Skip to main content

Can we avoid singularity in the black hole?


"Once you cross the threshold to form a black hole, everything inside the event horizon crunches down to a singularity that is, at most, one-dimensional. No 3D structures can survive intact, although the potential for any infalling matter/energy to be transported into a "baby Universe" created on the other side of this black hole cannot be ruled out". (BigtThink.com/We can’t avoid a singularity inside every black hole)

The problem with the black hole is that the time would start to travel backward inside the event horizon. The event horizon is the point, where time stops. And inside it, time starts to move backward. Which is against the linear time model. 

Time reverse breaks the golden order, that everything can happen only once. That thing makes the retrocausality possible.  "Retrocausality, or backward causation, is a concept of cause and effect in which an effect precedes its cause in time and so a later event affects an earlier one." 

"In quantum physics, the distinction between cause and effect is not made at the most fundamental level and so time-symmetric systems can be viewed as causal or retrocausal Philosophical considerations of time travel often address the same issues as retrocausality, as do treatments of the subject in fiction, but the two phenomena are distinct" (Wikipedia, Retrocausality)

So, the term Retrocausality means that information travels and affects in two directions in spacetime. The reason, why we cannot see information that travels back from the future is that information in the hypersurface of the present is so dominating, that we cannot see that information. 

When information comes out from a black hole the black hole's gravitation pulls it straight. And that thing causes an idea that maybe Hwaking's radiation is information that is from the future and escapes from the black hole. 

Could this be the first image of the black hole-white hole pair? Could that hot spot 9,2 billion light-years away be the white hole? The energy bridge seems to connect a supermassive black hole with that thing, and maybe that hot site is the white hole. 

"The galaxy 3C297 has been discovered to be lonelier than expected, implying it has likely pulled in and absorbed its former companion galaxies. 3C297 contains a quasar, a supermassive black hole pulling in gas at the center of the galaxy and driving powerful jets of matter seen in radio waves. X-ray data from Chandra, radio data from the Karl G. Jansky Very Large Array and visible data from Gemini suggest that even though 3C297’s surroundings possess many features of a galaxy cluster, all but one galaxy remains". (ScitechDaily.com/Astronomers Discover a Mysterious Lonely Galaxy 9.2 Billion Light-Years Away) 

"There is also visible light and infrared data from Hubble in this composite. Astronomers think this last large galaxy assimilated the others through its gravitational pull, and may push the limits for how quickly astronomers expect galaxies to grow in the early universe. Credit: X-ray: NASA/CXC/Univ. of Torino/V. Missaglia et al.; Optical: NASA/ESA/STScI & International Gemini Observatory/NOIRLab/NSF/AURA; Infrared: NASA/ESA/STScI; Radio: NRAO/AUI/NSF" (ScitechDaily.com/Astronomers Discover a Mysterious Lonely Galaxy 9.2 Billion Light-Years Away)

The problem with black hole models is this. The information turns upside down when it travels through the event horizon. Another problem is that we cannot imagine the situation, where the gravitation itself presses particles into their mirror. 



In some gravitational models the graviton, a hypothetical transportation particle of gravitation acts like a bullet when it reaches other particles. The graviton would travel through the particle. 

And hypothetical graviton pulls the energy field of the particle with it. That interaction causes electromagnetic low pressure in that particle. And that thing pulls particles to smaller sizes. Number of hits of those particles in the time unit determines how much gravitation will press particles. 

The model that we use for making models of the particle that travels through the event horizon is taken from particle accelerators. When those objects energy level is rising their size will turn smaller. And that thing means that when their speed reaches the speed of light their inside would turn outside. That means if the particle is a whisk-looking structure, those structures will press through each other. And that thing makes the particle and information opposite. But then we must realize another thing. 

There is a possibility that if a particle travels throughout the event horizon, that causes a situation that could impact ith singularity. There is a possibility, that if a black hole pulls information inside it symmetrically, that radiation can form a standing wave in the middle of the black hole. And then it can impact with outcoming radiation. Theoretically is the possibility that black holes can form quantum entanglement between other black holes.

 And another theory is that a wormhole will send energy out from the black hole. In this case, the white hole is always at the end of the white hole.  If the model higher energetic black hole will form the quantum entanglement with a smaller black hole. That causes a situation where energy travels to a lower energy black hole, and that thing causes a gravitational maser effect that vaporizes another black hole. 



https://bigthink.com/starts-with-a-bang/singularity-inside-black-hole/


https://scitechdaily.com/astronomers-discover-a-mysterious-lonely-galaxy-9-2-billion-light-years-away/


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Retrocausality


https://informationnevervanishes.blogspot.com/


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

What is the difference between TR-3A and TR-3B? And are those planes real?

What is the difference between TR-3A and TR-3B? And are those planes real? Is TR-3B (0) "Black Triangle UFO" or is it only the piece of paper?  The study project, what is used to create advanced ideas for use of the nuclear-powered aircraft. Or is it the study project or black budget aircraft, where lost 2,3 trillion dollars (1)of the stealth bomber were gone. In this text is things, that might seem very difficult to accept, and when we are thinking about things like doubling the object or making it smaller by using huge layers of energy, nothing denies to test those things. But were those tests successful, there is no data about that in public Internet, so we must say that things like doubling the human or aircraft can be tested, but the results can be unknown.  But in the source two is the tale, what seems like impossible, those men, who got Noble Prize put at first time one atom to the box, and hit it with photon one photon in the box and hit it with th

Mythic Planet X is an interesting thing because that allows the way to the perfect stealth technology.

  Mythic Planet X is an interesting thing because that allows the way to the perfect stealth technology.  Could a hypothetical Planet X tunnel all radiation?  The myth of Planet X still lives. Nobody ever saw that planet, and the thing that supports the theory of previously unknown large-size planets in Kuiper's belt are mysterious anomalies in Neptune's trajectory. The thing is that nothing else supports the theory of the existence of the "invisible planet". The size of the planet must be very big. And its gravitational field strong that it can affect Neptune's trajectory.  And the search for that mysterious planet is very long work. In some visions, the mysterious gravitational source is mentioned as the small black hole, but nobody understands why that black hole doesn't seem to interact.  In some other theories, Planet X is a glimpse of dark matter. And that thing makes it invisible. But there is one weakness. The dark matter object must have some kind of

Nanoparticles are excellent tools for medicine transporters.

"Researchers have developed a new therapy for pancreatic cancer involving nanoparticles that stimulate immune responses and improve drug delivery. This innovative method has led to significant tumor reduction in mice and holds potential for treating other cancers. Credit: SciTechDaily.com" (ScitechDaily, New Nanoparticle Cancer Treatment Successfully Shrinks and Eliminates Pancreatic Tumors) Nanoparticles can carry medicines into wanted cells. The idea is that the same system that feeds those cells transports those nanoparticles into cells that need medicine. When a nanoparticle goes, into a cell, it releases the chemicals into the targeted cells. Because nanoparticles don't let medical molecules interact with a body that makes it possible to create new and more powerful cytostatics. Nanoparticles can transport things like ricin molecules into wanted cells.  Ricin is one of the most poisonous chemicals. That chemical is useful for next-generation cytostatics, if researche