Fifth force and gravitational recoil.

There are suggestions that the Standard Model is wrong. That doesn’t mean that we must rewrite the entire model. We should search for the missing part of that model. Because. Something is missing in the model that we know. We cannot make all parts of it work as they should. There is a possibility. That some interaction, like a direct, wave-based interaction between a gluon and an electron, is just missing. Maybe that interaction really exists. 

And maybe those things can explain the hypothetical fifth force. Anyway, that fifth force is an extremely weak interaction. There are many other explanations for that still-hypothetical effect. That effect can be a recoil effect between electrons. Or a recoil effect between quarks and bosons. These are things that can explain the fifth force.  Or non-calculated anomalies. In particle accelerators.  Something is missing. Because the function doesn’t match the calculations

“In physics, a fifth force is a hypothetical fundamental interaction (also known as a fundamental force) beyond the four known interactions in nature: gravitational, electromagnetic, strong nuclear, and weak nuclear forces “. (Wikipedia, Fifth force) 

“Some speculative theories have proposed a fifth force to explain various anomalous observations that do not fit existing theories. The specific characteristics of a putative fifth force depend on which hypothesis is being advanced. No evidence to support these models has been found.” (Wikipedia, Fifth force) 

Maybe the fifth force is the recoil effect of bosons. The boson. It is the transporter particle of the interaction. When. Bosons travel in atoms. Those particles form a recoil effect. That means that. Maybe the fifth force is the missing part of interactions that we already know. Could that fifth force be a thing? Like gluon and electron interaction. When gluons send wave movement. That wave movement could travel through an atom’s nucleus. And maybe that wave movement.  That forms when a gluon evaporates. Could also impact electrons. 

Could the missing fifth force be the wave movement that travels between quarks? And if that thing is real, could we call that effect a fifth force? Is it an independent force? Or. Is it? Some? Kind of shadow? Of other forces? This means that before we yell that we found the fifth force. We should understand. Those forces. That we know might have sides. That. We didn’t know. The fact is that. If that missing part of the four known interactions is the fifth force. Maybe those four known interactions: strong interaction. Weak interaction. Electromagnetism, and gravity. Cover a hypothetical fifth interaction below them.

This means that the hypothetical fifth force could be a non-bosonic interaction between elementary particles. We know bosonic interactions. These bosons transmit fundamental interactions. But all wave movement is what the elementary particle sends. It doesn’t touch a boson. Part of the wave movement that the elementary particle transmits travels past the boson. This means the fifth force. It could be a wave interaction between elementary particles. 

The model for that is taken from the electroweak interaction. When. An atom’s core sends a wave motion. 

That wave movement impacts electrons. And transmits energy to them. This means that, in the same way, elementary particles like quarks can send wave motion. That impacts. And affect another quark without a boson transmitter. This straight wave interaction explains it. Why. There are no direct observations of the fifth force. The reason for that is simple. That direct wave movement is so weak. Other interactions cover it below them. 

Bosons are condensed energy, like fermions. They transport fundamental interactions. Fermions are bricks of matter. Fermions form protons and neutrons. Both. Of those particle types. They can be transformed into energy. That means all particles. They are actually condensed energy. 

Four known fundamental interactions are: 

1)Strong interaction

2)Weak interaction

3)Electromagnetism 

4)Gravity

The bosonic interactions cover the non-bosonic interactions below them. The situation is similar to what we try to see. A burning match and halogen light at the same time. The halogen light. It covers that match below its brightness. 

In the same way. The bosonic interaction. covers the pure wave interaction below it. This means that the pure wave interaction could be the fifth force. The fifth force is a myth. But the wave-based interaction explains why we cannot see that force. And the next question. It is: Does that mean a new natural law? 

In this model, gravitation forms two-part radiation. First, an energy wall travels through the universe. Then the gravitational center. Or. Spinning particles bind energy into them. That energy wall doesn’t let energy travel behind it. That forms a so-called gravitational pool. 

And then those spinning particles bind the energy into them. That makes the gravitational pool deeper. This makes objects like particles fill that pool. But if a graviton exists. That thing can be the whirl in the gravitational pool. Maybe those whirls that turn into gravitons can form outside the gravitational pool. When. the energy wall travels ahead. It sends recoil waves to the gravitational pool. Those waves could form energy ditches that travel to the gravitational center. 

If. That whirl turns smaller and denser. That whirl starts to condense that field. This makes a phenomenon that can act as a gravitational wave. This means those whirls in the field bind energy into them. The question is. Could a graviton be a quasiparticle or a particle? 

The thing that we see as (an example) the strong interaction. We can describe that interaction as an interaction between gluons and quarks. This interaction has a pushing side. And the pulling side. The last one pushes quarks away. When a boson, in this case a gluon, evaporates, that effect acts like ice. That evaporation pulls quarks together. When. The boson receives energy. The wave movement between quarks pushes those quarks away. So, the fundamental interaction is the wave movement. That. Bosons. The interaction transporter particles send. 

We know four interactions. Three of them have a boson transporter. But then we see that gravity has no known bosonic transporter. There is suspicion that a mythical graviton exists. But the fact is that. Gravitation doesn’t necessarily need a graviton. Spinning particles. That bind quantum fields into their structures. That can cause a situation. Their energy travels into that particle. And carries other particles with it. 

In this model. The gravitational wave has two parts. The energy wave that travels away from the gravitational center. Then the gravitational center. The structure of spinning particles that bind energy into itself. That pulls more energy into the gravitational center. Than. It travels out from it. The thing that creates the gravitational wave. And gravitation’s unique behavior. It’s the energy wall. Behind that energy wall. The gravitational center. It creates the energy ditch that travels across the universe. 

Same way the fifth force doesn’t need any boson as its transporter. Wave movement itself can act as a natural interaction. And that is one of the things that we must realize. 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boson

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electromagnetism

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electroweak_interaction

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fermion

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fifth_force

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fundamental_interaction

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Graviton

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gravity

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Weak_interaction

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Strong_interaction

Quarks, gluons, and symmetry.

"A recent experiment led by Mississippi State physicist Dipangkar Dutta has shaken one of physics’ most reliable concepts: symmetry. Credit: Shutterstock" (ScitechDaily, Rethinking the Universe: New Findings Rewrite Rules of Subatomic Matter)

The new research breaks the rules of physics. When an electron collides with quarks, it will not always decay and reassemble symmetrically. That means there is a problem with symmetry in the quarks. The Pauli exclusion principle, which states that no two identical fermions can occupy the same quantum state in the same system, explains many aspects of the existence of atoms and subatomic particles.

Because those particle's energy levels are different. That difference causes energy flow. That keeps them in their entirety. 

If there are two identical fermions. That causes the quantum flash that pushes those particles away. When quarks decay they can reassemble themselves. That requires that both of those parts are in the same quantum field. 

That quantum field is like the bag that denies the quantum shadow, or quantum bridge fill. That quantum shadow pulls those quark's halves back together. But there seems to be a situation where when an electron hits quakes the quantum field fills that bridge. If a quantum field turns between parts of a decayed quark, that field denies their reassembly. 

There is also the possibility that if those decayed parts of the quarks spin oppositely that event turns the quantum field between those particles into a shape that looks like twisted fabric. That means the energy density or energy level between those particles rises so high, that they cannot cross that bridge. That is one of the most interesting things in modern physics. That helps researchers make models about the strong interaction. 

Because energy travels from quarks to gluons. Gluon aims for energy flow to the outside. Because energy travels from quark to gluon, that acts like a thermal pump. It keeps those quarks close to each other. The reason why gluons can bind quarks together is that it cannot get energy from emptiness. It collects that energy from the system where it exists. 

The idea is that quarks spin. The spinning quarks also bind energy into them. The problem is that those quarks sometimes release that energy. That happens when their energy level turns higher than their environment. The gluon is like a thermal pump that aims for energy that the quarks release. 

That means the gluon that is in the quantum shadow between quarks keeps the energy flowing in a certain direction and a certain way. Without gluons, the quarks release their energy symmetrically, and that energy flash pushes those quarks away from each other. The gluon's role in the system is to keep energy flow stable. Because it binds energy from the quark's quantum fields it pulls them into it. That thing causes a situation in which the outside energy starts to push those quarks into the form that we call hadrons. So energy flow between quarks keeps that structure in its form. 

The idea is that the gluon is an extremely fast-spinning particle. That is a little bit flat. That particle binds quantum fields from quarks into the kinetic energy. When quarks come close to each other there forms a quantum (or energy) shadow between them. When gluon spins in that energy shadow it binds energy. 

And deepens that quantum low pressure. This thing stretches those quark's energy fields. Then the fast-spinning gluon binds those fields into themselves. Then the gluon acts like a centrifugal plate that aims energy to the sides of it. Because gluon conducts energy out from the system it pulls those quarks together. Or, otherwise, we can say that outcoming energy pushes quarks near each other. 

If we use a superstring model with gluon that thing looks like the plate that is formed of the strings or wires. Or, otherwise, it looks like a flat whisk. Those wires, or superstrings throw quantum fields to the sides of that particle. The gluon allows the quantum spikes that the quarks stretch quantum field forms to touch the gluon. The gluon aims energy out from them. And that forms quantum low-pressure. 

The strong interaction is the thing that keeps protons and neutrons in their form. In those hadrons, the outcoming energy or quantum fields push quarks so that they can keep their formation in hadrons. That means there is so-called quantum low-pressure that keeps quarks in the forms of protons and neutrons. 

There are models where the gluon. The strong interaction transmitting particle spins between those quarks. That means gluon binds energy into itself. When gluon touches the quantum field around it binds that field into the kinetic energy. That energy pulls the quarks together. When gluon goes between quarks. It pulls energy from the quark's quantum fields. That thing makes those fields stretch. And the gluon simply conducts energy out from that point. 

https://scitechdaily.com/rethinking-the-universe-new-findings-rewrite-rules-of-subatomic-matter/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gluon

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hadron

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quark

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Standard_Model

Why nothing is enough in the field of physics?

Why nothing is enough in the field of physics?

We could form this question in the form, "why scientists are looking for more and more smaller and high energy particles in the Universe"? Why we are creating more and more powerful systems, what can find smaller and smaller particles. And maybe we would someday find the point, where energy would get the "astral form", and that is the opposite for the form of quarks, and we can think that the physical form of atoms, electrons, and other fundamental particles is so-called "kinetic" or "crystallize", and the form of energy would be "quantum fog" or "astral", so sometimes somebody has asked, "is the material only the crystallized energy".

And annihilation reaction, where antimatter and matter would contact and all of their mass turn to energy are supporting that thing. So the material is only the kinetic version of energy, if we want to say this thing like that way.

The idea of those people is that they want to find the point, where the material is transforming the energy and the opposite way. If we could find out that point or gate, where the energy is turning to material, we could find something bigger than ever before. We know that somewhere in the quantum world is the extreme particle, what is turning to the energy, and if we would see that particle, we can simulate the opposite reaction. But what is the form of that particle?

Is it stable or is it like some kind of quantum version of "the elastic bound", what can move to another space and form to another? That would be the most interesting particle of the quantum Universe, what we can ever create, or rather saying, what we can ever find. Then we are facing another strange particle and that is gluon. That particle keeps quarks together, and sometimes the form or essence of the gluon is thought to be a key to see, what things are forming the quarks.

When we are thinking about the thing, what is called the "super spring", we must ask, is that thing the particle, what is mentioned at the beginning of this text. So if our super spring is the quantum version of elastic bound that means that this particle is like clew, what the super spring forms. And if that clew, what has name quark, would open, the super spring would slip to energy. And that thing would be very interesting.

So what would we need to observe this kind of case? The thing is that those super springs would not act like other fundamental particles. That makes problems for creating observation of those particles. So what kind of thing the "super spring" would be? The thing is that if the form of this thing is the wire, we must think, the reason, why this wire would turn to the clew and form the quarks?

Is there a tiny electric force, or force what effects a similar way with electricity, and pulls the wire to ball? And what is the role of gluons in that process? Are gluons some kind of small black holes, what can turn the super spring in the shape, what we are known as quarks? Those are things, that are waiting for answers in the thing, what we are known as material.

And then we must understand that we see material everywhere, but we don't know much about it or it's the deepest form. What is the point, when the material turns to energy or is there the final form, or is the material acting like melting crystal? This kind of thing is interesting when we are starting to research the final particle between material and energy.