Skip to main content

Dark energy and the shape of the universe.



Could the universe be egg-shaped? 


Could the cosmic microwave background explain some errors and anomalies in calculations? We can see two symmetrically cold areas that are in line at the left and right sides of the image. That could tell that there is a giant black hole in the middle of the universe. That hyper-massive black hole could form when just after the Big Bang part of the material dropped back. And that material formed an enormous black hole in history. The cosmic gamma- and X-ray backgrounds tell that there could be a point where that radiation leaves. 

And those cold points seem to be in line with gamma- and X-ray radiation. If the source of those gammas- and X-rays are black holes, where they are leaving from their poles, that radiation could turn the universe into a little bit of egg-looking structure. And that means we are at the equator of that hypothetical black hole. So could that thing cause us to overestimate some distances? That means we thought that the visible universe is a sphere. But it's an egg-looking structure. 


(Credit: NASA / GSFC)

If there is a black hole in the middle of the universe it sends gamma- and X-rays to the plasma or shockwave that travels in front of visible material. Then that plasma shockwave that is formed during the Big Bang sends part of that radiation back into the universe. And that reflection causes dark energy. The thing is that this shockwave is traveling with limited speed, and the universe's gravitational effect slows the speed of that thing. In the same way, it limits the speed of photons that travels ahead of the material because the gravitational effect slows the speed of photons if it is the backside of the photons. 






Above From the top: Cosmic gamma-ray, X-ray, and microwave background. There is a theory that forming galaxies creates that gamma-ray. But that linear form could tell that there is some extremely large-size black hole in the middle of the universe. 


In the X-ray image (middle) you can see how the X-rays are spread around the universe. And in the cosmic microwave backgroung (bottom) the cold areas that I mentioned are marked by using green arrows. 


"The local geometry of the universe is determined by whether the density parameter Ω is greater than, less than, or equal to 1.
From top to bottom: a spherical universe with Ω > 1, a hyperbolic universe with Ω < 1, and a flat universe with Ω = 1. These depictions of two-dimensional surfaces are merely easily visualizable analogs to the 3-dimensional structure of (local) space." (Wikipedia/Shape of the universe)

Can we eliminate dark energy? 


The expansion of the universe doesn't match with calculations. And the universe expands too slowly. So that means in the universe is too little dark energy or the weight of the universe is somehow too big. 

Which one is right? Or is that error or difference between theories and reality virtual? When we think. That the visible universe is like a ball, we face a very interesting model that could explain why calculations do not match. 

When photons travel from another side of the universe. The gravitational force from those galaxies and other objects is slowing those photons. And if there is some kind of unseen structure that thing can cause problems or errors in measurement. And the gravitational effect can turn redshift higher than it is. So is the universe just smaller than it should be? 

Or are there dark matter clouds behind the galaxies on another side of the universe? That means the universe looks like a galaxy. There could be a ball of visible material. And around it is a large cloud of dark matter. And in that model dark matter forms a gigantic version of the Kuiper Belt.  



Image: Wikipedia/Castle Romeo)

The nuclear test in the Pacific proving ground. Note the donut-shaped structure. A similar structure is an asteroid belt that formed when fusion reactions started in the Sun. So, could the Big Bang form a similar structure in the universe? Could that mega-size asteroid belt exist? 


Or are we just misunderstanding the form of the universe? Is the universe look donut? 


When we are thinking about the geometrical shape of the universe, nobody ever thought that the universe could be a donut-looking structure. In that model, the visible material is like a donut-shaped ring around the center of the universe. But the problem is how much there is dark material in the universe. 

And how strong the dark matter interaction is? In some models, dark matter is only the virtual material. That forms when gravitational waves are impacting. That thing explains why we cannot see dark matter. In that model dark matter is the bubble or gravitational skyrmion. In that case, dark matter does not exist in the material form. 


https://bigthink.com/starts-with-a-bang/eliminate-dark-energy/

https://cerncourier.com/a/elephants-in-the-gamma-ray-sky/

https://imagine.gsfc.nasa.gov/science/objects/diffuse_background2.html

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cosmic_microwave_background

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cosmic_microwave_background 


https://shorttextsofoldscholars.blogspot.com/

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

What is the difference between TR-3A and TR-3B? And are those planes real?

What is the difference between TR-3A and TR-3B? And are those planes real? Is TR-3B (0) "Black Triangle UFO" or is it only the piece of paper?  The study project, what is used to create advanced ideas for use of the nuclear-powered aircraft. Or is it the study project or black budget aircraft, where lost 2,3 trillion dollars (1)of the stealth bomber were gone. In this text is things, that might seem very difficult to accept, and when we are thinking about things like doubling the object or making it smaller by using huge layers of energy, nothing denies to test those things. But were those tests successful, there is no data about that in public Internet, so we must say that things like doubling the human or aircraft can be tested, but the results can be unknown.  But in the source two is the tale, what seems like impossible, those men, who got Noble Prize put at first time one atom to the box, and hit it with photon one photon in the box and hit it with th
Post a Comment
Read more

Mythic Planet X is an interesting thing because that allows the way to the perfect stealth technology.

  Mythic Planet X is an interesting thing because that allows the way to the perfect stealth technology.  Could a hypothetical Planet X tunnel all radiation?  The myth of Planet X still lives. Nobody ever saw that planet, and the thing that supports the theory of previously unknown large-size planets in Kuiper's belt are mysterious anomalies in Neptune's trajectory. The thing is that nothing else supports the theory of the existence of the "invisible planet". The size of the planet must be very big. And its gravitational field strong that it can affect Neptune's trajectory.  And the search for that mysterious planet is very long work. In some visions, the mysterious gravitational source is mentioned as the small black hole, but nobody understands why that black hole doesn't seem to interact.  In some other theories, Planet X is a glimpse of dark matter. And that thing makes it invisible. But there is one weakness. The dark matter object must have some kind of
Post a Comment
Read more

Nanoparticles are excellent tools for medicine transporters.

"Researchers have developed a new therapy for pancreatic cancer involving nanoparticles that stimulate immune responses and improve drug delivery. This innovative method has led to significant tumor reduction in mice and holds potential for treating other cancers. Credit: SciTechDaily.com" (ScitechDaily, New Nanoparticle Cancer Treatment Successfully Shrinks and Eliminates Pancreatic Tumors) Nanoparticles can carry medicines into wanted cells. The idea is that the same system that feeds those cells transports those nanoparticles into cells that need medicine. When a nanoparticle goes, into a cell, it releases the chemicals into the targeted cells. Because nanoparticles don't let medical molecules interact with a body that makes it possible to create new and more powerful cytostatics. Nanoparticles can transport things like ricin molecules into wanted cells.  Ricin is one of the most poisonous chemicals. That chemical is useful for next-generation cytostatics, if researche
Post a Comment
Read more