The difference between symmetry and asymmetry is interesting.

Information travels in asymmetric systems. When the system reaches energy symmetry information will not flow. The reason for that is simple. All systems attempt to reach a stable or symmetric energy state. The reason why no system can reach energy stability is that all systems are part of other systems. And finally, the biggest known system the universe is part of space. That causes a situation in that energy travels out from the universe. 

Researchers can store information in symmetrical systems. If systems are fully symmetrical. They can trap things like radio waves or even light inside them. Because all particles are sending energy waves at the same time. They cannot break the structure. So in symmetrical systems the information hovers between particles. Symmetrical systems can stand more energy than asymmetrical systems. 

Things like neutron poisoning where neutrons hover because of their radiation is a good examples of a symmetrical system. Neutron poisoning mean a situation where neutrons hover in a symmetric energy field. There is no problem. But if something hits that system it causes asymmetry that pushes the structure out of balance. The same way trapping light in a 3D structure base is in symmetry. 

Trapping light in 3D crystals is one of the most interesting things in history. Trapped light can use for making research on trapped waves, and the trapped light can be the key to next-generation sensor systems. Trapping light in 3D crystal bases the idea of Anderson localization. 

"Ultrafast optical field incident on material with broken spatial symmetry (blue), time-reversal symmetry (yellow), or both (green) to generate THz radiation. Insets illustrate various mechanisms that lead to rectified THz currents high-frequency optical fields. Credit: Hou-Tong Chen/Los Alamos National Laboratory" (ScitechDaily.com/Lighting Up Quantum Realms: Terahertz Spectroscopy and Symmetry-Broken Materials)

"Advanced computing has helped researchers solve a decades-old mystery about light localization in 3D structures. The study found that light can be trapped or “localized” in random packings of metallic spheres, paving the way for potential developments in lasers and photocatalysts. Credit: Yale University. (ScitechDaily.com/Trapping Light in 3D: Physicists Unlock the Longstanding Mystery of Trapped Waves)

The fullerene balls in steel can make it possible that there is space in metal where it can conduct energy that impacts the metal structure. 

The idea is that in optical systems the interference or superpositioning of the light wave is possible to trap the light inside the quantum system. When some kind of EM-stress impacts trapped light. That increases its energy. Then the trapped light can use as the sensor that tells if something stresses the system. 

The asymmetry in the system causes situations where information starts to move. Glass is one example of rigid material, that seems very hard  When something hits things those things there is no room where energy can be dumbed. So that means the energy asymmetry destroys the glass. When somebody hits glass by using a hammer that tool causes energy asymmetry in the system. And that asymmetry destroys the material. 

The reason why metals stand more impact is that in metals there is space where energy can go. That thing makes metals elastic. So when something hits the metal That impact pushes those atoms in the metal's structure inside. Things like steel are metal-carbon hybrid. The carbon forms the internal structures in steel.

 That makes space where energy can transfer in that material.  And that means the impact energy will transfer to metals like steel slower than glass. In ceramic structures, atoms cannot move at all, and impact energy transfers to the structure faster. And that is the thing that makes glass fragile. 

The reason why glass is fragile is also its homogenous silicon material. When something impacts class the energy causes resonation between those silicone atoms. And that resonation causes the standing waves that are pushing silicone atoms away. 

Steel is hybrid material where all atoms are not resonated. When iron resonates the steel can dump that energy in the carbon. And carbon pulls standing waves inside them. If there is fullerene in the steel those carbon balls make it possible to create space in the steel structure. That thing makes Damascus Steel so strong. 

Demon core means the subcritical mass of plutonium in the Los Alamos nuclear laboratory in 1945. When one participant in the nuclear program scratched that plutonium mass by using a screwdriver. That caused the situation where the radiation level in the laboratory rose and some people died. 

The demon core is one of the examples of how the asymmetry in the system causes the situation, where the system goes out of balance. And that is the thing that launches nuclear fission. Same thing: asymmetry in energy levels between the ends of the electric wires makes the electricity travel in the wire. All systems attempt to reach a stable position. And that's why energy always travels in lower energy states. 

When we think about things like demon core in nuclear physics we must realize that even small asymmetry in energy is enough that the fission reaction begins. The demon core means the situation where somebody just pushes plutonium or causes small local energy pike in plutonium that thing causes nuclear fission. 

https://scitechdaily.com/lighting-up-quantum-realms-terahertz-spectroscopy-and-symmetry-broken-materials/

https://scitechdaily.com/trapping-light-in-3d-physicists-unlock-the-longstanding-mystery-of-trapped-waves/?expand_article=1

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anderson_localization

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demon_core

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Superposition_principle

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wave_interference

Stanford professor said that aliens are already here.

We need open and free discussions about UFOs. And I mean that people should have the right to tell their opinions about things like aliens, UFOs, UAPs:s and ghosts, and other dimensions without being stamped as maniac or psychotic. 

The problem is that. There are many things. That was only imagination. Before the truth is uncovered and one of them is Area-51. At first, USAF denied the existence of that test range. And then physical evidence shows that USAF lied. 

Respected professor Garry Nolan, from Stanford University, said aliens are already here. And that is the right-type way to close that unidentified phenomenon. When we are reading about things like UFOs or some other types of UAPs those observations are quite often stamped as "made by imagination". 

Same way when some people are making UFO observations, some kind of joker comes to publicity and tell that this thing was some kind of fake. And then, what do you think, what happens to investigations around those cases? Would somebody even dare to tell about those things? 

When we think about innovation and development. Those things are first in somebody's imagination. There is some person who first invented stealth. The idea of at least older stealth solutions is that the shape of that aircraft makes the aircraft invisible to radar because radiation slides over its body. 

When we think about those extraordinary systems, we can ask one question. Are some of those highly classified systems copied from some craft with an unknown or extraterrestrial source? Or are some of those highly classified systems the "UFOs"s? If we think that some UFO cases are only the imagination, is there some kind of electromagnetic phenomenon that can make people think similar things? And even if those things are imagination, nothing denies engineers to use them to model new devices and vehicles. 

Skylifter

SR-71

B-2

?

Avro Canada VZ-9 Avrocar

F-117

Aircraft from the top: 

Many types of aerial vehicles are or were classified. Some of the Belgian UFO cases were F-117 or SR-71 planes. But some cases are unknown. There are about 1-2% of UAPs that have no explanations. Or maybe some aerial vehicle with an extraordinary power source could do things, that the famous Tic-Toc UAP in U.S. Navy's F/A-18 FLIR system makes. 

That means the craft seems too small. It could maneuver like that vehicle by using small-size jet engines. The fact is that the small, saucer-shaped aerial vehicle with radial jet engines could behave like that. But the fact is that the problem is that nobody confirms to own those mysterious vehicles. 

But are aliens already here? We must answer by saying that nobody knows. The fact is that nobody ever handed 100% confirmed extraterrestrial DNA. In normal cases, the DNA test is a very easy way to confirm the possibilities about the origin of the species. But in that case, there is DNA there that can be compiled. 

The DNA samples are taken from individuals that are in confirmed places. But the problem is that the DNA used in compilation must have a confirmed background. So if probes could find the DNA from the asteroids there is some kind of DNA. that can use in the compilation process. 

https://www.popularmechanics.com/military/weapons/a43978705/stanford-professor-says-aliens-are-already-here/

Are black holes solid gravitational fields that rotate in the warp bubble?

There is a model that a black hole is a group of particles that are whirling or rotating in a warp bubble. In gravitational models, gravitation is radiation, the sender is so small that it travels through particles and pulls them in the smaller size. In that model, a hypothetical graviton is an elementary particle that sends a very thin superstring. The superstring pulls the quantum or Higgs field from the elementary particle. And that pulls its shell near to the center of that particle. 

In some models, the black holes have two event horizons. The outer and inner event horizons deny seeing things that happen in the heart of a black hole. The event horizon is the place where the escaping velocity reaches the speed of light. And at that point, the photons are whirling around the black hole. The inner event horizon is the point, where the escaping velocity reaches 2X the speed of light. And if we think about the light cone and the hypersurface as the event horizon. 

We can think. That there are no limits to the number of event horizons. The most out-event horizon is the point, where the gravitation reaches the speed of light. The second event horizon is the point, where escaping velocity reaches 2X the speed of light and at the point of the third event horizon the escaping velocity reaches 3X the speed of light. So supermassive black holes can have multiple internal event horizons that all form internal space inside the outer event horizon. And those event horizons are the border between those spaces. So at the point of every event horizon, the information turns upside down. 

Those points could be the points where information turns opposite. So if the time moves backward in the outer event horizon behind the inner event horizon time starts to move forward. So in the points of event horizons that are the light-speed coefficients information turns upside down in comparison with the event horizon before that horizon. And that means every event horizon turns the information upside down. 

So in that model, the graviton is quite similar to the Higgs boson. It would be a very small-sized particle. That has an extremely large quantum field around it. The graviton sends radiation that wave movement is extremely thin. But it pushes other quantum fields from around that particle. That thing forms an electromagnetic vacuum that makes Higgs field travel in that field. So could the graviton be the next particle in the energy levels from the Higgs boson? 

The graviton would be a particle that rotates in the electromagnetic vacuum and that vacuum forms the warp bubble. In some models, the graviton would be the electron with an extremely high energy load, and maybe the graviton itself is a quantum-size black hole. 

Can the gravitational field turn solid in the supernova or Kilonova explosion?

There is the possibility that superstrings can turn into material. Gravitation is wave movement like all other superstrings. There is the possibility that if the elementary particle turns very tight. The superstrings that form gravitational waves can form plaque on that particle. 

The material that forms the black hole or its nucleus is different than we know. In some models, the singularity is like a yarn ball of gravitational waves. The supernova or kilonova explosion packs material in an extremely thick form. 

And there is the possibility that in this case, the explosion can form a dense or even solid gravitational field. In that model, black holes formed of the pure gravitational field that turned solid. 

But then, is a black hole the particle group that rotates faster than light? 

When black holes are forming during the kilonova- or supernova explosions the explosion itself forms an electromagnetic vacuum. That vacuum pulls particles inside it and forms a giant fusion. So, the supernova explodes twice. First is the explosion that we see. That effect is similar to the vacuum bomb.  

Then the remnants of that explosion can rotate faster than the speed of light because that collapse and the fusion pushes the falling quantum field back outside. That effect packs material and energy into the type of material called a singularity. The singularity is the type of material where all particles are packed into the same point.

So are all particles in a black hole turned into gravitons? In that model, all particles in the core of a black hole are melted into one extremely dense particle. The falling quantum field pushes also electromagnetic fields back into the atom's nucleus. 

That thing causes a reaction where those remnants are in the warp bubble. The reason why we cannot see that material is that its rotation speed is so fast. And it sends so strong gravitational radiation that the electromagnetic vacuum around the core of the black hole. The gravitational radiation that a black hole sends will cause its destiny. 

When a black hole sends gravitational radiation, it causes its vaporization. We know that all the time black holes are losing their mass. And sooner or later even the largest black hole turns to gravitational radiation. The form of a black hole is a mystery. And we can make multiple theoretical models about the singularity. 

Can we avoid singularity in the black hole?

"Once you cross the threshold to form a black hole, everything inside the event horizon crunches down to a singularity that is, at most, one-dimensional. No 3D structures can survive intact, although the potential for any infalling matter/energy to be transported into a "baby Universe" created on the other side of this black hole cannot be ruled out". (BigtThink.com/We can’t avoid a singularity inside every black hole)

The problem with the black hole is that the time would start to travel backward inside the event horizon. The event horizon is the point, where time stops. And inside it, time starts to move backward. Which is against the linear time model. 

Time reverse breaks the golden order, that everything can happen only once. That thing makes the retrocausality possible.  "Retrocausality, or backward causation, is a concept of cause and effect in which an effect precedes its cause in time and so a later event affects an earlier one." 

"In quantum physics, the distinction between cause and effect is not made at the most fundamental level and so time-symmetric systems can be viewed as causal or retrocausal Philosophical considerations of time travel often address the same issues as retrocausality, as do treatments of the subject in fiction, but the two phenomena are distinct" (Wikipedia, Retrocausality)

So, the term Retrocausality means that information travels and affects in two directions in spacetime. The reason, why we cannot see information that travels back from the future is that information in the hypersurface of the present is so dominating, that we cannot see that information. 

When information comes out from a black hole the black hole's gravitation pulls it straight. And that thing causes an idea that maybe Hwaking's radiation is information that is from the future and escapes from the black hole. 

Could this be the first image of the black hole-white hole pair? Could that hot spot 9,2 billion light-years away be the white hole? The energy bridge seems to connect a supermassive black hole with that thing, and maybe that hot site is the white hole. 

"The galaxy 3C297 has been discovered to be lonelier than expected, implying it has likely pulled in and absorbed its former companion galaxies. 3C297 contains a quasar, a supermassive black hole pulling in gas at the center of the galaxy and driving powerful jets of matter seen in radio waves. X-ray data from Chandra, radio data from the Karl G. Jansky Very Large Array and visible data from Gemini suggest that even though 3C297’s surroundings possess many features of a galaxy cluster, all but one galaxy remains". (ScitechDaily.com/Astronomers Discover a Mysterious Lonely Galaxy 9.2 Billion Light-Years Away) 

"There is also visible light and infrared data from Hubble in this composite. Astronomers think this last large galaxy assimilated the others through its gravitational pull, and may push the limits for how quickly astronomers expect galaxies to grow in the early universe. Credit: X-ray: NASA/CXC/Univ. of Torino/V. Missaglia et al.; Optical: NASA/ESA/STScI & International Gemini Observatory/NOIRLab/NSF/AURA; Infrared: NASA/ESA/STScI; Radio: NRAO/AUI/NSF" (ScitechDaily.com/Astronomers Discover a Mysterious Lonely Galaxy 9.2 Billion Light-Years Away)

The problem with black hole models is this. The information turns upside down when it travels through the event horizon. Another problem is that we cannot imagine the situation, where the gravitation itself presses particles into their mirror. 

In some gravitational models the graviton, a hypothetical transportation particle of gravitation acts like a bullet when it reaches other particles. The graviton would travel through the particle. 

And hypothetical graviton pulls the energy field of the particle with it. That interaction causes electromagnetic low pressure in that particle. And that thing pulls particles to smaller sizes. Number of hits of those particles in the time unit determines how much gravitation will press particles. 

The model that we use for making models of the particle that travels through the event horizon is taken from particle accelerators. When those objects energy level is rising their size will turn smaller. And that thing means that when their speed reaches the speed of light their inside would turn outside. That means if the particle is a whisk-looking structure, those structures will press through each other. And that thing makes the particle and information opposite. But then we must realize another thing. 

There is a possibility that if a particle travels throughout the event horizon, that causes a situation that could impact ith singularity. There is a possibility, that if a black hole pulls information inside it symmetrically, that radiation can form a standing wave in the middle of the black hole. And then it can impact with outcoming radiation. Theoretically is the possibility that black holes can form quantum entanglement between other black holes.

 And another theory is that a wormhole will send energy out from the black hole. In this case, the white hole is always at the end of the white hole.  If the model higher energetic black hole will form the quantum entanglement with a smaller black hole. That causes a situation where energy travels to a lower energy black hole, and that thing causes a gravitational maser effect that vaporizes another black hole. 

https://bigthink.com/starts-with-a-bang/singularity-inside-black-hole/

https://scitechdaily.com/astronomers-discover-a-mysterious-lonely-galaxy-9-2-billion-light-years-away/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Retrocausality

https://informationnevervanishes.blogspot.com/

Researchers found vast, hidden oceans found from Uranus's four large moons.

There are hidden oceans in many moons and dwarf planets including Pluto. Today the hidden oceans are found inside four of Uranus's large moons. And that thing is opening the road to another question. The question is what keeps water liquid on those moons, where nitrogen geysers are filling the air with nitrogen vapor, and the temperature is 190 Kelvin. The vaporization point of nitrogen is 77-124 Kelvin depending on pressure.  

Researchers found water on all of Uranus's large moons except Miranda which is too small to keep water liquid. There is a possibility, that Miranda has no core at all, and its inner structure is homogeneous. And the moon is formed entirely of water. And that makes Miranda-moon the cosmic ice bite. One mystery is what formed Miranda because normally regular, ball-shaped moons and planets form around the nucleus that is heavier than other parts of that planet. That process forms the ball-shaped object. But if there is no heavier nucleus the dwarf planet should be irregular. So why Miranda-moon is a ball-shaped moon without a metallic or stone nucleus?  

Things that affect vaporization are temperature, gravitation, pressure, and magnetic field. In weak gravitation, the water stays liquid in lower temperatures than in a strong gravitational field. And in some visions, the form of the ice on the weak gravitational field is super ionized. That means the water molecules are in lines. And the X-ray emission from Uranus's atmosphere causes thought, could that emission have something to do with the hidden oceans inside the ice shell of those moons? 

"Uranus is surrounded by its four major rings and 10 of its 27 known moons in this color-added view that uses data taken by the Hubble Space Telescope in 1998. A study featuring new modeling shows that four of Uranus’ large moons likely contain internal oceans. Credit: NASA/JPL/STScI" (ScitechDaily.com/Vast, Hidden Oceans Discovered on Four of Uranus’ Large Moons)

"New modeling shows that there likely is an ocean layer in four of Uranus’ major moons: Ariel, Umbriel, Titania, and Oberon. Salty – or briny – oceans lie under the ice and atop layers of water-rich rock and dry rock. Miranda is too small to retain enough heat for an ocean layer.Credit: NASA/JPL-Caltech"(ScitechDaily.com/Vast, Hidden Oceans Discovered on Four of Uranus’ Large Moons)

So the ice on those oceans might not be similar to ice on Earth. The dividing radioactive isotopes can put those water molecules in lines. And super ionized ice can look like a liquid even in extremely low temperatures, especially if the gravitational field is very weak. 

The thing. What makes this water interesting is that Uranus has not so strong gravitational field that could affect those moons very strongly. The hidden oceans can be liquid because of the combination of internal nuclear isotope dividing and the gravitational fields of Uranus and other moons. The temperature on those moons is quite high if we think about their distance from the sun. 

And their size means that the gravitation on those moons is weaker than on our moon. The escaping velocity from the surface of Titania, the largest Uranus moon is 0.759 km/s, and the earth Moon's escaping velocity is 2.38 km/s. That means the water moves far easier than on Earth on those distant moon's icy surfaces. That means tidal waves can keep those moon's oceans liquid. 

https://physicsworld.com/a/x-ray-emissions-from-uranus-are-detected-for-the-first-time/

https://scitechdaily.com/vast-hidden-oceans-discovered-on-four-of-uranus-large-moons/

Earth's moon: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moon

Uranus's moons

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ariel_(moon)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Miranda_(moon)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oberon_(moon)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Titania_(moon)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Umbriel_(moon)

Is spacetime real? Or is it just some term that researchers use in calculations?

In some models, gravitation is the superstring that travels through elementary particles. And when that superstring travels through the particle it acts like a thermal pump. The superstring transports energy out from the particle's poles and at the same time, the energy that comes from the sides of the particle will push it in its form. 

Term spacetime means that material, energy (Wave movement), and time are the same thing or at least interacting with each other.  One reason for time is that when the universe expands, it decreases the pressure of the quantum field inside that thing that we call the universe. When the quantum field's power decreases. That causes a situation that the material starts to turn to wave movement. 

We can think the spacetime as the energy field that affects the particles. When that energy field travels in the particle their energy level rises and their aging will slow. That means their vaporization or turning to wave movement turns slower. When energy travels out from the particle, that causes the particle to age or turn to wave movement. 

So the time dilation when speed accelerates can explain that object harvests the quantum field inside it. And that thing decreases the speed where the particle transforms to wave movement. In that model, the kinetic energy comes from quantum fields that are everywhere in the universe. 

Time dilation is a phenomenon that is not very well documented. The time dilation means that time is slowing in gravitational fields and at extremely high speeds. The time dilation is measured by using extremely short-living isotopes and elements. And the final proof of time dilation is clocks, that are running too fast in the GPS satellites. When launching crew sends a GPS satellite to the orbiter. There is an extremely accurate atom clock on those satellites. 

Before launch, that clock synchronized with another clock. That is in the ground station, and the time dilation causes the need to readjust clocks in those GPS satellites. The time dilation at high speed is also proved by putting the atom clock in the aircraft that travels around the world. And another atom clock is in a stable position. When that aircraft is sent to flight. Those atom clocks synchronized, and differences between those times prove that the speed causes time dilation. 

The main question is does time exists? Or is it an illusion? Time measurement consists only of the dividings of very short living elements and particles like neutrons. The speed and gravitation are causing that energy transforms in the particles. And that thing slows their aging and transforming to wave movement. 

There is the theory that gravitation is the effect that pulls the Higgs field in the gravitational center. The slowing dividing of heavy nuclear elements. Is not the thing that makes time real in the environment.

So in that model, the gravitation turns the Higgs field thicker and thicker. And that thicker Higgs field inputs energy to particles that are falling into the gravitational center. Then we must realize that the problem is that the gravitation must send something that impacts particles. The key element is does the gravitation impact with particle's shell or does it travel through it? 

If we think that particle is a whisk-looking structure and the gravitation sends some kind of strings through that particle. That thing could make the time dilation more easily to understand. In that model, gravitation is the string or straight wave movement that travels through the particle. In that model, a superstring pulls energy out from particles. 

But first energy travels through particles shell. And that thing causes a situation, where the energy that travels through the shell structure into elementary particles loads more energy into it. And then that energy extends its lifetime. 

But then people are asked what is the thing that causes the time dilation. There is something that pushes or pulls the particle in its form. In some models, the gravitational pothole is the thing that pulls the quantum field inside the gravitational center. And that gravitational pothole pulls the particle to its form. 

https://bigthink.com/starts-with-a-bang/spacetime-real-physical-calculational/

https://astronomyandtechnology.blogspot.com/

Can the GRB (Gamma-Ray Burst) form when the poles of black holes change their place?

The image of the black hole and its beam are interesting things. And maybe they can open a path to solve what causes the GRB (Gamma-Ray Burst). The GRB is one of the most high-energy phenomena in the universe. During that extremely short but powerful energy burst. 

The black hole releases as much energy as the entire galaxy sends. The source of the GRB is predicted to be black holes because there the energy level is high enough for making gamma rays, the most high-energy radiation in the universe. 

In some models, the GRB is the phenomenon that forms when the black hole rotates around its axle. That turns its relativistic jet's position. Black hole sends gamma rays from their poles, and when those poles change their side, the black hole's energy pike travels through the universe. 

The rotation of the black hole will not take a long time. And when the radiation pike or relativistic jet will travel through Earth, we will see that thing as the GRB. That effect is like an extremely powerful lightsaber. 

This might be the GRB that is forming in the lonely black hole. So thinking that way, we can say that the GRB is the gamma-ray pike that moves through the universe. The GRB would be the black hole's natural gamma-ray beam that moves in its direction. 

The gamma-ray beam of the black hole is powerful but thin. And it's hard to detect from the sides. That thing means that only if the gamma-ray pike points to Earth. Sensors can detect it. 

********************************************************************

The first image of the black hole and its beam is published. 

The next part is a straight quote from ScitechDaily.com. And it's about the first image of the black hole with its jets. 

"Scientists observing the compact radio core of M87 have discovered new details about the galaxy’s supermassive black hole. In this artist’s conception, the black hole’s massive jet is seen rising up from the center of the black hole. The observations on which this illustration is based represent the first time that the jet and the black hole shadow have been imaged together, giving scientists new insights into how black holes can launch these powerful jets. Credit: S. Dagnello (NRAO/AUI/NSF)"(ScitechDaily.com/Shedding Light on Darkness: Historic First Direct Image of a Black Hole Emitting a Powerful Jet)

"This image shows the jet and shadow of the black hole at the center of the M87 galaxy together for the first time. The observations were obtained with telescopes from the Global Millimetre VLBI Array (GMVA), the Atacama Large Millimeter/submillimeter Array (ALMA), of which ESO is a partner, and the Greenland Telescope. This image gives scientists the context needed to understand how the powerful jet is formed. "(ScitechDaily.com/Shedding Light on Darkness: Historic First Direct Image of a Black Hole Emitting a Powerful Jet)

"The new observations also revealed that the black hole’s ring, shown here in the inset, is 50% larger than the ring observed at shorter radio wavelengths by the Event Horizon Telescope (EHT). This suggests that in the new image, we see more of the material that is falling toward the black hole than what we could see with the EHT. Credit: R.-S. Lu (SHAO), E. Ros (MPIfR), S. Dagnello (NRAO/AUI/NSF)"(ScitechDaily.com/Shedding Light on Darkness: Historic First Direct Image of a Black Hole Emitting a Powerful Jet)

"This artist’s impression depicts a rapidly spinning supermassive black hole surrounded by an accretion disc. This thin disc of rotating material consists of the leftovers of a Sun-like star which was ripped apart by the tidal forces of the black hole. The black hole is labeled, showing the anatomy of this fascinating object. Credit: ESO"(ScitechDaily.com/Shedding Light on Darkness: Historic First Direct Image of a Black Hole Emitting a Powerful Jet)

Quote ended

********************************************************************

But we know that also black holes and neutron stars are colliding. When two neutron stars impact each other. 

That thing forms the so-called kilonova. The energy wave, that kilonovas sends. Can form even gold in the molecular cloud, that surrounds the neutron stars. When neutron stars impact there is forming an electric arc in those neutron stars. And that thing forms the black hole. 

Those neutron stars send gravitational waves. And the effect when black holes impact is more powerful than neutron star impacts. That thing sends gravitational waves that warp entire dimensions around those extremely powerful objects. 

The GRBs are also forming when black holes or neutron stars are colliding. In those versions, the impacting star remnants are releasing extremely high energy-level radiation. The GRBs:s might have multiple types of sources. 

https://scitechdaily.com/shedding-light-on-darkness-historic-first-direct-image-of-a-black-hole-emitting-a-powerful-jet/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gamma-ray_burst

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kilonova

Could natural fission make fission stars even in our solar system?

Natural fission and fission stars are an interesting combination. On Earth, the natural fission reactors are found in Gabon. There is nothing used for natural fission reactors that are working for at least thousands of years. And they deliver so little energy that those fission reactors cannot benefit from nuclear energy production. The energy production in those Gabon reactors was something about 100 KW. 

The hypothetical iron stars formed the theory of fission stars. 

The fission star theory or model is conducted from the Iron stars theory. Those hypothetical stars could be possible at the end of the universe. The energy level in that universe is very low. Stable conditions cause a situation where iron atoms can start cold fusion. The iron stars are extremely dense, and the energy travels out from those stars faster than in the universe where we live. 

That causes a situation that iron atoms start to make fusion. The iron stars are colder than today's stars. But otherways temperature in the universe is lower. And the requirement for that thing is that the proton will not divide. The thing that makes an iron star a star is that it is warmer than its environment. 

The temperature is a relative substance or variable. If we will put the light bulb on Earth, that thing will not make any impressions. But if we will put the light bulb on dwarf planet Quaor that thing cause a very high rise in temperature. And that causes the vaporization of the gases. Those gases can conduct to the turbine. 

The fission stars involve so much radioactive material that their temperature can rise considerably higher than their environment. If the planet's temperature is about 100 degrees higher than zero kelvin that causes vaporization of some gasses. And dividing radioactive isotopes can make this thing real.  In this case, we might call this planet a fission star because the star gets its energy from internal nuclear reactions. 

Could natural fission explain things like the icy volcanoes of Neptune's Triton moon and the dwarf planet Pluto? There we can see a very interesting ice area on Pluto's pole. That area seems to have fresh ice. And that means there is geological activity on that dwarf planet. 

Pluto (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pluto)

Pluto in detail (https://news.harvard.edu/gazette/story/2015/07/pluto-in-detail/)

Triton (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Triton_(moon))

Icy geysers on Triton (https://www.windows2universe.org/neptune/moons/triton_atmosphere.html)

Quaoar with its rings (https://scitechdaily.com/space-mystery-unexpected-new-ring-system-discovered-in-our-own-solar-system/)

Ceres (https://solarsystem.nasa.gov/planets/dwarf-planets/ceres/overview/)

The mountain on Ceres, tells us there was volcanic activity. (https://www.popularmechanics.com/space/solar-system/a25552/ice-volcanoes-ceres-active/)

Natural fission must rise the temperature on those dwarf planets like Pluto, Triton, and Quaor to the level where the gasses turn liquid. Maybe internal fission keeps the ocean on dwarf planet Ceres open. Once there were icy volcanoes on Ceres, but then the mass of radioactive material turned so low that icy volcanoes were lost. 

That thing means that something keeps the ocean on that dwarf planet liquid. Of course, Charon's tidal effect can make that thing possible. But there is also the possibility that internal fission makes that kind of structure. 

But there is the possibility that some planets like Pluto could be so-called fission stars. Fission stars are planets that are very much radioactive isotopes. If that fission star is in a zone. Where is a very low temperature, that thing can make some dwarf planets hotter than their environment. If we think. 

That natural fission happens on a planet like Pluto, there is the possibility that the geological effect of that thing is very huge even if the energy production is quite low. The gravitation and pressure on Triton and Pluto are very weak. That means the boiling temperature of the liquid is very low. 

Maybe natural fission explains the mystery rings of dwarf planet Quaoar's rings. 

If there is strong nuclear fission in that dwarf planet, that thing can form a magnetic field. Natural fission must not raise the temperature on the small planet very high. Keeping the gasses liquid is enough, that the iron bites can start to whirl around the magnetic nucleus. 

https://astronomy.com/news/2023/02/dwarf-planet-quaoar-hosts-a-ring-that-shouldnt-be-there

https://news.harvard.edu/gazette/story/2015/07/pluto-in-detail/

https://news.arizona.edu/story/ceres-takes-life-ice-volcano-time

https://www.popularmechanics.com/space/solar-system/a25552/ice-volcanoes-ceres-active/

https://solarsystem.nasa.gov/planets/dwarf-planets/ceres/overview/

https://www.windows2universe.org/neptune/moons/triton_atmosphere.html

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/50000_Quaoar

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iron_star

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Natural_nuclear_fission_reactor

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pluto

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Triton_(moon)

Is there a point when time began?

In modern theories, the beginning of the universe is in the Big Bang. At that point the material separated from time. But should we rather say that material made contact with time? In that model, we should think the opposite way. 

Normally we think. That time separated from the material during the Big Bang. But should we think like this: After the Big Bang time connected with the material? Is time series of pike-looking power fields that are pushing part of the particles' quantum fields with them? That causes shockwaves around the universe. 

And that could explain dark energy. In that model time is the wave movement that takes part of elementary particles with it. So time is some kind of free energy that destroys the material. But does time have to begin or is it infinite? 

At that point, the material started aging. And that aging continues until the last star and black hole are gone. When the universe reaches the stable point aging ends, and the universe's existence ends. The idea is that if the expansion of the universe continues forever there is a point where the wave movement reaches the minimum energy point that is the same as the environment. But that thing requires. 

That there is some kind of Higgs' field outside the universe. If there is nothing that means it's impossible that the wave movement reaches the same energy level as its environment. Because if there is a great emptiness outside the universe the information that remains of wave movement has always higher energy level than its environment. 

If there is an extremely weak energy field outside the universe. That thing can cause a situation. That the superstrings or information that is a remnant of the universe turned to wave movement and sends weak waves around each other. And that thing makes the Schwinger effect possible.

But then let's go back to the time. 

We always think that we know time. Time is the vaporization of material and when material turns to wave movement time ends. But then we should think that we are looking at the interaction with the time and material. We can see that the aging of material is the result of interaction between the universe and its environment around it. A regular way to think about time and space is that time is connected with material. 

When we enter the point. Where the material reaches the speed of light its aging stops. And because gravitation acts and interacts the same way as speed and other energy that means inside black holes behind their event horizon material turns younger. 

The reason for that is: the material or massive gravitational field of black holes will not let energy travel away from it. So the question is: has time a connection with the Big Bang at all? The Big Bang opened the material to the time. But does time exist before the Big Bang? In some models or visions time is some kind of energy field. If the energy field called time existed before the Big Bang we should think that Big Bang caused a situation where time started to interact with the material. 

So is the black hole the thing that separates time from material? In that model the black holes deny that time cannot interact with material. If that is true the time could exist before the Big Bang. 

https://bigthink.com/13-8/does-time-have-a-beginning/

https://www.space.com/time-how-it-works

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ultimate_fate_of_the_universe

Can we reach absolute zero?

The zero kelvin is the case where helium turns solid. That means we cannot measure temperatures below that. There is a possibility that there are movements like oscillation in helium ice below that temperature of -273,15 degrees Celsius. But that is the energy minimum in the universe. The temperature of the universe is 3 degrees higher than the absolute zero. So the temperature of the objects in the universe is a minimum of 3 degrees over absolute zero. 

In the universe, is no temperature in the same way as we know it on Earth. The plasma and other particles have more space to move. So the particles have a bigger impact on energy in a vacuum. Things like energy bursts cause the particles are sending energy impulses that are causing disorders in the giant molecular clouds. 

In those extremely low temperatures, even the smallest energy sources have meanings. The term absolute zero means that all movements in particles stopped, so the system must stop the spin of electrons and other elementary particles. Also, electrons must freeze in their orbitals so that the oscillation ends. 

The fact is that no particle can ever reach that temperature, because when a measurement instrument is taken to the same space, that thing causes the rise of energy level in the object. Another thing that makes it impossible to reach the absolute zero is the movement of electrons. Electrons have kinetic energy, and that thing causes little oscillation in the system. 

"When many quantum particles interact, complex systems can be formed. And this complexity allows reaching a temperature of absolute zero – at least in principle. Credit: IQOQI/ÖAW" (ScitechDaily.com/Absolute Zero Is Attainable? Scientists Have Found a Quantum Formulation for the Third Law of Thermodynamics)

And that thing causes a situation where the helium ice starts to oscillate. So absolute zero point is the situation where the material will not send any kind of radiation. One of the reasons why we cannot reach a temperature that is below absolute zero is the expansion of the universe. 

When the size of the universe expands the quantum field that presses particles turns weak. And that causes a situation where the distance of particles increases. In that case, particles send the photons or wave movement to the system. And their size along with the power of their quantum field decreases. 

This causes the free space in the system. When there is free space in the system energy or wave movement travels between those particles. And that thing causes oscillation. The oscillation means that the temperature is above the absolute zero. For stopping oscillation the system must turn extremely thick. And all movement in it must stop. And stopping the spin of elementary particles and electrons movement is not an easy thing. 

What happens to the temperature outside the universe? 

Outside the universe, atoms and ions have more space to move but radiation that comes out from the universe pushes them in one direction. And sooner or later they turn to the wave movement. Because all objects travel at the same speed there is no energy exchange between them. 

Or photons can travel faster than other particles, but there are no quantum fields that slow other particles either. The energy level outside the universe is also very low, and there is no reflection. So there is no speed either. There is possible that some kind of quantum field continues outside the universe but that thing is a hypothesis. 

When we are thinking about the area outside the universe, we face a very interesting question: could there be a lower temperature than in the universe? The material is thinner, and the energy level is far lower than in the universe. There is a possibility that a particle that travels outside the universe just pushes its electrons away. 

Or the radiation that comes out from the universe could freeze electrons to the same side of the atom. But the fact is that the atom itself moves. If it will not turn to wave movement. So could the temperature there be lower than absolute zero? The answer is that: there is no temperature in the form as we know it. 

https://scitechdaily.com/absolute-zero-is-attainable-scientists-have-found-a-quantum-formulation-for-the-third-law-of-thermodynamics/

ESA's Gaia mission found a new and very interesting type of black hole.

The film is introducing a motion of a new type of black hole, or binary star which another participant is the red giant. And the second one is about ten stellar mass black holes. The red giant star orbits the black hole in three years.  Interesting thing is that the black hole seems to rotate around the invisible mass center. Distance from the Earth to this binary system is 3800 light years. 

There is another black hole 1500 light years away from Earth. The thing is that there is a small possibility that those black holes could interact with each other. If that interaction is real that will be the first real evidence of wormholes. But when we are looking at the film we might ask, is there another black hole near the larger black hole? Or what makes the black hole also wobble? Does the mass of the red giant be enough for that thing? 

The thing is that black holes could be closer than we even think. The virtual redshift around those objects can be very strong because particles fall in them at very high speeds. 

"ESA’s Gaia mission has helped discover a new kind of black hole. The new family already has two members, and both are closer to Earth than any other black hole that we know of. The two black holes were discovered by studying ultra-precise measurements of stellar positions and motions in Gaia’s third data release. A strange ‘wobble’ in the movement of two stars in the sky indicated that they are orbiting a very massive object. In both cases, the objects are approximately ten times more massive than our Sun". So that is a stellar-mass black hole. (ScitechDaily.com/Gaia Discovers a Mysterious New Type of Black Hole – And Two Are Lurking in Earth’s Cosmic Backyard)

"Other explanations for these massive companions, like double-star systems, were ruled out since they do not seem to emit any light. Gaia’s second black hole, BH2, is located 3800 light-years away from Earth. It is a binary system consisting of a red giant star and likely a black hole. In this animation of Gaia BH2, created in Gaia Sky, the orbits are accurately sized, but the back hole diameter is not to scale. Credit: ESA/Gaia/DPAC, CC BY-SA 3.0 IGO" (ScitechDaily.com/Gaia Discovers a Mysterious New Type of Black Hole – And Two Are Lurking in Earth’s Cosmic Backyard)

The image of black holes

"The location of the first two black holes discovered by ESA’s Gaia mission in the Milky Way. This map of our galaxy was also made by the Gaia mission. Gaia Black Hole 1 is located just 1560 light-years away from us in the direction of the constellation Ophiuchus and Gaia Black Hole 2 is 3800 light-years away in the constellation Centaurus. In galactic terms, these black holes reside in our cosmic backyard. Credit: ESA/Gaia/DPAC; CC BY-SA 3.0 IGO" (ScitechDaily.com/Gaia Discovers a Mysterious New Type of Black Hole – And Two Are Lurking in Earth’s Cosmic Backyard)

 But the thing. What makes those black holes interesting is that they are similar. They don't have almost any kind of radiation. Because their companion star is far away from them. Gaia found those black holes by searching the wobbling of the visible participant of the binary system. The remarkable thing is that Gaia found those black holes at the same time. And they seem very special. 

https://scitechdaily.com/gaia-discovers-a-mysterious-new-type-of-black-hole-and-two-are-lurking-in-earths-cosmic-backyard/