lava? Today many people see those things on the television or the internet, and we all know what those things are. But did Plato knew those words?

Or was he even see the erupting volcano in his life? If he traveled around the Mediterranean as he claimed, there is a possibility, that he has ever seen a single eruption or probably he didn't know the words like volcanic action. There is also the possibility to think that Plato just didn't know the words like lava. Or maybe somebody else has been written some of the texts, what is believed to made by Plato.

There is a possibility that there was more than one man who used the name "Plato", which is very easy to write and remember. Of course, Plato could change the word "lava" to the "water", because the person, who he told about the tale of the Atlantis because the opponent would nor know what "lava" means.

And when we are thinking about that Plato heard that famous story from some Egyptian priest would be the product of imagination. Plato didn't mention where and when he heard that story. There is a possibility, that he heard it at a very young age. The other version would be that he spent the night in the temple, and eavesdrop the discussion between two or more priests.

That thing could cause problems for him, and that's why he wrote that thing a long time after that happening. Or maybe Egyptian priest was away from the home at some Greek city and told that story to Plato, maybe after drinking too much wine. Or there is the change that Plato heard that story from some Egyptian sailor, who has claimed to hear that thing from the Egyptian priest.

The problems with benefiting the asteroids, what are locating in the asteroid belt

The problems with benefiting the asteroids, what are locating in the asteroid belt

If we would want to benefit asteroids as the mineral sources, we would have one problem. The cost of those materials like gold, manganese and other minerals would drop if we would bring an asteroid to the Earth orbiter, and start to benefit it for the industrial purposes. When we are thinking the asteroid mining in the point of view of technology, basically we have that technology existed, what is needed in those projects. The thing is that we would use robots in those projects. Lasers and ion spectrometers along with highly sophisticated artificial intelligence would help those robots to find a suitable asteroid.

When we are thinking about that system, we could send the data-unit, what could be a group of satellites, what mission is to assist those robots with the calculating capacity, and they might be inside the asteroid belt. The energy source could be the solar panels, and they could communicate with robots, what are operating in the asteroid belt. The purpose of those data satellites is to compensate for the errors what is caused because of the distance to the asteroid belt is so long.

The radio signal would travel between those probes about 3-22 minutes, and that means that those systems must operate independently. The time what I used is the time, what radio signal travels between the Earth and Mars, and the asteroid belt would be farther than mars. That's why there should send the data processing assistance units to the asteroid belt, which can assist those probes when they need more "brain capacity". 

When we would think about the benefitting process of the asteroids, there would travel mini-size probes, what would search asteroids, what seems interesting, and when they are finding suitable and right size particle, they would mark it for bigger robot probes, what mission is to benefit that asteroid. One of the possibilities of the form of those robots would be X-37B type small size shuttle, what has one or two assistant robots.

Maybe those assistant robots are looking like some flashlight with manipulator's hand, and when those systems are finding the right size and other ways suitable asteroid, the asteroid could put in the mylar bag and pull to the earth orbiter. There are, of course, other ways to do that thing, and one is just building the spacecraft, what looks like Saturn V-rocket, what have feet at ahead it.

An idea in this system is that the rocket would push the asteroid to Earth, but the problem is that if the breaking would fail, the asteroid could hit to the Earth. But there are other possibilities to make that kind of operation, and one of them is breaking the asteroid in pieces with lasers or ion cannons. Of course, the system would shoot the asteroids by using rail guns. 

The idea is simple, the railgun would be also shooting ions to target, and it can also be used as ion motor. The railgun mode would consist of the centrifuge sling, what is the rotating plate. That system would be loaded with small iron bites, which are collected from the asteroid belt. And then the system would shoot those iron bites through the magnetic accelerator, which will increase the ammunition to very high speed.

A small piece, what is shot through accelerator would crush the targeted asteroid, and the pieces can collect to the mylar bag, what will pull over those particles like a giant trawl. And in this version, the spacecraft would act like a trawler. Those spacecraft might use ion motors, which allows them to operate freely in the asteroid belt. The idea of those motors is that they could use vaporized iron for making thrust. An energy source would be nuclear reactors, which can also give energy to the lasers and other systems, what are needed to benefit the asteroids.

The thing is that the same system can operate also as the ion motor if there is connected the chamber, where electric arc would turn the iron dust to vapor, and that vaporized iron will shoot through the magnetic accelerator, what operates as well the motor and railgun. But also lasers can be used for cutting that targeted asteroid in pieces. The thing would be done like the rail gun would crush the asteroid first in the smaller pieces, and then lasers would handle those pieces in right size particles.

The idea is that if there would be problems in the transportation process, the pieces what would be in the mylar bag would be so small, that they cannot cause danger on Earth, and if there is the problem, the mylar bags can just open. Of course, that causes problems with satellites, but it would be safe for humans on Earth. And in the skies would be seen only the nice meteor shower. This is why the asteroids should cut in pieces before they will send to Earth.

This kind of technology is a little bit complicated to create because many people see only the covert project for military operations, and developing military technology. Of course, we could wait for that suitable asteroid will come near the planet Earth, but the problem is that if something goes wrong, and we would accidentally drive the asteroid to the wrong track, it would make terrible destructions on the Earth.

Which is one very big problem for benefiting asteroids. If some corporation would start to operate in those mining areas, it would get a monopoly in those products. And also it can get ultimate power because the asteroids can shoot as the ammunition, and the defense against hundreds or thousand small-sized asteroids would be difficult.

In the cold war, there were plans that the asteroids would be used as the ammunition by pushing them against Earth by using rocket engines. And sometimes were plans to make artificial meteorites by using Apollo capsule-type craft which is filled with concrete, what would use Moon as gravity sling, and then that kinetic energy ammunition would hit to target at very high speed.

Writing about marketing

Writing about marketing

The idea of marketing is to increase the knowledge of the product, and also make people buy that thing. And the problem with marketing is to make people interesting in the product. The easiest way to make people interested in the product and the possibilities, what they can get by using the product is to make nice Internet homepages, where are beautiful pictures and tales about how the product works, and what benefit it brings. But there is one problem with this kind of marketing, and that is how to make people click those homepages, where the product is introduced?

The Internet is full of homepages, and the problem is that there should be some reason, why people should click to those homepages. And that thing is that they have seen that product somewhere, what wakes them an interest in that product. When we are thinking about the methods, how people should search for information about some specific product from the Internet, that thing might be that they are seen that product in some movies or other publications.

And that makes marketing problematic because if we think ourselves, we might ask, how many times we even read or watch real commercials? The thing is that if we would print some commercials or put them in some newspaper or other media, we have the right to expect that those expensive commercials would be even watched. 

But the reality is that when we see a commercial, we think that is meant for getting more chips or popcorn to the armchair. Or if that is a printed product, we might give that product to children for drawing papers. This is how normal people are acting with commercials. And how we would make people write the name of our product to the address line of our Internet browser?

The thing is that we should get more publicity for our product before we can start to market it because if people are searching the Internet by using some common words, we might be sure, that the entire net is full of similar products. And the thing is that those products, what are sold on the Internet should also make money to the marketer and producer. Only the incoming money is important for the business.

And that's why the language in the homepages, what is used for marketing must be good and polite. Angry people don't buy products. This is the rule in marketing. When people are looking at commercial, they must feel comfortable, or they don't buy a product. Interest is not enough, and only sold a piece of product is the thing, which means that the money would come to bank accounts of the company.