Will the change ever end in the universe?

When we think about the equilibrium in the universe, we say that the equilibrium is the situation where energy flow ends. In the case of the universe, its energy flow is like a lake. Waves on the surface of that lake tell. That there is movement in that water. Same way, there are waves in the energy fields in the universe.

The energy is like water. It turns destructive only when it moves. In the same way, we can benefit energy only if that energy moves. And we can say that standing energy cannot affect the material. Only moving energy can push or pull particles.

The energy flow from material to the environment is the thing. That keeps the universe in dynamic change. The energy flow or quantum vaporization is the event. Their material turns into wave movement. And the reason for that is the expansion of the universe.

Without that energy flow the universe would not expand, and oppositely thinking that energy flow also causes at least part of the universe's expansion. Another thing is that the energy flows out from the universe because the energy level in the universe is higher than its environment.

The energy flow in the universe is the thing, that keeps things going. And without that energy flow things would freeze immediately. We can say that all material formed in the event, called: the Big Bang. Expansion of the universe began just after the Big Bang.

The local geometry of the universe is determined by whether the density parameter Ω is greater than, less than, or equal to 1. From top to bottom: a spherical universe with Ω > 1, a hyperbolic universe with Ω < 1, and a flat universe with Ω = 1. These depictions of two-dimensional surfaces are merely easily visualizable analogs to the 3-dimensional structure of (local) space. (Wikipedia, Shape of the universe)

Ω > 1 is the only case in which the Big Crunch can happen.

Materia is a form of energy. And the material is turning into a wave movement. The wave movement is another form of energy.

During that expansion distance between particles increases. That causes a situation where the interaction between particles turns weaker. And that thing causes the effect, that natural forces in the universe turn weaker. There are also quantum fields in the universe. Those quantum fields are like gas in the atmosphere. When the universe turns larger, those quantum fields turn weaker, because the same energy must fill the larger entirety.

And if we compare that thing with gas, we can say that the same gas mass must fill the larger energy, and that means gas pressure turns lower. Same way we can say that energy pressure turns weaker, if we can say that energy has pressure. Or rather saying. The energy level in the universe turns lower. And that will make the universe colder.

But will the universe never reach energy stability or equilibrium? If the universe is not a ball-shaped structure or sphere it will expand forever. Or we can say that expansion is infinite. That means the universe will never reach the ultimate equilibrium. The interaction in the post-material universe is an extremely weak thing. But if the ultimate fate of the universe is the big silence. Those energy fields that travel away from each other. Meaning that the situation is not completely equilibrium.

At that moment the material is turned into electromagnetic waves. And those waves continue their travel forever. That is an oversimplified version of the very complicated theorem. There is the possibility that in the very old universe, the detonating black holes send the network of radiation across the great stability.

Those waves of energy can cross each other, and it's possible. Those cross points will start to pull energy and material remnants to them. That thing is the Big Crunch. The base idea of those models is that there are no other universes. But if those other universes exist. That thing turns even more complicated.

https://bigthink.com/starts-with-a-bang/universe-reach-equilibrium/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shape_of_the_universe

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ultimate_fate_of_the_universe

What is the difference between TR-3A and TR-3B? And are those planes real?

What is the difference between TR-3A and TR-3B? And are those planes real? Is TR-3B (0) "Black Triangle UFO" or is it only the piece of paper? The study project, what is used to create advanced ideas for use of the nuclear-powered aircraft. Or is it the study project or black budget aircraft, where lost 2,3 trillion dollars (1)of the stealth bomber were gone. In this text is things, that might seem very difficult to accept, and when we are thinking about things like doubling the object or making it smaller by using huge layers of energy, nothing denies to test those things. But were those tests successful, there is no data about that in public Internet, so we must say that things like doubling the human or aircraft can be tested, but the results can be unknown. But in the source two is the tale, what seems like impossible, those men, who got Noble Prize put at first time one atom to the box, and hit it with photon one photon in the box and hit it with th

Mythic Planet X is an interesting thing because that allows the way to the perfect stealth technology.

Mythic Planet X is an interesting thing because that allows the way to the perfect stealth technology. Could a hypothetical Planet X tunnel all radiation? The myth of Planet X still lives. Nobody ever saw that planet, and the thing that supports the theory of previously unknown large-size planets in Kuiper's belt are mysterious anomalies in Neptune's trajectory. The thing is that nothing else supports the theory of the existence of the "invisible planet". The size of the planet must be very big. And its gravitational field strong that it can affect Neptune's trajectory. And the search for that mysterious planet is very long work. In some visions, the mysterious gravitational source is mentioned as the small black hole, but nobody understands why that black hole doesn't seem to interact. In some other theories, Planet X is a glimpse of dark matter. And that thing makes it invisible. But there is one weakness. The dark matter object must have some kind of

Nanoparticles are excellent tools for medicine transporters.

"Researchers have developed a new therapy for pancreatic cancer involving nanoparticles that stimulate immune responses and improve drug delivery. This innovative method has led to significant tumor reduction in mice and holds potential for treating other cancers. Credit: SciTechDaily.com" (ScitechDaily, New Nanoparticle Cancer Treatment Successfully Shrinks and Eliminates Pancreatic Tumors) Nanoparticles can carry medicines into wanted cells. The idea is that the same system that feeds those cells transports those nanoparticles into cells that need medicine. When a nanoparticle goes, into a cell, it releases the chemicals into the targeted cells. Because nanoparticles don't let medical molecules interact with a body that makes it possible to create new and more powerful cytostatics. Nanoparticles can transport things like ricin molecules into wanted cells. Ricin is one of the most poisonous chemicals. That chemical is useful for next-generation cytostatics, if researche

Writings about astronomy and technology.

Search This Blog