Skip to main content

Gravity and the limits of Einstein's theory


Image: NASA


Gravity and the limits of Einstein's theory

One thing what we must understand, when we are creating texts and thoughts about black holes and forms of material behind the event horizon is that we can write and talk almost everything we want about that phenomenon. We cannot visit inside that object, because we don't have a single one near us. And because we cannot get any observations behind the event horizon, we cannot deny or prove a thing, what happens behind that point.

The observations are things that are proven or abandon theories. That is the thing, what we must realize when we are thinking about theories and scientific facts. Fact is the thing that gravity influences every object with the same way, and in the empty or vacuum chamber plume and bites, what are made of iron are dropping with the same speed.

And why the light doesn't drop to Earth. That thing is so fast, that Earth has so minimum influence to light, that we just cannot meter that difference. The black holes have so powerful gravity field that the escape velocity is higher than the speed of light, but the thing is that the transition disk around the black hole is so bright, that it denies making observations of the distant objects behind the black hole. The thing is that the gravitation lenses are proven that the gravity influences to light, but the thing is that also galactic molecular nebulas are causing the changes to the trajectory of photons. 

That's why the scientists must confirm that the errors or changes in the trajectories of photons are causing by gravity, not molecular nebulas. And that means that there is needed extreme sharp telescopes, what can eliminate the possibility, that the interstellar nebula is influencing the trajectory of light. Of course, there is needed enough massive target like galaxy, what is in the right angle, and in the point of the sky, where are only a few stars. That makes possible to search the double image of some quasar, what is in the same line with this galaxy.

If we would want to see what happens inside the black holes, we must travel inside them. This is the reason, why the theory of relativity is so confirmed. But there is one aspect, what we ever thought, and that is that inside the black hole might be multiple internal spaces, where the gravity is getting different geometrical forms. So what that thing, what I just wrote means?

The idea of the black hole is that the material would be pressured to the extremely tight, and that means that the form of a black hole is not material in the form how we understand the material. In the mind of some cosmologists, the black hole is only the gravitational field, what is firming in the giant energy burst, what releases when the giant star is blowing as a supernova. This is the normal black hole, buts then we must think how the supermassive black holes are forming? 

Those objects are forming that the interplanetary or interstellar molecule cloud is collapsing straight to the black hole and the thing what we are looking for in this thing is what is behind the event horizon? After that point, we cannot get any observations, and the only thing what we know is that the black holes are not growing.

Or do we know even that? When we are thinking about the supermassive black holes, what mass is about millions or even billions of masses of the sun, we might think that the black hole is growing but the increase of the size of this extreme object is so small, that we cannot even meter that thing. So this is about the growing black holes.

But there is another thing, what is ever thought when we are talking about black holes, and that is the powerful radiation zone around this object might blow a large mass of material away from the black hole. That thing is making one thing clear, and that is that there is a possibility to use black holes as a gravity sling. But we don't have a single one near us. So this makes that kind of things pure theory.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

What is the difference between TR-3A and TR-3B? And are those planes real?

What is the difference between TR-3A and TR-3B? And are those planes real? Is TR-3B (0) "Black Triangle UFO" or is it only the piece of paper?  The study project, what is used to create advanced ideas for use of the nuclear-powered aircraft. Or is it the study project or black budget aircraft, where lost 2,3 trillion dollars (1)of the stealth bomber were gone. In this text is things, that might seem very difficult to accept, and when we are thinking about things like doubling the object or making it smaller by using huge layers of energy, nothing denies to test those things. But were those tests successful, there is no data about that in public Internet, so we must say that things like doubling the human or aircraft can be tested, but the results can be unknown.  But in the source two is the tale, what seems like impossible, those men, who got Noble Prize put at first time one atom to the box, and hit it with photon one photon in the box and hit it with th

Mythic Planet X is an interesting thing because that allows the way to the perfect stealth technology.

  Mythic Planet X is an interesting thing because that allows the way to the perfect stealth technology.  Could a hypothetical Planet X tunnel all radiation?  The myth of Planet X still lives. Nobody ever saw that planet, and the thing that supports the theory of previously unknown large-size planets in Kuiper's belt are mysterious anomalies in Neptune's trajectory. The thing is that nothing else supports the theory of the existence of the "invisible planet". The size of the planet must be very big. And its gravitational field strong that it can affect Neptune's trajectory.  And the search for that mysterious planet is very long work. In some visions, the mysterious gravitational source is mentioned as the small black hole, but nobody understands why that black hole doesn't seem to interact.  In some other theories, Planet X is a glimpse of dark matter. And that thing makes it invisible. But there is one weakness. The dark matter object must have some kind of

Nanoparticles are excellent tools for medicine transporters.

"Researchers have developed a new therapy for pancreatic cancer involving nanoparticles that stimulate immune responses and improve drug delivery. This innovative method has led to significant tumor reduction in mice and holds potential for treating other cancers. Credit: SciTechDaily.com" (ScitechDaily, New Nanoparticle Cancer Treatment Successfully Shrinks and Eliminates Pancreatic Tumors) Nanoparticles can carry medicines into wanted cells. The idea is that the same system that feeds those cells transports those nanoparticles into cells that need medicine. When a nanoparticle goes, into a cell, it releases the chemicals into the targeted cells. Because nanoparticles don't let medical molecules interact with a body that makes it possible to create new and more powerful cytostatics. Nanoparticles can transport things like ricin molecules into wanted cells.  Ricin is one of the most poisonous chemicals. That chemical is useful for next-generation cytostatics, if researche