Beware the fake moderators.

Beware the fake moderators.

On the Internet, moderators would play the same role with police, and their mission is to keep Internet clear from carbage. But there are also fake moderators, who would sell writings, what people have done in some social media. And sometimes those persons are compiled as the faked police officers. They are playing with trust and if somebody trusts them, their diaries and other writings can be delivered to the Internet.

The thing is that I sometimes thought that what would I play if I would claim to be the moderator. And the answer would be that I would play the undercover moderator because the same tricks would be effective in the virtual world what have an effect in the real world. And one of the best tricks would be playing the virtual version of an undercover cop like Ted Bundy played in his famous and notorious career. That serial killer worked in the helpful telephone and claimed to be the nurse or cop. And that was the way he made contact with his victims.

The faked moderators are using the same methods with faked cops for making the trustful relationship between them and their victims. Of course, when that kind of persons have been caught for selling stolen texts or photographs those "moderators" must pay the payments if those texts are sold to the third party and also every cost, which is caused because of illegal copying.

The punishments would be similar to the cases, that somebody sells the copies of DVD movies or photographs. Texts that are written on the Internet are protecting by copyrights, and if there are no contracts, the benefit, that person has got by criminal activities, should pay to the victim.

Remember that everybody, who play moderator on the Internet are not moderators. Sometimes we all have faced the people, who are acting like some undercover moderators. Those people are coming to the Internet and start to boss around other people. When we are facing this kind of people, we might first see person, who comes to the mate in the social media application. And after that, this person disappears. Then there would be some other person, who starts to cheat the target.

But do you know, why those people are acting like that? They have two kinds of accounts for use. The other is for regular use and intelligence purposes, and another is for striking, and the last ones are very dangerous to use because they can easily to ban. The first kind of accounts are used for mapping the social network of some person, and those accounts must be separated from the accounts, which are meant for striking purposes.

They would tell other people, how they should write or speak about things. And if somebody has a different kind of opinions, those people would target you for net cheating. If you have some other opinions than this "moderator" that person would start to boss around.

 When we are talking about the freedom of speeches, there is, of course, people, who think that those words mean the children pornography and cheating other people. And the thing is that those things are not interesting some moderators at all. Or at least some persons are playing moderators on the Internet, but they seem not to have real authorities to operate in that place.

The thing, what makes that thing interesting is that there are official moderators, who would have authorities to act against cheating and trolls. But sometimes we are facing people, who are coming to the Internet to tell other people, how they should write or how they should think about things. And those people are very often telling other people by using very clear argumentation, how they should write about things.

Those people could be called as the "undercover moderators". The idea of this kind of  "moderation" is that everything would be possible if the target is chosen by those "moderators". Those people way to act in the Net is simply hanging in there and then start to troll other people. The way, how those people are acting is interesting. The trolling would happen by using some faked profiles, but the person self uses own account for supervision.

This is a very interesting question because if I would be in some group, where is some discussions with special things, I must realize, that there should be something special hobby or skill, what seems like great in the mind of other people. That thing must be something, what might feel very extraordinary and brilliant, which makes me seem nice and beautiful in the eyes of other people. Also, this thing must be something, where other people have not very much knowledge.

But how would I act in this case, if I have the full support of my guardian angels? Would I respect the opinion of some other persons, or would I just give them commands, what they must think or what they must say? If we think the truth, the last one would be a more common thing than the first one.

And the thing is that every person, who doesn't agree with their opinions with moderators could be banned because they would not represent the thing, what is accepted by moderators. This is one thing, why people hate moderators. Sometimes moderators are the painful persons because they are coming to boss around other net users, and sometimes people have asked, why those moderators are not using their authorities to other net users? That means those persons are not official moderators at all.