Happy 100-year birthday, quantum mechanics.

   Happy 100-year birthday, quantum mechanics. 

The GIF above this text introduces field interaction. When the outside field pushes the inner field, the inner field’s or structures' size will turn smaller. Until the pressure or energy level in it can break that process. Or the pressure or energy level turns so high that it can resist the outside field. 

It’s 100 years of quantum mechanics. In 1925, young scientists named Werner Heisenberg went to Helgoland Island and developed the concept of quantum mechanics. In Helgoland, he realized that all things in the universe are in interaction. There, that person realized that the sky is blue because some kind of particles hit it.

And then that thing caused shockwaves that we see as blue light. The blue light is so-called Cherenkov radiation. That radiation forms when a particle that travels speed of light hits the atmosphere. Those particles must slow their speed because the speed of light is lower in the atmosphere than outside the atmosphere. 

When a particle slows its speed, it must transfer its kinetic energy into its environment. When a particle hits the atmosphere. It sends a shockwave. The shockwave that we see as a photon is the thing that slows the particle's speed. When we think that the universe and all other systems are growing entropy, that means. We see that chaos is increasing in the system. But then we must wake up and make one decision. 

If the system is limited, any phenomena in it cannot be unlimited. And then we can see that entropy is not literally “chaos”. It's the thing that might look like chaos. But there can be repeating structures. Like in fractals. If researchers can someday find the order in the system’s entropy, they can calculate changes in its shape backward. And if those calculations are made right, they can uncover the shape of the original system. 

That makes this type of thing interesting. When a particle travels through the universe, it collects information from its environment. That information is on the particle like plague. And the problem is that. We cannot touch the particle. But if we could see the shape of the information that forms hills and potholes on the particle’s shell. If researchers know the route and entire systems. If the particle passes, it makes it possible to reorder that information. The problem is that near all stars, molecular nebulae, X- and gamma-ray bursts, and all other things involve quantum systems. 

The quantum fields in those systems are unique. And that makes this model theoretical. But if researchers know everything about the  particle’s route. They could restore information and see what things look like in that particle’s route. If that kind of thing is possible. That makes the quantum network possible. Data travels in a quantum network connected to particles. And if researchers can protect the data and calculate it back in the form. Where information was at the beginning of the particle’s journey. It allows sending bottle-post where information is stored in electrons. 

The ability to remove entropy. Makes it possible to see distant objects. And it can also allow researchers to transport information from the past to the future. Or from the future to the past. The black hole is the thing that can transport information from the future to the past. But the problem is that the entropy at the edge of the event horizon turns information into a mess that nobody understands. 

That entropy is like a series of whirls that mix information into a form. That makes no sense. But if researchers know how that border behaves and what kind of whirls there are. That allows them to re-order that information. That requires complete knowledge of the systems. And how those things behave in interaction. 

Time arrows and black holes.

Antigravity and Meissner effect. 

Normally, the Meissner effect is an electromagnetic phenomenon in superconducting materials. The Meissner effect happens in electromagnetic wavelengths. The gravitational Meissner effect is a similar effect that happens in the gravitational wavelength. Today, the gravitational Meissner effect is still a theory. 

Can gravity be like the Meissner effect? The Meissner effect is possible only in the extremely low temperature superconducting objects where an atom’s quantum fields form an entirety. The question is whether a similar effect that forms in gravity fields forms in cases where all parts of the atom are under one homogenous quantum field? Or is it enough that the electrons will push against the atom’s core into a homogenous form? 

If the “Gravitational Meissner effect” is possible, that makes antigravity levitation possible. If the gravitational Meissner effect is possible, that means the energy waves that travel past the particle or object are like time arrows, or arrows of time. Those things harness energy from their environment and push it into particles or particle groups. And that energy pushes those particles back in time. 

Or, otherwise saying, they cause time dilation. When the mass of an object increases, that means its spin turns faster. The spin speed accelerates until the particle cannot receive energy. Then the particle's speed starts to slow. In that process, it sends energy waves. Because it must transfer that kinetic energy somewhere. Black holes send gravitational waves when they slow their speed and release energy that is stored in them. 

The arrow of time (or time arrow) in the modern universe. 

Why doesn't the time arrow (arrow of time) work in the modern universe? There is one very good explanation. There is too much space in the modern universe. When a time arrow moves forward, it pushes energy to objects like particles around it. And then that energy pushes particles back in time. But the problem is that this requires that the particle can store the energy that it gets. In the modern universe, a receiving particle takes that energy into its quantum field. And then releases that energy immediately. 

The time arrow that pushes an object back in time requires a situation where a particle that receives energy will not give that energy away immediately. So the system must be dense enough and harness energy from a large enough area that the time arrow (or arrow of time) can push particles back in time. 

When we think about things like wormholes, those hypothetical energy tornadoes are one version of the time arrows. The wave movement tornado around the wormhole stores energy from around it. Then that energy will move to an object that travels in the wormhole. That energy can prevent an object from aging because that thing will not let the energy out from that particle or object. The case where the wormhole transports objects back in time is this. 

Diagram of the Meissner effect. Magnetic field lines, represented as arrows, are excluded from a superconductor when it is below its critical temperature. (Wikipedia, Meissner effect). Can this kind of effect be possible in the gravitational fields? In this image, Tc= temperature critical or critical temperature. The critical temperature means that below the critical temperature. The Meissner effect turns into reality. Could there also be a density critical that makes the gravity field act like EM-fields act in the Meissner effect? 

The energy level in those objects that travel in a wormhole must rise higher than the energy shadow at the front of the particle can transport that thing out from the object. The black hole is one type of time arrow. The black hole is a very fast-spinning object that collects quantum fields from around it and transforms that thing into kinetic energy. That means the black hole’s spin accelerates all the time. But that acceleration stops sooner or later. When the spinning speed of a black hole slows, it sends gravitational radiation or gravitational waves. 

When a black hole or any other particle spins in the energy field, it collects energy from that field. That thing makes an energy pothole. The pothole is the wormhole back in time. The particle can harness energy only from its environment. The thing in black hole cases is that the black hole is not eternal. It makes a hole through time. But the reason why the time arrow works in that case is that the energy field in that pothole is dense enough. The energy cannot escape from the black hole as easily as it could escape from some other objects. The black hole’s energy level can rise so high that it breaks the energy barrier around it. And that causes black hole destruction. The black hole travels back in time until it starts to deliver its energy. 

But why can gravity slow aging? The answer can be in the nature of gravity. If we think that gravity is one form of the Meissner effect, the particle that spins just makes energy fields travel past the particle. That makes quantum levitation. In the case of black holes, particles are in the same direction. And that makes the effect more powerful. The fast spin packs energy, or quantum fields, from such large areas that the object cannot release its energy through that thing. The dense material causes quantum fields to travel through the extremely dense object. Those energy fields or waves are like time arrows. They push objects in the middle of them back in time because they cannot let quantum fields travel through them. 

That means if we want to make a time machine that uses a time arrow, we should make extremely dense pearls. Then we must shoot particles or laser beams through it. That pumps energy to the structure around the channel. But for working that requires extremely dense materials. 

https://www.ecoticias.com/en/humanity-breaks-time-for-the-first-time/18338/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arrow_of_time

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Meissner_effect

False vacuum decay.

False vacuum decay is one of the most feared things in quantum mechanics. Another name for that thing is the dimensional collapse. The idea is that all particles involve false vacuums. The small false vacuum forms near superstrings that are the edge of the particle. The quantum low pressure in the particle keeps it in form. Or, the thing that keeps particles in their form is the interaction between the quantum field inside the particle and outside the particle. 

The outside quantum field pushes against the whisk-looking structure of the particle. A particle remains in its form as long as its inner structure is at a lower energy level than outside the particle. The thing that determines the particle's energy level is the elementary particle's shell. If the energy level in the particle rises too high, that rips its structure into pieces. If the energy level in a particle falls too low, that causes the particle's collapse. 

The dimension is energy level. The dimensional collapse can happen internally or externally. In internal collapse, the particle loses its internal energy. And that causes the particle to fall like a balloon that loses its internal pressure. In external collapse the outside energy level drops and that pulls energy out from the particle. 

When particles turn flat it leaves a hole behind it. Particles near that collapsed particle send an energy impulse that falls in the energy pothole, but that energy cannot reach the collapsed particle. And when energy, or wave movement comes from every direction that causes the formation of the energy bubble or dome. 

When outside energy tries to fill that hole that energy must come from somewhere. And that "somewhere" is other particles. That can cause a chain reaction where more and more particles start to lose their energy. The problem is that the wave movement slides over those flat parts but it cannot reach them. 

When lots of energy falls into the same spot from a large area. That can have a very strong impact. That packs lots of energy into one point, and sooner or later the energy load in that point turns so high that it pushes quantum waves backward. That can form a quantum tsunami that destroys lots of things. This explosion can be very strong. 

The other model is that dimension just removed from the people's eyes. The collapse of the energy level in particles causes a situation where the particle turns flat. And then other particles around it lose their energy to that particle. That means that the large particle group can lose its energy in a very short time. That means the particles around those particles turn flat. And that means those particles lose their ability to interact with other particles. Because energy travels always to lower energy points. A particle that falls can collect lots of energy from around it. 

https://www.vice.com/en/article/the-learnin-corner-false-vacuum-decay-0000052-v18n1/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/False_vacuum

Gravity and entropy.

  

From the point of gravity model. The problem with this image is that. Both balls should have a pothole under them. Those potholes make energy travel between those objects. And that causes things like quakes in black holes. Energy that travels between gravity quantum points makes shockwaves around the entirety. 

Gravity fields form multiple gravity fields or sub-fields that form around individual quantum points. We see those things as entirety or coherent fields. But they form around multiple particles. That forms space and entropy in the gravity field. 

The problem with this image is that. Both balls should have a pothole under them. Gravity fields form multiple gravity fields or sub-fields that form around individual quantum points. We see those things as entirety or coherent fields. But they form around multiple particles. That forms space and entropy in the gravity field

Space between actors makes space in the gravity field. And that is the beginning of entropy. The actor that makes the gravity field is an elementary particle. And the gravity field that outsider sees. Is the sum of those actors' gravity. That thing means there is space between those fields. That space forms entropy. 

Quantum gravity means the electron's, quark's, and other particles' gravity field. The spin of the particle has a connection with its mass. The mass is conducted with gravity force. That means the gravity field's strength is the speed at which the particle transports or harvests energy inside it. When a particle harvests energy from its environment it transports the field inside it. That energy field transports other things with it. 

So time dilation forms when that energy impacts particles. That energy is like wind that transfers energy into those particles. That energy forms a quantum shadow that pulls particles with it. 

When we look at gravity fields, we might think that they are uniform. Gravity fields are not coherent. They form around multiple particles. The gravity field in the gravity center looks like whirls. Which means the gravity center is not monolithic. There are multiple gravity centers in the gravity field's center, so the gravity field is virtually coherent. When we think that mass, energy, and density are things that form gravity, we can make a model where the gravity field is like a whirl. When a particle starts to spin it bounds energy into itself. So black holes are only fast-spinning and very dense objects. 

When an object spins at a very high speed it forms an electromagnetic shadow or vacuum around its shell. Those shadows make the energy fields travel to that object. The dense object has smaller "hills" and "valleys" on its shell. Then less dense objects have. In this text, particle means single elementary particle like quark. The object means the group of quarks or other actors. 

The object can spin faster because it doesn't deliver as much energy into its space. The object turns into a black hole if it cannot deliver the energy that it harvests from its environment. So when the spinning object increases its energy level it will just harvest it from its environment. When an object spins faster and faster it forms an energy bubble around it and if energy that jumps out from the particle cannot cross that bubble it gets more and more energy. 

Energy in that bubble pushes particles or objects into denser and denser forms. So when the uneven things on the particle's or object's shell harvest energy into it, that thing makes a small channel through the energy field. And those things are things that form the gravity field. So we can make a model that gravity is the hole in the energy field. Those channels are like tubes or rubber hoses that turn closer and closer to each other inside the gravity center. They form a tight bundle that unites in the gravity center. There is always a small point in the ball there is no gravity. 

In the gravity field, every single object or actor has its own gravity field. That means gravity fields are multiple fields. Because the gravity field is not uniform or coherent that forms space in the field. And that space makes entropy. 

Quantum gravity has a connection with entropy. So, what does that mean in real life? That means the gravity field is not coherent. In gravity models, every single particle with mass has its own gravity field. So, gravity fields have multiple cores. Every particle in its entirety. Forms a gravity field around it. That gravity field can look like a whirl. That means there is free space in the gravity field. Those whirls interact with each other and that forms smaller and smaller whirls around those gravity fields. And those small whirls turn larger all the time. In that process, every single particle or actor in the gravity field transports a little bit of themselves to those whirls that look like fractals. 

 https://phys.org/news/2025-03-sneaky-clocks-uncovering-einstein-interacting.html

https://interestingengineering.com/science/quantum-gravity-einstein-entropy

The new 2D carbon structure is 8 times stronger than graphene.

"Monolayer amorphous carbon is a game-changing material that combines strength with toughness, solving a key problem in 2D materials like graphene. Credit: SciTechDaily.com" (ScitechDaily, A New Carbon Super-Material Is 8x Tougher Than Graphene)

The new 2D materials are tougher than graphene. Graphene is the allotropic form of carbon. The single-atom layer makes that structure stronger. And the reason why 2D monoatomic structures are harder than regular materials is simple. When something impacts the graphene. That monoatomic structure transfers energy to a larger area. The single-atom layer transfers energy out from the structure immediately. And there is nothing that can form a standing wave in the structure. 

The new material called monolayer amorphous carbon, MAC is the thing that makes the 2D monoatomic structure tougher than graphene. The structure involves things that allow the carbon to be elastic. Or flex. And that makes the structure tougher or gives it the ability to flex. The problem with regular graphene is that the structure will not flex at all. Researchers crack the code to twist and stack 2D materials. 

"The regular octahedron and its dual polyhedron, the cube." (Wikipedia, Octahedron)

That thing opens the path to new types of solutions in mechanics and other things like electronics. The graphene layers lose their abilities when they connect. The 2D materials have their fundamental abilities only when they are in 2D structures. If those 2D structures are connected, that means their carbon structures lose their abilities. 

But if those things can remain separated that gives the new types of armor and extremely strong materials possible. The 2D carbon structures that are separated by octahedron carbon pillars can make that kind of material stronger than fullerene pillars. The octahedron pillars are their heads against each other can transport the energy straight through the graphene layers. The problem with nanotube pillars is that they form standing waves in their structure. The octahedron nanocrystals will not make that thing. In those nanocrystals are six atoms which makes them extremely small and able to transport energy straight through those layers. 

"A scanning tunneling microscopy (STM) study of moiré superlattice formation on a twisted bilayer covalent organic framework (COF). Credit: National University of Singapore" (ScitechDaily, Scientists Just Cracked the Code for Twisting and Stacking 2D Materials)

"STM images of (a) untwisted bilayer COF assembled from 2,7 PDBA; (b) twisted bilayer COF showing moiré superlattices, assembled from 1,6 PDBA. Credit: National University of Singapore" (ScitechDaily, Scientists Just Cracked the Code for Twisting and Stacking 2D Materials)

But making those things requires a system that can see how the graphene interacts in the reaction chamber. 

Imaging the Dynamic Assembly of Bilayer COFs

"Chemists from the National University of Singapore (NUS) have successfully captured real-time images of bilayer covalent organic frameworks (COFs) forming in solution. This breakthrough sheds new light on how these layers stack and how moiré superlattices emerge. " (ScitechDaily, Scientists Just Cracked the Code for Twisting and Stacking 2D Materials)

Moiré superlattices are part of the growing field of “twistronics,” where rotating one atomic layer relative to another can create new electronic properties. In this state, electrons no longer behave as independent particles but instead strongly interact with each other, potentially leading to unique forms of superconductivity or magnetism." (ScitechDaily, Scientists Just Cracked the Code for Twisting and Stacking 2D Materials)

"While moiré superlattices have been observed in inorganic materials, they are far rarer in purely organic crystals. This is because moiré patterns require materials that are both ultrathin and highly crystalline — properties that are difficult to achieve in organic materials using conventional imaging techniques." (ScitechDaily, Scientists Just Cracked the Code for Twisting and Stacking 2D Materials)

https://scitechdaily.com/a-new-carbon-super-material-is-8x-tougher-than-graphene

 https://scitechdaily.com/scientists-just-cracked-the-code-for-twisting-and-stacking-2d-materials/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Graphene

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Octahedron

Einstein is invincible. However, there are a few problems with spacetime models.

Can dark energy be the same as Hawking radiation? 

It's possible. When researchers measure things like gravitational lensing. They just forget that black holes make fields and materials denser than usual. Maybe researchers don't remember that near black holes other energy interaction than just gravity is also stronger. Or maybe there can be some structure that reflects energy back from structures near or even inside the black hole's event horizon. The Hawking radiation is the thing that ever measured. And for making precise models researchers must know the entire system. 

The source of dark energy is unknown. We know that black holes send gravity waves. But could it also send Hawking radiation and could dark energy and Hawking radiation be the same thing? People sometimes mix the terms gravity wave and dark energy. Gravity waves are waves in energy fields. Their source is in gravity centers. Dark energy is wave movement with an unknown source. 

That question is: can theoretical Hawking radiation be the dark energy? If that thing is true that means the black hole turns or transforms energy and material into dark energy. We know that dark energy is the wave movement that source is unknown. But because dark energy interacts with material it should interact with a black hole. The black hole should make the dark energy denser and it should change its route. So that means. Gravitational lensing should work with dark energy and dark matter. 

Above Gravitational lensing. 

When we think about spacetime and gravity, we say there is a pothole around gravitational centers.  That means there is something that pulls energy and material into the endless pothole, there it cannot flee. So, we can say that the gravity centers like black holes are endless potholes that will not fill. The problem is this. Where do those black holes put energy and material that fell into them? 

Theoretically, that energy should blow the black hole away. The problem with Einstein's models is that during his lifetime nobody knew that things like black holes existed. And the second thing is that dark energy and dark matter were not even predicted during Einstein's lifetime. The black hole must put energy, wave movement, and materials that it pulls inside it somewhere or it blows away because its internal power wins gravity. 

We can think that gravity is negative energy because it pulls material into the black hole. The energy that falls into a black hole impacts other energy waves at least at the center of a black hole trying to break out from that monster. So theoretically is possible that the black hole forms an energy level that breaks its structure. The singularity is the thing that forms a black hole. 

That means material where all particles and quantum fields form one entirety. But to keep its form that massive structure requires an outcoming energy field. The energy field presses the structure. And if it's gone, the energy flow starts to travel out from singularity. And sooner or later that massive structure turns into wave movement. But even black holes just turn energy and material into another form. 

In the same way, material is one form of energy. And a black hole is the only thing that can interact with dark matter. And there is introduced a model. Where a black hole turns material into dark matter. Or it can pull material to the spaghetti-shaped structure. But then we can think about the black hole's structure. 

Lasers can block the light itself. So could there be a structure around the black hole that blocks some other energy forms? Theoretically is possible that maser-emission or the ability to turn wavelength coherent and block other waves is universal to all wave movement types. That means also dark energy and gravity can turn coherent and then block other waves with same wavelength. So could it be possible that some energy form cannot fall into the black hole? 

Diagram illustrating gravitational lensing. (NASA, ESA & L. Calçada)

In some models, there are strings just in the middle of a black hole. If those energy strings or superstrings are long enough, that means they pull energy out from black holes. The idea is from the string theory, where energy forms strings, Those strings can be even billions of light years long. And the material is one form of those strings. 

And that means if those strings exist they can pull out energy from the black hole. Those theoretical superstrings can be hollow and even if a black hole can pull them inside, those superstrings can hang out from a black hole for millions of years before that monster can pull them inside it Because energy travels to the lower energy level. Those hypothetical strings can pull energy out of the black hole. 

A black hole is like a pothole in spacetime. When material and energy fall into them through the event horizon the point, where escaping velocity reaches the speed of light there are no observations about that information. But before material and energy fall into a black hole they follow the spiral-shaped trajectory. 

And just before the event horizon is the ring of material. In some interesting visions, one photon can turn into the ring. That surrounds the event horizon. That ring interacts with its environment and pumps energy into that gravitational pothole.  

But then we can see that structure in another way. We can say that if the energy ring orbits the pothole it could send energy waves over that pothole. 

And that energy can block the same wavelength fields to drop into the black hole. The idea is the same as the thing where laser light blocks light itself. If there is a so-called energy lid around the black hole we can ask what energy that thing removes. Is it possible that there is no energy form in the black holes? 

The black hole is a pothole in space-time. It's possible that the pothole that forms gravity channels is not smooth. In some models, there are waves in its shells. Those gravity waves or gravitational lumps in that pothole can cause the strength of the gravitational field will not grow symmetrically. Or maybe there is a thin, string-shaped structure where the side-coming energy pushes power. If that string is almost straight or its wavelength and frequencies are very small. Measurements of that string are a very difficult operation. Because. A black hole's radiation covers that string's existence. 

https://hubblesite.org/contents/media/images/2022/001/01FRKBDN5YKMM9ZMT5Q7TSN4RN

https://hubblesite.org/contents/articles/dark-energy

https://www.sciencealert.com/physicists-just-found-a-quirk-in-einsteins-predictions-of-space-time

https://scitechdaily.com/defying-physics-lasers-that-can-block-light-itself/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dark_energy

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hawking_radiation

Black holes and their energy can tell about the T-symmetry and Higgs bosons.

"Researchers have introduced a method for detecting light echoes around black holes that could transform our understanding of their characteristics and impact on the universe. Credit: SciTechDaily.com" (ScitechDaily, Black Holes Are Sending Signals – Astrophysicists’ Groundbreaking Method for Decoding Them)

The black holes send energy. Researchers are interested in the light echoes from the photons and particles, that orbit the black hole near its event horizon. It's possible. Those echoes can uncover the secrets of the black hole's mysterious Hawking radiation. The thing that black holes lose their mass requires that they send their mass somewhere. 

The mass cannot vanish. It must change its form into energy. Or it must jump to the other dimension. In that model, if the energy level of the material turns "too high" that thing causes a situation in the bridge between the material and 3D spacetime. The high-energy particles lose their ability to exchange information. Between them and other particles. In some other visions, the mythic Higgs radiation escapes from the point of the back hole's spin axle. 

The black hole is the only known object in the universe where is the minimum entropy. Maybe in the black hole is the singularity the place where dark matter, dark energy, and the visible material and visible energy are in contact. 

Theoretical physicists say that Higgs's particle gives mass to the material. But the problem is that they don't know if the Higgs boson and Higgs's gravitational- or mass particle are the same thing. Some researchers think that the highest energy particle known as the Higgs boson is still too low energy thing that it could be the Higgs mass particle. The Higgs mass -particle can be the graviton the transportation particle of the graviton, the mysterious graviton. 

The mystery is the Higgs boson's or Higgs's particles' role in gravity. The Higgs particle could be the Higgs's boson is the thing that can give material its mass. In some models, the Higgs's particle is very high energy, but a very small particle. The idea is that this particle is in every single particle with mass. The vaporization of the Higgs particle means that the particle sends energy waves very fast. The particle also spins fast and that means it can send most of its energy in the form of string from its poles or spin axle. 

That thing causes asymmetry in the quantum field around that particle. When a fast-spinning particle sends most of its energy from the poles or spin-axle, that causes the quantum field around it to travel to the poles, and the polar- or spin-axle the size of it decreases at the particle's equator. That causes things outside the quantum field to travel to fill that space. That interaction keeps the whisk-looking structure that forms elementary particles as its form. 

Time-reversal symmetry or T-symmetry means that the reactions are similar regardless of whether time travels forward or backward. Another thing is that the growing entropy in the system makes it impossible to send complicated systems back in time. The microscopic objects don't have entropy. But the problem is that. Those microscopic objects form complex systems. 

The T-symmetry means that it's very hard to detect whether time travels forward or backward in the small systems. We can see all reactions similar way. The expansion of the universe causes the quantum field that locks wave movement and particles in the system to turn weaker. That makes space in the system. And that space is the thing that causes entropy. That entropy makes it impossible or very hard to send information back in time. 

Confirming that thing requires the tunnel that length is from the Earth to Jupiter. 

That is impossible on Earth. The idea is that the information will be sent through the system, and if it's at goal before it leaves that is the thing that proves time travel. But if the size of the system is only a couple of atoms. That means that time reservation is very hard or impossible to detect. T-symmetry is the thing that can make time travel possible. That requires that. The system must control its internal entropy. So if we want to control the system, we must know every part of it. 

https://scitechdaily.com/black-holes-are-sending-signals-astrophysicists-groundbreaking-method-for-decoding-them/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Graviton

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Higgs_boson

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/T-symmetry

What if two metal objects are made by using the same material?

What if two metal objects are made by using the same material?

The strange idea of the book "The Lord of the Rings" is the sword, what would shine, when ring shadows would come to the place, and that thing would save the life of Bilbo many times. Some researchers have explained that the sword would shine because it is made by using the same material with the swords of ring shadows.

And when those creatures would come to a certain distance the sword would cause the electromagnetic resonance to the swords, and that resonance would make the sword shine. This thing has brought the strange thought that could this thing be behind the case of the "Philadelphia Experiment".

Was this kind of electromagnetic resonance behind the idea of the "Philadelphia Experiment"?

If we want to make resonance or sound-effect, we would need to make an object expanding and dwarf. That thing could be made by targeting the object by electromagnetic radiation, which makes every metal object like a loudspeaker.  And that thing can turn every single ship or tank to crab.

So the idea is that if some other structure has the same material mixture or combination with some other structure that thing can send the destructive resonance to that object. And if we want to weaken the material by using resonance, we must just send the oscillation or resonance to that other object. But there is one little problem with that thing.

The thing that is needed is the frequency, which transfers a certain vibration frequency to the other object, and that thing causes resonance. So the simplest way is to use the sender, which has the same combination of the materials, what is used in the targeted object. And in fact, the best result would get to use as an example metal ore, which is taken from the same place.

When we are thinking about resonance, the sound that is used must not be very loud. This means that if two ships are made with the material, what has the same molecule and elemental structure, would drive near each other, another ship causes the resonance, which can destroy the entire ship.

Could the "The incarnating man" be the trick, what is caused because of the high-power radio waves?

So during the "Philadelphia Experiment," it is claimed that one sailor of USS Elridge incarnated in the bar, and that thing has claimed to be a hoax. But was that thing the illusion would that illusion caused because of the amalgam of the fillings of the persons, who have seen that incarnation and the sailor were from the same source.

And that thing could cause that the fillings of teeth would start to send the radio signals when they were stressed with electromagnetic radiation. Maybe that radio wave would cause the electromagnetic effect, which will stimulate the blocks of the down layers of the brains. Or was that bar targeted the electromagnetic radiation, what was coming from the test area?

Image:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EDu0bp6AGfU

Stamps and security

Stamps and security

The intelligent components can make things more dangerous than ever before

In some spy novels, spies are putting microfilms or some electronic memories behind stamps and then send the data to their employers. This kind of thing is really interesting when we are thinking about things like national security. But by using modern technology the stamps can also contain very dangerous weapons, which can be deadlier than we ever expected.

If we are thinking about the case, that the stamp is covered with the wax, that is created by nanotechnology. In this case, the wax is created that only a certain person's skin bacteria can open it. And then the thing like nanomachines can slip in the body. But if we are thinking about the intelligent nanotechnology in the stamp or core of letter or postcard would be installed very thin microchip, what detects the fingerprints of the person, who touches that thing.

The thing is that nanotechnology allows creating very complicated but also invisible structures in things like paper. Modern lasers can split the paper horizontally, and then the extreme thin intelligent component can put between those layers. The entire layer can detect the fingerprints, and they can be got from cell phones. And when a certain person touches the card, that thing makes the computer to launch a weapon.

In the postcards can install the miniaturized mortars, which is looking like a honeycomb. They can shoot tiny capsules inside the body of a targeted person if the intelligent components detect the right fingerprint. Those capsules can involve biological or chemical agents. Or they can be the nano-submarines, what can involve pepsin, what those submarines will inject to certain cells. That molecule will destroy the mitochondrial in the cell. The thing is that those capsules might not able to detect by using regular sensors.

Then the nano-sized ventilates would open, and the system releases things like nanotechnical produced poison to the skin of the victim. If things like cytostatic are equipped with an enzyme, that would take those molecules on a certain targeted cell group, this kind of thing can cause very bad damages in brains or some other organ, in the very small dose. This kind of thing can kill one single cell in the organs like the liver, which causes death. If we are thinking about the ability to create extremely small explosive bites, that thing can make it possible that the system shoots the nanomachines inside the body of the victim.

Image:

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/3/31/Penny_Black_VR.jpg

The holographic reality

The holographic reality

Anyone who isn't shocked by quantum physics has not understood it.
-Niels Bohr-

And when we are looking at this quote, we must ask, does Niels Bohr himself understood quantum physics? Or is there anybody else, who understands this kind of thing? Or when Bohr created the idea of the Quantum theories, did he understand how fundamental his ideas were?

When we are talking about quantum physics, we are talking also about the very fundamental area of science, what is full of colorful people, who were and who are looking for thig, what is the final truth or definition about truth. Sometimes we are thinking that many things, what we see or what we are making is true, and we are forgetting that there are always exceptions about that kind of thing. And one thing, what we cannot ever understand is the reality.

What is the description of reality? For us, the reality is the thing, what we can taste, feel or see. And that's it. But then we must remember that we always see reality from a different point of view. That means that there is no absolute reality, and we can take one example of this thing. The thing is that when a person, who would not see colors looks at the traffic lights and says that they are red doesn't mean that this person sees colors. That person sees that the highest light is on, and that makes this person say, that the traffic light is red.

The possibility that we are meeting a person, who cannot see colors is very small, but in the world, it must be that kind of person. So should we think about this thing, when we are asking the color of the traffic light? I think that this thing doesn't affect the real life of most of the people. The probability that the absolute color-blind people come in front of us is very small. But when we are going to think the thing, that reality could be an illusion or some kind of hologram, we must remember that there are many people, who are writing many articles about this thing.

The Danish physician Niels Bohr explained that the universe is the hologram, what has sucked from some greater entirety. The thing that Niels Bohr precisely said was "subatomic particles only come into existence in the presence of an observer, then it is meaningless to speak of a particle's properties and characteristics as existing before they are observed"(1).

The thing, that Bohr pointed out was that the subatomic particles are forming the atomic particles, what are forming molecules, what are forming things, what we are calling as the reality. The thing was that this thing has been connected to the de Broglie's theory, that every single particle in the universe has the wave and particle mode, or the wave-particle duality (2).

So this thing has been created an idea, that the universe has been crushed through the wormhole to space, what we are calling as the universe. The thing is that when Bohr said that particles come into existence in the presence of an observer, he meant that the observer makes things real. Or he meant that the observer sees things, they have existed. If we are not seeing things they have not existed. And our consequence makes things real. And what this thing means? We know that quarks and Higg's boson are real, but at the same time, we cannot feel, see or taste them. So what makes this thing holographic?

In this case, we need the middleman to tell us that the thing is real. The thing is that we see the articles, which are written about those things, but we cannot see them ourselves. Or we see quarks when they are part of the bigger entirety. We see concrete walls, but we cannot see quarks inside it. So can the particle or object be real, before we see it? That is a really good question. The existence of an object is depending, that we realize that thing has existed. And is the wave movement or waveform of the material existed?

If you will touch powerful laser ray, that thing exists, because it burns our hand regardless of the form of light. And that means that the wave movement also exists. But what if we are looking at the radio waves, we are facing things that the machine or radio would need to transmit the radio waves to us. And are radio waves real? We know that they are real because in some books is written that the phenomenon that is called the radio waves is transmitting data, which can be analog or digital through the air. So in this kind of case, we need a tool to find out the reality.

(1)
https://www.khouse.org/articles/2002/398/print/

(2)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wave%E2%80%93particle_duality

A short tale about pseudoscience

A short tale about pseudoscience

What if there is no right answer?

One very good example of the question, where is not answer is the tale about scientists and boys. In this tale, the boy shows the brown and white horse on the plant, and then that boy asked the scientist "what is the name of that thing?". The scientist answered that "I don't know" and then the boy said, "it's a brown and white horse".  Here we must understand that the question was about the name of that thing. And how a scientist should know that name? The right form of the question would be "what is that thing?". And then the scientist would answer "horse", and then the real answer would be "brown and white horse".

Or if the scientist would answer that way, the boy could say "brown and white horse, what name is XXX", and then the answer would be longer and longer. The thing is that this tale is one of the best examples of things, where we cannot even give the right answer. This is one of the versions, where the form of the answer would also change all the time, and we cannot ask the hose, what its name is.  And who knows, how other horses are calling that horse, and could we even say its name? The name what the owners of that horse use of it, or the name what other horses call that horse?

There are two types of pseudoscience, harmless and harmful.

A harmless version of pseudosciences are things like horoscopes or some other things. Most of us don't believe them, and that thing makes them look quite harmless. Of course, some horoscope could be coded messages to intelligence or some other things, but there is quite a small possibility, that this kind of thing concerns the normal people.

Also, things like the mass of the photon or some case near the black holes, where the black holes extreme gravity field would cause the situation, that the speed of light could be crossed have no mean to people. We must say that for proving that thing, we must fly to the black hole, and meter our speed beyond the singularity. That is the thing, that gives answers to us, and before that everything, what we say about that thing is pure theory.

But the harmful pseudoscience is things like playing with medicals and homeopathy. This kind of thing can cause even death. And also things like carelessness while testing medicals and other kinds of things are serious things.

We should not justify everything, what we see in the world of quantum physics as pseudoscience. But the thing is that some pseudoscience makers are good speakers, and they can make even the very dangerous things looking good. They use good-looking arguments for supporting their way to see things, and sometimes they are an appeal to religious opinions. When the motivated followers are standing in the next of those people, there are only a few persons, who can resist those quite charismatic people, and that will boost their way to say things.

Image:

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/d/dd/RWS_Tarot_20_Judgement.jpg/220px-RWS_Tarot_20_Judgement.jpg

Dragons part II and one I hope a fictional story

Dragons part II and one I hope a fictional story

Could the famous "Jersey Devil" be an attempt to create some kind of dragon?

Sometimes I have thought that could dragons simply be some kind of hybrid species? In this scenario, some kind of natural thing or ancient scientists would create a hybrid animal by connecting some kind of snake as an example viper or cobra and birds like the goose, and that might be the reason, why those creatures would seem "a little bit different" than the normal animal. If those creatures would have behaved, that they would spit the poison, that would explain the flaming breath.

When we are thinking about this kind of hypothesis, we must realize that kind of people might test to hybridize many types of species by creating the perfect solution. And in the hypothesis of "Jersey Devil" is that things might be a result of this kind of hybridization. And if that kind of creature has been someday created, that means that the creator of that kind of thing could be sent to the hang because of witchcraft.

if we are thinking about this kind of hypothesis more careful, we must understand that there are not any official documents about things like "Jersey Devil". So we don't know how long those creatures would be living or how successful those attempts were, and that thing means that those things are a pure hypothesis, nothing else.

But we know that the world is full of little bit "different" people, who want to create things like hybrid animals, and there are also many people, who have money to make that kind of thing. If we want to hybridize two animals, we must take the genomes together, and that thing has put the limits for genetic engineering before.

Those ancient people had no change to operate on a genetic level, and that's why the hybridization between species was very difficult. But modern researchers have an ultimate tool, what is known as nanotechnology, and that thing allows us to connect the parts to the DNA precise in the right point. And that thing will make possible to make things, which has been impossible earlier, and this thing makes this kind of thing dangerous.

One horror-story for the end of this text.

At the end of this text, I'd like to introduce one very scary tale from the German Concentration camps. When we are reading horror stories, we might have heard the tale that the testis of Adolph Hitler has been transferred to the dog. The idea was that the sperm of that man was taken, and that is used to fertilize the egg, which is taken from Eva Braun.

We must remember that this kind of person is causing many tales, and that's why we must practice little kind of skepticism and critics with them. But somebody might make some kind of novel about that kind of thing. There is not proves about that kind of operation has been done, but they are interesting topics for some kind of movie. That is a similar story, with a story that the SS-officers turned to wolves and continued the persecution of Jews in the form of an animal.

The story is about nightmares that the SS-officers transformed into wolfs or dogs. In this scary tale, the neurons of the fanatic servants of Nazis have been transferred to the neural channel of the fetuses of dogs.

I don't know how seriously this kind of tales must be taken, and I don't know would those dogs live after that kind of thing. But if you like bizarre and hardcore horror stories, this kind of thing would be interesting. So is this kind of thing possible? The answer is that this kind of thing might be examined, but the results might not succeed.

Dragons

Dragons

Could dragon be silicone-based lifeform?

Sometimes the stories of dragons might be got their origin from the caves, where is the volcanic eruption hole. That would cause the very hot gas flow, which can burn people from a very long distance. And also very hot water, what flies from the volcanic eruption holes would be extremely hot. In this case the steam, what is the temperature of hundreds of degrees of Celsius that would turn the trees to the flames, and that can be a very good explanation of dragons.

Do you wonder where the evolution theorists create their models for their strange creatures? Sometimes the ideas of the creatures, what are so different, what we are being taken from the old folk stories. If there would be some kind of creature, what is silicone-based, that would explain many things, like old stories of the stoned dragons (1) and other creatures like mountain goblins.

Sometimes there have been introduced claiming that the dragons were the snakes like King Cobras, what was brought to the European courts, and sometimes those snakes could spit their poison. And in that case, the body armor of the knight would protect that person against that poison. But we can also use more imagination for trying to create an explanation for dragons.

And we create an idea of the silicon-based life form, what is covered by the skin, what is formed by the normal cells, and that creature would be opposite with diatoms. This kind of idea might seem imaginational, but we have the right to use imagination when we are creating the ideas of something extraordinary.

Could there be some strange creatures, what are living deep underground, and could those creatures stand the extreme heat and pressure? Could the old stories of dragons and other strange creatures like mountain Goblins caused because of those strange creatures, what might be the silicon-based lifeforms.

Diatoms have silicon layers on the top of normal cells, and sometimes philosophers think could it be possible that there could be creature, what has carbon-based cells on the top of silicone-based cells? If we are thinking about the creature, what might have this kind of structure in its body that thing might cause the breath of that kind of creature would be very hot. The temperature, what the silicon-based lifeform needs for a living would be very high, and the thing is that the silicon-based creature would be stoned if it would face water or too low temperature.

And in many dragon tales, dragons would be stoned, when they cannot eat lava. So are dragons the silicone-based creatures? There is no simple answer to that question, but there is one little thing, what people have to remember, and that thing is connected to the deepest hole on Earth (2). When the Soviets and later Russians drilled the deepest hole in the world at the Kola peninsula and the plans were to drill the hole to the magma layer.

That operation was ended, when the drill was heated to 180 degrees Celsius. That kind of drills are made by using a special metal combination, which would stand that temperature very well, and then the operation was ended. That caused rumors that there was found something from those samples, but the reason, why the drilling was ended. So did somebody found the bacteria, what is somehow different, what everything, what we have known before. Or are those drillers faced the roof of the hidden nuclear facility?

(1)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dragon

(2)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kola_Superdeep_Borehole

Image

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/d/d8/Friedrich-Johann-Justin-Bertuch_Mythical-Creature-Dragon_1806.jpg

What is the economical science?

What is the economical science?

Economics offers a good tool for controlling society

Economics is a good way to give stick and carrot for large numbers of people. If people would not please, the price of energy can rise, or some taxes like fuel or value-added taxes of some products can be raised. And if people are nice, those taxes can be decreased, which leaves more money for living. So this is can be used in large scale the method, what was created by Ivan Pavlov (1) for brainwashing. 

Economics or economical sciences are an area of science, that is researching the economic and environmental interaction. This is the normal definition of this science, which is one of the most complicated things in the field of science. The thing, that makes economics so difficult is that the role of psychology is so big in this field is so big, and if we are thinking about the big actors in the field of markets, that thing is culminating to them. 

If the director of a big company says something, that thing has a very big influence on every actor in the economic universe, what is called the areas, where companies and finances are operating. The economics is also researching the invisible hand, what is the media affect economics. If the media highlights the negative data of some companies, that would cause even bankruptcy, and if that thing happens to the biggest actor in markets, that thing causes huge turbulence, because the main actors are cooperating with many companies, which must find new partners. and that causes disorder in the marketing environment. 

One reason, why western nations or the opponents of Russia have not justified the actions, what Putin has made, is that this man keeps the society calm and peaceful. Economics needs and wants a stable environment, and Putin is giving that thing to them. Russia is in a very important place when the far east actors are sending their products to the European markets, and Russia has also very big natural resources. The Trans-Siberian railway is giving a very effective transport route fro cars and other products. 

And the natural gas would guarantee the willing to be friends with Russians. This means that if Europe pleases Russia, it would give very cheap fuel for the European actors, but if the leaders of Russia would not be pleased, that means that the gas would get more expensive. 

Applying Pavlov's training method by using gifts and punishments to entire nations is possible. If people are nice, they would get a gift, and if they are nasty their homes would turn very expensive. And if in some areas is riots, the temperature of flats and houses can turn down. 

This is the method, what Pavlov created for brainwashing. If other leaders please Russia, that would give a gift. If the other nation would disappointed Russia, there would be punishment, which can be a higher price for energy. And this is applying the brainwashing for a large environment and masses. If people are nice, they would get cheap electricity, but if they are dirty, they would get punishment. 

Many people think that economics is some kind of artificial science, and the fact is that many sciences are somehow artificial. But when we are thinking about natural animals, they also have resources, what they cannot spend limitlessly. If some animals eat their food, they would die in hunger. And the economics is researching things like division of the incomings. 

The thing is that the good name and relationship would help people get more and easily property than a person, who has not those relationships. If I would be the son of some famous family of industrial leaders, I would know the right persons and get a good job and good contracts more easily than a person, who has not those relationships, what makes decisions to hire high-level directors or make contracts with subcontractors. The economics are researching how the economical wall, between the people, is forming.

The thing is that this kind of thing is one of the many definitions of the reason, why we have something so boring, and at the same time so fascinating things like economical sciences. There has been said that people would not trust economics, and there is a reason for that thing. The predictions of how markets are acting are normally going wrong. And that thing makes economics something, what people think as the "non-sharp" science. 

Another thing, why people do not trust economics is that this seems boring. Following the curves on the screen are not seem fantastic, and then people are forgetting that the economics is cooperating with everything in the field of international politics. And this is the reason, why we are looking for mates like the USA for allies or cooperatives in the international field. 

Nuclear weapons are giving more value to the business. And this makes the nuclear states very wanted cooperatives in the field of international business. When we are thinking about the Western world, we are facing the thing, that normally means the nations, what are democracies and what are members of NATO or allies with the NATO. And we are always want to support democracy, which is one of the most aggressive things in the field of politics. And the term democracy is good for business. It should guarantee that the products are produced in humanitarian conditions. And that means that democracy is giving also extra value for the merchandise. 

(1)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ivan_Pavlov

Why fake-news are hard to deny?

Why fake-news are hard to deny?

The problems with fake news are quite simple. The main question is "who is right". And in this situation, we would need the facts, what is supporting us. But the main thing is that what if the opponent appeals in emotions? In the case, where against each other are research, what is made by using the empiric methodology, where is used the accepted methods and equipment, and the so-called self-experienced person, those things might make problematic to deny the person, who has the "experienced background".

Or those persons might have strong religious convictions, and other opinions are hurting that sensitive person. Those things are causing problems if we want to deny fake information. And one of the best ways is to use personal loss like ending the long-term relationship for keeping the opponent kindly, and of course, good rhetorics is helping the thing, that the audience reacts with the right way.

Then we must realize that criticism is not a negative thing. Why critics have so negative involving? When we are critically observing research, we must dare to ask, has some people seen all evidence? If we would want to deny some research, we must find the reason for that in the research report. Other things like leadership, personal property, and color of the skirt are meanless.

The error must be found from the words, what that person has put in that report. Has that person use many sources for collecting data, and does that person have access to the most modern equipment, what science has created, and then we must realize that we are not experts in everything in the world.

We are all humans, who are making mistakes. They are not a bad thing at all. But mistakes can become bad things if we don't confess and fix them. We must have the force and dare to look at the mirror and say, that we are human beings. Errors show that we are making our job ourselves. And we all have different interests. Some people are interested in medicine, other in history, and third is interested in technology like rockets or automobiles.

This means that we are facing very big paradoxes when we are talking about the engines. The thing is that nuclear-powered aircraft would not increase the level of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere. It can cause radioactive pollution and cause cancer in large areas and change those areas inhabitable for a long time, but it would not raise the level of carbon dioxide.

When somebody is using the images, where is some kind of curves, the other person can just say, that "I felt that thing myself". This is one version of the pseudoscientific thing. The so-called person "self-experienced" is causing empathy. The thing is that kind of thing is really good arguments, and the problem with fake news is that it is ambitious. And they offer simple answers to complicated problems. One of the best answer, what fake news is giving is "just let them be". We cannot make any changes to the world alone, and that's why we must just follow the main flow. Why we should change anything because we are not on Earth when something happens.

In this case, I will use the environment and climate change as an example. I know that somebody expected anything else. There are people, who are denying this thing. So they can go to the jungle, and interview some villains, who are repeating the word "yes, yes". Then they would tell how positive things the rising temperature is to those people, who are living in the houses, what is on the top of pylons. They can say, that they are happy now because they can fish straight from their houses, and when the children would go to school by using rubber boats. We want to believe that thing. Those people have own experience, how positive thing is the rising temperature.

This makes them hard to deny. The negative context is causing interest, and if we have some kind of opinion about the thing, that thing causes that our opinion would get support from the fake news. Let's think about the cases, where a person has just bought a new car. That car is really expensive. Would we want to listen to the things about environmental chancing in that case? Then we see the article, where is a story about the slowing of the increase in temperature. We would read that thing because it will support our opinion, that we cannot do anything ourselves, or we can change bad things to the next generations.

This is the thing in pseudoscience and fake news. If we would start to think about the black holes they are far away. There are billions or at least hundreds of lightyears to the nearest black hole, so let them be. We cannot affect those things. But when we are denying the environment change, we can make two things, we can deny the research.

That is one version, but the second version is that we can say, that the environment changes, but there is the national interest before it. And then the result is that the national interest would be boosted with the opinion, that the generations of the future are not here, and the political leaders would not get any votes from them. So why we must think about them. This means that the thing is one version of popularity.

The UFO:s and their power systems part II

The UFO:s and their power systems part II

The connection with UFO:s and thunderstorms are somehow interested me during all my life. And that connection might be, that UFO:s are coming to reload their batteries. In this text, UFO means "Unidentified Flying Object" which can be human-made, or it can come from some other place. And there are only a couple of people, who knows real answers for that kind of question would know only a couple of persons on Earth. 

When we are looking at the UFO in the thunderstorm, there is a possibility, that it uses the engine system, what will surround the craft with an electromagnetic bubble, and then the system would just kick the ions away from its layer. There are two possibilities, how the UFO would make that thing. 

The first thing is that there is a bubble or electromagnetic layer, that surrounds the craft. The mission of this layer would be that the gas, what comes through it will be ionized, and then the outer layer would just kick those ions away. 

By using the changing of the power of the magnets, what is making the outer layer magnetic, the craft would adjust it's flying direction. The other version is that the craft would be covered with the "U"-shaped tubes, what would let the gas flow through them, and the direction, where that craft would fly would adjust by using the ventilation system.

So where the UFO would get its energy?

The answer would be that the system can collect electricity from many directions. One thing could be the high-voltage cables, what it can use as the loader, but the other thing is that this system can benefit the lightning for getting power. The thing is that if the UFO:s are man-made they would use the radio transmitter as the power source. 

Or they can be covered by using the silicone plates, which can get the energy by the laser rays. The thing is that there are many military purposes in that kind of vehicle. 

Could those UFO:s use the artificial thunder cloud to make the electricity for its systems?

In some very interesting ideas the vehicle, which uses the electric power could use the rising lightning as the power source. In nature, some flashes of lightning would rise, and they could, in theory, load the electric systems of the UFO:s. 

So in some ideas, the craft would create the artificial thunder cloud around it, and then use that thing for creating the electricity to its high voltage systems. And the rising flashes of lightning are easy to make in the places, where is the high-voltage electric wires.

The artificial thunder could create by using the nanomachines, or the ice, what would be rotated like thunder clouds in nature, and this kind of thing could create the very high voltage electricity. These kinds of things are pure theories, but they can be a very interesting thing when we are thinking about the futuristic and ecological way to create high voltage green energy. 

So would UFO:s and thunderstorms have a wild connection?

Sometimes I see this kind of footage on the Internet, and I have thought that maybe the thunderstorm and those mysterious crafts have a connection. That connection would be that they are coming to fill or reload their batteries. I don't know is this film real or not, you decide, what is your opinion. I have not filmed it.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LB47AADvjhQ

Image: 

https://www.newshub.co.nz/home/world/2018/11/ufo-filmed-feeding-on-lightning/_jcr_content/par/image_1130362527.dynimg.1280.q75.jpg/v1543308737240/ufo-today-tr3b-xfiles-1120-youtube.jpg