Skip to main content

Is there a point when time began?

In modern theories, the beginning of the universe is in the Big Bang. At that point the material separated from time. But should we rather say that material made contact with time? In that model, we should think the opposite way. 

Normally we think. That time separated from the material during the Big Bang. But should we think like this: After the Big Bang time connected with the material? Is time series of pike-looking power fields that are pushing part of the particles' quantum fields with them? That causes shockwaves around the universe. 

And that could explain dark energy. In that model time is the wave movement that takes part of elementary particles with it. So time is some kind of free energy that destroys the material. But does time have to begin or is it infinite? 

At that point, the material started aging. And that aging continues until the last star and black hole are gone. When the universe reaches the stable point aging ends, and the universe's existence ends. The idea is that if the expansion of the universe continues forever there is a point where the wave movement reaches the minimum energy point that is the same as the environment. But that thing requires. 

That there is some kind of Higgs' field outside the universe. If there is nothing that means it's impossible that the wave movement reaches the same energy level as its environment. Because if there is a great emptiness outside the universe the information that remains of wave movement has always higher energy level than its environment. 

If there is an extremely weak energy field outside the universe. That thing can cause a situation. That the superstrings or information that is a remnant of the universe turned to wave movement and sends weak waves around each other. And that thing makes the Schwinger effect possible.





But then let's go back to the time. 


We always think that we know time. Time is the vaporization of material and when material turns to wave movement time ends. But then we should think that we are looking at the interaction with the time and material. We can see that the aging of material is the result of interaction between the universe and its environment around it. A regular way to think about time and space is that time is connected with material. 

When we enter the point. Where the material reaches the speed of light its aging stops. And because gravitation acts and interacts the same way as speed and other energy that means inside black holes behind their event horizon material turns younger. 

The reason for that is: the material or massive gravitational field of black holes will not let energy travel away from it. So the question is: has time a connection with the Big Bang at all? The Big Bang opened the material to the time. But does time exist before the Big Bang? In some models or visions time is some kind of energy field. If the energy field called time existed before the Big Bang we should think that Big Bang caused a situation where time started to interact with the material. 

So is the black hole the thing that separates time from material? In that model the black holes deny that time cannot interact with material. If that is true the time could exist before the Big Bang. 


https://bigthink.com/13-8/does-time-have-a-beginning/

https://www.space.com/time-how-it-works

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ultimate_fate_of_the_universe

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

What is the difference between TR-3A and TR-3B? And are those planes real?

What is the difference between TR-3A and TR-3B? And are those planes real? Is TR-3B (0) "Black Triangle UFO" or is it only the piece of paper?  The study project, what is used to create advanced ideas for use of the nuclear-powered aircraft. Or is it the study project or black budget aircraft, where lost 2,3 trillion dollars (1)of the stealth bomber were gone. In this text is things, that might seem very difficult to accept, and when we are thinking about things like doubling the object or making it smaller by using huge layers of energy, nothing denies to test those things. But were those tests successful, there is no data about that in public Internet, so we must say that things like doubling the human or aircraft can be tested, but the results can be unknown.  But in the source two is the tale, what seems like impossible, those men, who got Noble Prize put at first time one atom to the box, and hit it with photon one photon in the box and hit it with th

Mythic Planet X is an interesting thing because that allows the way to the perfect stealth technology.

  Mythic Planet X is an interesting thing because that allows the way to the perfect stealth technology.  Could a hypothetical Planet X tunnel all radiation?  The myth of Planet X still lives. Nobody ever saw that planet, and the thing that supports the theory of previously unknown large-size planets in Kuiper's belt are mysterious anomalies in Neptune's trajectory. The thing is that nothing else supports the theory of the existence of the "invisible planet". The size of the planet must be very big. And its gravitational field strong that it can affect Neptune's trajectory.  And the search for that mysterious planet is very long work. In some visions, the mysterious gravitational source is mentioned as the small black hole, but nobody understands why that black hole doesn't seem to interact.  In some other theories, Planet X is a glimpse of dark matter. And that thing makes it invisible. But there is one weakness. The dark matter object must have some kind of

Nanoparticles are excellent tools for medicine transporters.

"Researchers have developed a new therapy for pancreatic cancer involving nanoparticles that stimulate immune responses and improve drug delivery. This innovative method has led to significant tumor reduction in mice and holds potential for treating other cancers. Credit: SciTechDaily.com" (ScitechDaily, New Nanoparticle Cancer Treatment Successfully Shrinks and Eliminates Pancreatic Tumors) Nanoparticles can carry medicines into wanted cells. The idea is that the same system that feeds those cells transports those nanoparticles into cells that need medicine. When a nanoparticle goes, into a cell, it releases the chemicals into the targeted cells. Because nanoparticles don't let medical molecules interact with a body that makes it possible to create new and more powerful cytostatics. Nanoparticles can transport things like ricin molecules into wanted cells.  Ricin is one of the most poisonous chemicals. That chemical is useful for next-generation cytostatics, if researche