Spacetime’s two faces can look similar, but they are not the same.

   Spacetime’s two faces can look similar, but they are not the same. 

"This animation of DESI's 3D map of the large-scale structure in the Universe, the largest such map to date, was created with the intention of studying dark energy and its possible evolution. However, although they found evidence for dark energy evolving, that's likely due to the assumption that it's dark energy's evolution that's causing the discrepancies in the data compared to our standard cosmological model. This is not necessarily the case." (BigThink, Ask Ethan: Is dark energy no longer a cosmological constant?)

Can the dark energy be some kind of cosmic constant? 

There is one thing that can interact with dark energy. That is another dark energy wave package. When those wave packages impact, that thing can form the shockwaves. That can increase the dark energy’s energy level. But if De Sitter space impacts with anti-De Sitter space, can that image also introduce that thing? 

One of the key elements in quantum models is this: when something goes in a certain direction. Somewhere, something moves in the opposite direction. That is the model of the Arrow of time. And if we want to expand that model in the superstring theory, we can think that when energy moves in the hollow superstring, that means energy moves in the opposite direction on that string’s shells. That forms wave movement in that string’s shell. Those waves form a quantum vacuum. Behind those waves. And can that vacuum be the mysterious negative energy? And can that thing be the negative energy? Or maybe the dark energy? 

The energy level and density of the object determine the strength of the dark energy interaction with visible particles and energy. That means dark energy is not homogeneous. There is a model that black holes can transform matter into dark energy. That explains cosmic hickups. This means dark energy can interact with matter, like gravity interacts with particles. That could mean that the dark energy is the mythic negative energy.   

The question should be: Can the interaction between dark energy be stronger in some places than in others? Near objects with high density, dark energy might have higher interaction than in places where density is low. The high energy level means that energy density is higher. Than in low-energy places. In a high-energy area, dark and visible energy interaction should be stronger. Near black holes, dark energy should have the strongest possible interaction. 

However, in very dense and hot objects, visible energy is obscured by dark energy under it. That means we should know how much energy material that falls into the black hole forms. And then we should calculate visible energy, or wave movement into that energy level. And if we measure higher energy levels, that means the dark energy produces that extra energy. Practically, that is very hard to make. 

Dark energy should be denser in some areas than in other places. Black holes should pack that energy into a denser form. Gravity centers also pull dark matter inside them. That means there are axions or WIMP collisions . And that should create wave movement. It could be that the dark energy source is the dark matter particle collisions. But those hypothetical WIMPs and axions are theoretical particles. Maybe dark energy interacts more strongly near high-energy objects.

The universe is part of spacetime. That means there should be an antiverse. The place where everything goes oppositely. When something moves in some direction, that means that thing’s mirror image or particle should move in the opposite direction. The idea of the anti-universe and the universe is taken from the supernova explosions. Those explosions from the time glass-shaped structures. And that means the Big Bang should create two universes.Same way, when a superstring moves in the space-time, it moves things around it in the opposite direction.  

“In mathematical physics, n-dimensional de Sitter space (often denoted dSn) is a maximally symmetric Lorentzian manifold with constant positive scalar curvature. It is analogue of an n-sphere, with a Lorentzian metric in place of the Riemannian metric of the latter.” (Wikipedia, De Sitter space)

“The main application of de Sitter space is its use in general relativity, where it serves as one of the simplest mathematical models of the universe consistent with the observed accelerating expansion of the universe. More specifically, de Sitter space is the maximally symmetric vacuum solution of Einstein's field equations in which the cosmological constant” (Wikipedia, De Sitter space)

So if there is a so-called Anti-De Sitter universe or anti-De Sitter space, that thing can pull De Sitter space into it. In that case, impacting De Sitter and anti-De Sitter forms the parabolic or hyperbolic curves. When those curves impact. That impact can form a wave movement across the spacetime. The idea is that mirror-spaces also pull each other together. And they act like matter and antimatter. 

“In theoretical physics, the anti-de Sitter/conformal field theory correspondence (frequently abbreviated as AdS/CFT) is a conjectured relationship between two kinds of physical theories. On one side are anti-de Sitter spaces (AdS) that are used in theories of quantum gravity, formulated in terms of string theory or M-theory. On the other side of the correspondence are conformal field theories (CFT) that are quantum field theories, including theories similar to the Yang–Mills theories that describe elementary particles” (Wikipedia, AdS/CFT correspondence)

There is a possibility that there are two universes. Those universes might look similar, but their interactions are opposite. Same way, if negative energy exists. That energy can cause a similar interaction with the visible energy. Positive energy pushes things away. Negative energy pulls positive energy to it. The negative energy can look like positive energy, but its interaction is opposite. That is the energy dualism. Or energy has two faces. Those faces look the same. But they are not the same. Spacetime might have two faces. Spacetime is the space where we live. 

The nature of dark energy causes discussions. That means dark energy can be something very extraordinary to us. Can dark energy be so-called negative energy? Could that thing be true? The idea is that the negative energy could be the quantum vacuum that forms behind the superstrings? When superstrings travel through the universe, that thing is like all other strings. There should form a small quantum low region behind that thing. 

There is a theory about the universe and the anti-universe. In that theory, when something goes forward in the quantum world, something goes opposite in some other place. When time moves forward. In our universe, in another universe. Time moves backward. If we think about string theory and the model of hollow superstrings, we must realize that when energy moves in some direction in the superstring, that means the energy moves in the opposite direction at the string shell. This is the idea of the time arrow. And that can be the key also to dark energy. 

If we follow that model, the negative energy can seem like regular energy. If negative energy moves as pulses, that means. Its interaction looks like a visible energy interaction. When energy or wave movement travels in the universe, energy moves to those waves that are like strings. That means the string sends its extra energy to the environment. 

https://bigthink.com/starts-with-a-bang/dark-energy-no-longer-constant/

https://www.livescience.com/mirror-universe-explains-dark-matter

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/technology/black-holes-that-transform-matter-into-dark-energy-could-solve-cosmic-hiccups-mystery/ar-AA1L7eEL?ocid=BingNewsSerp

https://www.quantamagazine.org/the-two-faces-of-space-time-20240925/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AdS/CFT_correspondence

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anti-de_Sitter_space

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arrow_of_time

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Axion

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dark_energy

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/De_Sitter_space

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Negative_energy

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Weakly_interacting_massive_particle

The arrow of time.

 The arrow of time. 

The idea of the arrow of time, or time arrow, is when a high-energy beam or particle travels past some object or particle that transfers energy to that object. That should cause time dilation. But there are two things that make the time arrow unable to work in the modern universe. First, there is too much space in the universe. That means energy that the time arrow pumps to the object just travels away from the object immediately. 

That makes it impossible to see the time arrow and its effect on the object. The other thing is that if we think that time is like a river and we shoot an arrow against the flow, we know that this arrow makes the whirls. But those whirls are so short that we cannot detect them, and turbulence and chaos, and entropy are covering those things. So it's hard to detect the phenomenon that the arrow causes if there are rapids at that point. 

The black hole is one type of time arrow. There we could see the arrow of time. The reason for that is in the material and energy disk that will not let energy out from the black hole. In that case, the material disk acts as the time arrow, and that thing packs energy into the event horizon. So the black hole is like a tube where the high-energy structure pumps energy. Time dilation is also possible to see in places like particle accelerators. Their energy level is so high that researchers can see how the short-lived isotopes exist longer than they should. 

So, what should we do if we want to make a time machine? In this text, a time machine means a system that can travel to the past. We should make the tube or structure through which the laser, or some other particle beam, travel through a tube-shaped structure. The idea is that the tube cannot release its extra energy anywhere. 

The outside energy field must also press that structure into its form. And the beam that travels through the tube pumps energy into it. That thing can cause time dilation in the tube. That is one vision of the thing that bases the idea of the arrow of time. 

The idea is that time is energy. When a particle travels in the universe, it releases energy or receives energy. That means when the particle gets more energy than it receives, the particle turns younger. And if a particle receives energy, it turns older. The thing that makes time machines very hard to make is that the future is at a lower energy level than the past. If we make the time machine, there is a possibility that we will never be able to step out of that system. In the model where time is energy, the lower energy level in the future causes a situation where the energy flow out from the system turns so fast that it destroys the system. 

There is a possibility that the scientists of the future pack data into the balls. Then that researcher creates a black hole around those capsules. And sends information to the past. The system can be based on the spin of the nanotubes. When the capsule is at the right point in time, the system stops its spin. And that should make it possible to transport information through time. 

The idea is that all objects are in a gravitational pothole. That pothole means that all objects that have mass follow the present. The pothole forms in time dilation when spinning particles store energy in it. Or those particles turn the outgoing fields into the form of kinetic energy. When those spinning particles slow, they release their energy. And the present point in time reaches those objects. 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arrow_of_time

https://thatsthenatureoftime.blogspot.com