Discrimination of the person shows something

Discrimination of the person shows something

Do you want to know is somebody discriminating yourself? The thing to find out that question is to make three or more blogs and then share things like writings and pictures in those pages. The idea of those pages is that one of them must be made that way, that your identity would able to see immediately. And then the others would be made by using some other name, or by using graphics or something like that, which makes that your identity would not be noticed immediately.

If the pages, where is your identity notices would get fewer shares than other pages, that would tell that somebody would have something against you. The thing is that if you have three or more pages and the others than the page, where your identity has been are liked, that thing causes interesting thoughts. If people are interesting something, they might like also pages, where your name is visible, and the question is, is there something, what causes that you would be put in the boycott.

And does something cause that people would not want to show that they are talking to you? This kind of thing is noticed in social media, and if the writings of the person are interesting, the thing that makes the texts interesting is not depending on the person, who is written those texts. So this makes sometimes people think that is the personality of the publisher something, what causes that people don't want to know or show that they know some people?

There is a couple of things that are uncovering interesting things. One of the things is that if the people would share something, the involvement of shares must cause the ban, not the name of the writer of the texts. Sometimes scientific theories have been banned, when they are written some "not so well know" researcher. But when those theories are introduced as the product of some well-known person or scientist that theory has been passed the critical observation.

And there are many other things, which are causing the suspicious that somebody has been estimated by using little bit tougher standards than somebody else. If the inspectors of academic work have been tight and sharp with somebody, that means that they are soft for somebody else, and that thing makes people suspicious that there could be something else than the work itself, what has affected the estimation of the work, what person has brought to the board.