When coincidence destroys common

When coincidence destroys common

The location of the single gas atom is impossible to calculate because it is impossible to create the precise decimal number, which is marking the position and direction of vectors. That means we can put more and more numbers behind the dot, and this makes the calculating precise location of the particle in the 3D universe or space impossible. And here we can go to one of the most interesting things in the black holes and the mathematical formulas, that are using to create the most advanced simulations in theoretical calculation models.

The idea of the black holes is that they are the most dominating objects in the universe, and the particles are falling in that object without disturbing from the forces, what are caused by other objects. So if we would like to adjust those formulas, what is used for making predictions of the movements of atoms and molecules, but for that thing we should take the single, well distinct particle, where we can focus the system, and then we can compare the theoretical results, what the system would give to the results, what we can get from the real life.

This is one way to check those things. When we are creating the models, how the gas is acting in the universe, we must realize that those molecular clouds are the biggest objects in the universe, but the problem is that single molecules are extremely light.

So we can observe the entirety because the universe is so stable place, but the paradox is that it is full of radiation. Another thing in that in the case, where we would want to calculate the movements of the molecules, we can make the observations even hundreds of years, and then comes thing, what we can call as coincidence.

Coincidence can destroy every model in the world and this case, the explosion of supernova can turn the beautiful gas mass what we have observed even years in a couple of seconds, and in this case, the problem is that we cannot notice that kind of chances in the giant gas mass, what size is hundreds of light-years. When the electromagnetic shock-wave would hit to that nebula, it can turn it's the direction or cause the extremely big-size movements in the gas mass.

And this makes adjusting the calculations very difficult because we would want to find the stable gas mass, where are no pulsars or what is not influenced by the radiation, what comes out from impacting black holes and neutron stars. The thing is that we can say, that those phenomena are really interesting, and they give us very much information about the behavior of energy and other things like black holes.

But those coincidences are breaking the stability, what we are needing when we are adjusting calculations. If we want to make formulas and check how well they are fitting to the environment or real life, that means that this kind of testing needs extremely stable conditions.

When we are observing things like impacting black holes, there is a possibility, that this kind of phenomenon is really interesting, but they are not exactly very common cases in the universe. That kind of thing where we are observing billions and billions of particles, we are seeing those things like gamma-bursts all the time, but they are not very common cases.

People who are observing gamma-ray bursts are not making mathematical formulas is the common thing, what people are saying. The thing in the mathematical formulas is that people, who are working with those things are always needed or want the common cases and stable conditions. This means that things like intelligent life-forms and other things are not things, what those people want.

They are needing entirety without uncommon things, and that means they would want to observe the galaxy, where is no single star and every particle has the same size. And rather saying they would want to close that gas galaxy in the giant ball, where is not outer emission to that mass, what they want to use for checking their calculations. And here I must say one thing, we are always confused by coincidence.

Comments