Skip to main content

Is it dark matter or Modified Newtonian Dynamics (MOND)?


"Using gravitational lensing, scientists uncovered that dark matter may stretch over a million light-years from galactic centers, proposing significant adjustments to our gravitational theories or the concept of dark matter itself. Credit: SciTechDaily.com" (ScitechDaily, Revising Relativity: How Modified Gravity Challenges Einstein and Dark Matter)


 Is it dark matter or Modified Newtonian Dynamics (MOND)? 


Maybe they are both right. 


In the beginning, we must ask one question. That question is: can both theories: Modified Newtonian Dynamics (MOND) and dark matter theories be true? There is the possibility. There are two kinds of gravity waves. A short and long. In that model, the long gravity wave origin is in the strings between quarks and gluons. 

The long gravity waves come from some quantum fields around some particles or particle groups. Those long gravity waves can have light-year scale wavelength. Modern telescopes noticed. That there are wave-formations in galaxies that wavelength it millions or even billions of light years.

In some other models, the gravity waves can be longer than previously thought. In some models, gravity waves are like serpentines. They can surround particles. And that can explain dark matter. In that model, gravity is an energy ditch in front of particles or waves. That energy ditch pulls particles or wave movement forward. 

And maybe that energy ditch is also between superstrings that form particles. Particles are like a whisk-looking structure. And the thing that causes the spin is the energy shadow or energy ditch at the forward of them. That thing pulls particles like electrons back and forth. 

That is one of the biggest questions in cosmology. Modified gravity theory is one of the alternative solutions for dark matter. The thing that supports MOND is the galaxy spin. Galaxies spin at the same speed at a million light-years radius from the center. And that thing supports MOND. However, gravity lensing is not calculated in that theory. 

There is a model that the dark matter is the density or focus in the gravity fields. The thing called weak lensing is the thing that could explain dark matter. The idea is that gravity refracts gravity waves just like it refracts light. And that forms the gravity focuses that act like material. 

Another thing is that there are supermassive black holes in the center of the galaxies. Those black holes are not only black holes in galaxies. When a black hole spins, it pulls material and quantum fields into the spiral-shaped things. The only thing that has not proven to turn into a spiral is a gravity wave. 

But it's possible that gravity waves also follow that track. The interaction in that spiral is complicated. Black holes send X- and gamma-ray impulses. And then those impulses hit material that travels in the spiral. That energy rises the mass of the particles. Because the energy that hits the material increases its mass. That is the reason why energy can form things like black holes. 

Then we must realize. That MOND doesn't fit with gravity lenses. Otherwise, MOND and dark matter theory are both made before gravity waves. The thing is that impacting and standing gravity waves can form virtual material. Those standing gravity waves can explain why we cannot see weakly interacting massive particles WIMPs. In some models, WIMP is a gravity tornado or gravity whirl. 


https://scitechdaily.com/revising-relativity-how-modified-gravity-challenges-einstein-and-dark-matter/


https://thedaily.case.edu/a-million-light-years-and-still-going/


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dark_matter


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Modified_Newtonian_dynamics


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spin_(physics)



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

What is the difference between TR-3A and TR-3B? And are those planes real?

What is the difference between TR-3A and TR-3B? And are those planes real? Is TR-3B (0) "Black Triangle UFO" or is it only the piece of paper?  The study project, what is used to create advanced ideas for use of the nuclear-powered aircraft. Or is it the study project or black budget aircraft, where lost 2,3 trillion dollars (1)of the stealth bomber were gone. In this text is things, that might seem very difficult to accept, and when we are thinking about things like doubling the object or making it smaller by using huge layers of energy, nothing denies to test those things. But were those tests successful, there is no data about that in public Internet, so we must say that things like doubling the human or aircraft can be tested, but the results can be unknown.  But in the source two is the tale, what seems like impossible, those men, who got Noble Prize put at first time one atom to the box, and hit it with photon one photon in the box and hit it with th

Mythic Planet X is an interesting thing because that allows the way to the perfect stealth technology.

  Mythic Planet X is an interesting thing because that allows the way to the perfect stealth technology.  Could a hypothetical Planet X tunnel all radiation?  The myth of Planet X still lives. Nobody ever saw that planet, and the thing that supports the theory of previously unknown large-size planets in Kuiper's belt are mysterious anomalies in Neptune's trajectory. The thing is that nothing else supports the theory of the existence of the "invisible planet". The size of the planet must be very big. And its gravitational field strong that it can affect Neptune's trajectory.  And the search for that mysterious planet is very long work. In some visions, the mysterious gravitational source is mentioned as the small black hole, but nobody understands why that black hole doesn't seem to interact.  In some other theories, Planet X is a glimpse of dark matter. And that thing makes it invisible. But there is one weakness. The dark matter object must have some kind of

Nanoparticles are excellent tools for medicine transporters.

"Researchers have developed a new therapy for pancreatic cancer involving nanoparticles that stimulate immune responses and improve drug delivery. This innovative method has led to significant tumor reduction in mice and holds potential for treating other cancers. Credit: SciTechDaily.com" (ScitechDaily, New Nanoparticle Cancer Treatment Successfully Shrinks and Eliminates Pancreatic Tumors) Nanoparticles can carry medicines into wanted cells. The idea is that the same system that feeds those cells transports those nanoparticles into cells that need medicine. When a nanoparticle goes, into a cell, it releases the chemicals into the targeted cells. Because nanoparticles don't let medical molecules interact with a body that makes it possible to create new and more powerful cytostatics. Nanoparticles can transport things like ricin molecules into wanted cells.  Ricin is one of the most poisonous chemicals. That chemical is useful for next-generation cytostatics, if researche